Cards like Essence Warden
4.5× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 25% of other Selesnya decks
70% of decks run two or more
vs. 15% of other Selesnya decks
2.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.62 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Essence Warden 65%
- Soul Warden 58%
- Prosperous Innkeeper 54%
- Soul's Attendant 49%
- Auriok Champion 13%
- Suture Priest 12%
- Hinterland Sanctifier 5%
- Virulent Emissary 4%
- Distinguished Conjurer 2%
- Dazzling Angel 2%
- Lifecreed Duo 2%
- Impassioned Orator 2%
Other options: Kor Celebrant, Greenhouse Propagator, Healer of the Pride, Social Climber, Anointer Priest
Cards like Heroic Intervention
5.0× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 40% of other Selesnya decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Selesnya decks
0.92 per deck on average
vs. 0.47 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like The Gaffer
6.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Selesnya decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Generous Ent
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Generous Ent 27%
- Orchard Strider 16%
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 37% of other Selesnya decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Selesnya decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.56 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 38%
- Three Visits 27%
- Skyshroud Claim 5%
Other options: Glimpse the Core, Nissa's Pilgrimage, Ranger's Path, Field Trip, Hunting Wilds
Cards like Rampant Growth
1.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 51% of other Selesnya decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 29% of other Selesnya decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.95 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Rampant Growth 39%
- Cultivate 38%
- Kodama's Reach 18%
- Search for Tomorrow 7%
- Shared Roots 6%
- Explosive Vegetation 1%
Other options: Migration Path, Grow from the Ashes, Roamer's Routine, Viewpoint Synchronization, Terramorph, They Went This Way, New Generation's Technique, Map the Frontier, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Far Wanderings, Map the Wastes, Reach the Horizon, Primal Growth, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Path to the Festival
Cards like Congregate
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Congregate 27%
- War Report 7%
Cards like Night of the Sweets' Revenge
7.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Envoy of the Ancestors
5.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Exemplar of Light
1.6× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Selesnya decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Selesnya decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Exemplar of Light 19%
- Archangel of Thune 11%
- Ajani's Pridemate 10%
- Voice of the Blessed 6%
- Celestial Unicorn 6%
- Essence Channeler 2%
- Ageless Entity 1%
- Spider-Man, Peter Parker 1%
Other options: Twinblade Paladin, Unflinching Hortimancer, Serene Steward
Cards like Riot Control
19× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Riot Control 30%
- Fog of War 8%
- Respite 4%
- Blunt the Assault 2%
Cards like Well of Lost Dreams
5.8× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Spirit Link
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Revive the Shire
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Rhox Faithmender
4.0× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Rishkar's Expertise
5.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Branching Evolution
