Cards like Brainstorm
17× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
76% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Brainstorm 73%
- Brainsurge 37%
Cards like Hardened Scales
3.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Simic decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other Simic decks
Cards like Iron Man, Armored Avenger
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Iron Man, Armored Avenger 36%
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant 25%
- Baxter, Fly in the Ointment 13%
- Clinquant Skymage 4%
- Lorescale Coatl 1%
Other options: Oneirophage, Ravenhill Flock, Jace's Projection
Cards like Wizard Class
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Doubling Season
5.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
0.91 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Doubling Season 55%
- Primal Vigor 22%
- Parallel Lives 14%
Cards like Faerie Mastermind
4.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Zimone, Paradox Sculptor
11× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Ant-Man, Colony Commander
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Opt
9.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Cards like Ozolith, the Shattered Spire
4.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Harmonized Crescendo
17× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Growth Curve
12× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Heroic Intervention
3.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Ohran Frostfang
6.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Grazilaxx, Illithid Scholar, Oakhame Adversary, Ohran Viper, Keeper of Fables
Cards like Growth Spiral
1.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other Simic decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other Simic decks
Cards like Pym Particles
13× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards like Pensive Professor
5.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Lessons from Life
3.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Overwhelming Stampede
7.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.39 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 51%
- Lightning Greaves 20%
Cards like Thought Vessel
2.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Aetherize
3.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Aetherize 17%
- Perplexing Test 6%
- Evacuation 3%
Cards like Training Regimen
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Training Regimen 19%
- Sphere Grid 15%
Cards like Training Grounds
1.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Snakeskin Veil
2.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Ranger's Guile, Woodcutter's Grit
Cards like Banner of Kinship
9.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Ant-Man, Colony Commander relevance 0.54 · 48.6% (69 of 142 decks)
- Pym Particles relevance 0.54 · 48.6% (69 of 142 decks)
- Ezuri, Claw of Progress relevance 0.52 · 52.1% (74 of 142 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.44 · 66.9% (95 of 142 decks)
- Kid Loki relevance 0.55 · 38.0% (54 of 142 decks)
- Harmonized Trio // Brainstorm relevance 0.47 · 50.7% (72 of 142 decks)
- Iron Man, Armored Avenger relevance 0.54 · 35.9% (51 of 142 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.40 · 59.9% (85 of 142 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.48 · 39.4% (56 of 142 decks)
- Ivy Lane Denizen relevance 0.47 · 40.1% (57 of 142 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.34 · 73.2% (104 of 142 decks)
- Growth Curve relevance 0.42 · 50.7% (72 of 142 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.47 · 37.3% (53 of 142 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.47 · 35.9% (51 of 142 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.49 · 30.3% (43 of 142 decks)
- Krang, the All-Powerful relevance 0.54 · 21.1% (30 of 142 decks)
- Super Intelligence relevance 0.53 · 21.8% (31 of 142 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.42 · 43.7% (62 of 142 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.45 · 31.7% (45 of 142 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.28 · 79.6% (113 of 142 decks)
- Shang-Chi, Master of Kung Fu relevance 0.50 · 18.3% (26 of 142 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.33 · 60.6% (86 of 142 decks)
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant relevance 0.47 · 25.4% (36 of 142 decks)
- Mister Fantastic, Reed Richards relevance 0.40 · 41.5% (59 of 142 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.41 · 38.7% (55 of 142 decks)
- Spry and Mighty relevance 0.51 · 15.5% (22 of 142 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.48 · 19.0% (27 of 142 decks)
- Training Regimen relevance 0.48 · 19.0% (27 of 142 decks)
- Reed Richards, Smartest Man relevance 0.52 · 13.4% (19 of 142 decks)
- Iridescent Hornbeetle relevance 0.47 · 21.1% (30 of 142 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.33 · 54.2% (77 of 142 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.40 · 33.8% (48 of 142 decks)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 0.41 · 32.4% (46 of 142 decks)
- The Wondrous Wasp relevance 0.50 · 12.7% (18 of 142 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.37 · 39.4% (56 of 142 decks)
- Doc Samson, Super Psychiatrist relevance 0.49 · 12.7% (18 of 142 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.41 · 28.2% (40 of 142 decks)
- Zimone, Paradox Sculptor relevance 0.37 · 36.6% (52 of 142 decks)
- Tolarian Winds relevance 0.50 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
- Unstable Experiment relevance 0.50 · 10.6% (15 of 142 decks)
- Professor Hulk relevance 0.50 · 9.9% (14 of 142 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.37 · 33.1% (47 of 142 decks)
- Restorative Technique relevance 0.48 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
- Mister Hyde, Monster Within relevance 0.48 · 10.6% (15 of 142 decks)
- We Say Thee Nay! relevance 0.48 · 9.2% (13 of 142 decks)
