Cards like Etherium Sculptor
6.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
95% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other blue decks
87% of decks run two or more
vs. 13% of other blue decks
2.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.38 in other blue decks
Cards
- Etherium Sculptor 91%
- Foundry Inspector 87%
- Cloud Key 29%
- Helm of Awakening 3%
Other options: Stone Calendar, Mana Matrix, Planar Gate
Cards like Master of Etherium
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
62% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Thopter Spy Network
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
82% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Padeem, Consul of Innovation
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
74% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
43% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Nettlecyst
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
39% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.90 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
- Nettlecyst 45%
- Adaptive Omnitool 44%
Cards like Psychosis Crawler
12× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Counterspell
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
82% of decks run one or more
vs. 69% of other blue decks
60% of decks run two or more
vs. 33% of other blue decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 1.1 in other blue decks
Cards
- Counterspell 76%
- Negate 59%
- Disruption Protocol 10%
- Essence Scatter 2%
- Wash Away 1%
Other options: Spell Snare, Wild Unraveling, Nullify, Intervene, Stern Scolding, Remove Soul, Minor Misstep, Preemptive Strike, Envelop, False Summoning, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Outwit
Cards like Myr Retriever
11× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
- Myr Retriever 62%
- Scrap Trawler 24%
- Junk Diver 14%
- Workshop Assistant 7%
- Spine of Ish Sah 4%
Cards like Mystic Forge
4.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Shimmer Myr
5.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Steel Overseer
7.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.82 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Ornithopter
11× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
- Ornithopter 36%
- Memory Guardian 31%
- Snare Thopter 1%
Other options: Utrom Monitor, Hovermyr, Qumulox, Somber Hoverguard, Lumengrid Gargoyle, Scion of Ugin, A.I.M. Bot, Gold-Forged Sentinel, Anvilwrought Raptor, Chardalyn Dragon, Dancing Scimitar, Millennial Gargoyle
Cards like Launch Mishap
12× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
- Launch Mishap 37%
- Access Denied 13%
Cards like Unwinding Clock
3.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Vedalken Archmage
3.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
- Vedalken Archmage 61%
- Riddlesmith 10%
Cards like Mishra's Bauble
1.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mishra's Bauble 20%
- Urza's Bauble 8%
Cards like Bident of Thassa
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Mischievous Catgeist // Catlike Curiosity
Cards like Wayfarer's Bauble
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Armillary Sphere, Renegade Map, Wanderer's Twig, Ominous Parcel, Keys to the House, Braidwood Sextant
Cards like Hedron Archive
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Sceptre of Eternal Glory, Ichor Elixir
Cards like Stridehangar Automaton
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards like Fabricate
1.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other blue decks
Cards
- Fabricate 25%
- Scour for Scrap 12%
Cards like Whirler Rogue
11× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Aspiring Aeronaut
Cards like Master Transmuter
3.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Mind Stone
2.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
74% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mind Stone 73%
- Chromatic Sphere 4%
Cards like Soul-Guide Lantern
