Cards like Luck Bobblehead
19× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
15% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Voltaic Key
3.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
- Voltaic Key 19%
- Manifold Key 18%
- Galvanic Key 1%
Cards like Universal Surveillance
11× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Tidings, Concentrate, Vivisurgeon's Insight, Brilliant Plan, Shared Discovery, Eagle Vision
Cards like Aetherize
2.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 35% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other blue decks
Cards
- Aetherize 36%
- Evacuation 28%
- Perplexing Test 1%
Cards like Etherium Sculptor
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards
- Etherium Sculptor 33%
- Foundry Inspector 24%
- Cloud Key 5%
Other options: Mana Matrix, Stone Calendar, Planar Gate, Helm of Awakening
Cards like Trophy Mage
2.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other blue decks
Cards
- Trophy Mage 16%
- Trinket Mage 11%
- Transit Mage 8%
- Treasure Mage 5%
- Tribute Mage 5%
Cards like Gilded Lotus
4.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Krark-Clan Ironworks
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Wayfarer's Bauble
3.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other blue decks
Cards
- Wayfarer's Bauble 25%
- Moonsilver Key 18%
- Expedition Map 8%
- Keys to the House 3%
- Traveler's Amulet 1%
- World Map 1%
- Wanderer's Twig 1%
Other options: Armillary Sphere, Braidwood Sextant, Ominous Parcel, Renegade Map
Cards like Transplant Theorist
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Clock of Omens
5.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
- Clock of Omens 24%
- Unwinding Clock 15%
Cards like Broodstar
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
- Broodstar 29%
- Filigree Attendant 9%
Cards like Fabricate
2.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other blue decks
Cards
- Fabricate 29%
- Scour for Scrap 28%
Cards like Sol Ring
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
80% of decks run one or more
vs. 80% of other blue decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 79%
- Basalt Monolith 20%
- Mana Vault 9%
- Grim Monolith 5%
Cards like Shimmer Dragon
4.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Tezzeret the Seeker
2.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Pongify
1.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other blue decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other blue decks
Cards
- Pongify 39%
- Rapid Hybridization 29%
Cards like Confirm Suspicions
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other blue decks
Cards
- Confirm Suspicions 28%
- Cancel 5%
- Disallow 5%
- Admiral's Order 4%
- Saw It Coming 1%
Other options: Scatter to the Winds, Forceful Denial, Fervent Denial, Twist Reality, Ertai's Scorn, Broken Concentration, Sinister Sabotage, Wizard's Retort
Cards like Thran Dynamo
1.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Ichor Elixir, Sisay's Ring, Ur-Golem's Eye
Cards like Phyrexian Metamorph
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Cyberdrive Awakener
11× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Five Hundred Year Diary relevance 0.53 · 66.3% (53 of 80 decks)
- Tangletrove Kelp relevance 0.53 · 65.0% (52 of 80 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.45 · 65.0% (52 of 80 decks)
- Tamiyo's Journal relevance 0.45 · 53.8% (43 of 80 decks)
- Erdwal Illuminator relevance 0.51 · 36.3% (29 of 80 decks)
- Inspiring Statuary relevance 0.43 · 52.5% (42 of 80 decks)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.39 · 60.0% (48 of 80 decks)
- Piper Wright, Publick Reporter relevance 0.48 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- Confirm Suspicions relevance 0.45 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Nyssa of Traken relevance 0.46 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- In Too Deep relevance 0.43 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Junk Winder relevance 0.35 · 42.5% (34 of 80 decks)
- Ethereal Investigator relevance 0.37 · 36.3% (29 of 80 decks)
- Trail of Evidence relevance 0.41 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Universal Surveillance relevance 0.38 · 31.3% (25 of 80 decks)
- Nick Valentine, Private Eye relevance 0.41 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Shimmer Dragon relevance 0.34 · 41.3% (33 of 80 decks)
- Moonlit Meditation relevance 0.35 · 36.3% (29 of 80 decks)
- Lucky Clover relevance 0.45 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.25 · 68.8% (55 of 80 decks)
- Broodstar relevance 0.36 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.27 · 55.0% (44 of 80 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.27 · 53.8% (43 of 80 decks)
- Masterful Replication relevance 0.37 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Deduce relevance 0.33 · 31.3% (25 of 80 decks)
- Martha Jones relevance 0.39 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Senator Peacock relevance 0.37 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Secrets of the Key relevance 0.38 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Fleeting Memories relevance 0.41 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Daring Sleuth // Bearer of Overwhelming Truths relevance 0.40 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Osgood, Operation Double relevance 0.36 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Luck Bobblehead relevance 0.34 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Mm'menon, the Right Hand relevance 0.29 · 30.0% (24 of 80 decks)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.31 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Krark-Clan Ironworks relevance 0.30 · 26.3% (21 of 80 decks)
- Transplant Theorist relevance 0.33 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Clock of Omens relevance 0.30 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Hold for Questioning relevance 0.38 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.24 · 42.5% (34 of 80 decks)
- Hard Evidence relevance 0.31 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Intelligence Bobblehead relevance 0.32 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 0.28 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Chancellor of Tales relevance 0.37 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Follow the Bodies relevance 0.35 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Radiant Lotus relevance 0.32 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.22 · 43.8% (35 of 80 decks)
- Perception Bobblehead relevance 0.31 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Ironheart, Clever Champion relevance 0.31 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- The Mechanist, Aerial Artisan relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Vedalken Engineer relevance 0.29 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Tangletrove Kelp relevance 0.53 · 65.0% (52 of 80 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.45 · 65.0% (52 of 80 decks)
- Erdwal Illuminator relevance 0.51 · 36.3% (29 of 80 decks)
- Piper Wright, Publick Reporter relevance 0.48 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- Nyssa of Traken relevance 0.46 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Junk Winder relevance 0.35 · 42.5% (34 of 80 decks)
- Ethereal Investigator relevance 0.37 · 36.3% (29 of 80 decks)
- Nick Valentine, Private Eye relevance 0.41 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Shimmer Dragon relevance 0.34 · 41.3% (33 of 80 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.25 · 68.8% (55 of 80 decks)
- Broodstar relevance 0.36 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.27 · 55.0% (44 of 80 decks)
- Martha Jones relevance 0.39 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Senator Peacock relevance 0.37 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Daring Sleuth // Bearer of Overwhelming Truths relevance 0.40 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Osgood, Operation Double relevance 0.36 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Mm'menon, the Right Hand relevance 0.29 · 30.0% (24 of 80 decks)
- Transplant Theorist relevance 0.33 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.24 · 42.5% (34 of 80 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 0.28 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Chancellor of Tales relevance 0.37 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.22 · 43.8% (35 of 80 decks)
