Change per day
Archetypes
84% of decks lean toward it
52% of decks lean toward it
52% of decks lean toward it
Top Picks
With signature card Inspiring Call
84% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Grateful Apparition
52% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Summon: Fenrir
52% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Shelinda, Yevon Acolyte
18% of decks lean toward it
Measured on 117 of these decks. A deck leans toward an archetype when at least a twentieth of its makeup follows that plan, so one deck can lean toward several.
Cards like Hardened Scales
6.9× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
76% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Selesnya decks
46% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Gyre Sage
18× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Gyre Sage 45%
- Incubation Druid 43%
Cards like The Earth Crystal
16× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Selesnya decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Three Visits
2.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 37% of other Selesnya decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Selesnya decks
0.93 per deck on average
vs. 0.56 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Three Visits 45%
- Nature's Lore 45%
- Skyshroud Claim 3%
Other options: Ranger's Path, Field Trip, Nissa's Pilgrimage, Hunting Wilds, Glimpse the Core
Cards like Cultivate
1.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 54% of other Selesnya decks
42% of decks run two or more
vs. 32% of other Selesnya decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Cultivate 51%
- Rampant Growth 38%
- Kodama's Reach 19%
- Reach the Horizon 7%
- Shared Roots 6%
- Grow from the Ashes 1%
- Migration Path 1%
Other options: Beneath the Sands, Explosive Vegetation, Traverse the Outlands, Map the Frontier, Search for Tomorrow, Roamer's Routine, New Generation's Technique, Harvest Season, Terramorph, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Nissa's Expedition, Slimefoot's Survey, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Celebrate the Harvest, Path to the Festival, Boundless Realms, Reshape the Earth
Cards like Abzan Battle Priest
7.5× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Duskshell Crawler
3.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Selesnya decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Crowned Ceratok, Baloth Pup, Trollbred Guardian, Hornbash Mentor
Cards like Ouroboroid
7.5× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Loxodon Battle Priest
Cards like Collective Effort
11× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Beast Within
1.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 39% of other Selesnya decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 19% of other Selesnya decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.58 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Beast Within 36%
- Generous Gift 32%
Cards like Mikaeus, the Lunarch
3.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Selesnya decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Capricopian, Feral Hydra, Hungering Hydra
Cards like Inspiring Call
4.5× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Heroic Intervention
1.7× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other Selesnya decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.47 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Generous Pup
15× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Sovereign Okinec Ahau
7.6× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Kami of Whispered Hopes
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Innkeeper's Talent
14× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Ohran Frostfang
1.8× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Ohran Viper, Keeper of Fables, Oakhame Adversary
Cards like Terrasymbiosis
4.8× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other Selesnya decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.36 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 35%
- Lightning Greaves 20%
Cards like Bristly Bill, Spine Sower
1.6× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Fangs of Kalonia
4.7× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Selesnya decks
All top picks (50)
- Chocobo Knights relevance 0.61 · 53.9% (124 of 230 decks)
- Maester Seymour relevance 0.58 · 54.8% (126 of 230 decks)
- Auron, Venerated Guardian relevance 0.65 · 37.0% (85 of 230 decks)
- Blitzball relevance 0.63 · 25.7% (59 of 230 decks)
- Tromell, Seymour's Butler relevance 0.56 · 35.7% (82 of 230 decks)
