Cards like Tolsimir, Friend to Wolves
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Rampant Growth
1.6× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 51% of other Selesnya decks
48% of decks run two or more
vs. 29% of other Selesnya decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.95 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Rampant Growth 44%
- Kodama's Reach 40%
- Cultivate 40%
- Explosive Vegetation 10%
- Deep Reconnaissance 5%
- Shared Roots 3%
- Beneath the Sands 1%
- Roamer's Routine 1%
Other options: Reach the Horizon, Grow from the Ashes, Search for Tomorrow, Map the Wastes, Migration Path, Map the Frontier, Terramorph, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Collective Blessing
7.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Selesnya decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Muraganda Petroglyphs
Cards like Knight of New Alara
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Garruk's Uprising
5.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Selesnya decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Queen Allenal of Ruadach
14× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Juniper Order Ranger
6.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Selesnya decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 48% of other Selesnya decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. 31% of other Selesnya decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 1.1 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 45%
- Elvish Mystic 28%
- Avacyn's Pilgrim 25%
- Steward of Valeron 17%
- Fyndhorn Elves 10%
- Fyndhorn Elder 1%
- Leaf Gilder 1%
Other options: Boreal Druid, Woodland Mystic, Goobbue Gardener, Orochi Sustainer, Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Greenweaver Druid, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers
Cards like Rootborn Defenses
2.9× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Dauntless Escort
3.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Dauntless Bodyguard
Cards like Flowering of the White Tree
5.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Doubling Season
1.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other Selesnya decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other Selesnya decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.38 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Doubling Season 17%
- Parallel Lives 12%
- Anointed Procession 10%
- Primal Vigor 1%
Cards like Kutzil, Malamet Exemplar
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other Selesnya decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Lightning Greaves
1.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other Selesnya decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.36 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Lightning Greaves 24%
- Swiftfoot Boots 17%
All top picks (50)
- Tolsimir, Friend to Wolves relevance 0.66 · 42.4% (73 of 172 decks)
- Knight of New Alara relevance 0.75 · 29.1% (50 of 172 decks)
- Tolsimir, Midnight's Light relevance 0.58 · 35.5% (61 of 172 decks)
- Wilt-Leaf Liege relevance 0.48 · 47.1% (81 of 172 decks)
- Glass of the Guildpact relevance 0.67 · 12.8% (22 of 172 decks)
- Conclave Cavalier relevance 0.58 · 22.1% (38 of 172 decks)
- Sylvan Messenger relevance 0.59 · 11.0% (19 of 172 decks)
- Elvish Vanguard relevance 0.57 · 11.6% (20 of 172 decks)
- Wirewood Pride relevance 0.59 · 9.3% (16 of 172 decks)
- Steward of Valeron relevance 0.50 · 17.4% (30 of 172 decks)
- Conclave Guildmage relevance 0.50 · 17.4% (30 of 172 decks)
- Heedless One relevance 0.56 · 10.5% (18 of 172 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 0.52 · 12.8% (22 of 172 decks)
- Elvish Soultiller relevance 0.58 · 8.1% (14 of 172 decks)
- Voice of the Woods relevance 0.55 · 9.9% (17 of 172 decks)
- Wirewood Herald relevance 0.53 · 11.0% (19 of 172 decks)
- Selesnya Guildmage relevance 0.45 · 21.5% (37 of 172 decks)
- Assure // Assemble relevance 0.49 · 12.8% (22 of 172 decks)
- Seed Spark relevance 0.52 · 9.9% (17 of 172 decks)
- Mercy Killing relevance 0.47 · 14.0% (24 of 172 decks)
