Cards like Agility Bobblehead
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
38% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
2.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Etherium Sculptor
2.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
38% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Mana Matrix, Cloud Key, Stone Calendar, Planar Gate, Helm of Awakening
Cards like Relm's Sketching
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Phyrexian Metamorph
19× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other blue decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Scour for Scrap
5.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other blue decks
Cards
- Scour for Scrap 38%
- Fabricate 31%
Cards like Artificer Class
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
77% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.92 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
- Artificer Class 62%
- Does Machines 31%
Cards like Whispersilk Cloak
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Sculpting Steel
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sculpting Steel 54%
- Mirage Mirror 15%
Cards like Mirrormade
6.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Enter the Enigma
6.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Pym Particles, Touch of Invisibility
Cards like Slither Blade
3.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other blue decks
Cards
- Slither Blade 15%
- Mist-Cloaked Herald 15%
- Invisible Stalker 8%
- Triton Shorestalker 8%
- Gudul Lurker 8%
- Phantom Ninja 8%
Other options: Tidal Kraken, Talas Warrior, Phantom Warrior, Plasma Elemental, Latch Seeker, Mystic of the Hidden Way, Metathran Soldier, Covert Operative
Cards like Manifold Key
3.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
- Manifold Key 62%
- Filigree Sages 15%
- Voltaic Key 8%
Other options: Synod Artificer, Galvanic Key, Voltaic Construct
Cards like Strionic Resonator
20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Rhystic Study
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other blue decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other blue decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 38%
- Mystic Remora 23%
Cards like Solemn Simulacrum
9.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Blightsteel Colossus
7.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Nettlecyst
5.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
- Nettlecyst 38%
- Adaptive Omnitool 8%
Cards like The Reality Chip
4.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards like Diversion Unit
4.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
15% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other blue decks
Cards like Quantum Misalignment
3.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Multiversal Recruitment
Cards like Cyclonic Rift
3.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.34 in other blue decks
Cards like Thran Dynamo
3.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
- Thran Dynamo 23%
- Hedron Archive 15%
- Sisay's Ring 8%
- Ur-Golem's Eye 8%
Other options: Ichor Elixir, Ring of the Lucii
Cards like Spine of Ish Sah
2.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Junk Diver, Scrap Trawler
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 63% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Swan Song
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other blue decks
Cards
- Swan Song 38%
- Strix Serenade 8%
Cards like Trophy Mage
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other blue decks
All top picks (50)
- Agility Bobblehead relevance 0.31 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Artificer Class relevance 0.27 · 61.5% (8 of 13 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.29 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- K-9, Mark I relevance 0.28 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Strionic Resonator relevance 0.28 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Strength Bobblehead relevance 0.29 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Perception Bobblehead relevance 0.29 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.24 · 61.5% (8 of 13 decks)
- Auton Soldier relevance 0.23 · 61.5% (8 of 13 decks)
- Intelligence Bobblehead relevance 0.29 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Endurance Bobblehead relevance 0.29 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Charisma Bobblehead relevance 0.29 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Luck Bobblehead relevance 0.28 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Donatello, Way with Machines relevance 0.27 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.27 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Worldwalker Helm relevance 0.22 · 61.5% (8 of 13 decks)
- Krang, Master Mind relevance 0.25 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Donatello's Technique relevance 0.27 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Does Machines relevance 0.26 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.21 · 53.8% (7 of 13 decks)
- Sonic Screwdriver relevance 0.26 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.26 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Spine of Ish Sah relevance 0.24 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.22 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Master Transmuter relevance 0.20 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.17 · 61.5% (8 of 13 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.21 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.21 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.17 · 61.5% (8 of 13 decks)
- Darksteel Forge relevance 0.21 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Donatello, Mutant Mechanic relevance 0.23 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.20 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Winged Boots relevance 0.21 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Fireshrieker relevance 0.22 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.18 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Blightsteel Colossus relevance 0.21 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.19 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Saheeli's Artistry relevance 0.22 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.15 · 61.5% (8 of 13 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.22 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Donatello, Turtle Techie relevance 0.23 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.17 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Mirage Mockery relevance 0.21 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Darksteel Colossus relevance 0.21 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Unwinding Clock relevance 0.17 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Psychic Paper relevance 0.22 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Cybermen Squadron relevance 0.19 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.17 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Krang, Utrom Warlord relevance 0.19 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Turtles in Time relevance 0.22 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
All creatures (50)
- K-9, Mark I relevance 0.28 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Auton Soldier relevance 0.23 · 61.5% (8 of 13 decks)
- Donatello, Way with Machines relevance 0.27 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Krang, Master Mind relevance 0.25 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Master Transmuter relevance 0.20 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.17 · 61.5% (8 of 13 decks)
- Donatello, Mutant Mechanic relevance 0.23 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.20 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Blightsteel Colossus relevance 0.21 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.15 · 61.5% (8 of 13 decks)
- Donatello, Turtle Techie relevance 0.23 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.17 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Darksteel Colossus relevance 0.21 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Cybermen Squadron relevance 0.19 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.17 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Krang, Utrom Warlord relevance 0.19 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.15 · 53.8% (7 of 13 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.14 · 61.5% (8 of 13 decks)
