Cards like Ephemerate
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
87% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Bant decks
55% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Ephemerate 70%
- Cloudshift 57%
- Momentary Blink 15%
- Blur 6%
- Scrollshift 4%
- Flicker of Fate 4%
- Acrobatic Maneuver 4%
- Turn to Mist 2%
Other options: Justiciar's Portal, Liberate
Cards like Clone
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.92 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Clone 27%
- Waxen Shapethief 24%
- Stunt Double 22%
- Mirror Image 19%
Other options: Sakashima's Protege
Cards like Felidar Guardian
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Skyskipper Duo, Saltskitter, Wispweaver Angel
Cards like Clever Impersonator
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.76 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Clever Impersonator 41%
- Flesh Duplicate 25%
- Gigantoplasm 11%
Cards like Eerie Interlude
12× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Bant decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Eerie Interlude 32%
- Ghostway 14%
- Lae'zel's Acrobatics 13%
Cards like Wall of Omens
3.1× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Bant decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Bant decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Wall of Omens 18%
- Spirited Companion 11%
- Wall of Blossoms 11%
- Elvish Visionary 6%
- Helpful Hunter 5%
- Gallant Citizen 3%
- Kindly Customer 3%
- Pond Prophet 2%
- Llanowar Visionary 2%
Other options: Generous Stray, Roving Harper, Jungle Barrier, Owlbear, Nimble Innovator, Wistful Selkie, Salt Road Packbeast, Joraga Visionary, Pyknite, Search Party Captain, Kavu Climber, Striped Bears, Shaman of Spring, Carven Caryatid, Arctic Wolves, Multani's Acolyte, Rhox Oracle, Merchant of Secrets, Council of Advisors
Cards like Avacyn's Pilgrim
2.0× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other Bant decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 13% of other Bant decks
0.89 per deck on average
vs. 0.48 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Avacyn's Pilgrim 31%
- Llanowar Elves 24%
- Elvish Mystic 20%
- Fyndhorn Elves 12%
Other options: Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Goobbue Gardener, Nantuko Elder, Gyre Engineer, Boreal Druid, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Steward of Valeron, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Jwari Shapeshifter
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Teleportation Circle
11× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Eternal Witness
12× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Bant decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Eternal Witness 58%
- Timeless Witness 11%
Other options: Greenwarden of Murasa, Elvish Regrower, Wildwood Escort
Cards like Restoration Angel
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Appa, Steadfast Guardian
6.0× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Essence Flux
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Spaceshift
Cards like Badgermole Cub
17× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Bant decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Sol Ring
2.3× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
82% of decks run one or more
vs. 79% of other Bant decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
0.96 per deck on average
vs. 0.84 in other Bant decks
Cards like Clifftop Lookout
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Contagious Vorrac, Floriferous Vinewall, Overgrown Pest
Cards like Grand Abolisher
3.6× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Bant decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Grand Abolisher 18%
- Voice of Victory 11%
Cards like Mystic Remora
1.7× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other Bant decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Bant decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Mystic Remora 20%
- Rhystic Study 15%
Cards like Soulherder
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Toph, the Blind Bandit
16× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Coiling Oracle
7.5× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Bant decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Coiling Oracle 36%
- Risen Reef 4%
Cards like Bloom Tender
1.5× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Bant decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Bant decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Bloom Tender 18%
- Faeburrow Elder 17%
Cards like Wood Elves
12× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Bant decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Bant decks
Cards like Farhaven Elf
10× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Primeval Herald, Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary, Quirion Trailblazer, Ondu Giant, Wild Wanderer
Cards like Ghostly Flicker
5.0× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Bant decks
Cards like Brago, King Eternal
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Brainstorm
5.8× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Bant decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.18 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Brainstorm 17%
- Brainsurge 2%
Cards like Waterbender's Restoration
5.5× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.18 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Bant decks
All top picks (50)
- Katara, the Fearless relevance 0.33 · 76.3% (87 of 114 decks)
- Chameleon, Master of Disguise relevance 0.34 · 53.5% (61 of 114 decks)
- Spark Double relevance 0.32 · 52.6% (60 of 114 decks)
- Icewind Stalwart relevance 0.37 · 34.2% (39 of 114 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.34 · 41.2% (47 of 114 decks)
- Sakashima the Impostor relevance 0.37 · 34.2% (39 of 114 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.35 · 36.8% (42 of 114 decks)
- Clone relevance 0.38 · 27.2% (31 of 114 decks)
- Vizier of Many Faces relevance 0.40 · 21.1% (24 of 114 decks)
- Phantasmal Image relevance 0.37 · 28.9% (33 of 114 decks)
- Altered Ego relevance 0.39 · 22.8% (26 of 114 decks)
- Undercover Operative relevance 0.40 · 19.3% (22 of 114 decks)
- Naga Fleshcrafter relevance 0.39 · 22.8% (26 of 114 decks)
- Waxen Shapethief relevance 0.38 · 23.7% (27 of 114 decks)
- Mirrorhall Mimic // Ghastly Mimicry relevance 0.40 · 18.4% (21 of 114 decks)