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Scrabbling Claws, Lantern of the Lost, Silent Gravestone, Jack-o'-Lantern, Phyrexian Furnace
Cards like Unctus, Grand Metatect
4.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Chief of the Foundry relevance 0.75 · 67.2% (2,057 of 3,060 decks)
- Master of Etherium relevance 0.63 · 73.4% (2,247 of 3,060 decks)
- Steel Overseer relevance 0.63 · 74.1% (2,268 of 3,060 decks)
- Research Thief relevance 0.75 · 54.5% (1,667 of 3,060 decks)
- Graaz, Unstoppable Juggernaut relevance 0.80 · 46.5% (1,423 of 3,060 decks)
- Forsaken Monument relevance 0.66 · 61.3% (1,877 of 3,060 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.54 · 78.1% (2,389 of 3,060 decks)
- Myr Retriever relevance 0.64 · 62.2% (1,903 of 3,060 decks)
- Shimmer Dragon relevance 0.71 · 51.3% (1,571 of 3,060 decks)
- Spire Golem relevance 0.90 · 27.5% (843 of 3,060 decks)
- Launch Mishap relevance 0.81 · 37.3% (1,141 of 3,060 decks)
- Ichor Wellspring relevance 0.69 · 52.9% (1,618 of 3,060 decks)
- Fall from Favor relevance 0.89 · 27.9% (853 of 3,060 decks)
- Tamiyo's Logbook relevance 0.80 · 37.5% (1,149 of 3,060 decks)
- All Is Dust relevance 0.76 · 42.3% (1,295 of 3,060 decks)
- Memory Guardian relevance 0.85 · 30.6% (937 of 3,060 decks)
- Adaptive Omnitool relevance 0.74 · 44.0% (1,347 of 3,060 decks)
- Broodstar relevance 0.80 · 35.8% (1,094 of 3,060 decks)
- Cultivator's Caravan relevance 0.84 · 29.3% (896 of 3,060 decks)
- Skysovereign, Consul Flagship relevance 0.82 · 31.5% (963 of 3,060 decks)
- Darksteel Juggernaut relevance 0.80 · 33.7% (1,030 of 3,060 decks)
- Mazemind Tome relevance 0.82 · 30.0% (918 of 3,060 decks)
- Stridehangar Automaton relevance 0.68 · 47.0% (1,439 of 3,060 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.68 · 45.4% (1,389 of 3,060 decks)
- Whirler Rogue relevance 0.66 · 48.7% (1,489 of 3,060 decks)
- Shimmer Myr relevance 0.57 · 62.4% (1,910 of 3,060 decks)
- Thopter Fabricator relevance 0.60 · 55.3% (1,693 of 3,060 decks)
- Steel Hellkite relevance 0.73 · 36.2% (1,108 of 3,060 decks)
- Vedalken Archmage relevance 0.57 · 61.4% (1,878 of 3,060 decks)
- Duplicant relevance 0.75 · 32.2% (984 of 3,060 decks)
- Mind's Eye relevance 0.74 · 31.6% (967 of 3,060 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.48 · 73.8% (2,258 of 3,060 decks)
- Chief Engineer relevance 0.77 · 27.3% (835 of 3,060 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.71 · 34.7% (1,061 of 3,060 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.41 · 86.6% (2,651 of 3,060 decks)
- Sharding Sphinx relevance 0.67 · 38.4% (1,175 of 3,060 decks)
- Palladium Myr relevance 0.60 · 48.6% (1,487 of 3,060 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.45 · 76.5% (2,341 of 3,060 decks)
- Master Transmuter relevance 0.59 · 49.0% (1,500 of 3,060 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.49 · 65.6% (2,006 of 3,060 decks)
- Soul-Guide Lantern relevance 0.57 · 49.3% (1,508 of 3,060 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.45 · 71.9% (2,201 of 3,060 decks)
- Padeem, Consul of Innovation relevance 0.48 · 65.7% (2,011 of 3,060 decks)
- Leonardo da Vinci relevance 0.84 · 13.0% (398 of 3,060 decks)
- Myr Battlesphere relevance 0.64 · 37.6% (1,152 of 3,060 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.62 · 38.4% (1,174 of 3,060 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.57 · 46.7% (1,429 of 3,060 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.58 · 44.5% (1,362 of 3,060 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.37 · 90.8% (2,778 of 3,060 decks)
- Aether Spellbomb relevance 0.49 · 59.0% (1,805 of 3,060 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Chief of the Foundry relevance 0.75 · 67.2% (2,057 of 3,060 decks)
- Master of Etherium relevance 0.63 · 73.4% (2,247 of 3,060 decks)
- Steel Overseer relevance 0.63 · 74.1% (2,268 of 3,060 decks)
- Research Thief relevance 0.75 · 54.5% (1,667 of 3,060 decks)
- Graaz, Unstoppable Juggernaut relevance 0.80 · 46.5% (1,423 of 3,060 decks)
- Myr Retriever relevance 0.64 · 62.2% (1,903 of 3,060 decks)