- Give // Take relevance 0.46 · 10.6% (15 of 142 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.32 · 43.0% (61 of 142 decks)
- Banner of Kinship relevance 0.41 · 15.5% (22 of 142 decks)
- The Ten Rings relevance 0.47 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.30 · 43.7% (62 of 142 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Ant-Man, Colony Commander relevance 0.54 · 48.6% (69 of 142 decks)
- Ezuri, Claw of Progress relevance 0.52 · 52.1% (74 of 142 decks)
- Kid Loki relevance 0.55 · 38.0% (54 of 142 decks)
- Harmonized Trio // Brainstorm relevance 0.47 · 50.7% (72 of 142 decks)
- Iron Man, Armored Avenger relevance 0.54 · 35.9% (51 of 142 decks)
- Ivy Lane Denizen relevance 0.47 · 40.1% (57 of 142 decks)
- Krang, the All-Powerful relevance 0.54 · 21.1% (30 of 142 decks)
- Shang-Chi, Master of Kung Fu relevance 0.50 · 18.3% (26 of 142 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.33 · 60.6% (86 of 142 decks)
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant relevance 0.47 · 25.4% (36 of 142 decks)
- Mister Fantastic, Reed Richards relevance 0.40 · 41.5% (59 of 142 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.41 · 38.7% (55 of 142 decks)
- Reed Richards, Smartest Man relevance 0.52 · 13.4% (19 of 142 decks)
- Iridescent Hornbeetle relevance 0.47 · 21.1% (30 of 142 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.40 · 33.8% (48 of 142 decks)
- The Wondrous Wasp relevance 0.50 · 12.7% (18 of 142 decks)
- Doc Samson, Super Psychiatrist relevance 0.49 · 12.7% (18 of 142 decks)
- Zimone, Paradox Sculptor relevance 0.37 · 36.6% (52 of 142 decks)
- Professor Hulk relevance 0.50 · 9.9% (14 of 142 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.37 · 33.1% (47 of 142 decks)
- Mister Hyde, Monster Within relevance 0.48 · 10.6% (15 of 142 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.30 · 43.7% (62 of 142 decks)
- Baxter, Fly in the Ointment relevance 0.41 · 12.7% (18 of 142 decks)
- The Unagi of Kyoshi Island relevance 0.38 · 16.9% (24 of 142 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.32 · 33.1% (47 of 142 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.40 · 12.7% (18 of 142 decks)
- Ant-Man's Army relevance 0.45 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Ant-Man, Reformed Rogue relevance 0.45 · 7.0% (10 of 142 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.39 · 13.4% (19 of 142 decks)
- Michelangelo, Weirdness to 11 relevance 0.37 · 16.9% (24 of 142 decks)
- Enduring Vitality relevance 0.32 · 29.6% (42 of 142 decks)
- Ouroboroid relevance 0.34 · 21.8% (31 of 142 decks)
- Biomancer's Familiar relevance 0.41 · 9.2% (13 of 142 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.33 · 22.5% (32 of 142 decks)
- The Wasp, Winsome Avenger relevance 0.44 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- Giant-Sized Flying Ant relevance 0.44 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- Whirlpool Rider relevance 0.43 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- Pensive Professor relevance 0.33 · 16.9% (24 of 142 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.35 · 12.7% (18 of 142 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.33 · 16.2% (23 of 142 decks)
- Shang-Chi, Martial Mentor relevance 0.42 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Echo, Perceptive Prodigy relevance 0.40 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 0.40 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Titan of Littjara relevance 0.39 · 6.3% (9 of 142 decks)
- Ant-Man's Air Force relevance 0.41 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.32 · 14.1% (20 of 142 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.33 · 12.7% (18 of 142 decks)
- Curiosity Crafter relevance 0.25 · 34.5% (49 of 142 decks)
- Twenty-Toed Toad relevance 0.36 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
- Danny Pink relevance 0.35 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
All artifacts (49)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.44 · 66.9% (95 of 142 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.32 · 43.0% (61 of 142 decks)
- Banner of Kinship relevance 0.41 · 15.5% (22 of 142 decks)
- The Ten Rings relevance 0.47 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.27 · 49.3% (70 of 142 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.31 · 27.5% (39 of 142 decks)
- Teferi's Puzzle Box relevance 0.43 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.40 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.23 · 51.4% (73 of 142 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.30 · 19.7% (28 of 142 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.35 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.36 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.33 · 9.2% (13 of 142 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.28 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
- Arcade Cabinet relevance 0.30 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- Combine Chrysalis relevance 0.22 · 21.1% (30 of 142 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.28 · 6.3% (9 of 142 decks)
- Coat of Arms relevance 0.27 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.32 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.27 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.27 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.19 · 20.4% (29 of 142 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.19 · 20.4% (29 of 142 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.30 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (9 of 142 decks)
- Alhammarret's Archive relevance 0.32 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.22 · 7.0% (10 of 142 decks)