1.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Selesnya decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Authority of the Consuls
1.9× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Elanor Gardner
7.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Cleric Class
4.5× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Selesnya decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Sheltering Word relevance 0.87 · 53.5% (894 of 1,671 decks)
- Sam, Loyal Attendant relevance 0.71 · 70.7% (1,181 of 1,671 decks)
- Fangorn, Tree Shepherd relevance 0.93 · 37.9% (633 of 1,671 decks)
- Predator's Rapport relevance 0.88 · 39.3% (657 of 1,671 decks)
- Assemble the Entmoot relevance 0.81 · 44.6% (746 of 1,671 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 0.95 · 25.4% (424 of 1,671 decks)
- Feed the Clan relevance 0.79 · 40.1% (670 of 1,671 decks)
- Treefolk Harbinger relevance 0.94 · 23.3% (389 of 1,671 decks)
- Samwise Gamgee relevance 0.72 · 46.6% (779 of 1,671 decks)
- Ezzaroot Channeler relevance 0.84 · 28.4% (474 of 1,671 decks)
- Quickbeam, Upstart Ent relevance 0.91 · 18.3% (306 of 1,671 decks)
- Bosk Banneret relevance 0.94 · 15.0% (250 of 1,671 decks)
- Orchard Warden relevance 0.94 · 14.0% (234 of 1,671 decks)
- Generous Ent relevance 0.79 · 26.5% (443 of 1,671 decks)
- Orchard Strider relevance 0.87 · 16.4% (274 of 1,671 decks)
- Prize Pig relevance 0.73 · 32.8% (548 of 1,671 decks)
- Many Partings relevance 0.67 · 40.5% (676 of 1,671 decks)
- The Gaffer relevance 0.55 · 58.8% (983 of 1,671 decks)
- Peregrin Took relevance 0.58 · 50.2% (839 of 1,671 decks)
- Woodfall Primus relevance 0.82 · 15.7% (262 of 1,671 decks)
- Farmer Cotton relevance 0.62 · 42.8% (716 of 1,671 decks)
- Banquet Guests relevance 0.69 · 31.8% (531 of 1,671 decks)
- Revive the Shire relevance 0.71 · 29.6% (494 of 1,671 decks)
- Elanor Gardner relevance 0.70 · 28.8% (481 of 1,671 decks)
- Spirit Link relevance 0.71 · 25.2% (421 of 1,671 decks)
- Feasting Hobbit relevance 0.71 · 24.9% (416 of 1,671 decks)
- Gilded Goose relevance 0.58 · 43.6% (728 of 1,671 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.66 · 29.9% (500 of 1,671 decks)
- Soul's Grace relevance 0.85 · 10.7% (179 of 1,671 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.68 · 26.4% (441 of 1,671 decks)
- Dormant Grove // Gnarled Grovestrider relevance 0.81 · 12.1% (203 of 1,671 decks)
- Meriadoc Brandybuck relevance 0.71 · 21.4% (358 of 1,671 decks)
- Field-Tested Frying Pan relevance 0.73 · 18.8% (314 of 1,671 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 0.71 · 19.7% (330 of 1,671 decks)
- Dauntless Dourbark relevance 0.90 · 7.1% (118 of 1,671 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Elder relevance 0.90 · 6.9% (115 of 1,671 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.63 · 31.1% (519 of 1,671 decks)
- Stew the Coneys relevance 0.75 · 13.5% (226 of 1,671 decks)
- Scurry Oak relevance 0.57 · 37.9% (634 of 1,671 decks)
- Faeburrow Elder relevance 0.70 · 18.5% (309 of 1,671 decks)
- Fracturing Gust relevance 0.73 · 14.5% (242 of 1,671 decks)
- Beacon of Immortality relevance 0.68 · 20.2% (338 of 1,671 decks)
- Lifelink relevance 0.78 · 11.6% (194 of 1,671 decks)
- Wildwood Mentor relevance 0.79 · 10.1% (169 of 1,671 decks)
- Huatli, the Sun's Heart relevance 0.69 · 16.6% (278 of 1,671 decks)
- Treefolk Umbra relevance 0.76 · 11.4% (190 of 1,671 decks)
- Essence Warden relevance 0.42 · 64.5% (1,078 of 1,671 decks)
- Shriekwood Devourer relevance 0.83 · 7.3% (122 of 1,671 decks)
- Riot Control relevance 0.59 · 30.3% (506 of 1,671 decks)
- Dungrove Elder relevance 0.84 · 6.5% (108 of 1,671 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Sam, Loyal Attendant relevance 0.71 · 70.7% (1,181 of 1,671 decks)
