Cards like Toski, Bearer of Secrets
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Night of the Sweets' Revenge
7.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Poison Dart Frog
2.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
- Poison Dart Frog 36%
- Frog Butler 15%
- Noxious Newt 1%
Other options: Deathbloom Gardener, Nightshade Dryad
Cards like End-Raze Forerunners
3.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Jubilation, Thundering Ceratok, Earthshaker Giant
Cards like Bakersbane Duo
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards like Gilded Goose
5.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
1.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 61% of other green decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Cultivate 49%
- Rampant Growth 38%
- Kodama's Reach 28%
- Shared Roots 9%
- Roamer's Routine 3%
- New Generation's Technique 2%
- Viewpoint Synchronization 1%
- Grow from the Ashes 1%
Other options: Terramorph, Explosive Vegetation, Deep Reconnaissance, Migration Path, Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Peregrination, Search for Tomorrow, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Path to the Festival, Beneath the Sands, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Verdant Mastery
Cards like Maskwood Nexus
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Fog
1.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Defend the Hearth, Thwart the Enemy, Lull, Pause for Reflection, Chameleon Blur, Tanglesap, Terrifying Presence, Serene Sunset, Winds of Qal Sisma, Haze of Pollen, Vine Snare
Cards like Grow Extra Arms
7.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Feral Ferocity, Wielding the Green Dragon, Monstrous Growth, Mammoth Growth
Cards like Lurking Lizards
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other green decks
Cards like Clifftop Lookout
9.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Floriferous Vinewall, Elvish Rejuvenator, Overgrown Pest
All top picks (50)
- Eager Trufflesnout relevance 0.63 · 38.7% (92 of 238 decks)
- Spiders-Man, Heroic Horde relevance 0.72 · 22.3% (53 of 238 decks)
- Spider-Rex, Daring Dino relevance 0.59 · 38.7% (92 of 238 decks)
- Twitching Doll relevance 0.57 · 39.9% (95 of 238 decks)
- Arasta of the Endless Web relevance 0.46 · 59.7% (142 of 238 decks)
- Lurking Lizards relevance 0.64 · 19.7% (47 of 238 decks)
- Wall Crawl relevance 0.69 · 13.4% (32 of 238 decks)
- Pawpatch Recruit relevance 0.60 · 24.8% (59 of 238 decks)
- Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary relevance 0.58 · 26.5% (63 of 238 decks)
- Pictures of Spider-Man relevance 0.63 · 17.2% (41 of 238 decks)
- Sylvan Scavenging relevance 0.54 · 31.5% (75 of 238 decks)
- Lizard, Connors's Curse relevance 0.52 · 36.1% (86 of 238 decks)
- Valley Mightcaller relevance 0.51 · 34.0% (81 of 238 decks)
- Diligent Zookeeper relevance 0.57 · 20.6% (49 of 238 decks)
- Froghemoth relevance 0.55 · 24.4% (58 of 238 decks)
- Spider-Man, Miles Morales relevance 0.55 · 24.4% (58 of 238 decks)
- Gilded Goose relevance 0.43 · 47.5% (113 of 238 decks)
- Hot Dog Cart relevance 0.56 · 21.0% (50 of 238 decks)
- Ezekiel Sims, Spider-Totem relevance 0.66 · 10.1% (24 of 238 decks)
- Treeguard Duo relevance 0.59 · 15.5% (37 of 238 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen of Efrava relevance 0.59 · 15.1% (36 of 238 decks)
- Grow Extra Arms relevance 0.57 · 17.6% (42 of 238 decks)
- Spider-Bot relevance 0.63 · 12.2% (29 of 238 decks)
- Rust-Shield Rampager relevance 0.63 · 10.5% (25 of 238 decks)
- Bakersbane Duo relevance 0.52 · 22.3% (53 of 238 decks)
- Trailtracker Scout relevance 0.52 · 23.5% (56 of 238 decks)
- Keeper of Fables relevance 0.44 · 38.2% (91 of 238 decks)
- Brambleguard Veteran relevance 0.65 · 8.4% (20 of 238 decks)
- Kraven's Cats relevance 0.63 · 9.7% (23 of 238 decks)
- Bark-Knuckle Boxer relevance 0.63 · 9.2% (22 of 238 decks)
- Scurry of Squirrels relevance 0.44 · 37.0% (88 of 238 decks)
- Rampant Frogantua relevance 0.54 · 16.4% (39 of 238 decks)
- Canopy Spider relevance 0.61 · 8.4% (20 of 238 decks)
