Cards like Giada, Font of Hope
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Resplendent Angel
13× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
1.6× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 50% of other Selesnya decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. 29% of other Selesnya decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.94 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Cultivate 51%
- Rampant Growth 41%
- Kodama's Reach 35%
- Shared Roots 6%
- Explosive Vegetation 2%
- Grow from the Ashes 1%
- Migration Path 1%
Other options: Search for Tomorrow, Roamer's Routine, Reach the Horizon, Map the Frontier, Viewpoint Synchronization, They Went This Way, Beneath the Sands, Far Wanderings, Map the Wastes, Path to the Festival, Terramorph, Peregrination, Deep Reconnaissance, Untamed Wilds, New Generation's Technique, Primal Growth, Verdant Mastery
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
2.8× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 28% of other Selesnya decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 38%
- Lightning Greaves 32%
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.7× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 37% of other Selesnya decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Selesnya decks
0.82 per deck on average
vs. 0.56 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 40%
- Three Visits 32%
- Skyshroud Claim 8%
Other options: Nissa's Pilgrimage, Glimpse the Core, Ranger's Path, Field Trip, Hunting Wilds
Cards like Heronblade Elite
6.0× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Archangel of Thune
2.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Selesnya decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Selesnya decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Herald's Horn
16× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Herald's Horn 25%
- Urza's Incubator 22%
Cards like Garruk's Uprising
5.7× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Selesnya decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Pearl Medallion
16× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Selesnya decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Pearl Medallion 30%
- The Wind Crystal 16%
Cards like Eladamri's Call
2.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Selesnya decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Eladamri's Call 27%
- Worldly Tutor 20%
- Sylvan Tutor 4%
Cards like Austere Command
6.9× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Selesnya decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Herald of Eternal Dawn
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Wrath of God
3.9× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Selesnya decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Rout, Doomskar, Winds of Rath, End Hostilities, Sunscour, Sublime Exhalation
Cards like Beast Within
1.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 39% of other Selesnya decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 19% of other Selesnya decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.58 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Beast Within 33%
- Generous Gift 31%
Cards like Path to Exile
1.9× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 54% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.56 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.5× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 54% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.58 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Metropolis Reformer
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Archangel of Tithes
8.7× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Thraben Watcher
14× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Selesnya decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Somberwald Sage
7.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Angelic Skirmisher
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Giada, Font of Hope relevance 0.76 · 75.5% (3,167 of 4,193 decks)
- Lyra Dawnbringer relevance 0.77 · 68.0% (2,852 of 4,193 decks)
- Starnheim Aspirant relevance 0.85 · 54.4% (2,281 of 4,193 decks)
- Righteous Valkyrie relevance 0.78 · 54.4% (2,279 of 4,193 decks)