- Fangorn, Tree Shepherd relevance 0.93 · 37.9% (633 of 1,671 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 0.95 · 25.4% (424 of 1,671 decks)
- Treefolk Harbinger relevance 0.94 · 23.3% (389 of 1,671 decks)
- Samwise Gamgee relevance 0.72 · 46.6% (779 of 1,671 decks)
- Ezzaroot Channeler relevance 0.84 · 28.4% (474 of 1,671 decks)
- Quickbeam, Upstart Ent relevance 0.91 · 18.3% (306 of 1,671 decks)
- Bosk Banneret relevance 0.94 · 15.0% (250 of 1,671 decks)
- Orchard Warden relevance 0.94 · 14.0% (234 of 1,671 decks)
- Generous Ent relevance 0.79 · 26.5% (443 of 1,671 decks)
- Orchard Strider relevance 0.87 · 16.4% (274 of 1,671 decks)
- Prize Pig relevance 0.73 · 32.8% (548 of 1,671 decks)
- The Gaffer relevance 0.55 · 58.8% (983 of 1,671 decks)
- Peregrin Took relevance 0.58 · 50.2% (839 of 1,671 decks)
- Woodfall Primus relevance 0.82 · 15.7% (262 of 1,671 decks)
- Farmer Cotton relevance 0.62 · 42.8% (716 of 1,671 decks)
- Banquet Guests relevance 0.69 · 31.8% (531 of 1,671 decks)
- Elanor Gardner relevance 0.70 · 28.8% (481 of 1,671 decks)
- Feasting Hobbit relevance 0.71 · 24.9% (416 of 1,671 decks)
- Gilded Goose relevance 0.58 · 43.6% (728 of 1,671 decks)
- Dormant Grove // Gnarled Grovestrider relevance 0.81 · 12.1% (203 of 1,671 decks)
- Meriadoc Brandybuck relevance 0.71 · 21.4% (358 of 1,671 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 0.71 · 19.7% (330 of 1,671 decks)
- Dauntless Dourbark relevance 0.90 · 7.1% (118 of 1,671 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Elder relevance 0.90 · 6.9% (115 of 1,671 decks)
- Scurry Oak relevance 0.57 · 37.9% (634 of 1,671 decks)
- Faeburrow Elder relevance 0.70 · 18.5% (309 of 1,671 decks)
- Wildwood Mentor relevance 0.79 · 10.1% (169 of 1,671 decks)
- Essence Warden relevance 0.42 · 64.5% (1,078 of 1,671 decks)
- Shriekwood Devourer relevance 0.83 · 7.3% (122 of 1,671 decks)
- Dungrove Elder relevance 0.84 · 6.5% (108 of 1,671 decks)
- Bill the Pony relevance 0.69 · 14.8% (247 of 1,671 decks)
- Rosie Cotton of South Lane relevance 0.49 · 47.6% (796 of 1,671 decks)
- Alabaster Mage relevance 0.84 · 6.3% (106 of 1,671 decks)
- Prosperous Innkeeper relevance 0.46 · 53.7% (898 of 1,671 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.54 · 37.8% (632 of 1,671 decks)
- Ferrafor, Young Yew relevance 0.73 · 11.4% (191 of 1,671 decks)
- Rhox Faithmender relevance 0.55 · 34.3% (573 of 1,671 decks)
- Moonlit Lamenter relevance 0.80 · 7.4% (123 of 1,671 decks)
- Willow Geist relevance 0.82 · 4.9% (82 of 1,671 decks)
- Eastfarthing Farmer relevance 0.71 · 10.2% (170 of 1,671 decks)
- Soul's Attendant relevance 0.45 · 49.2% (822 of 1,671 decks)
- Knight of Dawn's Light relevance 0.75 · 7.2% (120 of 1,671 decks)
- Brandywine Farmer relevance 0.73 · 8.0% (134 of 1,671 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.57 · 21.4% (357 of 1,671 decks)
- Ollenbock Escort relevance 0.70 · 9.3% (156 of 1,671 decks)
- Abzan Beastmaster relevance 0.74 · 7.1% (119 of 1,671 decks)
- Saradoc, Master of Buckland relevance 0.74 · 6.6% (110 of 1,671 decks)
- Arwen, Mortal Queen relevance 0.63 · 12.6% (211 of 1,671 decks)
- Heron of Hope relevance 0.74 · 5.4% (90 of 1,671 decks)
All artifacts (40)
- Field-Tested Frying Pan relevance 0.73 · 18.8% (314 of 1,671 decks)
- Lembas relevance 0.74 · 11.8% (198 of 1,671 decks)
- Pristine Talisman relevance 0.59 · 27.9% (467 of 1,671 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.56 · 32.0% (535 of 1,671 decks)
- Well of Lost Dreams relevance 0.51 · 42.3% (706 of 1,671 decks)
- Caduceus, Staff of Hermes relevance 0.59 · 20.9% (350 of 1,671 decks)
- Nuka-Cola Vending Machine relevance 0.63 · 14.1% (235 of 1,671 decks)
- Instant Ramen relevance 0.74 · 6.4% (107 of 1,671 decks)