- Copycrook relevance 0.40 · 18.4% (21 of 114 decks)
- Visage Bandit relevance 0.40 · 18.4% (21 of 114 decks)
- Stunt Double relevance 0.38 · 21.9% (25 of 114 decks)
- Flesh Duplicate relevance 0.37 · 24.6% (28 of 114 decks)
- Mirror Image relevance 0.38 · 19.3% (22 of 114 decks)
- Toph, the Blind Bandit relevance 0.38 · 19.3% (22 of 114 decks)
- Roaming Throne relevance 0.34 · 29.8% (34 of 114 decks)
- Jwari Shapeshifter relevance 0.35 · 25.4% (29 of 114 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.30 · 43.0% (49 of 114 decks)
- The Legend of Kyoshi // Avatar Kyoshi relevance 0.39 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.33 · 30.7% (35 of 114 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.38 · 17.5% (20 of 114 decks)
- Appa, Steadfast Guardian relevance 0.29 · 44.7% (51 of 114 decks)
- Aang, Swift Savior // Aang and La, Ocean's Fury relevance 0.28 · 47.4% (54 of 114 decks)
- Haru, Hidden Talent relevance 0.34 · 23.7% (27 of 114 decks)
- Tatyova, Steward of Tides relevance 0.39 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- Momo, Friendly Flier relevance 0.38 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Monk Gyatso relevance 0.35 · 18.4% (21 of 114 decks)
- Aang, the Last Airbender relevance 0.35 · 19.3% (22 of 114 decks)
- Jyoti, Moag Ancient relevance 0.39 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Avatar's Wrath relevance 0.25 · 47.4% (54 of 114 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.33 · 20.2% (23 of 114 decks)
- Gigantoplasm relevance 0.38 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.19 · 72.8% (83 of 114 decks)
- Airbender's Reversal relevance 0.33 · 20.2% (23 of 114 decks)
- Jolrael, Voice of Zhalfir relevance 0.38 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Great Divide Guide relevance 0.30 · 26.3% (30 of 114 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.37 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Sakashima's Student relevance 0.38 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Felidar Guardian relevance 0.22 · 57.9% (66 of 114 decks)
- South Pole Voyager relevance 0.31 · 21.9% (25 of 114 decks)
- Supportive Parents relevance 0.38 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.32 · 16.7% (19 of 114 decks)
- Earth Kingdom General relevance 0.37 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Airbender Ascension relevance 0.23 · 49.1% (56 of 114 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Katara, the Fearless relevance 0.33 · 76.3% (87 of 114 decks)
- Chameleon, Master of Disguise relevance 0.34 · 53.5% (61 of 114 decks)
- Spark Double relevance 0.32 · 52.6% (60 of 114 decks)
- Icewind Stalwart relevance 0.37 · 34.2% (39 of 114 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.34 · 41.2% (47 of 114 decks)
- Sakashima the Impostor relevance 0.37 · 34.2% (39 of 114 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.35 · 36.8% (42 of 114 decks)
- Clone relevance 0.38 · 27.2% (31 of 114 decks)
- Vizier of Many Faces relevance 0.40 · 21.1% (24 of 114 decks)
- Phantasmal Image relevance 0.37 · 28.9% (33 of 114 decks)
- Altered Ego relevance 0.39 · 22.8% (26 of 114 decks)
- Undercover Operative relevance 0.40 · 19.3% (22 of 114 decks)
- Naga Fleshcrafter relevance 0.39 · 22.8% (26 of 114 decks)
- Waxen Shapethief relevance 0.38 · 23.7% (27 of 114 decks)
- Mirrorhall Mimic // Ghastly Mimicry relevance 0.40 · 18.4% (21 of 114 decks)
- Visage Bandit relevance 0.40 · 18.4% (21 of 114 decks)
- Copycrook relevance 0.40 · 18.4% (21 of 114 decks)
- Stunt Double relevance 0.38 · 21.9% (25 of 114 decks)
- Flesh Duplicate relevance 0.37 · 24.6% (28 of 114 decks)
- Toph, the Blind Bandit relevance 0.38 · 19.3% (22 of 114 decks)
- Mirror Image relevance 0.38 · 19.3% (22 of 114 decks)
- Roaming Throne relevance 0.34 · 29.8% (34 of 114 decks)
- Jwari Shapeshifter relevance 0.35 · 25.4% (29 of 114 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.30 · 43.0% (49 of 114 decks)
- The Legend of Kyoshi // Avatar Kyoshi relevance 0.39 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.33 · 30.7% (35 of 114 decks)
- Appa, Steadfast Guardian relevance 0.29 · 44.7% (51 of 114 decks)
- Aang, Swift Savior // Aang and La, Ocean's Fury relevance 0.28 · 47.4% (54 of 114 decks)
- Haru, Hidden Talent relevance 0.34 · 23.7% (27 of 114 decks)
- Tatyova, Steward of Tides relevance 0.39 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- Momo, Friendly Flier relevance 0.38 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Monk Gyatso relevance 0.35 · 18.4% (21 of 114 decks)
- Aang, the Last Airbender relevance 0.35 · 19.3% (22 of 114 decks)
- Jyoti, Moag Ancient relevance 0.39 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Gigantoplasm relevance 0.38 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.19 · 72.8% (83 of 114 decks)
- Jolrael, Voice of Zhalfir relevance 0.38 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Great Divide Guide relevance 0.30 · 26.3% (30 of 114 decks)
- Sakashima's Student relevance 0.38 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Felidar Guardian relevance 0.22 · 57.9% (66 of 114 decks)
- South Pole Voyager relevance 0.31 · 21.9% (25 of 114 decks)
- Supportive Parents relevance 0.38 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Earth Kingdom General relevance 0.37 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- White Plume Adventurer relevance 0.33 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Guardian of Ghirapur relevance 0.34 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- Restoration Angel relevance 0.18 · 70.2% (80 of 114 decks)
- Avatar Kyoshi, Earthbender relevance 0.37 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
- The Legend of Yangchen // Avatar Yangchen relevance 0.32 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Preston, the Vanisher relevance 0.26 · 36.0% (41 of 114 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.28 · 27.2% (31 of 114 decks)
All artifacts (47)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.33 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Mirror Box relevance 0.37 · 7.0% (8 of 114 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.31 · 11.4% (13 of 114 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.27 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.33 · 5.3% (6 of 114 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.30 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.28 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.29 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Glider Staff relevance 0.32 · 6.1% (7 of 114 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.30 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
