Saurian Explorer
Played in 141 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
141 decks
830+32+2+11+1+
That's every commander.
All commanders (8)
- Captain Kirk, Boldly Going relevance 2.43 · 5.7% (5 of 87 decks)
- Zagorka, Mother of Sanctum relevance 2.25 · 1.2% (11 of 905 decks)
- Captain Kathryn Janeway relevance 1.47 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Guild Artisan relevance 1.11 · 2.8% (2 of 72 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.84 · 8.3% (1 of 12 decks)
- Benjamin Sisko, Besieged relevance 0.81 · 9.1% (1 of 11 decks)
- Autumn Willow, Harmony relevance 0.59 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
- Jiang Yanggu, Never Alone relevance 0.58 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Overlord of the Hauntwoods relevance 1.30 · 27.0% (38 of 141 decks)
- Verdant Kraken relevance 1.19 · 17.7% (25 of 141 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 1.19 · 22.0% (31 of 141 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.18 · 36.2% (51 of 141 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 1.17 · 26.2% (37 of 141 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 1.15 · 21.3% (30 of 141 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 1.11 · 22.0% (31 of 141 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.06 · 34.0% (48 of 141 decks)
- Stone-Seeder Hierophant relevance 1.06 · 15.6% (22 of 141 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.05 · 29.1% (41 of 141 decks)
- Dancing from Dark to Dawn relevance 1.03 · 18.4% (26 of 141 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 1.01 · 25.5% (36 of 141 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 1.00 · 23.4% (33 of 141 decks)
- Beorn's Hospitality relevance 1.00 · 16.3% (23 of 141 decks)
- Seedship Agrarian relevance 1.00 · 14.9% (21 of 141 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.97 · 20.6% (29 of 141 decks)
- Sporemound relevance 0.97 · 17.0% (24 of 141 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.95 · 27.7% (39 of 141 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.94 · 27.7% (39 of 141 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.94 · 19.1% (27 of 141 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.93 · 17.7% (25 of 141 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.93 · 22.7% (32 of 141 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.92 · 15.6% (22 of 141 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.91 · 15.6% (22 of 141 decks)
- Scythecat Cub relevance 0.89 · 17.0% (24 of 141 decks)
- Mightform Harmonizer relevance 0.89 · 17.7% (25 of 141 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.89 · 19.9% (28 of 141 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.89 · 21.3% (30 of 141 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.87 · 21.3% (30 of 141 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.86 · 24.1% (34 of 141 decks)
All creatures (32)
- Overlord of the Hauntwoods relevance 1.30 · 27.0% (38 of 141 decks)
- Verdant Kraken relevance 1.19 · 17.7% (25 of 141 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 1.19 · 22.0% (31 of 141 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.18 · 36.2% (51 of 141 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 1.15 · 21.3% (30 of 141 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.06 · 34.0% (48 of 141 decks)
- Stone-Seeder Hierophant relevance 1.06 · 15.6% (22 of 141 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.05 · 29.1% (41 of 141 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 1.01 · 25.5% (36 of 141 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 1.00 · 23.4% (33 of 141 decks)
- Seedship Agrarian relevance 1.00 · 14.9% (21 of 141 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.97 · 20.6% (29 of 141 decks)
- Sporemound relevance 0.97 · 17.0% (24 of 141 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.95 · 27.7% (39 of 141 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.94 · 27.7% (39 of 141 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.93 · 22.7% (32 of 141 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.92 · 15.6% (22 of 141 decks)
- Scythecat Cub relevance 0.89 · 17.0% (24 of 141 decks)
- Mightform Harmonizer relevance 0.89 · 17.7% (25 of 141 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.89 · 19.9% (28 of 141 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.89 · 21.3% (30 of 141 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.87 · 21.3% (30 of 141 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.86 · 24.1% (34 of 141 decks)
- Grazing Gladehart relevance 0.84 · 12.1% (17 of 141 decks)
- Glacier Godmaw relevance 0.83 · 14.9% (21 of 141 decks)
- Embodiment of Insight relevance 0.81 · 12.8% (18 of 141 decks)
- Mutable Explorer relevance 0.80 · 16.3% (23 of 141 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.77 · 17.7% (25 of 141 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.77 · 22.0% (31 of 141 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.74 · 18.4% (26 of 141 decks)
- Eumidian Terrabotanist relevance 0.73 · 12.8% (18 of 141 decks)
- Toph, Earthbending Master relevance 0.72 · 14.2% (20 of 141 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.91 · 15.6% (22 of 141 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.75 · 17.0% (24 of 141 decks)
All enchantments (11)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 1.11 · 22.0% (31 of 141 decks)
- Dancing from Dark to Dawn relevance 1.03 · 18.4% (26 of 141 decks)
- Beorn's Hospitality relevance 1.00 · 16.3% (23 of 141 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.94 · 19.1% (27 of 141 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.93 · 17.7% (25 of 141 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.84 · 23.4% (33 of 141 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.83 · 15.6% (22 of 141 decks)
- Claim the Kingdom relevance 0.82 · 12.8% (18 of 141 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.80 · 13.5% (19 of 141 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.78 · 17.0% (24 of 141 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.77 · 14.2% (20 of 141 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 1.17 · 26.2% (37 of 141 decks)
EDH data for Saurian Explorer: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 141 real decks.












