- Gatta and Luzzu relevance 0.56 · 33.0% (76 of 230 decks)
- Liquimetal Coating relevance 0.69 · 13.5% (31 of 230 decks)
- Shelinda, Yevon Acolyte relevance 0.48 · 42.6% (98 of 230 decks)
- Resourceful Defense relevance 0.46 · 44.8% (103 of 230 decks)
- Blitzball Shot relevance 0.58 · 16.5% (38 of 230 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.41 · 48.7% (112 of 230 decks)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.36 · 58.3% (134 of 230 decks)
- Grateful Apparition relevance 0.49 · 24.8% (57 of 230 decks)
- Yuna's Whistle relevance 0.53 · 17.8% (41 of 230 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.40 · 43.0% (99 of 230 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.37 · 45.2% (104 of 230 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.48 · 18.3% (42 of 230 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.52 · 13.0% (30 of 230 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.37 · 43.5% (100 of 230 decks)
- Rampant Rejuvenator relevance 0.48 · 18.3% (42 of 230 decks)
- Generous Pup relevance 0.47 · 19.1% (44 of 230 decks)
- Hamza, Guardian of Arashin relevance 0.38 · 38.7% (89 of 230 decks)
- Fight Rigging relevance 0.47 · 16.5% (38 of 230 decks)
- Lord Jyscal Guado relevance 0.53 · 9.6% (22 of 230 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.33 · 47.8% (110 of 230 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.25 · 71.7% (165 of 230 decks)
- Bushmaster, Coiled Henchman relevance 0.51 · 10.0% (23 of 230 decks)
- Together Forever relevance 0.42 · 21.3% (49 of 230 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 0.31 · 50.0% (115 of 230 decks)
- Collective Effort relevance 0.42 · 19.6% (45 of 230 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.32 · 46.5% (107 of 230 decks)
- Sazh Katzroy relevance 0.46 · 12.6% (29 of 230 decks)
- Iridescent Hornbeetle relevance 0.43 · 15.7% (36 of 230 decks)
- Abzan Battle Priest relevance 0.37 · 28.7% (66 of 230 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.34 · 38.3% (88 of 230 decks)
- Shang-Chi, Martial Mentor relevance 0.50 · 8.3% (19 of 230 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.30 · 49.1% (113 of 230 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.26 · 64.3% (148 of 230 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.37 · 27.4% (63 of 230 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.30 · 50.0% (115 of 230 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.38 · 25.7% (59 of 230 decks)
- Chocobo Kick relevance 0.49 · 8.3% (19 of 230 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.29 · 50.4% (116 of 230 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.33 · 36.1% (83 of 230 decks)
- Protection Magic relevance 0.42 · 13.0% (30 of 230 decks)
- Dusk Legion Duelist relevance 0.37 · 22.6% (52 of 230 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.33 · 34.8% (80 of 230 decks)
- Vorinclex, Monstrous Raider relevance 0.40 · 14.8% (34 of 230 decks)
- Cloudbound Moogle relevance 0.49 · 6.1% (14 of 230 decks)
- Kodama of the West Tree relevance 0.33 · 33.5% (77 of 230 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Chocobo Knights relevance 0.61 · 53.9% (124 of 230 decks)
- Maester Seymour relevance 0.58 · 54.8% (126 of 230 decks)
- Auron, Venerated Guardian relevance 0.65 · 37.0% (85 of 230 decks)
- Tromell, Seymour's Butler relevance 0.56 · 35.7% (82 of 230 decks)
- Gatta and Luzzu relevance 0.56 · 33.0% (76 of 230 decks)
- Shelinda, Yevon Acolyte relevance 0.48 · 42.6% (98 of 230 decks)
- Grateful Apparition relevance 0.49 · 24.8% (57 of 230 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.40 · 43.0% (99 of 230 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.37 · 45.2% (104 of 230 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.37 · 43.5% (100 of 230 decks)
- Rampant Rejuvenator relevance 0.48 · 18.3% (42 of 230 decks)
- Generous Pup relevance 0.47 · 19.1% (44 of 230 decks)
- Hamza, Guardian of Arashin relevance 0.38 · 38.7% (89 of 230 decks)
- Lord Jyscal Guado relevance 0.53 · 9.6% (22 of 230 decks)
- Bushmaster, Coiled Henchman relevance 0.51 · 10.0% (23 of 230 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 0.31 · 50.0% (115 of 230 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.32 · 46.5% (107 of 230 decks)
- Sazh Katzroy relevance 0.46 · 12.6% (29 of 230 decks)
- Iridescent Hornbeetle relevance 0.43 · 15.7% (36 of 230 decks)
- Abzan Battle Priest relevance 0.37 · 28.7% (66 of 230 decks)
