Cards like Dreamdew Entrancer
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
91% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
66% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Dreamdew Entrancer 88%
- Splash Lasher 69%
Other options: Floodpits Drowner, Rowdy Snowballers, Fractal Mascot, Frostfist Strider, Shipwreck Patrol, Protocol Knight, Snaremaster Sprite, Referee Squad
Cards like Amphibian Downpour
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Amphibian Downpour 57%
- Frogify 53%
Cards like Polymorphist's Jest
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Polymorphist's Jest 51%
- Turn to Frog 37%
Cards like Stickytongue Sentinel
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
88% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Yarok's Wavecrasher, Invasive Species, Keymaster Rogue, Storm Sculptor, Ambush Krotiq, Denizen of the Deep
Cards like Poison Dart Frog
15× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.94 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Poison Dart Frog 69%
- Frog Butler 25%
Other options: Nightshade Dryad, Deathbloom Gardener, Noxious Newt, Accomplished Alchemist
Cards like Pond Prophet
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
97% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Reflections of Littjara
4.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Sunshower Druid
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
93% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards like Peregrine Drake
12× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards like Herald's Horn
12× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Herald's Horn 21%
- Urza's Incubator 11%
Cards like Beast Whisperer
10× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards like Distant Melody
4.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Coiling Oracle
3.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Coiling Oracle 43%
- Risen Reef 3%
Cards like Trollbred Guardian
3.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Drix Fatemaker, Crowned Ceratok, Gnarlid Colony, Tuskguard Captain, Baloth Pup, Hornbash Mentor, Pridemalkin
Cards like Door of Destinies
12× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Obelisk of Urd, Instruments of War, Brass Herald
Cards like Overprotect
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Overprotect 34%
- Snakeskin Veil 5%
Other options: Tyvar's Stand, Blossoming Defense, Ranger's Guile, Woodcutter's Grit
Cards like Reclamation Sage
1.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Viridian Shaman, Uktabi Orangutan, Myconid Spore Tender, Conclave Naturalists, Indrik Stomphowler
All top picks (50)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.28 · 43.5% (90 of 207 decks)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 0.31 · 32.4% (67 of 207 decks)
- Barrin, Tolarian Archmage relevance 0.35 · 22.2% (46 of 207 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.35 · 19.8% (41 of 207 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.34 · 22.2% (46 of 207 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.29 · 36.7% (76 of 207 decks)
- Kinnan, Bonder Prodigy relevance 0.37 · 14.5% (30 of 207 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.31 · 30.4% (63 of 207 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.28 · 41.1% (85 of 207 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 0.37 · 13.0% (27 of 207 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.33 · 22.2% (46 of 207 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.34 · 21.3% (44 of 207 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.29 · 36.2% (75 of 207 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.36 · 14.0% (29 of 207 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.27 · 43.5% (90 of 207 decks)
- Grolnok, the Omnivore relevance 0.25 · 50.7% (105 of 207 decks)
- Wear Down relevance 0.34 · 18.4% (38 of 207 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.37 · 12.6% (26 of 207 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.34 · 16.9% (35 of 207 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.35 · 14.5% (30 of 207 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.34 · 15.9% (33 of 207 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.37 · 11.6% (24 of 207 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.35 · 13.5% (28 of 207 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.37 · 11.1% (23 of 207 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.33 · 17.4% (36 of 207 decks)
- Fisher's Talent relevance 0.34 · 15.5% (32 of 207 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.37 · 11.1% (23 of 207 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.33 · 17.9% (37 of 207 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 0.38 · 9.2% (19 of 207 decks)
- Prosperous Innkeeper relevance 0.38 · 9.2% (19 of 207 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.36 · 11.1% (23 of 207 decks)
- Communal Brewing relevance 0.30 · 24.6% (51 of 207 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.35 · 12.1% (25 of 207 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.33 · 15.9% (33 of 207 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.29 · 26.1% (54 of 207 decks)
- Valley Floodcaller relevance 0.31 · 21.3% (44 of 207 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.36 · 10.6% (22 of 207 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.35 · 11.6% (24 of 207 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.37 · 9.7% (20 of 207 decks)
- Peerless Recycling relevance 0.36 · 10.1% (21 of 207 decks)
