Cards like Dreamdew Entrancer
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
86% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
61% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Rowdy Snowballers, Frostfist Strider, Shipwreck Patrol, Protocol Knight, Snaremaster Sprite, Fractal Mascot, Referee Squad
Cards like Amphibian Downpour
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Amphibian Downpour 54%
- Frogify 47%
Cards like Stickytongue Sentinel
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
84% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Yarok's Wavecrasher, Invasive Species, Keymaster Rogue, Storm Sculptor, Ambush Krotiq, Denizen of the Deep
Cards like Polymorphist's Jest
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Polymorphist's Jest 44%
- Turn to Frog 31%
Cards like Pond Prophet
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
95% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Poison Dart Frog
13× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.82 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Poison Dart Frog 59%
- Frog Butler 22%
Other options: Nightshade Dryad, Deathbloom Gardener, Noxious Newt, Accomplished Alchemist
Cards like Sunshower Druid
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
86% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards like Reflections of Littjara
4.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Mystic Snake
12× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Mystic Snake 22%
- Frilled Mystic 20%
Other options: Voracious Greatshark, Voidmage Husher, Sister of Silence
Cards like Peregrine Drake
15× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards like Beast Whisperer
17× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Evacuation
3.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Evacuation 17%
- Aetherize 11%
- Perplexing Test 4%
Cards like Eternal Witness
3.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Greenwarden of Murasa, Deadwood Treefolk, Wildwood Escort
Cards like Ghostly Flicker
3.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Coiling Oracle
4.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Coiling Oracle 50%
- Risen Reef 3%
Cards like Trollbred Guardian
4.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Crowned Ceratok, Gnarlid Colony, Tuskguard Captain, Baloth Pup, Hornbash Mentor, Pridemalkin
Cards like Reclamation Sage
2.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Viridian Shaman, Uktabi Orangutan, Myconid Spore Tender, Conclave Naturalists, Indrik Stomphowler
Cards like Overprotect
2.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Overprotect 30%
- Snakeskin Veil 6%
- Tyvar's Stand 1%
Other options: Blossoming Defense, Ranger's Guile, Woodcutter's Grit
Cards like Herald's Horn
5.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Run Away Together
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards like Door of Destinies
11× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Instruments of War, Obelisk of Urd, Brass Herald
All top picks (50)
- Grolnok, the Omnivore relevance 0.26 · 42.6% (63 of 148 decks)
- Berta, Wise Extrapolator relevance 0.27 · 37.8% (56 of 148 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.28 · 33.1% (49 of 148 decks)
- Papercraft Decoy relevance 0.34 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Haze Frog relevance 0.24 · 46.6% (69 of 148 decks)
- Door of Destinies relevance 0.30 · 25.0% (37 of 148 decks)
- Octomancer relevance 0.28 · 33.1% (49 of 148 decks)
- Valley Floodcaller relevance 0.31 · 23.0% (34 of 148 decks)
- Wear Down relevance 0.33 · 17.6% (26 of 148 decks)
- Gossip's Talent relevance 0.30 · 26.4% (39 of 148 decks)
- Communal Brewing relevance 0.32 · 19.6% (29 of 148 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.30 · 23.6% (35 of 148 decks)
- Turn to Frog relevance 0.28 · 31.1% (46 of 148 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.28 · 30.4% (45 of 148 decks)
- Frog Butler relevance 0.31 · 22.3% (33 of 148 decks)
- Chomping Changeling relevance 0.24 · 47.3% (70 of 148 decks)
- Croaking Counterpart relevance 0.25 · 41.2% (61 of 148 decks)
- Mutable Explorer relevance 0.29 · 27.0% (40 of 148 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.30 · 25.0% (37 of 148 decks)
- Textbook Tabulator relevance 0.32 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.32 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.25 · 41.2% (61 of 148 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.22 · 55.4% (82 of 148 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 0.31 · 20.3% (30 of 148 decks)
- Polymorphist's Jest relevance 0.24 · 43.9% (65 of 148 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.33 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
- Barrin, Tolarian Archmage relevance 0.28 · 29.1% (43 of 148 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.26 · 37.2% (55 of 148 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.34 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Skyskipper Duo relevance 0.27 · 33.8% (50 of 148 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.32 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Galloping Lizrog relevance 0.27 · 31.8% (47 of 148 decks)
- Omnibian relevance 0.30 · 20.3% (30 of 148 decks)
- Treeguard Duo relevance 0.25 · 41.2% (61 of 148 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.28 · 29.1% (43 of 148 decks)
- Masked Vandal relevance 0.33 · 13.5% (20 of 148 decks)
- Splash Lasher relevance 0.19 · 63.5% (94 of 148 decks)
- Polliwallop relevance 0.19 · 64.2% (95 of 148 decks)
- Plaxcaster Frogling relevance 0.22 · 50.7% (75 of 148 decks)
- Froghemoth relevance 0.21 · 53.4% (79 of 148 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.24 · 40.5% (60 of 148 decks)
- Species Gorger relevance 0.27 · 29.7% (44 of 148 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.34 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.31 · 16.9% (25 of 148 decks)
- Splash Portal relevance 0.18 · 70.3% (104 of 148 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.31 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.26 · 31.8% (47 of 148 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.24 · 42.6% (63 of 148 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.21 · 54.1% (80 of 148 decks)
- Trollbred Guardian relevance 0.29 · 20.9% (31 of 148 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Grolnok, the Omnivore relevance 0.26 · 42.6% (63 of 148 decks)
- Berta, Wise Extrapolator relevance 0.27 · 37.8% (56 of 148 decks)