- Shang-Chi, Martial Mentor relevance 0.50 · 8.3% (19 of 230 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.37 · 27.4% (63 of 230 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.30 · 50.0% (115 of 230 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.38 · 25.7% (59 of 230 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.29 · 50.4% (116 of 230 decks)
- Dusk Legion Duelist relevance 0.37 · 22.6% (52 of 230 decks)
- Vorinclex, Monstrous Raider relevance 0.40 · 14.8% (34 of 230 decks)
- Cloudbound Moogle relevance 0.49 · 6.1% (14 of 230 decks)
- Kodama of the West Tree relevance 0.33 · 33.5% (77 of 230 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.34 · 29.1% (67 of 230 decks)
- Ouroboroid relevance 0.35 · 24.8% (57 of 230 decks)
- Dyadrine, Synthesis Amalgam relevance 0.37 · 15.7% (36 of 230 decks)
- Biophagus relevance 0.40 · 11.3% (26 of 230 decks)
- Ainok Bond-Kin relevance 0.36 · 14.8% (34 of 230 decks)
- The Unbeatable Squirrel Girl relevance 0.42 · 8.3% (19 of 230 decks)
- Rosa, Resolute White Mage relevance 0.39 · 11.3% (26 of 230 decks)
- Wildwood Scourge relevance 0.35 · 17.0% (39 of 230 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.39 · 10.4% (24 of 230 decks)
- Herd Baloth relevance 0.35 · 14.8% (34 of 230 decks)
- Mikey & Leo, Chaos & Order relevance 0.36 · 13.0% (30 of 230 decks)
- Sovereign Okinec Ahau relevance 0.30 · 29.6% (68 of 230 decks)
- Luminous Broodmoth relevance 0.35 · 14.3% (33 of 230 decks)
- Scurry Oak relevance 0.33 · 18.3% (42 of 230 decks)
- Rinoa Heartilly relevance 0.40 · 8.3% (19 of 230 decks)
- Sazh's Chocobo relevance 0.39 · 8.3% (19 of 230 decks)
- Goobbue Gardener relevance 0.40 · 5.7% (13 of 230 decks)
- Envoy of the Ancestors relevance 0.31 · 18.3% (42 of 230 decks)
- Bastion Protector relevance 0.31 · 17.0% (39 of 230 decks)
- Diamond Weapon relevance 0.39 · 5.2% (12 of 230 decks)
- Haliya, Ascendant Cadet relevance 0.32 · 13.5% (31 of 230 decks)
All artifacts (49)
- Blitzball relevance 0.63 · 25.7% (59 of 230 decks)
- Liquimetal Coating relevance 0.69 · 13.5% (31 of 230 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.52 · 13.0% (30 of 230 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.33 · 47.8% (110 of 230 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.34 · 38.3% (88 of 230 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.33 · 34.8% (80 of 230 decks)
- Mycosynth Lattice relevance 0.48 · 6.1% (14 of 230 decks)
- Strixhaven Stadium relevance 0.45 · 6.5% (15 of 230 decks)
- White Auracite relevance 0.38 · 7.8% (18 of 230 decks)
- Sword of Truth and Justice relevance 0.38 · 7.0% (16 of 230 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.38 · 5.7% (13 of 230 decks)
- Summoning Materia relevance 0.36 · 5.2% (12 of 230 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.30 · 12.2% (28 of 230 decks)
- Contested Game Ball relevance 0.46 · 3.0% (7 of 230 decks)
- Power Fist relevance 0.34 · 6.5% (15 of 230 decks)
- Costume Closet relevance 0.36 · 4.3% (10 of 230 decks)
- Buster Sword relevance 0.33 · 5.7% (13 of 230 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.23 · 22.6% (52 of 230 decks)
- Andúril, Narsil Reforged relevance 0.31 · 4.8% (11 of 230 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.28 · 7.8% (18 of 230 decks)
- Baseball Bat relevance 0.34 · 3.5% (8 of 230 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.18 · 35.2% (81 of 230 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.30 · 3.9% (9 of 230 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.20 · 20.4% (47 of 230 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.27 · 4.3% (10 of 230 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.19 · 16.1% (37 of 230 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.24 · 5.2% (12 of 230 decks)
- Behemoth Sledge relevance 0.24 · 4.8% (11 of 230 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.22 · 6.1% (14 of 230 decks)
- S.H.I.E.L.D. Spy Kit relevance 0.33 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.17 · 16.1% (37 of 230 decks)
- The Wind Crystal relevance 0.20 · 7.4% (17 of 230 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.22 · 4.3% (10 of 230 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (7 of 230 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (7 of 230 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.08 · 68.7% (158 of 230 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.20 · 3.9% (9 of 230 decks)
- Tome of Legends relevance 0.27 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- Goldvein Pick relevance 0.26 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.21 · 3.5% (8 of 230 decks)