- Ironheart, Clever Champion relevance 0.31 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- The Mechanist, Aerial Artisan relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Vedalken Engineer relevance 0.29 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Floodhound relevance 0.31 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Loyal Inventor relevance 0.27 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Kuldotha Forgemaster relevance 0.27 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Master of Etherium relevance 0.24 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Katara, Bending Prodigy relevance 0.29 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.20 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- Temporal Adept relevance 0.30 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Synth Infiltrator relevance 0.27 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Skyswimmer Koi relevance 0.29 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 0.25 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Steelswarm Operator relevance 0.25 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Edgar, King of Figaro relevance 0.28 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Merchant's Dockhand relevance 0.28 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Filigree Attendant relevance 0.25 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Grand Architect relevance 0.23 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Alexi, Zephyr Mage relevance 0.28 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Forensic Researcher relevance 0.24 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Stridehangar Automaton relevance 0.22 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Trophy Mage relevance 0.21 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Renowned Weaponsmith relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.18 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Sage of Lat-Nam relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.21 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Curie, Emergent Intelligence relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Hypnotic Sprite // Mesmeric Glare relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Five Hundred Year Diary relevance 0.53 · 66.3% (53 of 80 decks)
- Tamiyo's Journal relevance 0.45 · 53.8% (43 of 80 decks)
- Inspiring Statuary relevance 0.43 · 52.5% (42 of 80 decks)
- Lucky Clover relevance 0.45 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Luck Bobblehead relevance 0.34 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Krark-Clan Ironworks relevance 0.30 · 26.3% (21 of 80 decks)
- Clock of Omens relevance 0.30 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Intelligence Bobblehead relevance 0.32 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Radiant Lotus relevance 0.32 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Perception Bobblehead relevance 0.31 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Elementalist's Palette relevance 0.34 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.29 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Strength Bobblehead relevance 0.31 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Charisma Bobblehead relevance 0.31 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Endurance Bobblehead relevance 0.30 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Erratic Portal relevance 0.32 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.26 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Agility Bobblehead relevance 0.30 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Sonic Screwdriver relevance 0.28 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Portal of Sanctuary relevance 0.31 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- The Millennium Calendar relevance 0.26 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Magnifying Glass relevance 0.28 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.23 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.22 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Brass Infiniscope relevance 0.28 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Hero's Blade relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Prototype Portal relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Voltaic Key relevance 0.21 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Worldwalker Helm relevance 0.23 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Brotherhood Vertibird relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Transmutation Font relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.19 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Esoteric Duplicator relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Nuka-Cola Vending Machine relevance 0.25 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.19 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.17 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.16 · 30.0% (24 of 80 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.19 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Lux Cannon relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- The Enigma Jewel // Locus of Enlightenment relevance 0.21 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.18 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Letter of Acceptance relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Manascape Refractor relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Arc Reactor relevance 0.22 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.16 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Mindslaver relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Surgical Skullbomb relevance 0.21 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Tamiyo's Logbook relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Moonsnare Prototype relevance 0.19 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Repurposing Bay relevance 0.18 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- In Too Deep relevance 0.43 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Trail of Evidence relevance 0.41 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Moonlit Meditation relevance 0.35 · 36.3% (29 of 80 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.27 · 53.8% (43 of 80 decks)
- Fleeting Memories relevance 0.41 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Hold for Questioning relevance 0.38 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- The Antiquities War relevance 0.29 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Font of Magic relevance 0.29 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Curious Inquiry relevance 0.29 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Tamiyo Meets the Story Circle relevance 0.29 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Rune of Flight relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Case of the Filched Falcon relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Fateful Discovery relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Does Machines relevance 0.20 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Disappear relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Artificer Class relevance 0.19 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.16 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Artificer's Intuition relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Sunken Hope relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.16 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Power Artifact relevance 0.16 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Struggle for Project Purity relevance 0.16 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Ghostly Touch relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Nerd Rage relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.13 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Sunken Field relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Words of Wind relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Traveler's Cloak relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.12 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Infinite Reflection relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Dissipation Field relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Weftwalking relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- The Phasing of Zhalfir relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Confiscate relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.09 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.09 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.08 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.10 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Thought Reflection relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Control Magic relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Impostor Syndrome relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Shadow of the Second Sun relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
All instants (50)
- Confirm Suspicions relevance 0.45 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Masterful Replication relevance 0.37 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Deduce relevance 0.33 · 31.3% (25 of 80 decks)
- Secrets of the Key relevance 0.38 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.20 · 38.8% (31 of 80 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.22 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.22 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Mirrorform relevance 0.24 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Cerebral Download relevance 0.28 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Rethink relevance 0.30 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- String of Disappearances relevance 0.26 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Assert Authority relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Oona's Grace relevance 0.25 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Prohibit relevance 0.26 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Withdraw relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Urza's Command relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Reality Heist relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Stoic Rebuttal relevance 0.21 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Spell Swindle relevance 0.21 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Disappearing Act relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Spell Snuff relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.19 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Reverse the Polarity relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.15 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.13 · 35.0% (28 of 80 decks)