- Intrepid Trufflesnout // Go Hog Wild relevance 0.58 · 10.1% (24 of 238 decks)
- Poison Dart Frog relevance 0.42 · 36.1% (86 of 238 decks)
- Spinner of Souls relevance 0.45 · 29.0% (69 of 238 decks)
- Undergrowth Leopard relevance 0.51 · 15.5% (37 of 238 decks)
- Brindle Shoat relevance 0.58 · 8.0% (19 of 238 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.36 · 45.8% (109 of 238 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.39 · 37.4% (89 of 238 decks)
- Spore Frog relevance 0.39 · 35.7% (85 of 238 decks)
- Prize Pig relevance 0.54 · 10.1% (24 of 238 decks)
- Loporrit Scout relevance 0.56 · 8.0% (19 of 238 decks)
- Turtle-Duck relevance 0.51 · 12.2% (29 of 238 decks)
- Quina, Qu Gourmet relevance 0.45 · 20.2% (48 of 238 decks)
- Spider-Suit relevance 0.58 · 5.9% (14 of 238 decks)
- Thornvault Forager relevance 0.41 · 29.8% (71 of 238 decks)
- Scrapshooter relevance 0.42 · 25.6% (61 of 238 decks)
- Radioactive Spider relevance 0.45 · 18.9% (45 of 238 decks)
- Kapow! relevance 0.50 · 12.2% (29 of 238 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Eager Trufflesnout relevance 0.63 · 38.7% (92 of 238 decks)
- Spiders-Man, Heroic Horde relevance 0.72 · 22.3% (53 of 238 decks)
- Spider-Rex, Daring Dino relevance 0.59 · 38.7% (92 of 238 decks)
- Twitching Doll relevance 0.57 · 39.9% (95 of 238 decks)
- Arasta of the Endless Web relevance 0.46 · 59.7% (142 of 238 decks)
- Lurking Lizards relevance 0.64 · 19.7% (47 of 238 decks)
- Pawpatch Recruit relevance 0.60 · 24.8% (59 of 238 decks)
- Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary relevance 0.58 · 26.5% (63 of 238 decks)
- Lizard, Connors's Curse relevance 0.52 · 36.1% (86 of 238 decks)
- Valley Mightcaller relevance 0.51 · 34.0% (81 of 238 decks)
- Diligent Zookeeper relevance 0.57 · 20.6% (49 of 238 decks)
- Froghemoth relevance 0.55 · 24.4% (58 of 238 decks)
- Spider-Man, Miles Morales relevance 0.55 · 24.4% (58 of 238 decks)
- Gilded Goose relevance 0.43 · 47.5% (113 of 238 decks)
- Ezekiel Sims, Spider-Totem relevance 0.66 · 10.1% (24 of 238 decks)
- Treeguard Duo relevance 0.59 · 15.5% (37 of 238 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen of Efrava relevance 0.59 · 15.1% (36 of 238 decks)
- Spider-Bot relevance 0.63 · 12.2% (29 of 238 decks)
- Rust-Shield Rampager relevance 0.63 · 10.5% (25 of 238 decks)
- Bakersbane Duo relevance 0.52 · 22.3% (53 of 238 decks)
- Trailtracker Scout relevance 0.52 · 23.5% (56 of 238 decks)
- Keeper of Fables relevance 0.44 · 38.2% (91 of 238 decks)
- Brambleguard Veteran relevance 0.65 · 8.4% (20 of 238 decks)
- Kraven's Cats relevance 0.63 · 9.7% (23 of 238 decks)
- Bark-Knuckle Boxer relevance 0.63 · 9.2% (22 of 238 decks)
- Scurry of Squirrels relevance 0.44 · 37.0% (88 of 238 decks)
- Rampant Frogantua relevance 0.54 · 16.4% (39 of 238 decks)
- Canopy Spider relevance 0.61 · 8.4% (20 of 238 decks)
- Intrepid Trufflesnout // Go Hog Wild relevance 0.58 · 10.1% (24 of 238 decks)
- Poison Dart Frog relevance 0.42 · 36.1% (86 of 238 decks)
- Spinner of Souls relevance 0.45 · 29.0% (69 of 238 decks)
- Undergrowth Leopard relevance 0.51 · 15.5% (37 of 238 decks)
- Brindle Shoat relevance 0.58 · 8.0% (19 of 238 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.36 · 45.8% (109 of 238 decks)
- Spore Frog relevance 0.39 · 35.7% (85 of 238 decks)
- Prize Pig relevance 0.54 · 10.1% (24 of 238 decks)
- Loporrit Scout relevance 0.56 · 8.0% (19 of 238 decks)
- Turtle-Duck relevance 0.51 · 12.2% (29 of 238 decks)
- Quina, Qu Gourmet relevance 0.45 · 20.2% (48 of 238 decks)
- Thornvault Forager relevance 0.41 · 29.8% (71 of 238 decks)
- Scrapshooter relevance 0.42 · 25.6% (61 of 238 decks)
- Radioactive Spider relevance 0.45 · 18.9% (45 of 238 decks)
- Champion of Rhonas relevance 0.51 · 10.5% (25 of 238 decks)
- Bramble Familiar // Fetch Quest relevance 0.45 · 16.0% (38 of 238 decks)
- Ferocious Pup relevance 0.50 · 10.5% (25 of 238 decks)
- Prowling Serpopard relevance 0.41 · 23.5% (56 of 238 decks)
- Clifftop Lookout relevance 0.42 · 22.3% (53 of 238 decks)
- Bloodspore Thrinax relevance 0.49 · 11.3% (27 of 238 decks)
- Sazh's Chocobo relevance 0.37 · 34.5% (82 of 238 decks)