- Konda's Banner relevance 0.51 · 9.3% (16 of 172 decks)
- Akroma's Blessing relevance 0.50 · 9.9% (17 of 172 decks)
- Wear Away relevance 0.55 · 5.8% (10 of 172 decks)
- Vernal Sovereign relevance 0.46 · 13.4% (23 of 172 decks)
- Loxodon Hierarch relevance 0.45 · 13.4% (23 of 172 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 0.46 · 12.2% (21 of 172 decks)
- Genesis relevance 0.49 · 9.9% (17 of 172 decks)
- Selesnya Keyrune relevance 0.46 · 12.8% (22 of 172 decks)
- Nightpack Ambusher relevance 0.46 · 12.8% (22 of 172 decks)
- High-Rise Sawjack relevance 0.52 · 7.0% (12 of 172 decks)
- Collective Blessing relevance 0.36 · 32.0% (55 of 172 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.45 · 11.6% (20 of 172 decks)
- Scepter of Celebration relevance 0.42 · 13.4% (23 of 172 decks)
- Dragon Throne of Tarkir relevance 0.46 · 9.3% (16 of 172 decks)
- Trostani, Selesnya's Voice relevance 0.33 · 34.9% (60 of 172 decks)
- Mirror Box relevance 0.47 · 8.7% (15 of 172 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.43 · 12.2% (21 of 172 decks)
- Wirewood Hivemaster relevance 0.49 · 6.4% (11 of 172 decks)
- Deathbloom Gardener relevance 0.47 · 8.1% (14 of 172 decks)
- Trostani Discordant relevance 0.35 · 26.7% (46 of 172 decks)
- Vrestin, Menoptra Leader relevance 0.41 · 12.8% (22 of 172 decks)
- Ray of Revelation relevance 0.45 · 8.7% (15 of 172 decks)
- Juniper Order Ranger relevance 0.36 · 22.1% (38 of 172 decks)
- Quirion Elves relevance 0.44 · 9.3% (16 of 172 decks)
- Watchwolf relevance 0.37 · 20.3% (35 of 172 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.46 · 7.6% (13 of 172 decks)
- Biorhythm relevance 0.43 · 9.9% (17 of 172 decks)
- Season of Renewal relevance 0.44 · 9.3% (16 of 172 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.42 · 10.5% (18 of 172 decks)
- Mirror Gallery relevance 0.47 · 5.2% (9 of 172 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Tolsimir, Friend to Wolves relevance 0.66 · 42.4% (73 of 172 decks)
- Knight of New Alara relevance 0.75 · 29.1% (50 of 172 decks)
- Tolsimir, Midnight's Light relevance 0.58 · 35.5% (61 of 172 decks)
- Wilt-Leaf Liege relevance 0.48 · 47.1% (81 of 172 decks)
- Conclave Cavalier relevance 0.58 · 22.1% (38 of 172 decks)
- Sylvan Messenger relevance 0.59 · 11.0% (19 of 172 decks)
- Elvish Vanguard relevance 0.57 · 11.6% (20 of 172 decks)
- Steward of Valeron relevance 0.50 · 17.4% (30 of 172 decks)
- Conclave Guildmage relevance 0.50 · 17.4% (30 of 172 decks)
- Heedless One relevance 0.56 · 10.5% (18 of 172 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 0.52 · 12.8% (22 of 172 decks)
- Elvish Soultiller relevance 0.58 · 8.1% (14 of 172 decks)
- Voice of the Woods relevance 0.55 · 9.9% (17 of 172 decks)
- Wirewood Herald relevance 0.53 · 11.0% (19 of 172 decks)
- Selesnya Guildmage relevance 0.45 · 21.5% (37 of 172 decks)
- Vernal Sovereign relevance 0.46 · 13.4% (23 of 172 decks)
- Loxodon Hierarch relevance 0.45 · 13.4% (23 of 172 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 0.46 · 12.2% (21 of 172 decks)
- Genesis relevance 0.49 · 9.9% (17 of 172 decks)
- Nightpack Ambusher relevance 0.46 · 12.8% (22 of 172 decks)
- High-Rise Sawjack relevance 0.52 · 7.0% (12 of 172 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.45 · 11.6% (20 of 172 decks)
- Trostani, Selesnya's Voice relevance 0.33 · 34.9% (60 of 172 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.43 · 12.2% (21 of 172 decks)
- Wirewood Hivemaster relevance 0.49 · 6.4% (11 of 172 decks)
- Deathbloom Gardener relevance 0.47 · 8.1% (14 of 172 decks)
- Trostani Discordant relevance 0.35 · 26.7% (46 of 172 decks)
- Vrestin, Menoptra Leader relevance 0.41 · 12.8% (22 of 172 decks)
- Juniper Order Ranger relevance 0.36 · 22.1% (38 of 172 decks)
- Quirion Elves relevance 0.44 · 9.3% (16 of 172 decks)
- Watchwolf relevance 0.37 · 20.3% (35 of 172 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.46 · 7.6% (13 of 172 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.42 · 10.5% (18 of 172 decks)
- Dauntless Escort relevance 0.35 · 23.3% (40 of 172 decks)
- Hollowhenge Overlord relevance 0.42 · 9.9% (17 of 172 decks)