- Heaped Harvest relevance 0.62 · 12.2% (204 of 1,671 decks)
- Wedding Invitation relevance 0.78 · 4.2% (71 of 1,671 decks)
- Explorer's Scope relevance 0.68 · 5.4% (91 of 1,671 decks)
- Bag End Banquet relevance 0.66 · 5.0% (83 of 1,671 decks)
- The Wind Crystal relevance 0.44 · 31.1% (520 of 1,671 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.50 · 11.3% (189 of 1,671 decks)
- Cosmos Elixir relevance 0.53 · 8.6% (144 of 1,671 decks)
- Alhammarret's Archive relevance 0.50 · 11.3% (188 of 1,671 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.46 · 13.8% (230 of 1,671 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.43 · 17.7% (295 of 1,671 decks)
- Bilbo's Ring relevance 0.64 · 4.0% (67 of 1,671 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.48 · 10.2% (170 of 1,671 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.36 · 26.8% (447 of 1,671 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.37 · 22.6% (378 of 1,671 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.39 · 16.5% (275 of 1,671 decks)
- Excalibur II relevance 0.50 · 4.7% (78 of 1,671 decks)
- Behemoth Sledge relevance 0.43 · 5.3% (88 of 1,671 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.47 · 4.1% (69 of 1,671 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.26 · 32.6% (544 of 1,671 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.35 · 4.6% (77 of 1,671 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.28 · 11.7% (195 of 1,671 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.32 · 4.8% (80 of 1,671 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.25 · 12.6% (211 of 1,671 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.42 · 2.5% (42 of 1,671 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.24 · 6.9% (115 of 1,671 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.36 · 2.7% (45 of 1,671 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.35 · 2.6% (44 of 1,671 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.12 · 61.3% (1,025 of 1,671 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.34 · 2.5% (41 of 1,671 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.29 · 2.7% (45 of 1,671 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (46 of 1,671 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.06 · 75.3% (1,259 of 1,671 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Assemble the Entmoot relevance 0.81 · 44.6% (746 of 1,671 decks)
- Spirit Link relevance 0.71 · 25.2% (421 of 1,671 decks)
- Lifelink relevance 0.78 · 11.6% (194 of 1,671 decks)
- Treefolk Umbra relevance 0.76 · 11.4% (190 of 1,671 decks)
- Of Herbs and Stewed Rabbit relevance 0.64 · 21.4% (358 of 1,671 decks)
- Night of the Sweets' Revenge relevance 0.62 · 18.1% (302 of 1,671 decks)
- Felidar Umbra relevance 0.69 · 11.0% (183 of 1,671 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.65 · 12.9% (216 of 1,671 decks)
- Light of Promise relevance 0.60 · 15.0% (250 of 1,671 decks)
- Ordeal of Heliod relevance 0.73 · 5.5% (92 of 1,671 decks)
- Ninja Pizza relevance 0.65 · 9.0% (151 of 1,671 decks)
- Spirit Loop relevance 0.68 · 6.2% (104 of 1,671 decks)
- Dawn of Hope relevance 0.51 · 19.7% (329 of 1,671 decks)
- Twinblade Blessing relevance 0.59 · 8.9% (149 of 1,671 decks)
- Authority of the Consuls relevance 0.36 · 45.8% (766 of 1,671 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.43 · 29.0% (485 of 1,671 decks)
- Trapped in the Screen relevance 0.63 · 4.8% (80 of 1,671 decks)
- Cleric Class relevance 0.41 · 30.7% (513 of 1,671 decks)
- True Conviction relevance 0.51 · 11.8% (198 of 1,671 decks)
- Sheltered by Ghosts relevance 0.45 · 18.3% (305 of 1,671 decks)