- Zimone's Hypothesis relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Peel from Reality relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Familiar's Ruse relevance 0.20 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Everdream relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Turn to Frog relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Admiral's Order relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Out Cold relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Long-Term Plans relevance 0.18 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- This Town Ain't Big Enough relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Divert Disaster relevance 0.19 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Memory Deluge relevance 0.19 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Stroke of Genius relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.17 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 0.18 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Cyber Conversion relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Katara's Reversal relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Reins of Power relevance 0.17 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Alchemist's Retrieval relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.15 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.16 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Bounce Off relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.13 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Thassa's Intervention relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.11 · 36.3% (29 of 80 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.39 · 60.0% (48 of 80 decks)
- Universal Surveillance relevance 0.38 · 31.3% (25 of 80 decks)
- Hard Evidence relevance 0.31 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Follow the Bodies relevance 0.35 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.22 · 36.3% (29 of 80 decks)
- Gone Missing relevance 0.33 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.23 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Reverse Engineer relevance 0.27 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.23 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Echo Storm relevance 0.27 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Fade Away relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Boomerang Basics relevance 0.20 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.14 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Memories Returning relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Modify Memory relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Press for Answers relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Distant Memories relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.12 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Baral's Expertise relevance 0.16 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Relm's Sketching relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Reminisce relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Switcheroo relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.12 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.09 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.11 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.11 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Day's Undoing relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Mitotic Manipulation relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Minds Aglow relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Replication Technique relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.10 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Rise from the Tides relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Aether Gale relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- One with the Machine relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Splash Portal relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Cut Your Losses relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Tasha's Hideous Laughter relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Traumatize relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (7)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.31 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.20 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Karn, Living Legacy relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.18 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Jace, Unraveler of Secrets relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Tezzeret, Artifice Master relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.07 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.24 · 61.3% (49 of 80 decks)
- Sanctum of Eternity relevance 0.36 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Scene of the Crime relevance 0.32 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.19 · 36.3% (29 of 80 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.20 · 26.3% (21 of 80 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.22 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.18 · 32.5% (26 of 80 decks)
- Study Hall relevance 0.26 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Secluded Starforge relevance 0.23 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.20 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.15 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 0.19 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.18 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.15 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.18 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Roadside Reliquary relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.19 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.17 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.13 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.14 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.16 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- HELIOS One relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.15 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- The Great Mound relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Clive's Hideaway relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.12 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.14 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Big Apple, 3 a.m. relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Fountainport relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.12 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.13 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.12 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.12 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.14 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.12 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.10 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Capital City relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Labyrinth of Skophos relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- The Gold Saucer relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Diamond City relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Arch of Orazca relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.10 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
All lands (35)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.16 · 46.3% (37 of 80 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.17 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Maestros Theater relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.14 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.16 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Primal Amulet // Primal Wellspring relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Sunken Citadel relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Mishra's Workshop relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.11 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Thaumatic Compass // Spires of Orazca relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Obscura Storefront relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Svyelunite Temple relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Dowsing Dagger // Lost Vale relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Urza's Workshop relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.09 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.09 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.09 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 88.8% (71 of 80 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for James, Wandering Dad // Follow Him, from 80 real Commander decks.