- Shimmer Dragon relevance 0.71 · 51.3% (1,571 of 3,060 decks)
- Spire Golem relevance 0.90 · 27.5% (843 of 3,060 decks)
- Memory Guardian relevance 0.85 · 30.6% (937 of 3,060 decks)
- Broodstar relevance 0.80 · 35.8% (1,094 of 3,060 decks)
- Darksteel Juggernaut relevance 0.80 · 33.7% (1,030 of 3,060 decks)
- Stridehangar Automaton relevance 0.68 · 47.0% (1,439 of 3,060 decks)
- Whirler Rogue relevance 0.66 · 48.7% (1,489 of 3,060 decks)
- Shimmer Myr relevance 0.57 · 62.4% (1,910 of 3,060 decks)
- Steel Hellkite relevance 0.73 · 36.2% (1,108 of 3,060 decks)
- Vedalken Archmage relevance 0.57 · 61.4% (1,878 of 3,060 decks)
- Duplicant relevance 0.75 · 32.2% (984 of 3,060 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.48 · 73.8% (2,258 of 3,060 decks)
- Chief Engineer relevance 0.77 · 27.3% (835 of 3,060 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.41 · 86.6% (2,651 of 3,060 decks)
- Sharding Sphinx relevance 0.67 · 38.4% (1,175 of 3,060 decks)
- Palladium Myr relevance 0.60 · 48.6% (1,487 of 3,060 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.45 · 76.5% (2,341 of 3,060 decks)
- Master Transmuter relevance 0.59 · 49.0% (1,500 of 3,060 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.45 · 71.9% (2,201 of 3,060 decks)
- Padeem, Consul of Innovation relevance 0.48 · 65.7% (2,011 of 3,060 decks)
- Leonardo da Vinci relevance 0.84 · 13.0% (398 of 3,060 decks)
- Myr Battlesphere relevance 0.64 · 37.6% (1,152 of 3,060 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.37 · 90.8% (2,778 of 3,060 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.60 · 35.4% (1,083 of 3,060 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.57 · 36.3% (1,112 of 3,060 decks)
- Silver Myr relevance 0.44 · 56.6% (1,733 of 3,060 decks)
- Junk Diver relevance 0.69 · 13.7% (418 of 3,060 decks)
- Scrap Trawler relevance 0.59 · 24.0% (733 of 3,060 decks)
- Glaring Fleshraker relevance 0.64 · 14.9% (457 of 3,060 decks)
- Hangarback Walker relevance 0.60 · 19.8% (607 of 3,060 decks)
- Jhoira's Familiar relevance 0.55 · 23.0% (704 of 3,060 decks)
- Workshop Assistant relevance 0.72 · 7.3% (222 of 3,060 decks)
- Ornithopter relevance 0.47 · 36.2% (1,107 of 3,060 decks)
- Adaptive Automaton relevance 0.67 · 8.7% (267 of 3,060 decks)
- Cyberman Patrol relevance 0.72 · 6.2% (189 of 3,060 decks)
- Kuldotha Forgemaster relevance 0.64 · 7.3% (222 of 3,060 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.40 · 42.8% (1,311 of 3,060 decks)
- Thopter Assembly relevance 0.68 · 4.9% (151 of 3,060 decks)
- Liberator, Urza's Battlethopter relevance 0.51 · 17.5% (536 of 3,060 decks)
- Unctus, Grand Metatect relevance 0.52 · 16.1% (494 of 3,060 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.46 · 27.6% (845 of 3,060 decks)
- Filigree Attendant relevance 0.64 · 6.0% (183 of 3,060 decks)
- Mm'menon, the Right Hand relevance 0.54 · 12.8% (392 of 3,060 decks)
- Iron Spider, Stark Upgrade relevance 0.60 · 7.5% (231 of 3,060 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Forsaken Monument relevance 0.66 · 61.3% (1,877 of 3,060 decks)
- Ichor Wellspring relevance 0.69 · 52.9% (1,618 of 3,060 decks)
- Tamiyo's Logbook relevance 0.80 · 37.5% (1,149 of 3,060 decks)
- Adaptive Omnitool relevance 0.74 · 44.0% (1,347 of 3,060 decks)
- Cultivator's Caravan relevance 0.84 · 29.3% (896 of 3,060 decks)
- Skysovereign, Consul Flagship relevance 0.82 · 31.5% (963 of 3,060 decks)
- Mazemind Tome relevance 0.82 · 30.0% (918 of 3,060 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.68 · 45.4% (1,389 of 3,060 decks)
- Thopter Fabricator relevance 0.60 · 55.3% (1,693 of 3,060 decks)
- Mind's Eye relevance 0.74 · 31.6% (967 of 3,060 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.71 · 34.7% (1,061 of 3,060 decks)
- Soul-Guide Lantern relevance 0.57 · 49.3% (1,508 of 3,060 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.62 · 38.4% (1,174 of 3,060 decks)
- Aether Spellbomb relevance 0.49 · 59.0% (1,805 of 3,060 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.56 · 43.3% (1,324 of 3,060 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.62 · 32.7% (1,000 of 3,060 decks)