- Animation Module relevance 0.25 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.17 · 4.3% (10 of 230 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.20 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.18 · 2.6% (6 of 230 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.19 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.18 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (6 of 230 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (6 of 230 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 77.8% (179 of 230 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Resourceful Defense relevance 0.46 · 44.8% (103 of 230 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.41 · 48.7% (112 of 230 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.48 · 18.3% (42 of 230 decks)
- Fight Rigging relevance 0.47 · 16.5% (38 of 230 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.25 · 71.7% (165 of 230 decks)
- Together Forever relevance 0.42 · 21.3% (49 of 230 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.30 · 49.1% (113 of 230 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.33 · 36.1% (83 of 230 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.31 · 37.4% (86 of 230 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.34 · 13.0% (30 of 230 decks)
- Path of Discovery relevance 0.38 · 7.8% (18 of 230 decks)
- Leader's Talent relevance 0.35 · 6.5% (15 of 230 decks)
- Virtue of Loyalty // Ardenvale Fealty relevance 0.31 · 9.6% (22 of 230 decks)
- High Score relevance 0.33 · 6.5% (15 of 230 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.23 · 24.8% (57 of 230 decks)
- Level Up relevance 0.31 · 6.5% (15 of 230 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.31 · 5.2% (12 of 230 decks)
- Stocking the Pantry relevance 0.29 · 8.3% (19 of 230 decks)
- Viridian Revel relevance 0.33 · 4.3% (10 of 230 decks)
- Summoner's Sending relevance 0.35 · 3.9% (9 of 230 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.22 · 21.3% (49 of 230 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.25 · 10.4% (24 of 230 decks)
- Warrior's Resolve relevance 0.34 · 3.5% (8 of 230 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.20 · 25.2% (58 of 230 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.27 · 5.2% (12 of 230 decks)
- Court of Garenbrig relevance 0.27 · 5.7% (13 of 230 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.20 · 23.0% (53 of 230 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.22 · 10.9% (25 of 230 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.21 · 11.7% (27 of 230 decks)
- Unbound Flourishing relevance 0.31 · 3.0% (7 of 230 decks)
- Anthem of Champions relevance 0.22 · 6.5% (15 of 230 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.22 · 4.8% (11 of 230 decks)
- Concerted Effort relevance 0.30 · 2.6% (6 of 230 decks)
- Super-Soldier Serum relevance 0.30 · 2.6% (6 of 230 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.23 · 3.9% (9 of 230 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.20 · 4.8% (11 of 230 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.17 · 10.9% (25 of 230 decks)
- Authority of the Consuls relevance 0.17 · 9.6% (22 of 230 decks)
- Well Rested relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (7 of 230 decks)
- Anointed Procession relevance 0.16 · 4.8% (11 of 230 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.16 · 6.1% (14 of 230 decks)
- Sylvan Scavenging relevance 0.23 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- Duelist's Heritage relevance 0.19 · 3.5% (8 of 230 decks)
- Thickest in the Thicket relevance 0.23 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- New Horizons relevance 0.23 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- Tale of Katara and Toph relevance 0.23 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.13 · 9.6% (22 of 230 decks)
- Shield of the Oversoul relevance 0.18 · 3.5% (8 of 230 decks)
- Noble Heritage relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (6 of 230 decks)
- Trouble in Pairs relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (7 of 230 decks)
All instants (50)
- Blitzball Shot relevance 0.58 · 16.5% (38 of 230 decks)
- Yuna's Whistle relevance 0.53 · 17.8% (41 of 230 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.26 · 64.3% (148 of 230 decks)
- Protection Magic relevance 0.42 · 13.0% (30 of 230 decks)
- Prishe's Wanderings relevance 0.41 · 9.6% (22 of 230 decks)
- Destroy Evil relevance 0.39 · 7.4% (17 of 230 decks)
- Ultimate Magic: Holy relevance 0.36 · 8.7% (20 of 230 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.27 · 21.3% (49 of 230 decks)
