Avacyn's Pilgrim
Played in 26,456 Bant decks
Color Identity Spread
18.1% Bant
All commanders (30)
- Peter Parker // Amazing Spider-Man relevance 2.25 · 52.5% (2,213 of 4,218 decks)
- Chulane, Teller of Tales relevance 2.12 · 46.2% (2,282 of 4,941 decks)
- Helga, Skittish Seer relevance 2.05 · 37.3% (4,564 of 12,228 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Yoshimaru, Ever Faithful relevance 1.96 · 46.2% (1,287 of 2,783 decks)
- Katilda and Lier relevance 1.87 · 57.0% (455 of 798 decks)
- Aang, at the Crossroads // Aang, Destined Savior relevance 1.83 · 37.1% (1,865 of 5,022 decks)
- Derevi, Empyrial Tactician relevance 1.57 · 28.9% (1,803 of 6,239 decks)
- Rigo, Streetwise Mentor relevance 1.51 · 43.0% (306 of 712 decks)
- Shanna, Purifying Blade relevance 1.34 · 33.3% (351 of 1,054 decks)
- Rafiq of the Many relevance 1.22 · 25.0% (577 of 2,309 decks)
- Mr. Foxglove relevance 1.19 · 22.7% (720 of 3,178 decks)
- Galadriel, Light of Valinor relevance 1.18 · 18.3% (1,897 of 10,338 decks)
- Storvald, Frost Giant Jarl relevance 1.17 · 30.9% (205 of 663 decks)
- Kellan, the Kid relevance 0.99 · 16.9% (810 of 4,785 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker relevance 0.98 · 32.5% (76 of 234 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Livio, Oathsworn Sentinel relevance 0.90 · 37.0% (40 of 108 decks)
- Jenara, Asura of War relevance 0.80 · 21.8% (95 of 436 decks)
- Tocasia, Dig Site Mentor relevance 0.80 · 19.3% (137 of 710 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.78 · 25.3% (56 of 221 decks)
- Aang and Katara relevance 0.70 · 15.0% (172 of 1,148 decks)
- Ms. Bumbleflower relevance 0.67 · 8.4% (2,079 of 24,793 decks)
- Falco Spara, Pactweaver relevance 0.65 · 12.3% (244 of 1,977 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.57 · 42.1% (8 of 19 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker relevance 0.57 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist relevance 0.57 · 25.0% (18 of 72 decks)
- Amareth, the Lustrous relevance 0.56 · 12.6% (102 of 811 decks)
- Lagrella, the Magpie relevance 0.55 · 11.8% (126 of 1,067 decks)
- Susan Foreman // The Fifth Doctor relevance 0.55 · 15.2% (52 of 342 decks)
- Angus Mackenzie relevance 0.53 · 11.7% (102 of 872 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Prava of the Steel Legion relevance 0.51 · 21.2% (18 of 85 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.08 · 57.6% (15,248 of 26,456 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.99 · 45.1% (11,943 of 26,456 decks)
- Noble Hierarch relevance 0.93 · 67.5% (17,852 of 26,456 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.88 · 43.2% (11,434 of 26,456 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.78 · 27.8% (7,364 of 26,456 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.75 · 39.2% (10,378 of 26,456 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.66 · 31.0% (8,196 of 26,456 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 0.61 · 21.7% (5,744 of 26,456 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.60 · 23.4% (6,182 of 26,456 decks)
- Esper Sentinel relevance 0.59 · 30.1% (7,975 of 26,456 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.57 · 23.2% (6,137 of 26,456 decks)
- Emiel the Blessed relevance 0.56 · 19.7% (5,223 of 26,456 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.56 · 25.6% (6,764 of 26,456 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.55 · 19.3% (5,115 of 26,456 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.55 · 22.8% (6,029 of 26,456 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.54 · 24.5% (6,481 of 26,456 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.54 · 31.2% (8,259 of 26,456 decks)
- Chulane, Teller of Tales relevance 0.54 · 22.4% (5,921 of 26,456 decks)
- Faeburrow Elder relevance 0.54 · 27.0% (7,153 of 26,456 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.53 · 26.1% (6,904 of 26,456 decks)
- Silence relevance 0.52 · 18.6% (4,916 of 26,456 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.52 · 17.3% (4,584 of 26,456 decks)
- Enduring Vitality relevance 0.51 · 18.0% (4,756 of 26,456 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.50 · 18.0% (4,772 of 26,456 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.50 · 16.0% (4,235 of 26,456 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.50 · 16.5% (4,360 of 26,456 decks)