- Mockingbird relevance 0.36 · 10.1% (21 of 207 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.32 · 15.0% (31 of 207 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.23 · 48.3% (100 of 207 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.32 · 15.0% (31 of 207 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.19 · 64.7% (134 of 207 decks)
- Equilibrium relevance 0.36 · 10.1% (21 of 207 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.36 · 10.1% (21 of 207 decks)
- Mutable Explorer relevance 0.30 · 21.7% (45 of 207 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.31 · 15.5% (32 of 207 decks)
- Biomass Mutation relevance 0.32 · 14.5% (30 of 207 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 0.31 · 32.4% (67 of 207 decks)
- Barrin, Tolarian Archmage relevance 0.35 · 22.2% (46 of 207 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.35 · 19.8% (41 of 207 decks)
- Kinnan, Bonder Prodigy relevance 0.37 · 14.5% (30 of 207 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 0.37 · 13.0% (27 of 207 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.33 · 22.2% (46 of 207 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.34 · 21.3% (44 of 207 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.29 · 36.2% (75 of 207 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.27 · 43.5% (90 of 207 decks)
- Grolnok, the Omnivore relevance 0.25 · 50.7% (105 of 207 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.37 · 12.6% (26 of 207 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.33 · 17.4% (36 of 207 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.37 · 11.1% (23 of 207 decks)
- Prosperous Innkeeper relevance 0.38 · 9.2% (19 of 207 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 0.38 · 9.2% (19 of 207 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.36 · 11.1% (23 of 207 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.35 · 12.1% (25 of 207 decks)
- Valley Floodcaller relevance 0.31 · 21.3% (44 of 207 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.37 · 9.7% (20 of 207 decks)
- Mockingbird relevance 0.36 · 10.1% (21 of 207 decks)
- Mutable Explorer relevance 0.30 · 21.7% (45 of 207 decks)
- Sab-Sunen, Luxa Embodied relevance 0.31 · 15.0% (31 of 207 decks)
- Papercraft Decoy relevance 0.30 · 17.9% (37 of 207 decks)
- Guardian Gladewalker relevance 0.35 · 9.7% (20 of 207 decks)
- Silverback Elder relevance 0.36 · 7.7% (16 of 207 decks)
- Berta, Wise Extrapolator relevance 0.24 · 37.7% (78 of 207 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.36 · 7.2% (15 of 207 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.36 · 7.7% (16 of 207 decks)
- Species Gorger relevance 0.26 · 30.0% (62 of 207 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.32 · 11.6% (24 of 207 decks)
- Skyskipper Duo relevance 0.22 · 42.5% (88 of 207 decks)
- Ezuri, Claw of Progress relevance 0.37 · 5.3% (11 of 207 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.35 · 7.7% (16 of 207 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.36 · 6.3% (13 of 207 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 0.35 · 6.3% (13 of 207 decks)
- Plumecreed Escort relevance 0.35 · 5.8% (12 of 207 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.29 · 15.5% (32 of 207 decks)
- Ice-Fang Coatl relevance 0.36 · 4.8% (10 of 207 decks)
- Gala Greeters relevance 0.36 · 5.3% (11 of 207 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 0.26 · 21.7% (45 of 207 decks)
- Frilled Mystic relevance 0.28 · 15.0% (31 of 207 decks)
- Octomancer relevance 0.21 · 43.0% (89 of 207 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.35 · 4.8% (10 of 207 decks)
- Treeguard Duo relevance 0.19 · 48.3% (100 of 207 decks)
- Faerie Impostor relevance 0.36 · 4.3% (9 of 207 decks)
- Chomping Changeling relevance 0.21 · 41.1% (85 of 207 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.22 · 34.3% (71 of 207 decks)
- Metallic Mimic relevance 0.32 · 8.2% (17 of 207 decks)
- Waterspout Warden relevance 0.22 · 33.3% (69 of 207 decks)
- Wistfulness relevance 0.33 · 5.3% (11 of 207 decks)
All artifacts (37)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.28 · 43.5% (90 of 207 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.37 · 11.6% (24 of 207 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.37 · 11.1% (23 of 207 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.35 · 11.6% (24 of 207 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.32 · 15.0% (31 of 207 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.36 · 10.1% (21 of 207 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.31 · 15.9% (33 of 207 decks)
- Urza's Incubator relevance 0.34 · 11.1% (23 of 207 decks)
- Door of Destinies relevance 0.27 · 26.6% (55 of 207 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.35 · 8.2% (17 of 207 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.33 · 11.1% (23 of 207 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.33 · 10.1% (21 of 207 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.28 · 21.3% (44 of 207 decks)
- Fountainport Bell relevance 0.34 · 7.2% (15 of 207 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.36 · 4.8% (10 of 207 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.33 · 7.7% (16 of 207 decks)
- Chronicle of Victory relevance 0.34 · 6.8% (14 of 207 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.34 · 5.8% (12 of 207 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.22 · 33.3% (69 of 207 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.34 · 4.8% (10 of 207 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.33 · 5.3% (11 of 207 decks)
