Commanders like Kaysa
4 commanders · based on 1,333 decks
Similar Commanders
Top Picks
All similar commanders (3)
- Seton, Krosan Protector 46.7% (622 of 1,333 decks)
- Shang-Chi, Master of Kung Fu 44.3% (590 of 1,333 decks)
- Thriss, Nantuko Primus 2.8% (37 of 1,333 decks)
All top picks (50)
- Llanowar Druid relevance 0.32 · 22.4% (298 of 1,333 decks)
- Druid Lyrist relevance 0.43 · 25.4% (339 of 1,333 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 0.31 · 44.3% (590 of 1,333 decks)
- Skyshroud Poacher relevance 0.40 · 20.4% (272 of 1,333 decks)
- Regal Force relevance 0.29 · 50.3% (670 of 1,333 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf Archdruid relevance 0.39 · 37.3% (497 of 1,333 decks)
- Mobilize relevance 0.28 · 30.5% (406 of 1,333 decks)
- Karametra's Acolyte relevance 0.27 · 69.8% (930 of 1,333 decks)
- Scryb Ranger relevance 0.27 · 27.8% (370 of 1,333 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.26 · 26.2% (349 of 1,333 decks)
- Woodland Bellower relevance 0.25 · 22.3% (297 of 1,333 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 0.33 · 24.4% (325 of 1,333 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.24 · 48.1% (641 of 1,333 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 0.24 · 55.0% (733 of 1,333 decks)
- Voice of Many relevance 0.32 · 32.8% (437 of 1,333 decks)
- Birchlore Rangers relevance 0.32 · 16.2% (216 of 1,333 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.24 · 44.4% (592 of 1,333 decks)
- Woodland Druid relevance 0.47 · 5.5% (73 of 1,333 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 0.23 · 29.5% (393 of 1,333 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.22 · 51.2% (683 of 1,333 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.22 · 44.7% (596 of 1,333 decks)
- Voyaging Satyr relevance 0.22 · 19.3% (257 of 1,333 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.22 · 13.1% (174 of 1,333 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.22 · 34.7% (462 of 1,333 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.22 · 72.1% (961 of 1,333 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.29 · 28.9% (385 of 1,333 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.22 · 77.0% (1,027 of 1,333 decks)
- Ulvenwald Tracker relevance 0.21 · 18.7% (249 of 1,333 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 0.21 · 39.7% (529 of 1,333 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.28 · 24.8% (331 of 1,333 decks)
- Argothian Elder relevance 0.21 · 12.1% (161 of 1,333 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 0.21 · 31.7% (422 of 1,333 decks)
- Llanowar Mentor relevance 0.27 · 17.0% (227 of 1,333 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.27 · 24.8% (331 of 1,333 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.20 · 33.5% (447 of 1,333 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.27 · 41.0% (547 of 1,333 decks)
- Elvish Lyrist relevance 0.27 · 5.0% (66 of 1,333 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.20 · 25.6% (341 of 1,333 decks)
- Heart Warden relevance 0.26 · 8.0% (107 of 1,333 decks)
- Leafkin Druid relevance 0.20 · 14.8% (197 of 1,333 decks)
- Magus of the Order relevance 0.26 · 23.6% (314 of 1,333 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.19 · 12.1% (161 of 1,333 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.19 · 33.4% (445 of 1,333 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.25 · 9.2% (122 of 1,333 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.19 · 24.5% (327 of 1,333 decks)
- Deeproot Historian relevance 0.37 · 15.1% (201 of 1,333 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.18 · 17.0% (226 of 1,333 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.18 · 16.1% (214 of 1,333 decks)
- Yisan, the Wanderer Bard relevance 0.24 · 28.3% (377 of 1,333 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.24 · 29.8% (397 of 1,333 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Llanowar Druid relevance 0.32 · 22.4% (298 of 1,333 decks)
- Druid Lyrist relevance 0.43 · 25.4% (339 of 1,333 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 0.31 · 44.3% (590 of 1,333 decks)
- Skyshroud Poacher relevance 0.40 · 20.4% (272 of 1,333 decks)
- Regal Force relevance 0.29 · 50.3% (670 of 1,333 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf Archdruid relevance 0.39 · 37.3% (497 of 1,333 decks)
- Karametra's Acolyte relevance 0.27 · 69.8% (930 of 1,333 decks)
- Scryb Ranger relevance 0.27 · 27.8% (370 of 1,333 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.26 · 26.2% (349 of 1,333 decks)
- Woodland Bellower relevance 0.25 · 22.3% (297 of 1,333 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 0.33 · 24.4% (325 of 1,333 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.24 · 48.1% (641 of 1,333 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 0.24 · 55.0% (733 of 1,333 decks)
- Voice of Many relevance 0.32 · 32.8% (437 of 1,333 decks)
- Birchlore Rangers relevance 0.32 · 16.2% (216 of 1,333 decks)
- Woodland Druid relevance 0.47 · 5.5% (73 of 1,333 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 0.23 · 29.5% (393 of 1,333 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.22 · 44.7% (596 of 1,333 decks)
- Voyaging Satyr relevance 0.22 · 19.3% (257 of 1,333 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.22 · 13.1% (174 of 1,333 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.22 · 34.7% (462 of 1,333 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.22 · 72.1% (961 of 1,333 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.29 · 28.9% (385 of 1,333 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.22 · 77.0% (1,027 of 1,333 decks)
- Ulvenwald Tracker relevance 0.21 · 18.7% (249 of 1,333 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 0.21 · 39.7% (529 of 1,333 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.28 · 24.8% (331 of 1,333 decks)
- Argothian Elder relevance 0.21 · 12.1% (161 of 1,333 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 0.21 · 31.7% (422 of 1,333 decks)
- Llanowar Mentor relevance 0.27 · 17.0% (227 of 1,333 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.27 · 24.8% (331 of 1,333 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.20 · 33.5% (447 of 1,333 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.27 · 41.0% (547 of 1,333 decks)