- Papercraft Decoy relevance 0.34 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Haze Frog relevance 0.24 · 46.6% (69 of 148 decks)
- Octomancer relevance 0.28 · 33.1% (49 of 148 decks)
- Valley Floodcaller relevance 0.31 · 23.0% (34 of 148 decks)
- Frog Butler relevance 0.31 · 22.3% (33 of 148 decks)
- Chomping Changeling relevance 0.24 · 47.3% (70 of 148 decks)
- Mutable Explorer relevance 0.29 · 27.0% (40 of 148 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.30 · 25.0% (37 of 148 decks)
- Textbook Tabulator relevance 0.32 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 0.31 · 20.3% (30 of 148 decks)
- Barrin, Tolarian Archmage relevance 0.28 · 29.1% (43 of 148 decks)
- Skyskipper Duo relevance 0.27 · 33.8% (50 of 148 decks)
- Galloping Lizrog relevance 0.27 · 31.8% (47 of 148 decks)
- Omnibian relevance 0.30 · 20.3% (30 of 148 decks)
- Treeguard Duo relevance 0.25 · 41.2% (61 of 148 decks)
- Masked Vandal relevance 0.33 · 13.5% (20 of 148 decks)
- Splash Lasher relevance 0.19 · 63.5% (94 of 148 decks)
- Plaxcaster Frogling relevance 0.22 · 50.7% (75 of 148 decks)
- Froghemoth relevance 0.21 · 53.4% (79 of 148 decks)
- Species Gorger relevance 0.27 · 29.7% (44 of 148 decks)
- Trollbred Guardian relevance 0.29 · 20.9% (31 of 148 decks)
- Bellowing Crier relevance 0.19 · 64.2% (95 of 148 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.23 · 43.9% (65 of 148 decks)
- Jade Avenger relevance 0.30 · 16.9% (25 of 148 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.30 · 16.9% (25 of 148 decks)
- Stickytongue Sentinel relevance 0.17 · 73.0% (108 of 148 decks)
- Poison Dart Frog relevance 0.20 · 59.5% (88 of 148 decks)
- Kinnan, Bonder Prodigy relevance 0.32 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- Waterspout Warden relevance 0.28 · 24.3% (36 of 148 decks)
- Rampant Frogantua relevance 0.22 · 48.0% (71 of 148 decks)
- Pollywog Prodigy relevance 0.17 · 72.3% (107 of 148 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 0.29 · 20.3% (30 of 148 decks)
- Frilled Mystic relevance 0.29 · 19.6% (29 of 148 decks)
- Twenty-Toed Toad relevance 0.18 · 68.2% (101 of 148 decks)
- Prosperous Innkeeper relevance 0.34 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- Guardian Gladewalker relevance 0.34 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.27 · 26.4% (39 of 148 decks)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 0.24 · 35.1% (52 of 148 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.31 · 13.5% (20 of 148 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.30 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
- Mystic Snake relevance 0.28 · 21.6% (32 of 148 decks)
- Spore Frog relevance 0.16 · 73.6% (109 of 148 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.29 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 0.32 · 11.5% (17 of 148 decks)
- Sab-Sunen, Luxa Embodied relevance 0.32 · 11.5% (17 of 148 decks)
- Silverback Elder relevance 0.31 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Crocanura relevance 0.31 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Valley Mightcaller relevance 0.15 · 81.1% (120 of 148 decks)
All artifacts (41)
- Door of Destinies relevance 0.30 · 25.0% (37 of 148 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.32 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.33 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.28 · 29.1% (43 of 148 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.34 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.24 · 42.6% (63 of 148 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.34 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Urza's Incubator relevance 0.34 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.30 · 13.5% (20 of 148 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.31 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Gathering Stone relevance 0.32 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Chronicle of Victory relevance 0.33 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.33 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.26 · 18.2% (27 of 148 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.29 · 11.5% (17 of 148 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.26 · 16.9% (25 of 148 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.31 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.29 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.28 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.32 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.29 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.31 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.28 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Fountainport Bell relevance 0.30 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Banner of Kinship relevance 0.29 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Bontu's Monument relevance 0.31 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.28 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.26 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.22 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.17 · 36.5% (54 of 148 decks)
- Blood Clock relevance 0.30 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Aether Vial relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Vedalken Orrery relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.09 · 57.4% (85 of 148 decks)
- Wishing Well relevance 0.26 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.22 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.22 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.28 · 33.1% (49 of 148 decks)
- Gossip's Talent relevance 0.30 · 26.4% (39 of 148 decks)
- Communal Brewing relevance 0.32 · 19.6% (29 of 148 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.30 · 23.6% (35 of 148 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.25 · 41.2% (61 of 148 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.26 · 37.2% (55 of 148 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.31 · 16.9% (25 of 148 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.31 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.26 · 31.8% (47 of 148 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.21 · 54.1% (80 of 148 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.30 · 19.6% (29 of 148 decks)
- Aluren relevance 0.34 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Frogify relevance 0.22 · 46.6% (69 of 148 decks)