- Trail of Crumbs relevance 0.58 · 5.6% (94 of 1,671 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.52 · 10.1% (169 of 1,671 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.52 · 9.7% (162 of 1,671 decks)
- Griffin Aerie relevance 0.55 · 7.1% (118 of 1,671 decks)
- Test of Endurance relevance 0.50 · 8.7% (145 of 1,671 decks)
- Well Rested relevance 0.50 · 5.6% (93 of 1,671 decks)
- Level Up relevance 0.50 · 5.3% (89 of 1,671 decks)
- Dawn of a New Age relevance 0.53 · 4.6% (77 of 1,671 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.37 · 20.9% (349 of 1,671 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.48 · 6.3% (105 of 1,671 decks)
- Alpha Authority relevance 0.49 · 5.4% (90 of 1,671 decks)
- Armadillo Cloak relevance 0.44 · 9.0% (151 of 1,671 decks)
- Heroic Feast relevance 0.52 · 4.2% (71 of 1,671 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.33 · 22.3% (373 of 1,671 decks)
- Boon Reflection relevance 0.42 · 7.4% (123 of 1,671 decks)
- Stocking the Pantry relevance 0.44 · 5.6% (93 of 1,671 decks)
- Rune of Sustenance relevance 0.59 · 3.1% (51 of 1,671 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.46 · 4.5% (75 of 1,671 decks)
- Ajani's Welcome relevance 0.41 · 5.6% (94 of 1,671 decks)
- Lifegift relevance 0.52 · 3.5% (59 of 1,671 decks)
- Leyline of Hope relevance 0.47 · 3.9% (65 of 1,671 decks)
- Resourceful Defense relevance 0.42 · 4.1% (69 of 1,671 decks)
- Shield of the Oversoul relevance 0.36 · 5.0% (83 of 1,671 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.28 · 16.5% (276 of 1,671 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.35 · 6.0% (100 of 1,671 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.47 · 3.2% (54 of 1,671 decks)
- Gourmand's Talent relevance 0.49 · 2.9% (49 of 1,671 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.33 · 7.2% (120 of 1,671 decks)
- Sunbond relevance 0.51 · 2.5% (42 of 1,671 decks)
- Duelist's Heritage relevance 0.37 · 4.4% (74 of 1,671 decks)
All instants (50)
- Sheltering Word relevance 0.87 · 53.5% (894 of 1,671 decks)
- Predator's Rapport relevance 0.88 · 39.3% (657 of 1,671 decks)
- Feed the Clan relevance 0.79 · 40.1% (670 of 1,671 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.66 · 29.9% (500 of 1,671 decks)
- Soul's Grace relevance 0.85 · 10.7% (179 of 1,671 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.63 · 31.1% (519 of 1,671 decks)
- Stew the Coneys relevance 0.75 · 13.5% (226 of 1,671 decks)
- Fracturing Gust relevance 0.73 · 14.5% (242 of 1,671 decks)
- Beacon of Immortality relevance 0.68 · 20.2% (338 of 1,671 decks)
- Riot Control relevance 0.59 · 30.3% (506 of 1,671 decks)
- Heroes' Reunion relevance 0.70 · 13.5% (225 of 1,671 decks)
- Blessed Defiance relevance 0.78 · 6.2% (104 of 1,671 decks)
- War Report relevance 0.76 · 7.4% (124 of 1,671 decks)
- Congregate relevance 0.56 · 26.9% (450 of 1,671 decks)
- Fog of War relevance 0.74 · 7.8% (130 of 1,671 decks)
- Fortifying Draught relevance 0.74 · 7.8% (131 of 1,671 decks)
- Moment of Heroism relevance 0.78 · 5.3% (88 of 1,671 decks)
- Light of Hope relevance 0.67 · 10.2% (171 of 1,671 decks)
- Weather the Storm relevance 0.73 · 6.8% (114 of 1,671 decks)
- Invoke the Divine relevance 0.64 · 10.1% (168 of 1,671 decks)
- Chant of Vitu-Ghazi relevance 0.71 · 5.3% (88 of 1,671 decks)
- Take Up the Shield relevance 0.56 · 16.1% (269 of 1,671 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.46 · 33.9% (567 of 1,671 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.58 · 13.3% (223 of 1,671 decks)
- Heliod's Intervention relevance 0.56 · 15.0% (250 of 1,671 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.55 · 15.4% (257 of 1,671 decks)
- Horrid Vigor relevance 0.67 · 6.6% (110 of 1,671 decks)