- Retrofitter Foundry relevance 0.69 · 17.9% (549 of 3,060 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.53 · 41.2% (1,262 of 3,060 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.57 · 15.6% (477 of 3,060 decks)
- Krark-Clan Ironworks relevance 0.58 · 14.0% (428 of 3,060 decks)
- Mycosynth Wellspring relevance 0.69 · 5.9% (182 of 3,060 decks)
- Trading Post relevance 0.67 · 7.3% (223 of 3,060 decks)
- Throne of the God-Pharaoh relevance 0.71 · 4.9% (150 of 3,060 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.47 · 29.0% (886 of 3,060 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.49 · 26.2% (801 of 3,060 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.43 · 35.9% (1,099 of 3,060 decks)
- The Indomitable relevance 0.59 · 9.8% (301 of 3,060 decks)
- Clock of Omens relevance 0.57 · 9.2% (283 of 3,060 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.53 · 12.0% (368 of 3,060 decks)
- Semblance Anvil relevance 0.59 · 7.1% (218 of 3,060 decks)
- Crystal Skull, Isu Spyglass relevance 0.50 · 14.1% (432 of 3,060 decks)
- Coat of Arms relevance 0.58 · 7.0% (215 of 3,060 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.39 · 34.5% (1,057 of 3,060 decks)
- Banner of Kinship relevance 0.54 · 9.3% (285 of 3,060 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.49 · 12.3% (377 of 3,060 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.50 · 10.2% (312 of 3,060 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.44 · 15.2% (466 of 3,060 decks)
- Repurposing Bay relevance 0.50 · 9.4% (287 of 3,060 decks)
- Strixhaven Stadium relevance 0.61 · 4.3% (132 of 3,060 decks)
- Chromatic Star relevance 0.53 · 6.4% (195 of 3,060 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.52 · 7.0% (213 of 3,060 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.24 · 72.9% (2,230 of 3,060 decks)
- Mishra's Bauble relevance 0.41 · 20.1% (616 of 3,060 decks)
- Welding Jar relevance 0.46 · 11.7% (358 of 3,060 decks)
- Moonsnare Prototype relevance 0.52 · 6.2% (189 of 3,060 decks)
- Worldwalker Helm relevance 0.52 · 5.8% (177 of 3,060 decks)
- Inspiring Statuary relevance 0.56 · 4.5% (138 of 3,060 decks)
- Unwinding Clock relevance 0.38 · 21.1% (645 of 3,060 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.44 · 12.1% (370 of 3,060 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.44 · 11.6% (354 of 3,060 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All enchantments (19)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.54 · 78.1% (2,389 of 3,060 decks)
- Fall from Favor relevance 0.89 · 27.9% (853 of 3,060 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.57 · 46.7% (1,429 of 3,060 decks)
- The Antiquities War relevance 0.69 · 7.3% (224 of 3,060 decks)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.54 · 15.5% (475 of 3,060 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.48 · 24.9% (763 of 3,060 decks)
- Fateful Discovery relevance 0.60 · 7.6% (233 of 3,060 decks)
- Opposition relevance 0.59 · 4.9% (149 of 3,060 decks)
- Favorable Winds relevance 0.50 · 8.8% (270 of 3,060 decks)
- Moonlit Meditation relevance 0.52 · 5.0% (153 of 3,060 decks)
- Artificer Class relevance 0.51 · 4.2% (127 of 3,060 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.41 · 6.6% (203 of 3,060 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.39 · 7.3% (223 of 3,060 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.23 · 43.3% (1,326 of 3,060 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.38 · 6.3% (192 of 3,060 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.30 · 5.0% (154 of 3,060 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.33 · 3.2% (97 of 3,060 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.20 · 8.3% (255 of 3,060 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.19 · 9.9% (303 of 3,060 decks)
All instants (44)
- Launch Mishap relevance 0.81 · 37.3% (1,141 of 3,060 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.58 · 44.5% (1,362 of 3,060 decks)
- Stoic Rebuttal relevance 0.64 · 13.5% (413 of 3,060 decks)