- Kasmina's Transmutation relevance 0.30 · 17.6% (26 of 148 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.34 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Equilibrium relevance 0.32 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Fortune Teller's Talent relevance 0.31 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Fisher's Talent relevance 0.32 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Leyline of Transformation relevance 0.33 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Path of Discovery relevance 0.33 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.31 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.31 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.31 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.30 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Quest for Renewal relevance 0.31 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.28 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.29 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.25 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.26 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.25 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.30 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.25 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.23 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.24 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Arcane Adaptation relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Thickest in the Thicket relevance 0.26 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Sylvan Scavenging relevance 0.26 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Sugar Coat relevance 0.24 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Frog Tongue relevance 0.24 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Cunning Evasion relevance 0.23 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.23 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
All instants (50)
- Turn to Frog relevance 0.28 · 31.1% (46 of 148 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.28 · 30.4% (45 of 148 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.22 · 55.4% (82 of 148 decks)
- Polymorphist's Jest relevance 0.24 · 43.9% (65 of 148 decks)
- Polliwallop relevance 0.19 · 64.2% (95 of 148 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.24 · 40.5% (60 of 148 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.18 · 63.5% (94 of 148 decks)
- Peerless Recycling relevance 0.34 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.24 · 35.1% (52 of 148 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.29 · 15.5% (23 of 148 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.28 · 17.6% (26 of 148 decks)
- Familiar's Ruse relevance 0.33 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.32 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.27 · 18.2% (27 of 148 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.27 · 16.9% (25 of 148 decks)
- This Town Ain't Big Enough relevance 0.31 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Biomass Mutation relevance 0.30 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.30 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.25 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Incubation // Incongruity relevance 0.30 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.30 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.29 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 0.30 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.26 · 11.5% (17 of 148 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.28 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Get Out relevance 0.29 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.24 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.21 · 20.9% (31 of 148 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.28 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.28 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Pawpatch Formation relevance 0.30 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.25 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.24 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.25 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.24 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.17 · 35.1% (52 of 148 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.24 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Banishing Knack relevance 0.30 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.30 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Filter Out relevance 0.27 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Perplexing Test relevance 0.27 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.24 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.19 · 18.9% (28 of 148 decks)
- Hide on the Ceiling relevance 0.26 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Retraction Helix relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Spider-Sense relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- High Stride relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Mystic Reflection relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
All sorceries (49)
- Wear Down relevance 0.33 · 17.6% (26 of 148 decks)
- Croaking Counterpart relevance 0.25 · 41.2% (61 of 148 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.34 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.32 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Splash Portal relevance 0.18 · 70.3% (104 of 148 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.30 · 15.5% (23 of 148 decks)
- Rootcast Apprenticeship relevance 0.33 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.32 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.30 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Portent of Calamity relevance 0.32 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 0.31 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.30 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Procrastinate relevance 0.31 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Boomerang Basics relevance 0.28 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.28 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.22 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.19 · 23.6% (35 of 148 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.18 · 25.0% (37 of 148 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.21 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- Calamitous Tide relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Longstalk Brawl relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Mind Spiral relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.25 