- Sephara, Sky's Blade relevance 0.81 · 49.5% (2,075 of 4,193 decks)
- Herald of War relevance 0.77 · 54.0% (2,265 of 4,193 decks)
- Bishop of Wings relevance 0.86 · 42.1% (1,767 of 4,193 decks)
- Archangel of Tithes relevance 0.80 · 42.7% (1,789 of 4,193 decks)
- Sigarda, Host of Herons relevance 0.69 · 55.0% (2,308 of 4,193 decks)
- Bruna, the Fading Light relevance 0.79 · 40.3% (1,691 of 4,193 decks)
- Youthful Valkyrie relevance 0.82 · 34.7% (1,454 of 4,193 decks)
- Avacyn, Angel of Hope relevance 0.64 · 58.1% (2,435 of 4,193 decks)
- Gisela, the Broken Blade relevance 0.79 · 36.9% (1,549 of 4,193 decks)
- Firemane Commando relevance 0.78 · 34.9% (1,464 of 4,193 decks)
- Serra's Emissary relevance 0.82 · 29.1% (1,220 of 4,193 decks)
- Thraben Watcher relevance 0.87 · 21.4% (896 of 4,193 decks)
- Metropolis Reformer relevance 0.87 · 18.7% (782 of 4,193 decks)
- Angel of Jubilation relevance 0.84 · 22.1% (925 of 4,193 decks)
- Battle Angels of Tyr relevance 0.79 · 28.3% (1,188 of 4,193 decks)
- Angelic Field Marshal relevance 0.88 · 16.0% (670 of 4,193 decks)
- Somberwald Sage relevance 0.68 · 39.9% (1,671 of 4,193 decks)
- Herald of Eternal Dawn relevance 0.84 · 18.6% (778 of 4,193 decks)
- Angelic Skirmisher relevance 0.83 · 17.3% (727 of 4,193 decks)
- Serra Paragon relevance 0.84 · 14.6% (614 of 4,193 decks)
- Sigarda, Champion of Light relevance 0.75 · 23.8% (999 of 4,193 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.62 · 42.4% (1,776 of 4,193 decks)
- Emeria Shepherd relevance 0.70 · 28.5% (1,195 of 4,193 decks)
- Sunblast Angel relevance 0.84 · 12.9% (542 of 4,193 decks)
- Baneslayer Angel relevance 0.83 · 13.2% (553 of 4,193 decks)
- Serra the Benevolent relevance 0.86 · 10.6% (443 of 4,193 decks)
- Urza's Incubator relevance 0.72 · 22.4% (940 of 4,193 decks)
- Linvala, Keeper of Silence relevance 0.67 · 28.5% (1,193 of 4,193 decks)
- Valkyrie Harbinger relevance 0.70 · 23.5% (987 of 4,193 decks)
- Angel of Finality relevance 0.84 · 11.0% (460 of 4,193 decks)
- The Book of Exalted Deeds relevance 0.77 · 14.9% (624 of 4,193 decks)
- Katilda, Dawnhart Prime relevance 0.63 · 32.8% (1,374 of 4,193 decks)
- Sigarda's Vanguard relevance 0.78 · 13.8% (577 of 4,193 decks)
- Pearl Medallion relevance 0.65 · 29.6% (1,240 of 4,193 decks)
- Platinum Angel relevance 0.81 · 11.5% (483 of 4,193 decks)
- Angel of Vitality relevance 0.71 · 19.6% (821 of 4,193 decks)
- Dazzling Angel relevance 0.74 · 15.2% (637 of 4,193 decks)
- Akroma, Vision of Ixidor relevance 0.86 · 8.7% (364 of 4,193 decks)
- Bastion Protector relevance 0.60 · 32.9% (1,379 of 4,193 decks)
- Angelic Arbiter relevance 0.85 · 7.7% (323 of 4,193 decks)
- Thalia, Heretic Cathar relevance 0.62 · 28.5% (1,197 of 4,193 decks)
- Angel of Serenity relevance 0.83 · 8.7% (365 of 4,193 decks)
- Odric, Lunarch Marshal relevance 0.65 · 23.2% (974 of 4,193 decks)
- Sigarda, Heron's Grace relevance 0.66 · 21.9% (918 of 4,193 decks)
- Angel of Destiny relevance 0.74 · 12.6% (530 of 4,193 decks)
- Serra's Guardian relevance 0.84 · 6.5% (272 of 4,193 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Giada, Font of Hope relevance 0.76 · 75.5% (3,167 of 4,193 decks)
- Lyra Dawnbringer relevance 0.77 · 68.0% (2,852 of 4,193 decks)
- Starnheim Aspirant relevance 0.85 · 54.4% (2,281 of 4,193 decks)
- Righteous Valkyrie relevance 0.78 · 54.4% (2,279 of 4,193 decks)
- Sephara, Sky's Blade relevance 0.81 · 49.5% (2,075 of 4,193 decks)
- Herald of War relevance 0.77 · 54.0% (2,265 of 4,193 decks)
- Bishop of Wings relevance 0.86 · 42.1% (1,767 of 4,193 decks)
- Archangel of Tithes relevance 0.80 · 42.7% (1,789 of 4,193 decks)
- Sigarda, Host of Herons relevance 0.69 · 55.0% (2,308 of 4,193 decks)
- Bruna, the Fading Light relevance 0.79 · 40.3% (1,691 of 4,193 decks)
- Youthful Valkyrie relevance 0.82 · 34.7% (1,454 of 4,193 decks)
- Avacyn, Angel of Hope relevance 0.64 · 58.1% (2,435 of 4,193 decks)
- Gisela, the Broken Blade relevance 0.79 · 36.9% (1,549 of 4,193 decks)
- Firemane Commando relevance 0.78 · 34.9% (1,464 of 4,193 decks)
- Serra's Emissary relevance 0.82 · 29.1% (1,220 of 4,193 decks)
- Thraben Watcher relevance 0.87 · 21.4% (896 of 4,193 decks)
- Metropolis Reformer relevance 0.87 · 18.7% (782 of 4,193 decks)
- Angel of Jubilation relevance 0.84 · 22.1% (925 of 4,193 decks)