- Fecund Greenshell relevance 0.44 · 16.4% (39 of 238 decks)
All artifacts (41)
- Pictures of Spider-Man relevance 0.63 · 17.2% (41 of 238 decks)
- Hot Dog Cart relevance 0.56 · 21.0% (50 of 238 decks)
- Spider-Suit relevance 0.58 · 5.9% (14 of 238 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.38 · 19.3% (46 of 238 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.38 · 17.6% (42 of 238 decks)
- Esika's Chariot relevance 0.42 · 10.1% (24 of 238 decks)
- Heaped Harvest relevance 0.37 · 10.9% (26 of 238 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 0.33 · 14.7% (35 of 238 decks)
- Nuka-Cola Vending Machine relevance 0.35 · 11.3% (27 of 238 decks)
- Guac & Marshmallow Pizza relevance 0.39 · 6.3% (15 of 238 decks)
- Bumbleflower's Sharepot relevance 0.40 · 4.6% (11 of 238 decks)
- Chitterspitter relevance 0.33 · 12.6% (30 of 238 decks)
- Gauntlet of Power relevance 0.35 · 8.8% (21 of 238 decks)
- Firdoch Core relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (12 of 238 decks)
- Omni-Cheese Pizza relevance 0.36 · 3.4% (8 of 238 decks)
- Staff of the Wild Magus relevance 0.33 · 3.8% (9 of 238 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.23 · 13.4% (32 of 238 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.21 · 21.4% (51 of 238 decks)
- Birthing Boughs relevance 0.36 · 2.9% (7 of 238 decks)
- Coat of Arms relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (15 of 238 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.19 · 23.1% (55 of 238 decks)
- Witch's Oven relevance 0.31 · 3.4% (8 of 238 decks)
- Instant Ramen relevance 0.31 · 2.9% (7 of 238 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.15 · 31.9% (76 of 238 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.15 · 17.6% (42 of 238 decks)
- Wurm's Tooth relevance 0.27 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.18 · 4.6% (11 of 238 decks)
- Transmutation Font relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.10 · 32.4% (77 of 238 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (7 of 238 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.17 · 2.9% (7 of 238 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.12 · 8.4% (20 of 238 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (8 of 238 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.10 · 10.1% (24 of 238 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.15 · 2.9% (7 of 238 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 62.6% (149 of 238 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Wall Crawl relevance 0.69 · 13.4% (32 of 238 decks)
- Sylvan Scavenging relevance 0.54 · 31.5% (75 of 238 decks)
- Gourmand's Talent relevance 0.43 · 14.3% (34 of 238 decks)
- Squirrel Nest relevance 0.38 · 23.1% (55 of 238 decks)
- Night of the Sweets' Revenge relevance 0.40 · 18.1% (43 of 238 decks)
- Ninja Pizza relevance 0.39 · 12.2% (29 of 238 decks)
- Web of Life and Destiny relevance 0.39 · 8.8% (21 of 238 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.26 · 33.2% (79 of 238 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.27 · 28.6% (68 of 238 decks)
- Ranger Class relevance 0.38 · 6.7% (16 of 238 decks)
- Campsite Cuisine relevance 0.33 · 5.5% (13 of 238 decks)
- Trail of Crumbs relevance 0.32 · 6.7% (16 of 238 decks)
- Creeping Crystal Coating relevance 0.35 · 4.2% (10 of 238 decks)
- Curse of Clinging Webs relevance 0.40 · 3.4% (8 of 238 decks)
- Heroic Feast relevance 0.32 · 4.2% (10 of 238 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.19 · 20.6% (49 of 238 decks)
- Howling Moon relevance 0.32 · 3.4% (8 of 238 decks)
- Stocking the Pantry relevance 0.25 · 5.0% (12 of 238 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.22 · 8.8% (21 of 238 decks)
- Squirrel Sanctuary relevance 0.28 · 3.8% (9 of 238 decks)
- Seismic Tutelage relevance 0.28 · 3.8% (9 of 238 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.16 · 25.6% (61 of 238 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.21 · 7.6% (18 of 238 decks)
- Arachnoform relevance 0.32 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Wolfwillow Haven relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (8 of 238 decks)