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.21 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Celestial Reunion relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Mercurial Transformation relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.18 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.18 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.26 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Silent Departure relevance 0.26 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Visions of Dominance relevance 0.26 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Primal Might relevance 0.26 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.24 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.22 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.22 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.22 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Mind into Matter relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.30 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Lilypad Village relevance 0.20 · 60.1% (89 of 148 decks)
- Oakhollow Village relevance 0.19 · 61.5% (91 of 148 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.32 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.21 · 52.0% (77 of 148 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.28 · 15.5% (23 of 148 decks)
- Novijen, Heart of Progress relevance 0.33 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.23 · 33.8% (50 of 148 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.27 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
- Drowner of Truth // Drowned Jungle relevance 0.32 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.26 · 15.5% (23 of 148 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.31 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Hidden Grotto relevance 0.30 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.24 · 18.2% (27 of 148 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.25 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.28 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.25 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.26 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.28 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.30 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.28 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.19 · 36.5% (54 of 148 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.25 · 11.5% (17 of 148 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.27 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.28 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.25 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.24 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.25 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Abundant Countryside relevance 0.30 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.13 · 47.3% (70 of 148 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.23 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.23 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.21 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.21 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Fountainport relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Kishla Village relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Fertile Thicket relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Winding Canyons relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Skyline Cascade relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Pendelhaven relevance 0.26 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Paradox Gardens relevance 0.22 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.19 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.19 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
All lands (50)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.30 · 23.6% (35 of 148 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.31 · 19.6% (29 of 148 decks)
- Unclaimed Territory relevance 0.34 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.27 · 22.3% (33 of 148 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.26 · 18.9% (28 of 148 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.25 · 21.6% (32 of 148 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.22 · 33.1% (49 of 148 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.25 · 20.3% (30 of 148 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.24 · 22.3% (33 of 148 decks)
- Uncharted Haven relevance 0.32 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.23 · 24.3% (36 of 148 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.28 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.31 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.25 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.17 · 45.9% (68 of 148 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.23 · 17.6% (26 of 148 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.25 · 11.5% (17 of 148 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.18 · 38.5% (57 of 148 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.28 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.22 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.27 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.26 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.14 · 51.4% (76 of 148 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.14 · 54.1% (80 of 148 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.15 · 41.2% (61 of 148 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.22 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.12 · 58.1% (86 of 148 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.13 · 41.9% (62 of 148 decks)
- Hadana's Climb // Winged Temple of Orazca relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Lakeside Shack relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.20 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.09 · 68.2% (101 of 148 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.21 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.24 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.20 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.20 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.05 · 77.7% (115 of 148 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 95.9% (142 of 148 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 95.9% (142 of 148 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Clement, the Worrywort, from 148 real Commander decks.