- Elvish Lyrist relevance 0.27 · 5.0% (66 of 1,333 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.20 · 25.6% (341 of 1,333 decks)
- Heart Warden relevance 0.26 · 8.0% (107 of 1,333 decks)
- Leafkin Druid relevance 0.20 · 14.8% (197 of 1,333 decks)
- Magus of the Order relevance 0.26 · 23.6% (314 of 1,333 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.19 · 12.1% (161 of 1,333 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.19 · 33.4% (445 of 1,333 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.25 · 9.2% (122 of 1,333 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.19 · 24.5% (327 of 1,333 decks)
- Deeproot Historian relevance 0.37 · 15.1% (201 of 1,333 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.18 · 16.1% (214 of 1,333 decks)
- Yisan, the Wanderer Bard relevance 0.24 · 28.3% (377 of 1,333 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.24 · 29.8% (397 of 1,333 decks)
- Elvish Pioneer relevance 0.24 · 33.1% (441 of 1,333 decks)
- Great Oak Guardian relevance 0.24 · 12.4% (165 of 1,333 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.24 · 29.9% (399 of 1,333 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.18 · 76.4% (1,018 of 1,333 decks)
All artifacts (23)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.16 · 15.1% (201 of 1,333 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.13 · 20.1% (268 of 1,333 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.12 · 18.4% (245 of 1,333 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.12 · 7.2% (96 of 1,333 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.07 · 19.8% (264 of 1,333 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.04 · 10.4% (139 of 1,333 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.05 · 21.8% (290 of 1,333 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.04 · 26.4% (352 of 1,333 decks)
- Throne of the God-Pharaoh relevance 0.06 · 9.5% (127 of 1,333 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.02 · 11.2% (149 of 1,333 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.01 · 6.1% (81 of 1,333 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.02 · 5.1% (68 of 1,333 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.01 · 7.4% (98 of 1,333 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.01 · 19.3% (257 of 1,333 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.01 · 24.6% (328 of 1,333 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.01 · 22.0% (293 of 1,333 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.00 · 8.0% (106 of 1,333 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.00 · 28.6% (381 of 1,333 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.00 · 5.5% (73 of 1,333 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.00 · 9.2% (123 of 1,333 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.00 · 7.0% (93 of 1,333 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.00 · 51.5% (687 of 1,333 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.00 · 9.4% (125 of 1,333 decks)
All enchantments (23)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.22 · 51.2% (683 of 1,333 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.18 · 8.8% (117 of 1,333 decks)
- Quest for Renewal relevance 0.17 · 9.7% (129 of 1,333 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.16 · 17.7% (236 of 1,333 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.16 · 36.6% (488 of 1,333 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.16 · 9.3% (124 of 1,333 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.21 · 9.2% (122 of 1,333 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.15 · 12.6% (168 of 1,333 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (95 of 1,333 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.15 · 16.3% (217 of 1,333 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.15 · 42.0% (560 of 1,333 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.14 · 10.3% (137 of 1,333 decks)
- Aluren relevance 0.19 · 5.0% (66 of 1,333 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.14 · 6.0% (80 of 1,333 decks)
- Survival of the Fittest relevance 0.18 · 23.3% (310 of 1,333 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.13 · 16.4% (218 of 1,333 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.13 · 5.6% (74 of 1,333 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.12 · 5.3% (71 of 1,333 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.12 · 9.5% (127 of 1,333 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.15 · 8.6% (114 of 1,333 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.10 · 5.9% (79 of 1,333 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.12 · 5.7% (76 of 1,333 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.11 · 5.1% (68 of 1,333 decks)
All instants (25)
- Vitalize relevance 0.24 · 44.4% (592 of 1,333 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.18 · 31.0% (413 of 1,333 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.17 · 44.5% (593 of 1,333 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (94 of 1,333 decks)
- Benefactor's Draught relevance 0.22 · 21.9% (292 of 1,333 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.16 · 12.3% (164 of 1,333 decks)
- Autumn's Veil relevance 0.16 · 9.8% (131 of 1,333 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.20 · 36.2% (482 of 1,333 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.15 · 39.9% (532 of 1,333 decks)
- Once Upon a Time relevance 0.20 · 19.0% (253 of 1,333 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.15 · 28.2% (376 of 1,333 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.14 · 12.8% (171 of 1,333 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.14 · 43.2% (576 of 1,333 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.13 · 17.3% (230 of 1,333 decks)