- Killer Service relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (8 of 238 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.17 · 16.4% (39 of 238 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.18 · 12.2% (29 of 238 decks)
- Leaves from the Vine relevance 0.30 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Glorious Sunrise relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (9 of 238 decks)
- Careful Cultivation relevance 0.30 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Communal Brewing relevance 0.28 · 2.9% (7 of 238 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.18 · 11.3% (27 of 238 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.20 · 5.0% (12 of 238 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.22 · 4.2% (10 of 238 decks)
- Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.27 · 2.9% (7 of 238 decks)
- Animal Friend relevance 0.26 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.17 · 6.7% (16 of 238 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (15 of 238 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.15 · 10.9% (26 of 238 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.16 · 10.1% (24 of 238 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (9 of 238 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.21 · 2.9% (7 of 238 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (15 of 238 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (12 of 238 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.13 · 12.2% (29 of 238 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.14 · 7.6% (18 of 238 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.10 · 24.8% (59 of 238 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (7 of 238 decks)
- Dancing from Dark to Dawn relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (8 of 238 decks)
All instants (50)
- Grow Extra Arms relevance 0.57 · 17.6% (42 of 238 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.39 · 37.4% (89 of 238 decks)
- Pawpatch Formation relevance 0.40 · 18.9% (45 of 238 decks)
- Pippin's Bravery relevance 0.46 · 8.8% (21 of 238 decks)
- Polliwallop relevance 0.45 · 6.3% (15 of 238 decks)
- Terrific Team-Up relevance 0.43 · 5.9% (14 of 238 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.33 · 14.3% (34 of 238 decks)
- Blinding Fog relevance 0.37 · 8.4% (20 of 238 decks)
- Stew the Coneys relevance 0.35 · 5.5% (13 of 238 decks)
- Insatiable Appetite relevance 0.40 · 3.8% (9 of 238 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.29 · 5.9% (14 of 238 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.29 · 4.6% (11 of 238 decks)
- Saved by the Shell relevance 0.30 · 4.2% (10 of 238 decks)
- The Art of Tea relevance 0.33 · 3.4% (8 of 238 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.22 · 12.6% (30 of 238 decks)
- Tangle relevance 0.27 · 4.6% (11 of 238 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.23 · 11.3% (27 of 238 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.25 · 7.6% (18 of 238 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.19 · 24.8% (59 of 238 decks)
- Verdant Command relevance 0.27 · 4.6% (11 of 238 decks)
- Blessed Respite relevance 0.26 · 5.5% (13 of 238 decks)
- Plummet relevance 0.30 · 3.4% (8 of 238 decks)
- Tower Defense relevance 0.34 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.20 · 12.2% (29 of 238 decks)
- Fell the Pheasant relevance 0.33 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.21 · 5.5% (13 of 238 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.21 · 4.6% (11 of 238 decks)
- Bestow Greatness relevance 0.29 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (9 of 238 decks)
- Staggering Size relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.13 · 34.9% (83 of 238 decks)
- Cache Grab relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (8 of 238 decks)
- Aggressive Urge relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Moment's Peace relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (8 of 238 decks)
- Aspect of Hydra relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (8 of 238 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.15 · 15.5% (37 of 238 decks)