- Lightfoot Technique relevance 0.64 · 6.8% (114 of 1,671 decks)
- Gods Willing relevance 0.62 · 7.8% (130 of 1,671 decks)
- Revitalize relevance 0.58 · 10.3% (172 of 1,671 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.49 · 20.7% (346 of 1,671 decks)
- Hobbit's Sting relevance 0.63 · 6.3% (106 of 1,671 decks)
- Ranger's Guile relevance 0.63 · 6.4% (107 of 1,671 decks)
- Blacksmith's Skill relevance 0.56 · 10.6% (177 of 1,671 decks)
- Pippin's Bravery relevance 0.67 · 4.5% (76 of 1,671 decks)
- Union of the Third Path relevance 0.70 · 4.2% (71 of 1,671 decks)
- Restoration Magic relevance 0.44 · 20.8% (348 of 1,671 decks)
- Enter the Avatar State relevance 0.58 · 5.3% (88 of 1,671 decks)
- Galadriel's Dismissal relevance 0.51 · 9.4% (157 of 1,671 decks)
- Life Goes On relevance 0.65 · 4.1% (68 of 1,671 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.53 · 7.1% (118 of 1,671 decks)
- Cosmic Rebirth relevance 0.47 · 10.7% (179 of 1,671 decks)
- Loran's Escape relevance 0.52 · 6.6% (111 of 1,671 decks)
- Second Breakfast relevance 0.64 · 3.8% (63 of 1,671 decks)
- Reprieve relevance 0.40 · 14.3% (239 of 1,671 decks)
- Rest for the Weary relevance 0.68 · 3.1% (51 of 1,671 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.45 · 9.0% (151 of 1,671 decks)
- Awe Strike relevance 0.65 · 3.2% (53 of 1,671 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.53 · 4.5% (75 of 1,671 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.36 · 19.9% (333 of 1,671 decks)
All sorceries (42)
- Many Partings relevance 0.67 · 40.5% (676 of 1,671 decks)
- Revive the Shire relevance 0.71 · 29.6% (494 of 1,671 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.68 · 26.4% (441 of 1,671 decks)
- Devouring Tendrils relevance 0.83 · 6.8% (114 of 1,671 decks)
- Sanctify relevance 0.68 · 12.8% (214 of 1,671 decks)
- Study the Classics relevance 0.76 · 6.8% (114 of 1,671 decks)
- Ent's Fury relevance 0.76 · 6.3% (106 of 1,671 decks)
- Return from the Wilds relevance 0.65 · 10.0% (167 of 1,671 decks)
- Scale the Heights relevance 0.61 · 10.7% (178 of 1,671 decks)
- Fumigate relevance 0.50 · 19.1% (319 of 1,671 decks)
- Tend the Sprigs relevance 0.64 · 5.8% (97 of 1,671 decks)
- The Battle of Bywater relevance 0.56 · 11.0% (183 of 1,671 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.60 · 6.8% (114 of 1,671 decks)
- Late to Dinner relevance 0.62 · 4.9% (82 of 1,671 decks)
- Spider Food relevance 0.67 · 4.2% (71 of 1,671 decks)
- Spry and Mighty relevance 0.57 · 5.1% (85 of 1,671 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.38 · 18.8% (314 of 1,671 decks)
- Avatar's Wrath relevance 0.48 · 5.0% (83 of 1,671 decks)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.40 · 12.5% (209 of 1,671 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.48 · 4.4% (74 of 1,671 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.42 · 6.5% (108 of 1,671 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.31 · 20.0% (335 of 1,671 decks)
- Single Combat relevance 0.47 · 4.1% (68 of 1,671 decks)
- Soul's Majesty relevance 0.49 · 3.8% (63 of 1,671 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.27 · 27.3% (456 of 1,671 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.33 · 9.5% (159 of 1,671 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.23 · 39.3% (656 of 1,671 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.37 · 4.8% (80 of 1,671 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.24 · 32.8% (548 of 1,671 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.34 · 7.8% (130 of 1,671 decks)
- Fell the Mighty relevance 0.46 · 3.4% (56 of 1,671 decks)
- Dusk // Dawn relevance 0.41 · 3.6% (60 of 1,671 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.20 · 38.2% (639 of 1,671 decks)