- Battle Angels of Tyr relevance 0.79 · 28.3% (1,188 of 4,193 decks)
- Angelic Field Marshal relevance 0.88 · 16.0% (670 of 4,193 decks)
- Somberwald Sage relevance 0.68 · 39.9% (1,671 of 4,193 decks)
- Herald of Eternal Dawn relevance 0.84 · 18.6% (778 of 4,193 decks)
- Angelic Skirmisher relevance 0.83 · 17.3% (727 of 4,193 decks)
- Serra Paragon relevance 0.84 · 14.6% (614 of 4,193 decks)
- Sigarda, Champion of Light relevance 0.75 · 23.8% (999 of 4,193 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.62 · 42.4% (1,776 of 4,193 decks)
- Emeria Shepherd relevance 0.70 · 28.5% (1,195 of 4,193 decks)
- Sunblast Angel relevance 0.84 · 12.9% (542 of 4,193 decks)
- Baneslayer Angel relevance 0.83 · 13.2% (553 of 4,193 decks)
- Linvala, Keeper of Silence relevance 0.67 · 28.5% (1,193 of 4,193 decks)
- Valkyrie Harbinger relevance 0.70 · 23.5% (987 of 4,193 decks)
- Angel of Finality relevance 0.84 · 11.0% (460 of 4,193 decks)
- Katilda, Dawnhart Prime relevance 0.63 · 32.8% (1,374 of 4,193 decks)
- Sigarda's Vanguard relevance 0.78 · 13.8% (577 of 4,193 decks)
- Platinum Angel relevance 0.81 · 11.5% (483 of 4,193 decks)
- Angel of Vitality relevance 0.71 · 19.6% (821 of 4,193 decks)
- Dazzling Angel relevance 0.74 · 15.2% (637 of 4,193 decks)
- Akroma, Vision of Ixidor relevance 0.86 · 8.7% (364 of 4,193 decks)
- Bastion Protector relevance 0.60 · 32.9% (1,379 of 4,193 decks)
- Angelic Arbiter relevance 0.85 · 7.7% (323 of 4,193 decks)
- Thalia, Heretic Cathar relevance 0.62 · 28.5% (1,197 of 4,193 decks)
- Angel of Serenity relevance 0.83 · 8.7% (365 of 4,193 decks)
- Odric, Lunarch Marshal relevance 0.65 · 23.2% (974 of 4,193 decks)
- Sigarda, Heron's Grace relevance 0.66 · 21.9% (918 of 4,193 decks)
- Angel of Destiny relevance 0.74 · 12.6% (530 of 4,193 decks)
- Serra's Guardian relevance 0.84 · 6.5% (272 of 4,193 decks)
- Inspiring Overseer relevance 0.74 · 11.8% (494 of 4,193 decks)
- Kyler, Sigardian Emissary relevance 0.66 · 16.5% (692 of 4,193 decks)
- Aegis Angel relevance 0.82 · 5.5% (229 of 4,193 decks)
- Reya Dawnbringer relevance 0.79 · 6.5% (274 of 4,193 decks)
All artifacts (38)
- Urza's Incubator relevance 0.72 · 22.4% (940 of 4,193 decks)
- The Book of Exalted Deeds relevance 0.77 · 14.9% (624 of 4,193 decks)
- Pearl Medallion relevance 0.65 · 29.6% (1,240 of 4,193 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.73 · 9.3% (389 of 4,193 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.53 · 24.9% (1,043 of 4,193 decks)
- Horn of Gondor relevance 0.56 · 7.5% (316 of 4,193 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.57 · 6.2% (258 of 4,193 decks)
- The Wind Crystal relevance 0.46 · 15.6% (656 of 4,193 decks)
- Oketra's Monument relevance 0.55 · 6.4% (267 of 4,193 decks)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.79 · 3.0% (124 of 4,193 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.37 · 32.1% (1,348 of 4,193 decks)
- Caduceus, Staff of Hermes relevance 0.55 · 5.4% (225 of 4,193 decks)
- Moonsilver Spear relevance 0.76 · 3.0% (124 of 4,193 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.52 · 6.7% (283 of 4,193 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.48 · 8.9% (375 of 4,193 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.49 · 8.4% (354 of 4,193 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.48 · 9.2% (386 of 4,193 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.39 · 20.3% (851 of 4,193 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.51 · 5.0% (208 of 4,193 decks)
- Chronicle of Victory relevance 0.48 · 5.2% (220 of 4,193 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.30 · 38.1% (1,597 of 4,193 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.43 · 9.5% (398 of 4,193 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.35 · 19.7% (826 of 4,193 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.46 · 5.3% (223 of 4,193 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.48 · 4.7% (197 of 4,193 decks)