- Panther Habit relevance 0.32 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Winged Boots relevance 0.27 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.21 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Waterbending Scroll relevance 0.28 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.08 · 72.5% (103 of 142 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.24 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.23 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Contagion Clasp relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.21 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Sword of Truth and Justice relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.15 · 7.0% (10 of 142 decks)
- Necklace of Girion relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.14 · 9.2% (13 of 142 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.20 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Thopter Fabricator relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.17 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.19 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Wizard's Staff relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 85.2% (121 of 142 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.11 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.48 · 39.4% (56 of 142 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.47 · 35.9% (51 of 142 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.49 · 30.3% (43 of 142 decks)
- Super Intelligence relevance 0.53 · 21.8% (31 of 142 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.42 · 43.7% (62 of 142 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.28 · 79.6% (113 of 142 decks)
- Training Regimen relevance 0.48 · 19.0% (27 of 142 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.33 · 54.2% (77 of 142 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.30 · 42.3% (60 of 142 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.34 · 28.2% (40 of 142 decks)
- Stark's Ingenuity relevance 0.46 · 6.3% (9 of 142 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.33 · 23.9% (34 of 142 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.28 · 38.0% (54 of 142 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.29 · 36.6% (52 of 142 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.35 · 13.4% (19 of 142 decks)
- Well Rested relevance 0.41 · 6.3% (9 of 142 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.33 · 18.3% (26 of 142 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.37 · 10.6% (15 of 142 decks)
- Claim the Kingdom relevance 0.41 · 6.3% (9 of 142 decks)
- High Score relevance 0.36 · 10.6% (15 of 142 decks)
- Waterbender Ascension relevance 0.39 · 6.3% (9 of 142 decks)
- Level Up relevance 0.35 · 10.6% (15 of 142 decks)
- Quantum Reduction relevance 0.40 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.30 · 15.5% (22 of 142 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.28 · 21.8% (31 of 142 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.29 · 16.9% (24 of 142 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.23 · 35.9% (51 of 142 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.26 · 20.4% (29 of 142 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.18 · 54.9% (78 of 142 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.33 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.27 · 12.0% (17 of 142 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.29 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.28 · 9.9% (14 of 142 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.27 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.31 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.26 · 9.9% (14 of 142 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.32 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Rewrite History relevance 0.35 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Stocking the Pantry relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.25 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.23 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.28 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.27 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.21 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.23 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.27 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.23 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Moonlit Meditation relevance 0.22 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Struggle for Project Purity relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Security Bypass relevance 0.31 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
All instants (50)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.40 · 59.9% (85 of 142 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.34 · 73.2% (104 of 142 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.47 · 37.3% (53 of 142 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.48 · 19.0% (27 of 142 decks)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 0.41 · 32.4% (46 of 142 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.37 · 39.4% (56 of 142 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.41 · 28.2% (40 of 142 decks)
- Tolarian Winds relevance 0.50 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
- Unstable Experiment relevance 0.50 · 10.6% (15 of 142 decks)
- We Say Thee Nay! relevance 0.48 · 9.2% (13 of 142 decks)
- Keep Watch relevance 0.43 · 9.2% (13 of 142 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.39 · 12.7% (18 of 142 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.40 · 10.6% (15 of 142 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.36 · 14.8% (21 of 142 decks)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 0.41 · 6.3% (9 of 142 decks)
- Quick Study relevance 0.38 · 9.9% (14 of 142 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.36 · 9.9% (14 of 142 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.23 · 50.7% (72 of 142 decks)