- Promise of Loyalty relevance 0.40 · 3.7% (61 of 1,671 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.24 · 18.3% (306 of 1,671 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.30 · 6.9% (116 of 1,671 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.40 · 3.1% (51 of 1,671 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.25 · 11.4% (190 of 1,671 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.25 · 9.2% (153 of 1,671 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.17 · 38.5% (643 of 1,671 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.36 · 2.5% (42 of 1,671 decks)
- Vanquish the Horde relevance 0.29 · 2.5% (41 of 1,671 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (3)
- Huatli, the Sun's Heart relevance 0.69 · 16.6% (278 of 1,671 decks)
- Ajani, Strength of the Pride relevance 0.43 · 5.8% (97 of 1,671 decks)
- Ajani, the Greathearted relevance 0.38 · 6.9% (116 of 1,671 decks)
All utility lands (41)
- The Shire relevance 0.58 · 52.1% (871 of 1,671 decks)
- Witch's Clinic relevance 0.74 · 22.3% (373 of 1,671 decks)
- Gingerbread Cabin relevance 0.65 · 19.9% (332 of 1,671 decks)
- Adventurer's Inn relevance 0.57 · 28.8% (481 of 1,671 decks)
- Skyclave Cleric // Skyclave Basilica relevance 0.69 · 5.5% (92 of 1,671 decks)
- Radiant Fountain relevance 0.47 · 27.8% (464 of 1,671 decks)
- Kabira Crossroads relevance 0.59 · 8.1% (136 of 1,671 decks)
- Graypelt Refuge relevance 0.38 · 39.4% (658 of 1,671 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.49 · 7.2% (121 of 1,671 decks)
- Minas Tirith relevance 0.40 · 16.1% (269 of 1,671 decks)
- Hidden Hideout relevance 0.57 · 3.9% (66 of 1,671 decks)
- Sapseep Forest relevance 0.41 · 6.5% (109 of 1,671 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.25 · 42.2% (705 of 1,671 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.38 · 9.8% (164 of 1,671 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.29 · 28.1% (470 of 1,671 decks)
- Sejiri Shelter // Sejiri Glacier relevance 0.41 · 5.9% (99 of 1,671 decks)
- Blighted Steppe relevance 0.52 · 3.4% (57 of 1,671 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.28 · 25.0% (418 of 1,671 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.41 · 4.5% (76 of 1,671 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.48 · 3.6% (60 of 1,671 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.32 · 11.3% (189 of 1,671 decks)
- Bretagard Stronghold relevance 0.46 · 3.5% (59 of 1,671 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.29 · 15.5% (259 of 1,671 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.34 · 8.0% (133 of 1,671 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.35 · 6.1% (102 of 1,671 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.41 · 3.9% (66 of 1,671 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.27 · 16.6% (278 of 1,671 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.25 · 17.2% (287 of 1,671 decks)
- The Grey Havens relevance 0.47 · 2.8% (46 of 1,671 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.30 · 8.4% (140 of 1,671 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.31 · 6.2% (103 of 1,671 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.30 · 7.2% (121 of 1,671 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.33 · 4.5% (75 of 1,671 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.23 · 20.2% (338 of 1,671 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.25 · 10.9% (182 of 1,671 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.20 · 23.5% (392 of 1,671 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.24 · 7.8% (131 of 1,671 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.31 · 2.6% (43 of 1,671 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.19 · 7.4% (123 of 1,671 decks)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (57 of 1,671 decks)