- Archaeomancer's Map relevance 0.63 · 2.7% (114 of 4,193 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.43 · 5.7% (238 of 4,193 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.32 · 22.0% (924 of 4,193 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.40 · 7.6% (317 of 4,193 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.39 · 5.6% (235 of 4,193 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.48 · 3.8% (158 of 4,193 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.51 · 3.2% (136 of 4,193 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.47 · 3.3% (138 of 4,193 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.44 · 2.6% (109 of 4,193 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.13 · 65.1% (2,730 of 4,193 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.32 · 4.0% (166 of 4,193 decks)
- Well of Lost Dreams relevance 0.37 · 2.8% (119 of 4,193 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.07 · 82.2% (3,448 of 4,193 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Court of Grace relevance 0.68 · 11.9% (497 of 4,193 decks)
- Sigarda's Splendor relevance 0.74 · 6.7% (280 of 4,193 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.58 · 14.7% (617 of 4,193 decks)
- Luminarch Ascension relevance 0.65 · 9.3% (392 of 4,193 decks)
- Descendants' Path relevance 0.68 · 7.5% (314 of 4,193 decks)
- Sigarda's Summons relevance 0.63 · 9.9% (417 of 4,193 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.54 · 16.2% (679 of 4,193 decks)
- Angelic Accord relevance 0.63 · 8.6% (362 of 4,193 decks)
- Laid to Rest relevance 0.64 · 7.0% (293 of 4,193 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.42 · 35.0% (1,469 of 4,193 decks)
- Land Tax relevance 0.52 · 13.5% (566 of 4,193 decks)
- Valkyrie's Call relevance 0.64 · 4.9% (207 of 4,193 decks)
- True Conviction relevance 0.56 · 8.6% (360 of 4,193 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.43 · 22.7% (950 of 4,193 decks)
- Leyline of Sanctity relevance 0.69 · 3.7% (157 of 4,193 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.43 · 17.0% (712 of 4,193 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.40 · 22.2% (932 of 4,193 decks)
- Divine Visitation relevance 0.50 · 7.4% (310 of 4,193 decks)
- Mirri's Guile relevance 0.59 · 4.3% (180 of 4,193 decks)
- Authority of the Consuls relevance 0.38 · 23.5% (984 of 4,193 decks)
- Trouble in Pairs relevance 0.49 · 7.0% (292 of 4,193 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.40 · 15.7% (658 of 4,193 decks)
- Angelic Destiny relevance 0.51 · 5.3% (222 of 4,193 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.38 · 20.3% (852 of 4,193 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.31 · 37.5% (1,572 of 4,193 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.38 · 17.8% (746 of 4,193 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.48 · 4.9% (204 of 4,193 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.35 · 19.7% (824 of 4,193 decks)
- Privileged Position relevance 0.44 · 6.3% (266 of 4,193 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.44 · 6.0% (250 of 4,193 decks)
- Flowering of the White Tree relevance 0.43 · 5.3% (223 of 4,193 decks)
- Lurking Predators relevance 0.64 · 2.6% (108 of 4,193 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.59 · 2.9% (122 of 4,193 decks)
- Citadel Siege relevance 0.57 · 2.9% (123 of 4,193 decks)
- Folk Hero relevance 0.59 · 2.6% (110 of 4,193 decks)
- Blind Obedience relevance 0.43 · 4.5% (188 of 4,193 decks)
- Darksteel Mutation relevance 0.36 · 6.1% (255 of 4,193 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.50 · 2.8% (119 of 4,193 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.50 · 2.6% (108 of 4,193 decks)
- Armadillo Cloak relevance 0.43 · 3.3% (140 of 4,193 decks)
- Virtue of Loyalty // Ardenvale Fealty relevance 0.47 · 2.6% (111 of 4,193 decks)
- Cleric Class relevance 0.34 · 4.5% (187 of 4,193 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.29 · 8.2% (342 of 4,193 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.37 · 3.7% (157 of 4,193 decks)
- Anthem of Champions relevance 0.39 · 3.2% (136 of 4,193 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.27 · 6.9% (291 of 4,193 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.27 · 6.0% (253 of 4,193 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.27 · 5.2% (218 of 4,193 decks)
- Grasp of Fate relevance 0.34 · 2.6% (108 of 4,193 decks)
- Sterling Grove relevance 0.30 · 2.8% (119 of 4,193 decks)
All instants (47)
- Congregation at Dawn relevance 0.68 · 12.1% (506 of 4,193 decks)
- Flare of Fortitude relevance 0.51 · 13.7% (575 of 4,193 decks)