- Gathering Stone relevance 0.30 · 9.7% (20 of 207 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.32 · 4.8% (10 of 207 decks)
- Banner of Kinship relevance 0.29 · 8.2% (17 of 207 decks)
- Wishing Well relevance 0.33 · 3.9% (8 of 207 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.21 · 21.3% (44 of 207 decks)
- Bontu's Monument relevance 0.34 · 3.4% (7 of 207 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.26 · 7.2% (15 of 207 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.32 · 3.4% (7 of 207 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.20 · 15.9% (33 of 207 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.22 · 11.1% (23 of 207 decks)
- Blood Clock relevance 0.33 · 2.9% (6 of 207 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.23 · 6.8% (14 of 207 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.19 · 12.1% (25 of 207 decks)
- Icon of Ancestry relevance 0.29 · 2.9% (6 of 207 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.12 · 45.4% (94 of 207 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.08 · 64.7% (134 of 207 decks)
All enchantments (46)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.29 · 36.7% (76 of 207 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.31 · 30.4% (63 of 207 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.28 · 41.1% (85 of 207 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.34 · 16.9% (35 of 207 decks)
- Fisher's Talent relevance 0.34 · 15.5% (32 of 207 decks)
- Communal Brewing relevance 0.30 · 24.6% (51 of 207 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.29 · 26.1% (54 of 207 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.32 · 15.0% (31 of 207 decks)
- Equilibrium relevance 0.36 · 10.1% (21 of 207 decks)
- Gossip's Talent relevance 0.28 · 27.1% (56 of 207 decks)
- Aluren relevance 0.37 · 7.7% (16 of 207 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.30 · 19.3% (40 of 207 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.34 · 8.2% (17 of 207 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.34 · 7.7% (16 of 207 decks)
- Quest for Renewal relevance 0.35 · 5.8% (12 of 207 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.35 · 5.3% (11 of 207 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.35 · 4.8% (10 of 207 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.33 · 7.7% (16 of 207 decks)
- Path of Discovery relevance 0.33 · 7.2% (15 of 207 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.31 · 10.1% (21 of 207 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.29 · 10.6% (22 of 207 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.33 · 4.8% (10 of 207 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.20 · 41.1% (85 of 207 decks)
- Leyline of Transformation relevance 0.30 · 6.8% (14 of 207 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.31 · 4.8% (10 of 207 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.30 · 5.3% (11 of 207 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.29 · 7.2% (15 of 207 decks)
- Fortune Teller's Talent relevance 0.24 · 11.6% (24 of 207 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.30 · 3.9% (8 of 207 decks)
- Kasmina's Transmutation relevance 0.20 · 19.3% (40 of 207 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.25 · 4.8% (10 of 207 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.32 · 2.4% (5 of 207 decks)
- Thickest in the Thicket relevance 0.27 · 2.9% (6 of 207 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.30 · 2.4% (5 of 207 decks)
- Frog Tongue relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (7 of 207 decks)
- Sugar Coat relevance 0.29 · 2.4% (5 of 207 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.22 · 3.9% (8 of 207 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.25 · 2.9% (6 of 207 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.10 · 57.5% (119 of 207 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.27 · 2.4% (5 of 207 decks)
- Frogify relevance 0.10 · 53.1% (110 of 207 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.24 · 2.4% (5 of 207 decks)
- Arcane Adaptation relevance 0.21 · 2.9% (6 of 207 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (7 of 207 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.18 · 2.4% (5 of 207 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (5 of 207 decks)
All instants (50)
- Snap relevance 0.36 · 14.0% (29 of 207 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.35 · 14.5% (30 of 207 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.35 · 13.5% (28 of 207 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.33 · 17.9% (37 of 207 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.36 · 10.6% (22 of 207 decks)
- Peerless Recycling relevance 0.36 · 10.1% (21 of 207 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.23 · 48.3% (100 of 207 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.19 · 64.7% (134 of 207 decks)
- Biomass Mutation relevance 0.32 · 14.5% (30 of 207 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.26 · 33.8% (70 of 207 decks)
- Familiar's Ruse relevance 0.37 · 6.8% (14 of 207 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.32 · 13.0% (27 of 207 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.29 · 19.3% (40 of 207 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.37 · 6.8% (14 of 207 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.33 · 9.7% (20 of 207 decks)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 0.35 · 6.3% (13 of 207 decks)