- Talisman of Progress relevance 0.28 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Altar of the Brood relevance 0.28 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.28 · 4.4% (5 of 114 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.21 · 16.7% (19 of 114 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.27 · 4.4% (5 of 114 decks)
- Pentad Prism relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.28 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.25 · 5.3% (6 of 114 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.13 · 46.5% (53 of 114 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.21 · 4.4% (5 of 114 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.20 · 5.3% (6 of 114 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.16 · 18.4% (21 of 114 decks)
- Blade of Selves relevance 0.24 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.09 · 58.8% (67 of 114 decks)
- Sword of Hearth and Home relevance 0.18 · 4.4% (5 of 114 decks)
- White Lotus Tile relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Campfire relevance 0.23 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Null Rod relevance 0.23 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.15 · 4.4% (5 of 114 decks)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.21 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.18 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 82.5% (94 of 114 decks)
- Mirror of Life Trapping relevance 0.19 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.19 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.19 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Semblance Anvil relevance 0.19 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- The Mind Stone relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.18 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Azorius Signet relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.15 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.13 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.12 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.10 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.38 · 17.5% (20 of 114 decks)
- Airbender Ascension relevance 0.23 · 49.1% (56 of 114 decks)
- Deafening Silence relevance 0.36 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
- Aang's Iceberg relevance 0.34 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.32 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Food Chain relevance 0.33 · 7.0% (8 of 114 decks)
- Touch the Spirit Realm relevance 0.29 · 11.4% (13 of 114 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.25 · 20.2% (23 of 114 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.31 · 7.0% (8 of 114 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.28 · 11.4% (13 of 114 decks)
- Cream of the Crop relevance 0.32 · 5.3% (6 of 114 decks)
- Solid Ground relevance 0.32 · 4.4% (5 of 114 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.28 · 4.4% (5 of 114 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.22 · 14.9% (17 of 114 decks)
- Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.25 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
- Path to Redemption relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.22 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.23 · 6.1% (7 of 114 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.23 · 6.1% (7 of 114 decks)
- Teleportation Circle relevance 0.16 · 29.8% (34 of 114 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.22 · 6.1% (7 of 114 decks)
- Birthing Ritual relevance 0.25 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Waterbender Ascension relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.20 · 4.4% (5 of 114 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.16 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Honest Work relevance 0.25 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.18 · 7.0% (8 of 114 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.21 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Sokka's Charge relevance 0.21 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Invasion Tactics relevance 0.24 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Far Traveler relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Tocasia's Welcome relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Tale of Katara and Toph relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Descendants' Path relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Terra Eternal relevance 0.23 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Impostor Syndrome relevance 0.23 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Master's Guidance relevance 0.22 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Stony Silence relevance 0.20 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Team Avatar relevance 0.20 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Gleaming Splendor relevance 0.19 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.19 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.18 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.18 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.17 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Kellan Joins Up relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
All instants (50)
- Airbender's Reversal relevance 0.33 · 20.2% (23 of 114 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.37 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.32 · 16.7% (19 of 114 decks)
- Enter the Avatar State relevance 0.34 · 11.4% (13 of 114 decks)
- It'll Quench Ya! relevance 0.35 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Earthshape relevance 0.36 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.27 · 28.9% (33 of 114 decks)
- Waterbender's Restoration relevance 0.30 · 16.7% (19 of 114 decks)
- Airbending Lesson relevance 0.31 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.33 · 11.4% (13 of 114 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.30 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Silence relevance 0.31 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.29 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.27 · 20.2% (23 of 114 decks)