- Access Denied relevance 0.59 · 13.1% (400 of 3,060 decks)
- Disruption Protocol relevance 0.62 · 9.9% (302 of 3,060 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.45 · 32.9% (1,007 of 3,060 decks)
- Metallic Rebuke relevance 0.63 · 6.8% (208 of 3,060 decks)
- Paradoxical Outcome relevance 0.60 · 7.9% (243 of 3,060 decks)
- Reality Heist relevance 0.63 · 5.2% (158 of 3,060 decks)
- Desynchronization relevance 0.51 · 13.2% (405 of 3,060 decks)
- Machine Over Matter relevance 0.66 · 4.6% (141 of 3,060 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.38 · 21.8% (668 of 3,060 decks)
- Perplexing Test relevance 0.49 · 6.7% (205 of 3,060 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.41 · 12.2% (372 of 3,060 decks)
- Masterful Replication relevance 0.58 · 3.2% (99 of 3,060 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.22 · 58.9% (1,801 of 3,060 decks)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 0.42 · 5.2% (158 of 3,060 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.23 · 49.5% (1,516 of 3,060 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.30 · 9.6% (294 of 3,060 decks)
- Filter Out relevance 0.46 · 2.8% (87 of 3,060 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.25 · 17.3% (529 of 3,060 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.25 · 7.5% (230 of 3,060 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.20 · 20.7% (634 of 3,060 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.21 · 14.3% (439 of 3,060 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.20 · 14.4% (442 of 3,060 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.23 · 8.1% (247 of 3,060 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.17 · 22.7% (696 of 3,060 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.10 · 75.6% (2,313 of 3,060 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.21 · 9.2% (281 of 3,060 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.30 · 3.5% (107 of 3,060 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.25 · 4.5% (137 of 3,060 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.17 · 23.0% (704 of 3,060 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.18 · 16.3% (498 of 3,060 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (139 of 3,060 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.33 · 2.5% (76 of 3,060 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.24 · 4.1% (126 of 3,060 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.31 · 2.5% (77 of 3,060 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.28 · 2.9% (89 of 3,060 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.30 · 2.6% (79 of 3,060 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.20 · 3.3% (101 of 3,060 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.14 · 7.2% (221 of 3,060 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (96 of 3,060 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.12 · 5.2% (160 of 3,060 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (96 of 3,060 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All sorceries (16)
- All Is Dust relevance 0.76 · 42.3% (1,295 of 3,060 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.49 · 65.6% (2,006 of 3,060 decks)
- Reverse Engineer relevance 0.67 · 8.1% (247 of 3,060 decks)
- March of Progress relevance 0.64 · 6.0% (183 of 3,060 decks)
- Universal Surveillance relevance 0.61 · 5.9% (182 of 3,060 decks)
- One with the Machine relevance 0.51 · 5.4% (164 of 3,060 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.42 · 10.2% (313 of 3,060 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.43 · 6.2% (191 of 3,060 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.29 · 24.6% (754 of 3,060 decks)
- Baral's Expertise relevance 0.50 · 2.6% (81 of 3,060 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.42 · 3.0% (91 of 3,060 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.31 · 3.7% (112 of 3,060 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.32 · 2.6% (80 of 3,060 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.18 · 6.0% (185 of 3,060 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (125 of 3,060 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (91 of 3,060 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (6)