- This Town Ain't Big Enough relevance 0.36 · 4.8% (10 of 207 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.31 · 10.1% (21 of 207 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.35 · 5.8% (12 of 207 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.28 · 15.5% (32 of 207 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.33 · 7.7% (16 of 207 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.31 · 10.1% (21 of 207 decks)
- Pawpatch Formation relevance 0.36 · 4.3% (9 of 207 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.34 · 5.8% (12 of 207 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.21 · 42.0% (87 of 207 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.33 · 5.8% (12 of 207 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.32 · 6.8% (14 of 207 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.33 · 5.3% (11 of 207 decks)
- Get Out relevance 0.35 · 4.3% (9 of 207 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.24 · 23.7% (49 of 207 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.28 · 11.6% (24 of 207 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.34 · 4.3% (9 of 207 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.16 · 63.8% (132 of 207 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.31 · 6.3% (13 of 207 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.21 · 35.3% (73 of 207 decks)
- Turn to Frog relevance 0.20 · 37.2% (77 of 207 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.32 · 4.3% (9 of 207 decks)
- Might of Murasa relevance 0.34 · 3.9% (8 of 207 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.29 · 5.3% (11 of 207 decks)
- Auroral Procession relevance 0.30 · 4.3% (9 of 207 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.30 · 4.3% (9 of 207 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.30 · 4.3% (9 of 207 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.34 · 3.4% (7 of 207 decks)
- Banishing Knack relevance 0.34 · 3.4% (7 of 207 decks)
- Polliwallop relevance 0.12 · 72.0% (149 of 207 decks)
- Polymorphist's Jest relevance 0.15 · 51.2% (106 of 207 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.31 · 3.9% (8 of 207 decks)
- Incubation // Incongruity relevance 0.27 · 5.8% (12 of 207 decks)
- High Stride relevance 0.33 · 3.4% (7 of 207 decks)
- Retraction Helix relevance 0.33 · 2.9% (6 of 207 decks)
All sorceries (35)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.34 · 22.2% (46 of 207 decks)
- Wear Down relevance 0.34 · 18.4% (38 of 207 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.34 · 15.9% (33 of 207 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.33 · 15.9% (33 of 207 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.31 · 15.5% (32 of 207 decks)
- Portent of Calamity relevance 0.35 · 9.7% (20 of 207 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.32 · 13.0% (27 of 207 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.33 · 12.1% (25 of 207 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.35 · 8.7% (18 of 207 decks)
- Rootcast Apprenticeship relevance 0.35 · 9.2% (19 of 207 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.33 · 10.6% (22 of 207 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.26 · 27.1% (56 of 207 decks)
- Splash Portal relevance 0.16 · 72.9% (151 of 207 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.33 · 6.3% (13 of 207 decks)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 0.36 · 4.3% (9 of 207 decks)
- Longstalk Brawl relevance 0.35 · 4.3% (9 of 207 decks)
- Boomerang Basics relevance 0.33 · 4.8% (10 of 207 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.33 · 4.3% (9 of 207 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.22 · 28.0% (58 of 207 decks)
- Mercurial Transformation relevance 0.33 · 4.3% (9 of 207 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.32 · 4.3% (9 of 207 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.30 · 4.8% (10 of 207 decks)
- Procrastinate relevance 0.31 · 4.3% (9 of 207 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.27 · 7.7% (16 of 207 decks)
- Mind Spiral relevance 0.34 · 3.4% (7 of 207 decks)
- Calamitous Tide relevance 0.32 · 3.4% (7 of 207 decks)
- Croaking Counterpart relevance 0.14 · 51.2% (106 of 207 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.31 · 3.4% (7 of 207 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (13 of 207 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.32 · 2.9% (6 of 207 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.31 · 2.9% (6 of 207 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.32 · 2.4% (5 of 207 decks)
- Visions of Dominance relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (7 of 207 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.27 · 2.9% (6 of 207 decks)
- Druidic Ritual relevance 0.25 · 2.9% (6 of 207 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (1)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.32 · 11.6% (24 of 207 decks)
All utility lands (39)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.34 · 15.0% (31 of 207 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.32 · 14.5% (30 of 207 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.31 · 11.1% (23 of 207 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.18 · 52.7% (109 of 207 decks)
- Novijen, Heart of Progress relevance 0.31 · 8.7% (18 of 207 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.33 · 5.3% (11 of 207 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.26 · 16.9% (35 of 207 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.29 · 10.1% (21 of 207 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.32 · 5.3% (11 of 207 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.21 · 31.4% (65 of 207 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.27 · 11.6% (24 of 207 decks)