- Hide on the Ceiling relevance 0.29 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.32 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.31 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.29 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Parting Gust relevance 0.25 · 20.2% (23 of 114 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.30 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Accumulate Wisdom relevance 0.32 · 5.3% (6 of 114 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.21 · 36.0% (41 of 114 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.30 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.25 · 16.7% (19 of 114 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.30 · 6.1% (7 of 114 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.25 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 0.28 · 5.3% (6 of 114 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.21 · 21.1% (24 of 114 decks)
- Cloudshift relevance 0.15 · 57.0% (65 of 114 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.24 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.17 · 40.4% (46 of 114 decks)
- Spider-Sense relevance 0.28 · 4.4% (5 of 114 decks)
- Getaway Glamer relevance 0.26 · 6.1% (7 of 114 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.26 · 6.1% (7 of 114 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.27 · 4.4% (5 of 114 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.24 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
- Ghostway relevance 0.21 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.25 · 5.3% (6 of 114 decks)
- Clever Concealment relevance 0.26 · 4.4% (5 of 114 decks)
- Flare of Fortitude relevance 0.25 · 4.4% (5 of 114 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.19 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Swords to Plowshares relevance 0.12 · 59.6% (68 of 114 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.17 · 28.1% (32 of 114 decks)
- Lae'zel's Acrobatics relevance 0.19 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.23 · 6.1% (7 of 114 decks)
- Teferi's Time Twist relevance 0.23 · 4.4% (5 of 114 decks)
- Dovin's Veto relevance 0.21 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Momentary Blink relevance 0.18 · 14.9% (17 of 114 decks)
- Scrollshift relevance 0.23 · 4.4% (5 of 114 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.23 · 4.4% (5 of 114 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Avatar's Wrath relevance 0.25 · 47.4% (54 of 114 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.33 · 20.2% (23 of 114 decks)
- Boomerang Basics relevance 0.34 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.31 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.27 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Seismic Sense relevance 0.33 · 5.3% (6 of 114 decks)
- Another Round relevance 0.26 · 14.9% (17 of 114 decks)
- Earthbending Lesson relevance 0.33 · 4.4% (5 of 114 decks)
- Tale of Momo relevance 0.30 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.21 · 28.1% (32 of 114 decks)
- Daydream relevance 0.28 · 6.1% (7 of 114 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.21 · 18.4% (21 of 114 decks)
- Waterbending Lesson relevance 0.28 · 4.4% (5 of 114 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.22 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.31 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.27 · 5.3% (6 of 114 decks)
- Rockalanche relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.26 · 4.4% (5 of 114 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.24 · 6.1% (7 of 114 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.28 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- United Front relevance 0.25 · 5.3% (6 of 114 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.17 · 26.3% (30 of 114 decks)
- True Ancestry relevance 0.26 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.20 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.21 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
- Ascend from Avernus relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Earth Rumble relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Planar Outburst relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Ember Island Production relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Starfall Invocation relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Morningtide's Light relevance 0.21 · 5.3% (6 of 114 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.21 · 4.4% (5 of 114 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.17 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- Supreme Verdict relevance 0.20 · 6.1% (7 of 114 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.19 · 4.4% (5 of 114 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.24 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.21 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Splash Portal relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.19 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.19 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Vanquish the Horde relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Baral's Expertise relevance 0.23 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Emergent Sequence relevance 0.23 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Season of the Burrow relevance 0.22 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.22 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Winds of Abandon relevance 0.18 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Croaking Counterpart relevance 0.20 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Hour of Revelation relevance 0.20 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (7)
- The Eternal Wanderer relevance 0.22 · 7.0% (8 of 114 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.23 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.23 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Ugin, the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.23 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Venser, the Sojourner relevance 0.16 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.20 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.38 · 25.4% (29 of 114 decks)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.35 · 22.8% (26 of 114 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.30 · 30.7% (35 of 114 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.34 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.30 · 22.8% (26 of 114 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.37 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Jasmine Dragon Tea Shop relevance 0.32 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.32 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- Restless Anchorage relevance 0.36 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