- Oversoul of Dusk relevance 0.46 · 5.8% (10 of 172 decks)
- Wayfaring Temple relevance 0.36 · 16.9% (29 of 172 decks)
- Knight of Autumn relevance 0.35 · 18.6% (32 of 172 decks)
- Viridian Joiner relevance 0.43 · 7.6% (13 of 172 decks)
- Tundra Wolves relevance 0.45 · 5.8% (10 of 172 decks)
- Quirion Trailblazer relevance 0.44 · 5.2% (9 of 172 decks)
- King Darien XLVIII relevance 0.30 · 29.7% (51 of 172 decks)
- Elvish Pioneer relevance 0.40 · 9.9% (17 of 172 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.39 · 10.5% (18 of 172 decks)
- Trostani, Three Whispers relevance 0.35 · 15.1% (26 of 172 decks)
- Rhys the Redeemed relevance 0.28 · 33.7% (58 of 172 decks)
- Master of the Wild Hunt relevance 0.40 · 8.7% (15 of 172 decks)
- Queen Allenal of Ruadach relevance 0.30 · 26.2% (45 of 172 decks)
- Voice of Resurgence relevance 0.31 · 22.7% (39 of 172 decks)
- Emmara Tandris relevance 0.35 · 12.2% (21 of 172 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Glass of the Guildpact relevance 0.67 · 12.8% (22 of 172 decks)
- Konda's Banner relevance 0.51 · 9.3% (16 of 172 decks)
- Selesnya Keyrune relevance 0.46 · 12.8% (22 of 172 decks)
- Scepter of Celebration relevance 0.42 · 13.4% (23 of 172 decks)
- Dragon Throne of Tarkir relevance 0.46 · 9.3% (16 of 172 decks)
- Mirror Box relevance 0.47 · 8.7% (15 of 172 decks)
- Mirror Gallery relevance 0.47 · 5.2% (9 of 172 decks)
- Thornbite Staff relevance 0.42 · 7.6% (13 of 172 decks)
- Spear of Heliod relevance 0.34 · 12.2% (21 of 172 decks)
- Crown of Convergence relevance 0.41 · 4.1% (7 of 172 decks)
- Sword of Vengeance relevance 0.34 · 8.1% (14 of 172 decks)
- Firdoch Core relevance 0.34 · 6.4% (11 of 172 decks)
- Door of Destinies relevance 0.30 · 9.9% (17 of 172 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.20 · 43.6% (75 of 172 decks)
- Sword of the Paruns relevance 0.32 · 5.8% (10 of 172 decks)
- Selesnya Locket relevance 0.31 · 6.4% (11 of 172 decks)
- Selesnya Cluestone relevance 0.31 · 5.8% (10 of 172 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.31 · 5.2% (9 of 172 decks)
- Gathering Stone relevance 0.28 · 6.4% (11 of 172 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.19 · 24.4% (42 of 172 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 0.28 · 4.1% (7 of 172 decks)
- Tome of the Guildpact relevance 0.36 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Halo Fountain relevance 0.21 · 12.8% (22 of 172 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.24 · 6.4% (11 of 172 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.24 · 6.4% (11 of 172 decks)
- Wolfrider's Saddle relevance 0.32 · 2.9% (5 of 172 decks)
- Coat of Arms relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (8 of 172 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (6 of 172 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.24 · 5.2% (9 of 172 decks)
- Wildfield Borderpost relevance 0.30 · 2.9% (5 of 172 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.17 · 14.5% (25 of 172 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.21 · 5.2% (9 of 172 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.25 · 3.5% (6 of 172 decks)
- Behemoth Sledge relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (8 of 172 decks)
- Seal of the Guildpact relevance 0.29 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Citizen's Crowbar relevance 0.28 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.19 · 5.8% (10 of 172 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (7 of 172 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.14 · 17.4% (30 of 172 decks)
- Wurm's Tooth relevance 0.26 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (7 of 172 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.21 · 3.5% (6 of 172 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.16 · 8.7% (15 of 172 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (8 of 172 decks)
- Fireshrieker relevance 0.22 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.19 · 2.9% (5 of 172 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.07 · 47.1% (81 of 172 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Staff of the Storyteller relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.14 · 3.5% (6 of 172 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Collective Blessing relevance 0.36 · 32.0% (55 of 172 decks)