- Stridehangar Automaton relevance 0.15 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Filigree Sages relevance 0.20 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Lady Octopus, Inspired Inventor relevance 0.18 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Hulking Metamorph relevance 0.18 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.14 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.15 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Ornithopter relevance 0.15 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Diversion Unit relevance 0.17 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Whirler Rogue relevance 0.15 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Myr Battlesphere relevance 0.15 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Slither Blade relevance 0.16 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Eon Frolicker relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Passwall Adept relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Clockwork Droid relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.13 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.13 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Padeem, Consul of Innovation relevance 0.13 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Utrom Monitor relevance 0.16 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Moonsnare Specialist relevance 0.16 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Scuttling Doom Engine relevance 0.16 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Mist-Cloaked Herald relevance 0.15 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Disruptive Student relevance 0.16 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Donatello, Rad Scientist relevance 0.16 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Higure, the Still Wind relevance 0.16 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 0.16 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 0.13 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Trophy Mage relevance 0.14 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Myr Welder relevance 0.15 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Genestealer Patriarch relevance 0.15 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Mm'menon, the Right Hand relevance 0.13 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Roaming Throne relevance 0.12 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Donnie & April, Adorkable Duo relevance 0.14 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Agility Bobblehead relevance 0.31 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.29 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Strionic Resonator relevance 0.28 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Strength Bobblehead relevance 0.29 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Perception Bobblehead relevance 0.29 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.24 · 61.5% (8 of 13 decks)
- Charisma Bobblehead relevance 0.29 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Intelligence Bobblehead relevance 0.29 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Endurance Bobblehead relevance 0.29 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Luck Bobblehead relevance 0.28 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.27 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Worldwalker Helm relevance 0.22 · 61.5% (8 of 13 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.21 · 53.8% (7 of 13 decks)
- Sonic Screwdriver relevance 0.26 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.26 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Spine of Ish Sah relevance 0.24 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.22 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.21 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.21 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Darksteel Forge relevance 0.21 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Winged Boots relevance 0.21 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Fireshrieker relevance 0.22 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.18 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.19 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Unwinding Clock relevance 0.17 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Psychic Paper relevance 0.22 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Leyline Axe relevance 0.21 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.17 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Atomic Microsizer relevance 0.21 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Buster Sword relevance 0.21 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.19 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Silver Shroud Costume relevance 0.19 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Repurposing Bay relevance 0.18 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.17 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Bessie, the Doctor's Roadster relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.16 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Wedding Invitation relevance 0.16 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Cliffhaven Kitesail relevance 0.16 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Helvault relevance 0.16 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Boom Box relevance 0.16 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Bounty Board relevance 0.16 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Imposter Mech relevance 0.15 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.13 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Cobbled Wings relevance 0.16 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Knight Paladin relevance 0.15 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Memory Jar relevance 0.15 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Tangle Wire relevance 0.15 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Dino DNA relevance 0.15 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.13 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.13 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
All enchantments (24)
- Artificer Class relevance 0.27 · 61.5% (8 of 13 decks)
- Does Machines relevance 0.26 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.17 · 61.5% (8 of 13 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.16 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Court of Vantress relevance 0.17 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.16 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Search the City relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Protective Bubble relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Second Chance relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.14 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.14 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Lost Isle Calling relevance 0.15 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.11 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.12 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Artificer's Intuition relevance 0.13 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.09 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Gossip's Talent relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.07 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Waterbender Ascension relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Vesuvan Duplimancy relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.06 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.05 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.06 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