- High Stride relevance 0.27 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.15 · 12.6% (30 of 238 decks)
- Druid's Deliverance relevance 0.23 · 2.9% (7 of 238 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (9 of 238 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.16 · 8.8% (21 of 238 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.15 · 11.8% (28 of 238 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.17 · 4.6% (11 of 238 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.16 · 7.6% (18 of 238 decks)
- Airship Crash relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Silkguard relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (8 of 238 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.14 · 10.9% (26 of 238 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.16 · 4.2% (10 of 238 decks)
- Peerless Recycling relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (9 of 238 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Kapow! relevance 0.50 · 12.2% (29 of 238 decks)
- Wolf's Quarry relevance 0.53 · 8.0% (19 of 238 decks)
- Scout the City relevance 0.47 · 8.4% (20 of 238 decks)
- Revive the Shire relevance 0.38 · 15.1% (36 of 238 decks)
- Preposterous Proportions relevance 0.34 · 24.8% (59 of 238 decks)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 0.40 · 11.8% (28 of 238 decks)
- Gysahl Greens relevance 0.44 · 6.7% (16 of 238 decks)
- Many Partings relevance 0.35 · 15.5% (37 of 238 decks)
- Spider Food relevance 0.40 · 8.0% (19 of 238 decks)
- Chatterstorm relevance 0.34 · 14.3% (34 of 238 decks)
- Return from the Wilds relevance 0.36 · 5.5% (13 of 238 decks)
- Rootcast Apprenticeship relevance 0.33 · 6.7% (16 of 238 decks)
- Formless Genesis relevance 0.36 · 4.2% (10 of 238 decks)
- Giant Opportunity relevance 0.33 · 5.0% (12 of 238 decks)
- Commune with Beavers relevance 0.32 · 5.5% (13 of 238 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.25 · 14.7% (35 of 238 decks)
- Bumi's Feast Lecture relevance 0.31 · 5.0% (12 of 238 decks)
- Chatter of the Squirrel relevance 0.29 · 5.5% (13 of 238 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.18 · 26.1% (62 of 238 decks)
- For the Common Good relevance 0.24 · 5.9% (14 of 238 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.16 · 26.5% (63 of 238 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.21 · 8.8% (21 of 238 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.18 · 18.9% (45 of 238 decks)
- Sami's Curiosity relevance 0.30 · 2.9% (7 of 238 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.17 · 19.3% (46 of 238 decks)
- Tend the Sprigs relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (8 of 238 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.19 · 8.0% (19 of 238 decks)
- Assert Perfection relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Mutant Chain Reaction relevance 0.27 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (17 of 238 decks)
- Synchronized Charge relevance 0.27 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Wear Down relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (8 of 238 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (9 of 238 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.12 · 37.8% (90 of 238 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (17 of 238 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.14 · 22.7% (54 of 238 decks)
- Gaea's Blessing relevance 0.24 · 2.9% (7 of 238 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.13 · 27.7% (66 of 238 decks)
- Earthbending Lesson relevance 0.24 · 2.9% (7 of 238 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.15 · 10.9% (26 of 238 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.10 · 48.7% (116 of 238 decks)
- Atraxa's Fall relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 0.23 · 2.9% (7 of 238 decks)
- Roamer's Routine relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Rabid Bite relevance 0.22 · 2.9% (7 of 238 decks)
- Chocobo Kick relevance 0.22 · 2.9% (7 of 238 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.11 · 27.7% (66 of 238 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (8 of 238 decks)