- Tezzeret, Artifice Master relevance 0.61 · 15.8% (484 of 3,060 decks)
- Ugin, the Ineffable relevance 0.57 · 4.4% (136 of 3,060 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.41 · 9.9% (302 of 3,060 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.38 · 7.7% (237 of 3,060 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.51 · 3.5% (106 of 3,060 decks)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.48 · 2.7% (82 of 3,060 decks)
All utility lands (29)
- Foundry of the Consuls relevance 0.86 · 42.1% (1,287 of 3,060 decks)
- Tomb of the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.78 · 17.0% (520 of 3,060 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.43 · 67.9% (2,078 of 3,060 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.58 · 33.2% (1,015 of 3,060 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.38 · 43.7% (1,338 of 3,060 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.39 · 37.8% (1,157 of 3,060 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.41 · 28.6% (874 of 3,060 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.51 · 9.1% (279 of 3,060 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.41 · 20.6% (631 of 3,060 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.47 · 11.7% (359 of 3,060 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.37 · 24.9% (763 of 3,060 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.48 · 6.8% (208 of 3,060 decks)
- Secluded Starforge relevance 0.55 · 4.2% (129 of 3,060 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.30 · 31.8% (973 of 3,060 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.42 · 4.6% (141 of 3,060 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.30 · 16.9% (518 of 3,060 decks)
- Fountainport relevance 0.48 · 3.3% (101 of 3,060 decks)
- Power Depot relevance 0.51 · 2.7% (82 of 3,060 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.38 · 3.9% (118 of 3,060 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.25 · 9.8% (299 of 3,060 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.36 · 3.2% (97 of 3,060 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.33 · 3.2% (98 of 3,060 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.22 · 10.1% (309 of 3,060 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.25 · 4.5% (138 of 3,060 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.22 · 8.5% (260 of 3,060 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.25 · 4.4% (135 of 3,060 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.25 · 4.2% (130 of 3,060 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.12 · 30.4% (930 of 3,060 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.12 · 10.8% (329 of 3,060 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (13)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.44 · 69.7% (2,134 of 3,060 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.31 · 44.7% (1,369 of 3,060 decks)
- Shrine of the Forsaken Gods relevance 0.63 · 3.8% (117 of 3,060 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.48 · 8.5% (261 of 3,060 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.48 · 8.5% (260 of 3,060 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.48 · 8.5% (261 of 3,060 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.42 · 4.7% (143 of 3,060 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.34 · 4.3% (131 of 3,060 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.30 · 5.1% (157 of 3,060 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.38 · 3.4% (104 of 3,060 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.33 · 3.3% (101 of 3,060 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.30 · 2.6% (81 of 3,060 decks)
- Island relevance 0.03 · 93.8% (2,870 of 3,060 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Sai, Master Thopterist, from 3,060 real Commander decks.