All instants (50)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.17 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Desynchronization relevance 0.16 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.15 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Minamo's Meddling relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Flash Counter relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.14 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Counterbore relevance 0.16 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Countermand relevance 0.16 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Mirrorform relevance 0.14 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 0.14 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Machinate relevance 0.13 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- This Town Ain't Big Enough relevance 0.13 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Farsight Ritual relevance 0.13 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Don't Make a Sound relevance 0.13 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Intuition relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.09 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.08 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Memory Deluge relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.09 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Retraction Helix relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.10 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.09 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Paradoxical Outcome relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Gifts Ungiven relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Miscast relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Reverse the Polarity relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.07 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Filter Out relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Anticipate relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Artistic Refusal relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.04 · 76.9% (10 of 13 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Hide on the Ceiling relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.06 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Cyber Conversion relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.06 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.06 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.06 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.06 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.05 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
All sorceries (46)
- Donatello's Technique relevance 0.27 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Saheeli's Artistry relevance 0.22 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.22 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Mirage Mockery relevance 0.21 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Turtles in Time relevance 0.22 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Plea for Power relevance 0.21 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Relm's Sketching relevance 0.18 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Twice Upon a Time // Unlikely Meeting relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Counterintelligence relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Replication Technique relevance 0.16 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.14 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.13 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Stolen Identity relevance 0.14 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Rise of the Eldrazi relevance 0.14 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.11 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.12 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Tempt with Reflections relevance 0.13 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.12 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Shimmer of Possibility relevance 0.13 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Notorious Throng relevance 0.13 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Drawn from Dreams relevance 0.13 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Part the Waterveil relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Walk the Aeons relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Echo Storm relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.10 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Will of the Temur relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.10 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Savor the Moment relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.09 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- All Is Dust relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- March of Progress relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Clone Legion relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.06 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.06 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.06 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.03 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (7)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.15 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.15 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Mu Yanling relevance 0.14 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Tezzeret, Artifice Master relevance 0.12 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.13 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
All battles (2)
- Invasion of Vryn // Overloaded Mage-Ring relevance 0.14 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Invasion of Arcavios // Invocation of the Founders relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
All utility lands (46)
- Turtle Lair relevance 0.33 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Daily Bugle Building relevance 0.30 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.21 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.14 · 84.6% (11 of 13 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.17 · 61.5% (8 of 13 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.19 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.16 · 53.8% (7 of 13 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.14 · 61.5% (8 of 13 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.14 · 53.8% (7 of 13 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.14 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Access Tunnel relevance 0.17 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.13 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Power Depot relevance 0.15 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.15 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Magosi, the Waterveil relevance 0.15 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.13 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Volatile Fault relevance 0.13 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Soaring Seacliff relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Roadside Reliquary relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Detection Tower relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Sunscorched Desert relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.11 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.08 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Amonkhet Raceway relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Abstergo Entertainment relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Muraganda Raceway relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Secluded Starforge relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Desert of the Mindful relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.06 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.06 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.06 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.06 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.06 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.05 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.04 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.04 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.04 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.03 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.01 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (20)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.16 · 69.2% (9 of 13 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.14 · 76.9% (10 of 13 decks)
- Painted Bluffs relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Sunken Citadel relevance 0.14 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.11 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Dowsing Dagger // Lost Vale relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Mishra's Workshop relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.05 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.05 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 92.3% (12 of 13 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Donatello, Gadget Master, from 13 real Commander decks.