- Kinnan, Bonder Prodigy relevance 0.49 · 16.2% (4,286 of 26,456 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.48 · 15.4% (4,062 of 26,456 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.48 · 16.1% (4,271 of 26,456 decks)
- Ranger-Captain of Eos relevance 0.47 · 14.6% (3,866 of 26,456 decks)
All creatures (18)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.08 · 57.6% (15,248 of 26,456 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.99 · 45.1% (11,943 of 26,456 decks)
- Noble Hierarch relevance 0.93 · 67.5% (17,852 of 26,456 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.88 · 43.2% (11,434 of 26,456 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.78 · 27.8% (7,364 of 26,456 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.75 · 39.2% (10,378 of 26,456 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.66 · 31.0% (8,196 of 26,456 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 0.61 · 21.7% (5,744 of 26,456 decks)
- Esper Sentinel relevance 0.59 · 30.1% (7,975 of 26,456 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.57 · 23.2% (6,137 of 26,456 decks)
- Emiel the Blessed relevance 0.56 · 19.7% (5,223 of 26,456 decks)
- Chulane, Teller of Tales relevance 0.54 · 22.4% (5,921 of 26,456 decks)
- Faeburrow Elder relevance 0.54 · 27.0% (7,153 of 26,456 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.52 · 17.3% (4,584 of 26,456 decks)
- Enduring Vitality relevance 0.51 · 18.0% (4,756 of 26,456 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.50 · 16.5% (4,360 of 26,456 decks)
- Kinnan, Bonder Prodigy relevance 0.49 · 16.2% (4,286 of 26,456 decks)
- Ranger-Captain of Eos relevance 0.47 · 14.6% (3,866 of 26,456 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.47 · 15.3% (4,052 of 26,456 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.56 · 25.6% (6,764 of 26,456 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.55 · 22.8% (6,029 of 26,456 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.48 · 16.1% (4,271 of 26,456 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.47 · 26.7% (7,076 of 26,456 decks)
All instants (9)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.55 · 19.3% (5,115 of 26,456 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.54 · 24.5% (6,481 of 26,456 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.54 · 31.2% (8,259 of 26,456 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.53 · 26.1% (6,904 of 26,456 decks)
- Silence relevance 0.52 · 18.6% (4,916 of 26,456 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.50 · 18.0% (4,772 of 26,456 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.48 · 15.4% (4,062 of 26,456 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.47 · 20.5% (5,435 of 26,456 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.47 · 22.3% (5,899 of 26,456 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.60 · 23.4% (6,182 of 26,456 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.50 · 16.0% (4,235 of 26,456 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.59 · 33.5% (8,862 of 26,456 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.58 · 28.9% (7,637 of 26,456 decks)
All lands (14)
- City of Brass relevance 0.62 · 26.3% (6,950 of 26,456 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.61 · 47.4% (12,543 of 26,456 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.58 · 23.4% (6,187 of 26,456 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.55 · 21.0% (5,568 of 26,456 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.52 · 19.7% (5,204 of 26,456 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.52 · 24.4% (6,457 of 26,456 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.51 · 24.3% (6,419 of 26,456 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.51 · 18.8% (4,979 of 26,456 decks)
- Tundra relevance 0.51 · 23.6% (6,249 of 26,456 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.50 · 17.2% (4,553 of 26,456 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.49 · 17.8% (4,716 of 26,456 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.49 · 36.6% (9,679 of 26,456 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.49 · 15.7% (4,144 of 26,456 decks)
- Sea of Clouds relevance 0.48 · 34.4% (9,108 of 26,456 decks)
EDH data for Avacyn's Pilgrim: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 26,456 real decks.