- Angel's Grace relevance 0.59 · 5.0% (209 of 4,193 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.38 · 33.3% (1,396 of 4,193 decks)
- Cosmic Rebirth relevance 0.53 · 7.8% (327 of 4,193 decks)
- Galadriel's Dismissal relevance 0.55 · 6.0% (251 of 4,193 decks)
- Disenchant relevance 0.58 · 4.8% (202 of 4,193 decks)
- Erode relevance 0.52 · 7.0% (293 of 4,193 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.40 · 20.5% (858 of 4,193 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.37 · 26.9% (1,128 of 4,193 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.49 · 7.8% (325 of 4,193 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.36 · 27.3% (1,145 of 4,193 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.51 · 5.4% (227 of 4,193 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.39 · 17.5% (733 of 4,193 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.35 · 26.9% (1,126 of 4,193 decks)
- Unbreakable Formation relevance 0.39 · 16.2% (681 of 4,193 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.48 · 5.3% (224 of 4,193 decks)
- Clever Concealment relevance 0.43 · 10.3% (433 of 4,193 decks)
- Reprieve relevance 0.43 · 8.6% (359 of 4,193 decks)
- Return to Dust relevance 0.55 · 3.9% (164 of 4,193 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.43 · 7.7% (322 of 4,193 decks)
- Get Lost relevance 0.54 · 3.9% (164 of 4,193 decks)
- Rebuff the Wicked relevance 0.52 · 4.1% (172 of 4,193 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.44 · 5.7% (241 of 4,193 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.35 · 14.9% (626 of 4,193 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.51 · 3.9% (162 of 4,193 decks)
- Dawn's Truce relevance 0.39 · 8.2% (345 of 4,193 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.41 · 6.2% (259 of 4,193 decks)
- Destroy Evil relevance 0.63 · 2.5% (105 of 4,193 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.40 · 6.0% (253 of 4,193 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.55 · 3.2% (133 of 4,193 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.26 · 31.1% (1,305 of 4,193 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.43 · 4.1% (171 of 4,193 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.37 · 5.0% (208 of 4,193 decks)
- Silence relevance 0.41 · 4.1% (173 of 4,193 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.35 · 6.1% (256 of 4,193 decks)
- Call the Coppercoats relevance 0.47 · 3.2% (134 of 4,193 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.21 · 39.1% (1,640 of 4,193 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.22 · 32.7% (1,373 of 4,193 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.30 · 8.3% (348 of 4,193 decks)
- Heliod's Intervention relevance 0.47 · 2.6% (107 of 4,193 decks)
- Restoration Magic relevance 0.37 · 3.3% (139 of 4,193 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.13 · 60.1% (2,522 of 4,193 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.39 · 2.6% (107 of 4,193 decks)
- Sundering Growth relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (147 of 4,193 decks)
- Swords to Plowshares relevance 0.10 · 69.4% (2,908 of 4,193 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.33 · 2.7% (113 of 4,193 decks)
All sorceries (36)
- Entreat the Angels relevance 0.76 · 6.3% (265 of 4,193 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.56 · 17.5% (734 of 4,193 decks)
- Cleansing Nova relevance 0.58 · 13.9% (584 of 4,193 decks)
- Restoration Seminar relevance 0.65 · 4.9% (205 of 4,193 decks)
- Mass Calcify relevance 0.78 · 3.4% (141 of 4,193 decks)
- Day of Judgment relevance 0.58 · 5.8% (243 of 4,193 decks)
- Vanquish the Horde relevance 0.49 · 12.2% (511 of 4,193 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.43 · 19.8% (832 of 4,193 decks)
- Time of Need relevance 0.65 · 3.9% (165 of 4,193 decks)
- Split Up relevance 0.53 · 5.2% (219 of 4,193 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.49 · 8.3% (347 of 4,193 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.58 · 4.4% (185 of 4,193 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.58 · 4.4% (183 of 4,193 decks)
- Starnheim Unleashed relevance 0.74 · 2.8% (119 of 4,193 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.36 · 28.7% (1,205 of 4,193 decks)