- Take Up the Shield relevance 0.31 · 9.6% (22 of 230 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.32 · 6.1% (14 of 230 decks)
- Restoration Magic relevance 0.26 · 14.3% (33 of 230 decks)
- Battle Menu relevance 0.34 · 4.3% (10 of 230 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.30 · 7.0% (16 of 230 decks)
- Duty Beyond Death relevance 0.28 · 8.7% (20 of 230 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.23 · 18.7% (43 of 230 decks)
- Unbreakable Formation relevance 0.22 · 17.0% (39 of 230 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.27 · 6.5% (15 of 230 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.20 · 22.6% (52 of 230 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.20 · 20.4% (47 of 230 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.26 · 6.5% (15 of 230 decks)
- Auron's Inspiration relevance 0.37 · 2.6% (6 of 230 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.27 · 4.3% (10 of 230 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.23 · 9.1% (21 of 230 decks)
- Pledge of Unity relevance 0.24 · 5.2% (12 of 230 decks)
- Lightfoot Technique relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (8 of 230 decks)
- Fate of the Sun-Cryst relevance 0.33 · 2.6% (6 of 230 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.19 · 14.8% (34 of 230 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.15 · 31.7% (73 of 230 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.21 · 7.8% (18 of 230 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.21 · 7.4% (17 of 230 decks)
- Fleeting Flight relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (7 of 230 decks)
- Clever Concealment relevance 0.21 · 7.8% (18 of 230 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.13 · 36.1% (83 of 230 decks)
- Airship Crash relevance 0.29 · 2.6% (6 of 230 decks)
- Reprieve relevance 0.20 · 6.1% (14 of 230 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.13 · 38.7% (89 of 230 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.17 · 11.3% (26 of 230 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.23 · 3.5% (8 of 230 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.18 · 7.0% (16 of 230 decks)
- You're Not Alone relevance 0.27 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.20 · 3.9% (9 of 230 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.16 · 7.4% (17 of 230 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (7 of 230 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.08 · 58.7% (135 of 230 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (7 of 230 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.16 · 5.7% (13 of 230 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.24 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- Dromoka's Command relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (7 of 230 decks)
- Silkguard relevance 0.22 · 2.6% (6 of 230 decks)
- Trash the Town relevance 0.23 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.36 · 58.3% (134 of 230 decks)
- Collective Effort relevance 0.42 · 19.6% (45 of 230 decks)
- Chocobo Kick relevance 0.49 · 8.3% (19 of 230 decks)
- Fangs of Kalonia relevance 0.37 · 17.4% (40 of 230 decks)
- Yuna's Decision relevance 0.40 · 9.6% (22 of 230 decks)
- Reach the Horizon relevance 0.40 · 7.4% (17 of 230 decks)
- Honor relevance 0.37 · 7.4% (17 of 230 decks)
- The Crystal's Chosen relevance 0.38 · 5.2% (12 of 230 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.20 · 44.8% (103 of 230 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.25 · 20.9% (48 of 230 decks)
- Requisition Raid relevance 0.26 · 15.7% (36 of 230 decks)
- Knockout Maneuver relevance 0.34 · 4.3% (10 of 230 decks)
- Practiced Offense relevance 0.31 · 4.8% (11 of 230 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.29 · 6.5% (15 of 230 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.28 · 8.7% (20 of 230 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.24 · 15.7% (36 of 230 decks)
- Smell Fear relevance 0.31 · 4.3% (10 of 230 decks)
- Promise of Loyalty relevance 0.28 · 7.4% (17 of 230 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.28 · 7.0% (16 of 230 decks)
- Commune with Beavers relevance 0.32 · 3.5% (8 of 230 decks)
- Biogenic Upgrade relevance 0.29 · 3.9% (9 of 230 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.23 · 8.7% (20 of 230 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.16 · 34.3% (79 of 230 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.16 · 38.3% (88 of 230 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.14 · 44.8% (103 of 230 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.24 · 5.7% (13 of 230 decks)