- Rabble Rousing relevance 0.36 · 16.9% (29 of 172 decks)
- Lunarch Mantle relevance 0.45 · 5.8% (10 of 172 decks)
- Alpha Status relevance 0.41 · 9.3% (16 of 172 decks)
- Howling Moon relevance 0.40 · 8.7% (15 of 172 decks)
- Gaea's Anthem relevance 0.36 · 12.8% (22 of 172 decks)
- Flowering of the White Tree relevance 0.30 · 25.0% (43 of 172 decks)
- Rune of Might relevance 0.39 · 8.1% (14 of 172 decks)
- Anthem of Champions relevance 0.30 · 25.0% (43 of 172 decks)
- Serpent Skin relevance 0.44 · 4.1% (7 of 172 decks)
- Dictate of Heliod relevance 0.33 · 13.4% (23 of 172 decks)
- Glorious Anthem relevance 0.34 · 11.6% (20 of 172 decks)
- Howlpack Resurgence relevance 0.38 · 6.4% (11 of 172 decks)
- Growing Ranks relevance 0.27 · 23.8% (41 of 172 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.24 · 35.5% (61 of 172 decks)
- Marshal's Anthem relevance 0.34 · 7.6% (13 of 172 decks)
- Wolfcaller's Howl relevance 0.35 · 5.8% (10 of 172 decks)
- Force of Virtue relevance 0.36 · 5.2% (9 of 172 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.34 · 7.6% (13 of 172 decks)
- Raised by Wolves relevance 0.36 · 5.2% (9 of 172 decks)
- In the Trenches relevance 0.33 · 5.8% (10 of 172 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.29 · 11.0% (19 of 172 decks)
- Mantle of the Wolf relevance 0.34 · 4.1% (7 of 172 decks)
- Wolfkin Bond relevance 0.37 · 3.5% (6 of 172 decks)
- Buried in the Garden relevance 0.28 · 9.3% (16 of 172 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.18 · 43.0% (74 of 172 decks)
- Ooze Garden relevance 0.40 · 2.9% (5 of 172 decks)
- Glare of Subdual relevance 0.29 · 7.6% (13 of 172 decks)
- Pollenbright Wings relevance 0.30 · 5.8% (10 of 172 decks)
- Intangible Virtue relevance 0.24 · 15.7% (27 of 172 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.26 · 12.2% (21 of 172 decks)
- Cage of Hands relevance 0.36 · 3.5% (6 of 172 decks)
- Feed the Pack relevance 0.32 · 4.1% (7 of 172 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.22 · 22.7% (39 of 172 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.29 · 4.7% (8 of 172 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.28 · 5.8% (10 of 172 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.22 · 15.7% (27 of 172 decks)
- Exoskeletal Armor relevance 0.35 · 2.9% (5 of 172 decks)
- Evolutionary Leap relevance 0.29 · 4.1% (7 of 172 decks)
- Ranger Class relevance 0.27 · 4.1% (7 of 172 decks)
- Paladin Class relevance 0.25 · 4.7% (8 of 172 decks)
- Leyline of the Meek relevance 0.33 · 2.9% (5 of 172 decks)
- Fists of Ironwood relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (6 of 172 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.23 · 7.6% (13 of 172 decks)
- Kinbinding relevance 0.23 · 7.6% (13 of 172 decks)
- Privileged Position relevance 0.22 · 8.7% (15 of 172 decks)
- Unflinching Courage relevance 0.23 · 5.8% (10 of 172 decks)
- Conclave's Blessing relevance 0.32 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Anointed Procession relevance 0.19 · 10.5% (18 of 172 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.19 · 11.6% (20 of 172 decks)
All instants (50)
- Wirewood Pride relevance 0.59 · 9.3% (16 of 172 decks)
- Assure // Assemble relevance 0.49 · 12.8% (22 of 172 decks)
- Seed Spark relevance 0.52 · 9.9% (17 of 172 decks)
- Mercy Killing relevance 0.47 · 14.0% (24 of 172 decks)
- Akroma's Blessing relevance 0.50 · 9.9% (17 of 172 decks)
- Wear Away relevance 0.55 · 5.8% (10 of 172 decks)
- Ray of Revelation relevance 0.45 · 8.7% (15 of 172 decks)
- Season of Renewal relevance 0.44 · 9.3% (16 of 172 decks)
- Selesnya Charm relevance 0.36 · 16.3% (28 of 172 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.39 · 8.1% (14 of 172 decks)
- Predator's Howl relevance 0.38 · 5.2% (9 of 172 decks)
- Advent of the Wurm relevance 0.34 · 8.1% (14 of 172 decks)
- Sundering Vitae relevance 0.36 · 5.2% (9 of 172 decks)
- Rebuff the Wicked relevance 0.31 · 11.6% (20 of 172 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.31 · 11.6% (20 of 172 decks)