- Winds of Abandon relevance 0.50 · 5.1% (215 of 4,193 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.49 · 5.7% (238 of 4,193 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.31 · 35.5% (1,487 of 4,193 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.41 · 11.9% (498 of 4,193 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.31 · 31.7% (1,331 of 4,193 decks)
- Increasing Devotion relevance 0.53 · 4.2% (177 of 4,193 decks)
- Fumigate relevance 0.46 · 5.0% (209 of 4,193 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.51 · 4.2% (176 of 4,193 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.28 · 37.3% (1,562 of 4,193 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.26 · 41.3% (1,731 of 4,193 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.40 · 7.8% (329 of 4,193 decks)
- Idyllic Tutor relevance 0.41 · 6.5% (274 of 4,193 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.34 · 12.6% (529 of 4,193 decks)
- Requisition Raid relevance 0.39 · 5.3% (221 of 4,193 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.23 · 40.2% (1,684 of 4,193 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.30 · 13.9% (582 of 4,193 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.20 · 50.8% (2,131 of 4,193 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.32 · 6.8% (287 of 4,193 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.38 · 3.7% (154 of 4,193 decks)
- Cut a Deal relevance 0.42 · 2.5% (105 of 4,193 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.33 · 3.3% (140 of 4,193 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (4)
- Serra the Benevolent relevance 0.86 · 10.6% (443 of 4,193 decks)
- Elspeth Resplendent relevance 0.70 · 5.0% (210 of 4,193 decks)
- Archangel Elspeth relevance 0.68 · 5.1% (212 of 4,193 decks)
- Elspeth, Storm Slayer relevance 0.39 · 7.6% (319 of 4,193 decks)
All utility lands (38)
- Seraph Sanctuary relevance 0.62 · 43.6% (1,828 of 4,193 decks)
- Emeria, the Sky Ruin relevance 0.66 · 18.2% (763 of 4,193 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.52 · 21.5% (902 of 4,193 decks)
- Emeria's Call // Emeria, Shattered Skyclave relevance 0.57 · 5.2% (218 of 4,193 decks)
- Minas Tirith relevance 0.46 · 14.9% (623 of 4,193 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.56 · 5.2% (219 of 4,193 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.53 · 6.2% (262 of 4,193 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.33 · 38.3% (1,605 of 4,193 decks)
- Sejiri Shelter // Sejiri Glacier relevance 0.50 · 6.9% (289 of 4,193 decks)
- Windbrisk Heights relevance 0.47 · 6.8% (287 of 4,193 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.54 · 4.4% (185 of 4,193 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.39 · 14.3% (601 of 4,193 decks)
- Castle Ardenvale relevance 0.42 · 10.0% (420 of 4,193 decks)
- Botanical Plaza relevance 0.51 · 4.5% (187 of 4,193 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.40 · 10.4% (435 of 4,193 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.38 · 12.1% (509 of 4,193 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.40 · 8.4% (351 of 4,193 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.32 · 19.9% (835 of 4,193 decks)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.38 · 9.2% (386 of 4,193 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.28 · 29.0% (1,214 of 4,193 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.37 · 9.6% (404 of 4,193 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.31 · 18.6% (781 of 4,193 decks)
- Kor Haven relevance 0.57 · 2.9% (120 of 4,193 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.31 · 17.5% (733 of 4,193 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.31 · 16.1% (676 of 4,193 decks)
- Graypelt Refuge relevance 0.35 · 8.8% (370 of 4,193 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.31 · 13.3% (557 of 4,193 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.48 · 3.4% (143 of 4,193 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.24 · 30.9% (1,294 of 4,193 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.26 · 21.1% (886 of 4,193 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.31 · 10.2% (428 of 4,193 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.41 · 3.9% (163 of 4,193 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.48 · 2.7% (114 of 4,193 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.25 · 16.5% (690 of 4,193 decks)