- Ultima relevance 0.31 · 3.0% (7 of 230 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.19 · 13.9% (32 of 230 decks)
- Clash of the Eikons relevance 0.26 · 3.9% (9 of 230 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.12 · 50.9% (117 of 230 decks)
- Helping Hand relevance 0.27 · 3.5% (8 of 230 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.16 · 19.1% (44 of 230 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.19 · 7.8% (18 of 230 decks)
- Basri's Solidarity relevance 0.26 · 3.0% (7 of 230 decks)
- Courage in Crisis relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (6 of 230 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (7 of 230 decks)
- Vanquish the Horde relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (11 of 230 decks)
- Day of Judgment relevance 0.23 · 3.5% (8 of 230 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (7 of 230 decks)
- Aerith Rescue Mission relevance 0.28 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- Raise the Past relevance 0.22 · 3.0% (7 of 230 decks)
- Cleansing Nova relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (8 of 230 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.15 · 6.1% (14 of 230 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.16 · 4.3% (10 of 230 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.19 · 3.5% (8 of 230 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.18 · 3.5% (8 of 230 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.14 · 6.5% (15 of 230 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.13 · 6.5% (15 of 230 decks)
- Winds of Abandon relevance 0.17 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- Idyllic Tutor relevance 0.14 · 2.6% (6 of 230 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (9)
- Elspeth Resplendent relevance 0.30 · 3.9% (9 of 230 decks)
- Ajani, the Greathearted relevance 0.24 · 8.3% (19 of 230 decks)
- Jiang Yanggu, Wildcrafter relevance 0.27 · 3.9% (9 of 230 decks)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.27 · 3.5% (8 of 230 decks)
- Karn, the Great Creator relevance 0.28 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- Ajani Goldmane relevance 0.25 · 2.6% (6 of 230 decks)
- Ajani, Mentor of Heroes relevance 0.22 · 3.0% (7 of 230 decks)
- Ajani, Caller of the Pride relevance 0.17 · 2.6% (6 of 230 decks)
- Elspeth, Storm Slayer relevance 0.13 · 2.6% (6 of 230 decks)
All utility lands (46)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.44 · 10.4% (24 of 230 decks)
- Zanarkand, Ancient Metropolis // Lasting Fayth relevance 0.42 · 11.7% (27 of 230 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.33 · 32.6% (75 of 230 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.34 · 20.4% (47 of 230 decks)
- Capital City relevance 0.42 · 6.1% (14 of 230 decks)
- Ishgard, the Holy See // Faith & Grief relevance 0.32 · 10.4% (24 of 230 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.30 · 10.4% (24 of 230 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.30 · 7.8% (18 of 230 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.30 · 7.8% (18 of 230 decks)
- The Gold Saucer relevance 0.38 · 3.5% (8 of 230 decks)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.23 · 16.5% (38 of 230 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.19 · 26.5% (61 of 230 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.26 · 7.0% (16 of 230 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.17 · 35.2% (81 of 230 decks)
- Kishla Village relevance 0.37 · 2.6% (6 of 230 decks)
- Clive's Hideaway relevance 0.32 · 3.5% (8 of 230 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.19 · 24.3% (56 of 230 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.17 · 32.2% (74 of 230 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.18 · 24.8% (57 of 230 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.25 · 5.2% (12 of 230 decks)
- Hidden Hideout relevance 0.30 · 3.5% (8 of 230 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.23 · 6.5% (15 of 230 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.25 · 4.3% (10 of 230 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.20 · 11.3% (26 of 230 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.23 · 4.3% (10 of 230 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.20 · 10.0% (23 of 230 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.17 · 13.9% (32 of 230 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.14 · 28.3% (65 of 230 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.15 · 18.7% (43 of 230 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.15 · 10.4% (24 of 230 decks)