- Embrace the Paradox relevance 0.33 · 13.4% (19 of 142 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.26 · 31.0% (44 of 142 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.32 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.33 · 9.9% (14 of 142 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.38 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Spider-Sense relevance 0.34 · 6.3% (9 of 142 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.35 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.34 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 0.29 · 12.7% (18 of 142 decks)
- Refute relevance 0.34 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.34 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.28 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.34 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.15 · 66.9% (95 of 142 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.32 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.28 · 12.0% (17 of 142 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.25 · 16.9% (24 of 142 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.24 · 15.5% (22 of 142 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.30 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.19 · 33.1% (47 of 142 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.30 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (9 of 142 decks)
- Mutational Advantage relevance 0.26 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.28 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (9 of 142 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.24 · 10.6% (15 of 142 decks)
- Auroral Procession relevance 0.26 · 7.0% (10 of 142 decks)
- Depower relevance 0.35 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.14 · 54.2% (77 of 142 decks)
- Quandrix Charm relevance 0.24 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.27 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.21 · 12.0% (17 of 142 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Pym Particles relevance 0.54 · 48.6% (69 of 142 decks)
- Growth Curve relevance 0.42 · 50.7% (72 of 142 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.45 · 31.7% (45 of 142 decks)
- Spry and Mighty relevance 0.51 · 15.5% (22 of 142 decks)
- Restorative Technique relevance 0.48 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
- Give // Take relevance 0.46 · 10.6% (15 of 142 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.45 · 9.9% (14 of 142 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.30 · 43.0% (61 of 142 decks)
- Lessons from Life relevance 0.36 · 24.6% (35 of 142 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.39 · 14.1% (20 of 142 decks)
- Call Damage Control relevance 0.44 · 7.0% (10 of 142 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.36 · 16.2% (23 of 142 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.28 · 41.5% (59 of 142 decks)
- Go Nuts! relevance 0.43 · 6.3% (9 of 142 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.41 · 7.0% (10 of 142 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.33 · 17.6% (25 of 142 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.32 · 16.9% (24 of 142 decks)
- Winternight Stories relevance 0.40 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- Epic Fight relevance 0.40 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Mind into Matter relevance 0.32 · 16.2% (23 of 142 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.36 · 9.9% (14 of 142 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.31 · 13.4% (19 of 142 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.31 · 13.4% (19 of 142 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.35 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- Fangs of Kalonia relevance 0.33 · 6.3% (9 of 142 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.32 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Oracle's Restoration relevance 0.36 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Wear Down relevance 0.31 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.24 · 14.8% (21 of 142 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.27 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.25 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.23 · 15.5% (22 of 142 decks)
- Preposterous Proportions relevance 0.29 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.31 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Study the Classics relevance 0.31 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.26 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Worlds Within Worlds relevance 0.32 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.22 · 9.2% (13 of 142 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.16 · 27.5% (39 of 142 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.22 · 7.0% (10 of 142 decks)
- Ideas Unbound relevance 0.32 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.23 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Biorhythm relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Scale the Heights relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.21 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- Felling Blow relevance 0.30 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.12 · 43.0% (61 of 142 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.15 · 25.4% (36 of 142 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.13 · 32.4% (46 of 142 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.13 · 31.0% (44 of 142 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (6)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.30 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.23 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.24 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.12 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Avengers Tower relevance 0.49 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
- Baxter Building relevance 0.44 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.27 · 26.1% (37 of 142 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.35 · 7.0% (10 of 142 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.31 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