- Strength of the Harvest // Haven of the Harvest relevance 0.30 · 5.4% (225 of 4,193 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.44 · 2.6% (107 of 4,193 decks)
- Hall of Heliod's Generosity relevance 0.32 · 3.9% (163 of 4,193 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.35 · 2.7% (114 of 4,193 decks)
All lands (50)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.54 · 15.0% (631 of 4,193 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.52 · 6.9% (288 of 4,193 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.45 · 11.6% (488 of 4,193 decks)
- Unclaimed Territory relevance 0.52 · 4.8% (203 of 4,193 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.46 · 8.3% (349 of 4,193 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.46 · 6.9% (290 of 4,193 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.39 · 14.1% (590 of 4,193 decks)
- Arctic Treeline relevance 0.46 · 6.2% (261 of 4,193 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.36 · 16.5% (690 of 4,193 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.44 · 6.3% (263 of 4,193 decks)
- Radiant Grove relevance 0.39 · 11.2% (469 of 4,193 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.45 · 5.9% (247 of 4,193 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.43 · 6.2% (259 of 4,193 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.36 · 13.5% (568 of 4,193 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.42 · 5.9% (247 of 4,193 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.44 · 4.8% (203 of 4,193 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.37 · 10.2% (429 of 4,193 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.48 · 4.1% (172 of 4,193 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.31 · 16.8% (705 of 4,193 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.29 · 22.6% (949 of 4,193 decks)
- Thriving Heath relevance 0.48 · 3.7% (155 of 4,193 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.28 · 23.5% (985 of 4,193 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.30 · 16.2% (681 of 4,193 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.29 · 19.5% (819 of 4,193 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.39 · 4.7% (197 of 4,193 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.25 · 30.3% (1,272 of 4,193 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.24 · 34.3% (1,438 of 4,193 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.41 · 4.2% (178 of 4,193 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.39 · 4.3% (181 of 4,193 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.24 · 25.1% (1,053 of 4,193 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.40 · 4.1% (171 of 4,193 decks)
- Windurst, Federation Center relevance 0.49 · 2.6% (109 of 4,193 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.18 · 48.4% (2,030 of 4,193 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.47 · 2.8% (117 of 4,193 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 0.47 · 2.6% (108 of 4,193 decks)
- Tranquil Expanse relevance 0.44 · 2.9% (121 of 4,193 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.34 · 4.4% (184 of 4,193 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.44 · 2.8% (117 of 4,193 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.19 · 40.2% (1,686 of 4,193 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.44 · 2.7% (114 of 4,193 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.45 · 2.5% (104 of 4,193 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.19 · 34.2% (1,435 of 4,193 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.42 · 2.8% (117 of 4,193 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.16 · 52.8% (2,215 of 4,193 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.17 · 42.1% (1,764 of 4,193 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.20 · 25.1% (1,052 of 4,193 decks)
- Gathering Place relevance 0.38 · 2.9% (123 of 4,193 decks)
- Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.12 · 60.3% (2,530 of 4,193 decks)
- Canopy Vista relevance 0.10 · 65.5% (2,747 of 4,193 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.05 · 81.9% (3,433 of 4,193 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Sigarda, Font of Blessings, from 4,193 real Commander decks.