- Kyoshi Village relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (6 of 230 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.14 · 7.4% (17 of 230 decks)
- Witch's Clinic relevance 0.22 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.20 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.14 · 3.9% (9 of 230 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.18 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.12 · 4.3% (10 of 230 decks)
- Botanical Plaza relevance 0.17 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- Minas Tirith relevance 0.15 · 3.0% (7 of 230 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (6 of 230 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.14 · 3.0% (7 of 230 decks)
- Graypelt Refuge relevance 0.12 · 3.0% (7 of 230 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.14 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.13 · 2.6% (6 of 230 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.13 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.13 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
All lands (48)
- Radiant Grove relevance 0.26 · 23.0% (53 of 230 decks)
- Windurst, Federation Center relevance 0.30 · 7.4% (17 of 230 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.28 · 8.7% (20 of 230 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.25 · 9.1% (21 of 230 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.25 · 9.6% (22 of 230 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.24 · 10.0% (23 of 230 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.18 · 30.9% (71 of 230 decks)
- Gathering Place relevance 0.24 · 9.1% (21 of 230 decks)
- Etched Cornfield relevance 0.28 · 4.3% (10 of 230 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.20 · 15.7% (36 of 230 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.19 · 21.7% (50 of 230 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.21 · 13.0% (30 of 230 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.22 · 5.7% (13 of 230 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.17 · 17.8% (41 of 230 decks)
- Crossroads Village relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (7 of 230 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.14 · 32.6% (75 of 230 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.12 · 44.3% (102 of 230 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.18 · 10.9% (25 of 230 decks)
- Birnin Zana Plaza relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (8 of 230 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.13 · 35.7% (82 of 230 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.18 · 8.3% (19 of 230 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.14 · 23.0% (53 of 230 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.11 · 40.9% (94 of 230 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.15 · 12.6% (29 of 230 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.13 · 18.3% (42 of 230 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.10 · 47.8% (110 of 230 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.10 · 38.3% (88 of 230 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (7 of 230 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.10 · 32.6% (75 of 230 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.17 · 3.9% (9 of 230 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.17 · 3.9% (9 of 230 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.13 · 10.4% (24 of 230 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.17 · 3.5% (8 of 230 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.21 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.07 · 55.7% (128 of 230 decks)
- Canopy Vista relevance 0.06 · 66.5% (153 of 230 decks)
- Thriving Heath relevance 0.18 · 2.6% (6 of 230 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.17 · 3.0% (7 of 230 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.19 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- Thornglint Bridge relevance 0.18 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.17 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.14 · 3.0% (7 of 230 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.15 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.14 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.13 · 2.2% (5 of 230 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.03 · 80.0% (184 of 230 decks)
- Plains relevance 0.01 · 95.2% (219 of 230 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 95.2% (219 of 230 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Wakka, Devoted Guardian, from 230 real Commander decks.