- Kyoshi Village relevance 0.33 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Restless Prairie relevance 0.35 · 6.1% (7 of 114 decks)
- Meditation Pools relevance 0.32 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
- North Pole Gates relevance 0.31 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.20 · 28.9% (33 of 114 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.23 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.20 · 25.4% (29 of 114 decks)
- Ally Encampment relevance 0.26 · 6.1% (7 of 114 decks)
- Blinkmoth Nexus relevance 0.31 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.25 · 7.0% (8 of 114 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.23 · 11.4% (13 of 114 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.20 · 17.5% (20 of 114 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.26 · 5.3% (6 of 114 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.26 · 5.3% (6 of 114 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.23 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Temple of Enlightenment relevance 0.21 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- Meticulous Archive relevance 0.22 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.23 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.21 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.21 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Celestial Colonnade relevance 0.28 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.20 · 11.4% (13 of 114 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.24 · 4.4% (5 of 114 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.20 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.21 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
- Tranquil Landscape relevance 0.18 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.25 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.25 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Spara's Headquarters relevance 0.14 · 38.6% (44 of 114 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Crawling Barrens relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Ondu Inversion // Ondu Skyruins relevance 0.23 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.23 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Mutavault relevance 0.26 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Irrigated Farmland relevance 0.19 · 5.3% (6 of 114 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.22 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.17 · 4.4% (5 of 114 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.13 · 17.5% (20 of 114 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.18 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
All lands (50)
- Rumble Arena relevance 0.37 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.32 · 11.4% (13 of 114 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.30 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.34 · 5.3% (6 of 114 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.27 · 17.5% (20 of 114 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.28 · 11.4% (13 of 114 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.28 · 11.4% (13 of 114 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.28 · 11.4% (13 of 114 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.28 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.27 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.26 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.24 · 17.5% (20 of 114 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.27 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Port Town relevance 0.24 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.27 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.24 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.27 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.26 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.24 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Urban Retreat relevance 0.23 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.24 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.25 · 11.4% (13 of 114 decks)
- Skycloud Expanse relevance 0.23 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.26 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Tundra relevance 0.23 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Floodfarm Verge relevance 0.24 · 11.4% (13 of 114 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.23 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.21 · 21.1% (24 of 114 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.23 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.23 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.15 · 49.1% (56 of 114 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.18 · 31.6% (36 of 114 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.31 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.21 · 18.4% (21 of 114 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.25 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.19 · 26.3% (30 of 114 decks)
- Sea of Clouds relevance 0.19 · 26.3% (30 of 114 decks)
- Tarnished Citadel relevance 0.27 · 4.4% (5 of 114 decks)
- Adarkar Wastes relevance 0.18 · 29.8% (34 of 114 decks)
- Deserted Beach relevance 0.20 · 19.3% (22 of 114 decks)
- Cascading Cataracts relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Tranquil Cove relevance 0.25 · 5.3% (6 of 114 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.26 · 4.4% (5 of 114 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.16 · 36.0% (41 of 114 decks)
- White Lotus Hideout relevance 0.28 · 3.5% (4 of 114 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.22 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Seachrome Coast relevance 0.23 · 7.0% (8 of 114 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.17 · 28.9% (33 of 114 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.15 · 42.1% (48 of 114 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.17 · 25.4% (29 of 114 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Aang, at the Crossroads // Aang, Destined Savior, from 114 real Commander decks.