- Traverse the Ulvenwald relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (8 of 238 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (1)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.30 · 11.3% (27 of 238 decks)
All utility lands (44)
- Oakhollow Village relevance 0.44 · 31.1% (74 of 238 decks)
- Animal Sanctuary relevance 0.50 · 13.0% (31 of 238 decks)
- The Shire relevance 0.38 · 34.0% (81 of 238 decks)
- Swarmyard relevance 0.38 · 18.5% (44 of 238 decks)
- Gingerbread Cabin relevance 0.34 · 20.6% (49 of 238 decks)
- Daily Bugle Building relevance 0.39 · 7.1% (17 of 238 decks)
- Chocobo Camp relevance 0.39 · 5.0% (12 of 238 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.19 · 24.8% (59 of 238 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.22 · 8.0% (19 of 238 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (15 of 238 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.22 · 5.9% (14 of 238 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.27 · 2.9% (7 of 238 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.19 · 8.0% (19 of 238 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.19 · 8.0% (19 of 238 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.16 · 14.7% (35 of 238 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.19 · 5.0% (12 of 238 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (9 of 238 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.14 · 20.6% (49 of 238 decks)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.20 · 4.2% (10 of 238 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (8 of 238 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.15 · 11.8% (28 of 238 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.14 · 21.0% (50 of 238 decks)
- Drannith Ruins relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (34 of 238 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.23 · 2.9% (7 of 238 decks)
- Pendelhaven relevance 0.22 · 2.9% (7 of 238 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.16 · 8.0% (19 of 238 decks)
- Zanarkand, Ancient Metropolis // Lasting Fayth relevance 0.22 · 2.9% (7 of 238 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.13 · 16.8% (40 of 238 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (34 of 238 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.21 · 2.9% (7 of 238 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.21 · 2.9% (7 of 238 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (8 of 238 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.11 · 21.4% (51 of 238 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (15 of 238 decks)
- Inkmoth Nexus relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.14 · 5.5% (13 of 238 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (8 of 238 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.14 · 2.9% (7 of 238 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (16)
- Command Tower relevance 0.26 · 15.5% (37 of 238 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (15 of 238 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.19 · 13.9% (33 of 238 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.18 · 9.2% (22 of 238 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.19 · 6.7% (16 of 238 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.17 · 11.3% (27 of 238 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.17 · 8.0% (19 of 238 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (34 of 238 decks)
- Tree of Tales relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.16 · 4.2% (10 of 238 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.14 · 5.5% (13 of 238 decks)
- Havenwood Battleground relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.17 · 2.9% (7 of 238 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.13 · 4.6% (11 of 238 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (6 of 238 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 92.0% (219 of 238 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Spider-Ham, Peter Porker, from 238 real Commander decks.