- Kindred Summons relevance 0.18 · 10.9% (145 of 1,333 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.17 · 53.0% (707 of 1,333 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.12 · 10.2% (136 of 1,333 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.12 · 7.8% (104 of 1,333 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.12 · 5.9% (79 of 1,333 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.12 · 42.1% (561 of 1,333 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.15 · 18.5% (247 of 1,333 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.11 · 8.0% (107 of 1,333 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.11 · 36.0% (480 of 1,333 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.19 · 29.0% (386 of 1,333 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.13 · 9.5% (126 of 1,333 decks)
All sorceries (31)
- Mobilize relevance 0.28 · 30.5% (406 of 1,333 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.18 · 17.0% (226 of 1,333 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.18 · 28.6% (381 of 1,333 decks)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 0.23 · 34.1% (454 of 1,333 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.17 · 51.5% (686 of 1,333 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.17 · 36.9% (492 of 1,333 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.16 · 19.1% (255 of 1,333 decks)
- Collective Unconscious relevance 0.22 · 18.6% (248 of 1,333 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.16 · 39.8% (531 of 1,333 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.16 · 51.1% (681 of 1,333 decks)
- Creeping Renaissance relevance 0.19 · 9.5% (126 of 1,333 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.18 · 40.0% (533 of 1,333 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.14 · 9.0% (120 of 1,333 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.13 · 6.8% (91 of 1,333 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.13 · 6.1% (81 of 1,333 decks)
- Hurricane relevance 0.17 · 5.7% (76 of 1,333 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (222 of 1,333 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.17 · 24.2% (323 of 1,333 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.12 · 8.2% (109 of 1,333 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.16 · 29.8% (397 of 1,333 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.11 · 6.7% (89 of 1,333 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.11 · 5.3% (71 of 1,333 decks)
- Ecological Appreciation relevance 0.22 · 20.2% (269 of 1,333 decks)
- Celestial Reunion relevance 0.21 · 20.9% (279 of 1,333 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.10 · 5.6% (74 of 1,333 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.09 · 8.7% (116 of 1,333 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.09 · 10.5% (140 of 1,333 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.09 · 7.8% (104 of 1,333 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.08 · 6.9% (92 of 1,333 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.16 · 10.7% (142 of 1,333 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.08 · 9.1% (121 of 1,333 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.19 · 14.6% (194 of 1,333 decks)
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.18 · 26.3% (350 of 1,333 decks)
All utility lands (22)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.27 · 31.6% (421 of 1,333 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.18 · 30.2% (402 of 1,333 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.17 · 49.5% (660 of 1,333 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.16 · 18.8% (250 of 1,333 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.15 · 19.0% (253 of 1,333 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.14 · 6.2% (83 of 1,333 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.14 · 16.1% (214 of 1,333 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.13 · 5.1% (68 of 1,333 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.13 · 46.6% (621 of 1,333 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (94 of 1,333 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.12 · 13.0% (173 of 1,333 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.11 · 7.5% (100 of 1,333 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.02 · 13.5% (180 of 1,333 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.01 · 25.0% (333 of 1,333 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.01 · 22.2% (296 of 1,333 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.01 · 5.6% (74 of 1,333 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.00 · 11.5% (153 of 1,333 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.01 · 17.9% (239 of 1,333 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.00 · 5.6% (75 of 1,333 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.00 · 5.5% (73 of 1,333 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.00 · 6.6% (88 of 1,333 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.00 · 12.5% (166 of 1,333 decks)
All lands (17)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.21 · 18.1% (241 of 1,333 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.16 · 28.1% (375 of 1,333 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.15 · 39.2% (522 of 1,333 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.13 · 9.9% (132 of 1,333 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.11 · 5.5% (73 of 1,333 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.07 · 89.5% (1,193 of 1,333 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.06 · 45.2% (603 of 1,333 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.04 · 29.0% (387 of 1,333 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.04 · 28.4% (378 of 1,333 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.03 · 28.9% (385 of 1,333 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.03 · 28.9% (385 of 1,333 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.03 · 16.7% (222 of 1,333 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.01 · 39.4% (525 of 1,333 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.01 · 18.9% (252 of 1,333 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.01 · 27.0% (360 of 1,333 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.00 · 15.6% (208 of 1,333 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.00 · 23.8% (317 of 1,333 decks)
4 EDH commanders that play like Kaysa, and the cards they share.