Cards like Etherium Sculptor
5.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
100% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
78% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
2.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards
- Etherium Sculptor 89%
- Foundry Inspector 83%
- Cloud Key 39%
- Helm of Awakening 11%
Other options: Mana Matrix, Stone Calendar, Planar Gate
Cards like Sol Ring
4.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
94% of decks run one or more
vs. 80% of other blue decks
61% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
2.1 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 94%
- Basalt Monolith 56%
- Mana Vault 39%
- Grim Monolith 22%
Cards like Trophy Mage
9.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
1.9 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards
- Trophy Mage 50%
- Trinket Mage 50%
- Tribute Mage 39%
- Treasure Mage 33%
- Transit Mage 22%
Cards like Scour for Scrap
8.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other blue decks
Cards
- Scour for Scrap 61%
- Fabricate 50%
Cards like Manifold Key
7.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
- Manifold Key 61%
- Voltaic Key 44%
Other options: Synod Artificer, Filigree Sages, Galvanic Key, Voltaic Construct
Cards like Scrap Trawler
10× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
- Scrap Trawler 28%
- Myr Retriever 28%
- Spine of Ish Sah 17%
- Junk Diver 6%
- Workshop Assistant 6%
Cards like Merchant Scroll
3.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other blue decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
0.94 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Eerie Procession
Cards like Transmute Artifact
13× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards
- Transmute Artifact 33%
- Reshape 28%
Cards like Arcane Signet
4.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
89% of decks run one or more
vs. 63% of other blue decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other blue decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 89%
- Commander's Sphere 22%
Cards like Mox Diamond
4.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mox Diamond 33%
- Chrome Mox 22%
Cards like Forensic Gadgeteer
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.89 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
- Forensic Gadgeteer 72%
- Heartstone 17%
Cards like Guidelight Optimizer
14× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Soldevi Machinist, Hydraulic Helper, Cargo Ship, Oaken Siren, Vedalken Engineer
Cards like Moonsilver Key
6.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other blue decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Armillary Sphere, World Map, Keys to the House, Braidwood Sextant, Ominous Parcel, Wanderer's Twig
Cards like Tezzeret the Seeker
5.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Sai, Master Thopterist
4.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other blue decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Corridor Monitor
17× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards like Flusterstorm
2.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other blue decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other blue decks
Cards
- Flusterstorm 22%
- Mental Misstep 17%
- Miscast 6%
Other options: Spell Blast, Spell Burst, Clash of Wills, Dispel
Cards like Vedalken Archmage
6.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
- Vedalken Archmage 28%
- Transplant Theorist 11%
- Riddlesmith 11%
Other options: Skyswimmer Koi, Rook Turret
Cards like Shimmer Myr
6.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Copy Artifact
4.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Spell Pierce
2.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other blue decks
Cards
- Spell Pierce 22%
- Lose Focus 6%
- Make Disappear 6%
- Logic Knot 6%
- Metallic Rebuke 6%
- Mana Leak 6%
Other options: Reasonable Doubt, Revolutionary Rebuff, Force Spike, It'll Quench Ya!, Rethink, Don't Make a Sound, Quench
Cards like Mystic Remora
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other blue decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mystic Remora 50%
- Rhystic Study 28%
Cards like Force of Will
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Force of Will 33%
- Force of Negation 17%
Cards like Artificer Class
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
- Artificer Class 33%
- Does Machines 6%
Cards like Krark-Clan Ironworks
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Cryogen Relic
11× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Aether Spellbomb
11× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Sculpting Steel
8.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sculpting Steel 44%
- Mirage Mirror 6%
Cards like Solemn Simulacrum
6.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Padeem, Consul of Innovation
3.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Cyclonic Rift
2.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.34 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Mystic Forge
2.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Negate
1.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 68% of other blue decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 31% of other blue decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards
- Negate 44%
- Counterspell 33%
- Minor Misstep 6%
Other options: Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, Essence Scatter, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Outwit
All top picks (50)
- Ugin's Nexus relevance 0.33 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Artificer Class relevance 0.29 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.22 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
- Treasure Mage relevance 0.26 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.16 · 83.3% (15 of 18 decks)
- Jhoira's Familiar relevance 0.21 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.18 · 55.6% (10 of 18 decks)
- Worldwalker Helm relevance 0.23 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.20 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Corridor Monitor relevance 0.22 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.17 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
- Guidelight Optimizer relevance 0.25 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Trophy Mage relevance 0.19 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.21 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.13 · 88.9% (16 of 18 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.15 · 72.2% (13 of 18 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.16 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
- The Enigma Jewel // Locus of Enlightenment relevance 0.21 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.18 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.16 · 55.6% (10 of 18 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.20 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Twinning Staff relevance 0.23 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Esoteric Duplicator relevance 0.23 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.15 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.17 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.18 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.20 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Master Transmuter relevance 0.19 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 0.19 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Spine of Ish Sah relevance 0.21 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Shimmer Myr relevance 0.17 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Renowned Weaponsmith relevance 0.21 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Scrap Trawler relevance 0.18 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Myr Retriever relevance 0.18 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Prophetic Prism relevance 0.20 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Heartstone relevance 0.19 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Steelswarm Operator relevance 0.19 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Scrapyard Recombiner relevance 0.20 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Transit Mage relevance 0.18 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.15 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Powerstone Shard relevance 0.19 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.15 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Energy Refractor relevance 0.19 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.15 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.17 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Liberator, Urza's Battlethopter relevance 0.16 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- The Mightstone and Weakstone relevance 0.19 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Tribute Mage relevance 0.14 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.15 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Vedalken Archmage relevance 0.16 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Treasure Mage relevance 0.26 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.16 · 83.3% (15 of 18 decks)