- Moonlight Hunt relevance 0.36 · 4.7% (8 of 172 decks)
- Join Shields relevance 0.33 · 7.0% (12 of 172 decks)
- Wing It relevance 0.33 · 5.8% (10 of 172 decks)
- Sundering Growth relevance 0.23 · 29.1% (50 of 172 decks)
- Grand Crescendo relevance 0.24 · 25.6% (44 of 172 decks)
- Rootborn Defenses relevance 0.23 · 26.7% (46 of 172 decks)
- Congregation at Dawn relevance 0.30 · 8.1% (14 of 172 decks)
- Scatter the Seeds relevance 0.29 · 5.8% (10 of 172 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.28 · 6.4% (11 of 172 decks)
- Rite of Harmony relevance 0.25 · 10.5% (18 of 172 decks)
- Common Bond relevance 0.33 · 3.5% (6 of 172 decks)
- Druid's Deliverance relevance 0.25 · 8.1% (14 of 172 decks)
- March of the Multitudes relevance 0.21 · 14.5% (25 of 172 decks)
- Devouring Light relevance 0.26 · 5.2% (9 of 172 decks)
- Gerrard's Command relevance 0.33 · 2.9% (5 of 172 decks)
- Dromoka's Command relevance 0.24 · 6.4% (11 of 172 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.20 · 14.0% (24 of 172 decks)
- Aura Mutation relevance 0.21 · 11.0% (19 of 172 decks)
- Pledge of Unity relevance 0.24 · 6.4% (11 of 172 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.23 · 6.4% (11 of 172 decks)
- Cosmic Rebirth relevance 0.23 · 6.4% (11 of 172 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.21 · 9.3% (16 of 172 decks)
- Eyes in the Skies relevance 0.30 · 2.9% (5 of 172 decks)
- Decree of Savagery relevance 0.31 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Sylvan Reclamation relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (7 of 172 decks)
- Disenchant relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (7 of 172 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.17 · 14.0% (24 of 172 decks)
- Dryad's Caress relevance 0.29 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Reprieve relevance 0.19 · 7.0% (12 of 172 decks)
- Nature's Chant relevance 0.26 · 2.9% (5 of 172 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.21 · 4.1% (7 of 172 decks)
- Seeds of Strength relevance 0.28 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.16 · 12.8% (22 of 172 decks)
- Fracturing Gust relevance 0.24 · 2.9% (5 of 172 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.17 · 7.6% (13 of 172 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Biorhythm relevance 0.43 · 9.9% (17 of 172 decks)
- Deep Reconnaissance relevance 0.44 · 4.7% (8 of 172 decks)
- Creeping Mold relevance 0.44 · 4.7% (8 of 172 decks)
- Three Dreams relevance 0.38 · 7.0% (12 of 172 decks)
- Preposterous Proportions relevance 0.34 · 11.0% (19 of 172 decks)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 0.38 · 6.4% (11 of 172 decks)
- Reborn Hope relevance 0.41 · 4.1% (7 of 172 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.33 · 9.9% (17 of 172 decks)
- Overwhelm relevance 0.38 · 4.1% (7 of 172 decks)
- Camaraderie relevance 0.25 · 24.4% (42 of 172 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.29 · 9.9% (17 of 172 decks)
- Call of the Conclave relevance 0.30 · 4.7% (8 of 172 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.28 · 8.1% (14 of 172 decks)
- Alive // Well relevance 0.32 · 4.1% (7 of 172 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.18 · 40.1% (69 of 172 decks)
- Squall relevance 0.39 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.26 · 7.0% (12 of 172 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.24 · 9.9% (17 of 172 decks)
- Flower // Flourish relevance 0.31 · 3.5% (6 of 172 decks)
- Sprouting Renewal relevance 0.30 · 3.5% (6 of 172 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.15 · 44.2% (76 of 172 decks)
- Slimefoot's Survey relevance 0.36 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.19 · 19.2% (33 of 172 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.20 · 12.2% (21 of 172 decks)
- Hour of Reckoning relevance 0.20 · 13.4% (23 of 172 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.22 · 7.6% (13 of 172 decks)
- Depopulate relevance 0.30 · 2.9% (5 of 172 decks)
- Winnowing relevance 0.23 · 4.7% (8 of 172 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.17 · 20.3% (35 of 172 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (7 of 172 decks)