- Drowner of Truth // Drowned Jungle relevance 0.33 · 4.3% (9 of 207 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.32 · 4.3% (9 of 207 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.30 · 5.8% (12 of 207 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.33 · 3.9% (8 of 207 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.28 · 7.2% (15 of 207 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.19 · 36.2% (75 of 207 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.26 · 9.7% (20 of 207 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.30 · 4.3% (9 of 207 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.27 · 7.7% (16 of 207 decks)
- Hidden Grotto relevance 0.27 · 6.8% (14 of 207 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.28 · 4.8% (10 of 207 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.27 · 5.3% (11 of 207 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.22 · 13.5% (28 of 207 decks)
- Fountainport relevance 0.33 · 3.4% (7 of 207 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (13 of 207 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.22 · 12.1% (25 of 207 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.29 · 3.9% (8 of 207 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.14 · 52.7% (109 of 207 decks)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.28 · 3.9% (8 of 207 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.25 · 5.3% (11 of 207 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.32 · 2.4% (5 of 207 decks)
- Oakhollow Village relevance 0.10 · 65.2% (135 of 207 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (7 of 207 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (7 of 207 decks)
- Lilypad Village relevance 0.11 · 61.4% (127 of 207 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.31 · 2.4% (5 of 207 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.27 · 2.9% (6 of 207 decks)
- Kishla Village relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (5 of 207 decks)
All lands (44)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.31 · 21.3% (44 of 207 decks)
- Unclaimed Territory relevance 0.33 · 9.2% (19 of 207 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.27 · 21.3% (44 of 207 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.27 · 19.8% (41 of 207 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.33 · 8.7% (18 of 207 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.27 · 17.9% (37 of 207 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.35 · 4.8% (10 of 207 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.26 · 18.4% (38 of 207 decks)
- Uncharted Haven relevance 0.34 · 5.3% (11 of 207 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.26 · 18.8% (39 of 207 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.29 · 11.1% (23 of 207 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.32 · 6.8% (14 of 207 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.23 · 27.5% (57 of 207 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.25 · 16.4% (34 of 207 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.25 · 17.9% (37 of 207 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.24 · 21.3% (44 of 207 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.22 · 29.0% (60 of 207 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.27 · 10.1% (21 of 207 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.34 · 3.9% (8 of 207 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.28 · 4.8% (10 of 207 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.28 · 4.8% (10 of 207 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.27 · 7.2% (15 of 207 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.17 · 38.2% (79 of 207 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.17 · 35.3% (73 of 207 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.15 · 49.8% (103 of 207 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.15 · 46.9% (97 of 207 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.29 · 3.9% (8 of 207 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.31 · 3.4% (7 of 207 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.15 · 44.9% (93 of 207 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.25 · 4.8% (10 of 207 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.32 · 2.9% (6 of 207 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (7 of 207 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.31 · 2.9% (6 of 207 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.13 · 50.2% (104 of 207 decks)
- Lakeside Shack relevance 0.29 · 2.9% (6 of 207 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.29 · 2.9% (6 of 207 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.32 · 2.4% (5 of 207 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.11 · 53.6% (111 of 207 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.26 · 2.9% (6 of 207 decks)
- Hadana's Climb // Winged Temple of Orazca relevance 0.26 · 2.9% (6 of 207 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.08 · 66.7% (138 of 207 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.04 · 79.2% (164 of 207 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 96.6% (200 of 207 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 98.1% (203 of 207 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Clement, the Worrywort, from 207 real Commander decks.