- Jhoira's Familiar relevance 0.21 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.18 · 55.6% (10 of 18 decks)
- Corridor Monitor relevance 0.22 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.17 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
- Guidelight Optimizer relevance 0.25 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Trophy Mage relevance 0.19 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.13 · 88.9% (16 of 18 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.15 · 72.2% (13 of 18 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.16 · 55.6% (10 of 18 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.17 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Master Transmuter relevance 0.19 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 0.19 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Shimmer Myr relevance 0.17 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Renowned Weaponsmith relevance 0.21 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Scrap Trawler relevance 0.18 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Myr Retriever relevance 0.18 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Steelswarm Operator relevance 0.19 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Scrapyard Recombiner relevance 0.20 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Transit Mage relevance 0.18 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Liberator, Urza's Battlethopter relevance 0.16 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Tribute Mage relevance 0.14 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Vedalken Archmage relevance 0.16 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Trinket Mage relevance 0.13 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.11 · 66.7% (12 of 18 decks)
- Shuri, Wakandan Inventor relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Mirran Spy relevance 0.15 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Hulking Metamorph relevance 0.17 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Floodhound relevance 0.18 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Master of Etherium relevance 0.15 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.15 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Steel Overseer relevance 0.15 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.12 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Transplant Theorist relevance 0.15 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.12 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Grand Architect relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Glaring Fleshraker relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Memnarch relevance 0.14 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- April O'Neil, Hacktivist relevance 0.16 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- The Mechanist, Aerial Artisan relevance 0.14 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 0.14 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.13 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Etherium Spinner relevance 0.16 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- The Reality Chip relevance 0.11 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Automated Artificer relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Loyal Inventor relevance 0.13 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Bronze Walrus relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Ugin's Nexus relevance 0.33 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Worldwalker Helm relevance 0.23 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.20 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.21 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- The Enigma Jewel // Locus of Enlightenment relevance 0.21 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.18 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.20 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Twinning Staff relevance 0.23 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Esoteric Duplicator relevance 0.23 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.15 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.18 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.20 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Spine of Ish Sah relevance 0.21 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Prophetic Prism relevance 0.20 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Heartstone relevance 0.19 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.15 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Powerstone Shard relevance 0.19 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.15 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Energy Refractor relevance 0.19 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.17 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- The Mightstone and Weakstone relevance 0.19 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.15 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Voltaic Key relevance 0.13 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.13 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.16 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Ichor Wellspring relevance 0.16 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.14 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Repurposing Bay relevance 0.15 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Semblance Anvil relevance 0.16 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Rings of Brighthearth relevance 0.13 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.11 · 55.6% (10 of 18 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.10 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
- Monkey Cage relevance 0.18 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- False Floor relevance 0.18 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Mirror of Life Trapping relevance 0.18 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Relic of Progenitus relevance 0.16 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- The Deck of Many Things relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- The Dominion Bracelet relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Thought Prison relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Caltrops relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Moonsnare Prototype relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- The Eternity Elevator relevance 0.15 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.12 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.13 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.12 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Unwinding Clock relevance 0.11 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Aeon Engine relevance 0.16 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Smelting Vat relevance 0.16 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
All enchantments (23)
- Artificer Class relevance 0.29 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.22 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.14 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Zoetic Glyph relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Thought Lash relevance 0.14 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.13 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Does Machines relevance 0.12 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- The Phasing of Zhalfir relevance 0.12 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.10 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.10 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Power Artifact relevance 0.10 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.09 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.10 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.09 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Artificer's Intuition relevance 0.09 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Fateful Discovery relevance 0.09 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.09 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.07 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.07 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.07 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.05 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
All instants (50)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.16 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.15 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Defabricate relevance 0.16 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.10 · 55.6% (10 of 18 decks)