- Wake the Reflections relevance 0.25 · 3.5% (6 of 172 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.25 · 3.5% (6 of 172 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.15 · 27.3% (47 of 172 decks)
- Recollect relevance 0.29 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.18 · 8.7% (15 of 172 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.15 · 18.6% (32 of 172 decks)
- Urza's Ruinous Blast relevance 0.23 · 3.5% (6 of 172 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.16 · 12.8% (22 of 172 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (8 of 172 decks)
- Commune with Nature relevance 0.26 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.11 · 39.5% (68 of 172 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.16 · 6.4% (11 of 172 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.12 · 25.0% (43 of 172 decks)
- Sunset Revelry relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.20 · 2.9% (5 of 172 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Martial Coup relevance 0.16 · 3.5% (6 of 172 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (5 of 172 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (5 of 172 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (12)
- Arlinn, Voice of the Pack relevance 0.36 · 5.2% (9 of 172 decks)
- Ajani, the Greathearted relevance 0.25 · 13.4% (23 of 172 decks)
- Huatli, Radiant Champion relevance 0.28 · 7.0% (12 of 172 decks)
- Ajani, Outland Chaperone relevance 0.26 · 7.0% (12 of 172 decks)
- Gideon, Ally of Zendikar relevance 0.31 · 3.5% (6 of 172 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (8 of 172 decks)
- Elspeth, Storm Slayer relevance 0.19 · 9.3% (16 of 172 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (6 of 172 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 0.25 · 2.9% (5 of 172 decks)
- Elspeth, Sun's Champion relevance 0.19 · 5.2% (9 of 172 decks)
- Ajani, Mentor of Heroes relevance 0.21 · 3.5% (6 of 172 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
All utility lands (45)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.36 · 17.4% (30 of 172 decks)
- Monumental Henge relevance 0.31 · 9.3% (16 of 172 decks)
- Vitu-Ghazi, the City-Tree relevance 0.28 · 12.8% (22 of 172 decks)
- Stirring Wildwood relevance 0.28 · 10.5% (18 of 172 decks)
- Grove of the Guardian relevance 0.26 · 14.0% (24 of 172 decks)
- Botanical Plaza relevance 0.27 · 9.3% (16 of 172 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.20 · 32.0% (55 of 172 decks)
- Restless Prairie relevance 0.21 · 11.0% (19 of 172 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.20 · 14.0% (24 of 172 decks)
- Secluded Steppe relevance 0.23 · 4.7% (8 of 172 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.17 · 19.8% (34 of 172 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.17 · 18.6% (32 of 172 decks)
- Windbrisk Heights relevance 0.21 · 6.4% (11 of 172 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.15 · 25.0% (43 of 172 decks)
- Graypelt Refuge relevance 0.18 · 11.0% (19 of 172 decks)
- Fountainport relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (7 of 172 decks)
- Strength of the Harvest // Haven of the Harvest relevance 0.17 · 11.6% (20 of 172 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.21 · 4.1% (7 of 172 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.21 · 4.1% (7 of 172 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.19 · 5.2% (9 of 172 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.17 · 9.3% (16 of 172 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.15 · 14.5% (25 of 172 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.18 · 5.8% (10 of 172 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.16 · 11.6% (20 of 172 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.13 · 26.2% (45 of 172 decks)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.17 · 7.6% (13 of 172 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.15 · 12.8% (22 of 172 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.13 · 16.9% (29 of 172 decks)
- Conservatory relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.21 · 2.9% (5 of 172 decks)