- Strength of the Harvest // Haven of the Harvest relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (42 of 1,671 decks)
All lands (44)
- Shire Terrace relevance 0.62 · 7.4% (123 of 1,671 decks)
- Hobbit Hole relevance 0.64 · 5.0% (83 of 1,671 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.53 · 9.6% (161 of 1,671 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.46 · 8.0% (134 of 1,671 decks)
- Thriving Heath relevance 0.46 · 7.7% (129 of 1,671 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.26 · 38.6% (645 of 1,671 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.27 · 33.4% (558 of 1,671 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.38 · 6.0% (101 of 1,671 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.28 · 19.7% (329 of 1,671 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.43 · 3.4% (56 of 1,671 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.28 · 11.0% (183 of 1,671 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.30 · 8.0% (133 of 1,671 decks)
- Radiant Grove relevance 0.30 · 6.7% (112 of 1,671 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.29 · 7.4% (123 of 1,671 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.28 · 8.4% (141 of 1,671 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.24 · 15.2% (254 of 1,671 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.18 · 44.8% (748 of 1,671 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.35 · 3.9% (65 of 1,671 decks)
- Arctic Treeline relevance 0.34 · 3.8% (64 of 1,671 decks)
- Eclipsed Realms relevance 0.42 · 2.5% (42 of 1,671 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.24 · 11.8% (198 of 1,671 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.33 · 4.0% (67 of 1,671 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.34 · 3.8% (64 of 1,671 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.21 · 21.8% (365 of 1,671 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.16 · 47.8% (799 of 1,671 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.19 · 22.8% (381 of 1,671 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.20 · 17.7% (295 of 1,671 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.36 · 2.8% (46 of 1,671 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.16 · 36.7% (614 of 1,671 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.31 · 3.4% (57 of 1,671 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.17 · 23.1% (386 of 1,671 decks)
- Gathering Place relevance 0.31 · 3.1% (51 of 1,671 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.33 · 2.6% (43 of 1,671 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.15 · 27.1% (453 of 1,671 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.30 · 3.1% (51 of 1,671 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.13 · 40.6% (678 of 1,671 decks)
- Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.10 · 61.5% (1,027 of 1,671 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.29 · 2.6% (44 of 1,671 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.29 · 2.5% (41 of 1,671 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.29 · 2.5% (41 of 1,671 decks)
- Canopy Vista relevance 0.09 · 61.8% (1,033 of 1,671 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.04 · 79.7% (1,331 of 1,671 decks)
- Plains relevance 0.02 · 93.1% (1,555 of 1,671 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 93.8% (1,567 of 1,671 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Treebeard, Gracious Host, from 1,671 real Commander decks.