- Meditation Pools relevance 0.31 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.29 · 7.0% (10 of 142 decks)
- Paradox Gardens relevance 0.27 · 9.2% (13 of 142 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.19 · 34.5% (49 of 142 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.30 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.27 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Novijen, Heart of Progress relevance 0.25 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.23 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.22 · 14.1% (20 of 142 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.25 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.32 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.11 · 70.4% (100 of 142 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.24 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.18 · 19.7% (28 of 142 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.23 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Swarmyard relevance 0.30 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.22 · 7.0% (10 of 142 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.20 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.21 · 7.0% (10 of 142 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.19 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.17 · 18.3% (26 of 142 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.29 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.20 · 9.9% (14 of 142 decks)
- Surveillance Room relevance 0.31 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.19 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.16 · 14.1% (20 of 142 decks)
- Fountainport relevance 0.20 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.16 · 9.9% (14 of 142 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.19 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.17 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.13 · 21.8% (31 of 142 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.16 · 9.2% (13 of 142 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.15 · 9.9% (14 of 142 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.15 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
- Vastwood Fortification // Vastwood Thicket relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.18 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.14 · 9.2% (13 of 142 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.17 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.16 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.15 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
All lands (50)
- Pym Technologies relevance 0.49 · 17.6% (25 of 142 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.33 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.27 · 19.0% (27 of 142 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.18 · 54.9% (78 of 142 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.31 · 7.0% (10 of 142 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.27 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.26 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.18 · 36.6% (52 of 142 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.21 · 17.6% (25 of 142 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.22 · 16.9% (24 of 142 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.17 · 38.7% (55 of 142 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.23 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
- Mutant Town relevance 0.27 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.19 · 21.8% (31 of 142 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.18 · 25.4% (36 of 142 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.23 · 9.2% (13 of 142 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.23 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.21 · 12.0% (17 of 142 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.19 · 16.2% (23 of 142 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.17 · 23.9% (34 of 142 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.13 · 49.3% (70 of 142 decks)
- Guadosalam, Farplane Gateway relevance 0.27 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.22 · 7.0% (10 of 142 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.22 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.20 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- Multiversal Passage relevance 0.27 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Hadana's Climb // Winged Temple of Orazca relevance 0.23 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.15 · 16.2% (23 of 142 decks)
- Crossroads Village relevance 0.28 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.11 · 50.7% (72 of 142 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.14 · 24.6% (35 of 142 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.08 · 69.7% (99 of 142 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.19 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.10 · 45.1% (64 of 142 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.09 · 59.2% (84 of 142 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.16 · 7.0% (10 of 142 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.17 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (9 of 142 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.09 · 50.7% (72 of 142 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.18 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.20 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.19 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Lakeside Shack relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.10 · 25.4% (36 of 142 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.18 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.06 · 76.8% (109 of 142 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.16 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for The Astonishing Ant-Man, from 142 real Commander decks.