- Suburban Sanctuary relevance 0.20 · 2.9% (5 of 172 decks)
- Minas Tirith relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (8 of 172 decks)
- Kyoshi Village relevance 0.20 · 2.9% (5 of 172 decks)
- Abundant Countryside relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.13 · 8.1% (14 of 172 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.12 · 11.0% (19 of 172 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.14 · 4.1% (7 of 172 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.17 · 2.9% (5 of 172 decks)
- Bretagard Stronghold relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.14 · 3.5% (6 of 172 decks)
- Castle Ardenvale relevance 0.14 · 3.5% (6 of 172 decks)
- Kabira Takedown // Kabira Plateau relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Razorgrass Ambush // Razorgrass Field relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (5 of 172 decks)
All lands (47)
- Riftstone Portal relevance 0.40 · 11.0% (19 of 172 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.28 · 22.1% (38 of 172 decks)
- Elfhame Palace relevance 0.27 · 7.6% (13 of 172 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.16 · 48.8% (84 of 172 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.21 · 18.0% (31 of 172 decks)
- Radiant Grove relevance 0.21 · 15.7% (27 of 172 decks)
- Arctic Treeline relevance 0.22 · 8.1% (14 of 172 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.18 · 22.7% (39 of 172 decks)
- Tranquil Expanse relevance 0.23 · 6.4% (11 of 172 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.19 · 12.2% (21 of 172 decks)
- Thriving Heath relevance 0.22 · 5.2% (9 of 172 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.15 · 25.0% (43 of 172 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.20 · 8.1% (14 of 172 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (8 of 172 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.17 · 13.4% (23 of 172 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.17 · 12.2% (21 of 172 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.19 · 5.8% (10 of 172 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.17 · 7.6% (13 of 172 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (7 of 172 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.13 · 20.9% (36 of 172 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (8 of 172 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (8 of 172 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.12 · 22.7% (39 of 172 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.14 · 11.6% (20 of 172 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.19 · 3.5% (6 of 172 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.11 · 26.2% (45 of 172 decks)
- Gathering Place relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (7 of 172 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.13 · 11.6% (20 of 172 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.09 · 45.3% (78 of 172 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.10 · 36.0% (62 of 172 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.10 · 33.1% (57 of 172 decks)
- Saltcrusted Steppe relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.10 · 26.2% (45 of 172 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (5 of 172 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.10 · 24.4% (42 of 172 decks)
- Etched Cornfield relevance 0.19 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.12 · 8.7% (15 of 172 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.17 · 2.9% (5 of 172 decks)
- Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.07 · 49.4% (85 of 172 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.13 · 2.9% (5 of 172 decks)
- Canopy Vista relevance 0.06 · 47.7% (82 of 172 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (4 of 172 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.03 · 60.5% (104 of 172 decks)
- Plains relevance 0.01 · 89.5% (154 of 172 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 89.0% (153 of 172 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Tolsimir Wolfblood, from 172 real Commander decks.