- Disruption Protocol relevance 0.15 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Dizzy Spell relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Eject relevance 0.16 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.12 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.10 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.13 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.10 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Power Sink relevance 0.14 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Whoosh! relevance 0.14 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Make Disappear relevance 0.13 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Urza's Command relevance 0.13 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.12 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Desynchronization relevance 0.12 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Syncopate relevance 0.13 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.11 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.08 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.11 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- This Town Ain't Big Enough relevance 0.13 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Logic Knot relevance 0.13 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Minor Misstep relevance 0.13 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.11 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.11 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Null Elemental Blast relevance 0.12 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Desculpting Blast relevance 0.12 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Sudden Substitution relevance 0.12 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Ertai's Scorn relevance 0.12 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.08 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.10 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.10 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.10 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Lose Focus relevance 0.11 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Blink of an Eye relevance 0.11 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Divert Disaster relevance 0.11 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Turn Aside relevance 0.11 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.07 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.08 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.09 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Metallic Rebuke relevance 0.11 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.07 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Machine Over Matter relevance 0.10 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Boomerang relevance 0.10 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Radstorm relevance 0.10 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
All sorceries (30)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.15 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.15 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.13 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Splitting the Powerstone relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.11 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.10 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- March of Progress relevance 0.13 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.08 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Displacement Wave relevance 0.12 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Will of the Temur relevance 0.11 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.11 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Show and Tell relevance 0.10 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Boomerang Basics relevance 0.10 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.09 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.10 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Flow State relevance 0.09 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.09 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.08 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.08 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.08 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.07 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.07 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.06 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.06 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.05 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.05 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.04 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (6)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.15 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.12 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.11 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Karn, Living Legacy relevance 0.13 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.09 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.18 · 72.2% (13 of 18 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.14 · 66.7% (12 of 18 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.17 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.16 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Hall of Tagsin relevance 0.21 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Volatile Fault relevance 0.19 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Power Depot relevance 0.16 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.14 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.11 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.13 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.10 · 55.6% (10 of 18 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.15 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.14 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.13 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Sanctum of Ugin relevance 0.16 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.12 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Encroaching Wastes relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.08 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 0.13 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.12 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Dust Bowl relevance 0.14 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.10 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.10 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.11 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Tectonic Edge relevance 0.12 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Hidden Cataract relevance 0.12 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Phyrexia's Core relevance 0.12 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Tomb of the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.11 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.09 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.10 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Skyline Cascade relevance 0.11 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- The Surgical Bay relevance 0.11 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Fountainport relevance 0.11 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Soldevi Excavations relevance 0.10 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Scene of the Crime relevance 0.10 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.07 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.09 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.08 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.10 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.08 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.07 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.08 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.05 · 55.6% (10 of 18 decks)
- Mishra's Factory relevance 0.09 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Ipnu Rivulet relevance 0.08 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.07 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.07 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.07 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (20)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.13 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Mishra's Workshop relevance 0.15 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.09 · 66.7% (12 of 18 decks)
- Tarnished Citadel relevance 0.16 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Spire of Industry relevance 0.12 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.09 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.09 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.08 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.07 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.07 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.07 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.07 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.06 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.06 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.06 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.06 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.05 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.04 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 94.4% (17 of 18 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Drafna, Founder of Lat-Nam, from 18 real Commander decks.