Cards like Akrasan Squire
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.93 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Akrasan Squire 40%
- Court Archers 25%
- Rhox Charger 20%
- Outrider of Jhess 8%
Cards like Shield of the Oversoul
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Idolized
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.76 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Idolized 33%
- Angelic Exaltation 32%
- Team Avatar 11%
Cards like Sword of Feast and Famine
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Bant decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Bant decks
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
2.9× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 34% of other Bant decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Bant decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 56%
- Lightning Greaves 29%
Cards like Aven Squire
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Aven Squire 41%
- Waveskimmer Aven 14%
Cards like Armadillo Cloak
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Open the Armory
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Sram, Senior Edificer
13× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Tanglespan Lookout
Cards like Azorius Signet
2.6× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Bant decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Bant decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Azorius Signet 16%
- Selesnya Signet 14%
- Simic Signet 14%
Cards like Cultivate
1.4× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 46% of other Bant decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 22% of other Bant decks
0.94 per deck on average
vs. 0.77 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Cultivate 36%
- Rampant Growth 30%
- Kodama's Reach 21%
- Search for Tomorrow 2%
- Shared Roots 1%
- Explosive Vegetation 1%
Other options: Migration Path, Viewpoint Synchronization, They Went This Way, Grow from the Ashes, New Generation's Technique, Peregrination, Terramorph, Far Wanderings, Deep Reconnaissance, Roamer's Routine, Beneath the Sands, Untamed Wilds, Path to the Festival, Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Primal Growth, Verdant Mastery, Map the Wastes
Cards like Sythis, Harvest's Hand
3.5× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Bant decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Bant decks
Cards like Mother of Runes
17× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Bant decks
Cards like Aqueous Form
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Aqueous Form 48%
- Security Bypass 11%
Cards like Snake Umbra
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Snake Umbra 17%
- Curiosity 10%
- Keen Sense 4%
- Ophidian Eye 1%
Cards like Behemoth Sledge
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Behemoth Sledge 21%
- Loxodon Warhammer 12%
Cards like Ethercaste Knight
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Winds of Rath
4.1× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Bant decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Rout, Sublime Exhalation, Doomskar, End Hostilities, Sunscour
Cards like Counterspell
1.6× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other Bant decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Bant decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.50 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Counterspell 40%
- Negate 20%
Other options: Essence Scatter, Wash Away, Stern Scolding, Spell Snare, Remove Soul, Intervene, Minor Misstep, Wild Unraveling, Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Disruption Protocol, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Outwit
Cards like Rancor
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Cards like Combat Research
18× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Ethereal Armor
10× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Bant decks
Cards like Stoneforge Mystic
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Bastion Protector
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Sovereigns of Lost Alara
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.8× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 69% of other Bant decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.72 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Spirit Mantle
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Spirit Mantle 37%
- Spectra Ward 3%
- Holy Mantle 2%
Cards like Heroic Intervention
2.3× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other Bant decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Silent Arbiter
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Silent Arbiter 39%
- Crawlspace 2%
Cards like Cold-Eyed Selkie
14× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Vedalken Heretic, Sea-Dasher Octopus, Broodbirth Viper, Jhessian Thief, Illvoi Infiltrator, Scroll Thief, Lu Xun, Scholar General, Soulknife Spy, Thieving Magpie, Neurok Commando, Nine-Tail White Fox, Thieving Otter, Gateway Sneak, Stealer of Secrets, Marchesa's Infiltrator, Saltwater Stalwart, Nimble Brigand
Cards like Beast Within
1.1× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Bant decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Bant decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.42 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Beast Within 26%
- Generous Gift 18%
Cards like Sigil of Valor
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Bant decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Qasali Pridemage relevance 0.86 · 70.5% (1,646 of 2,335 decks)
- Sublime Archangel relevance 0.89 · 66.3% (1,549 of 2,335 decks)
- Finest Hour relevance 0.70 · 84.9% (1,983 of 2,335 decks)
- Sovereigns of Lost Alara relevance 0.85 · 65.0% (1,517 of 2,335 decks)
- Giltspire Avenger relevance 0.89 · 58.8% (1,372 of 2,335 decks)
- Battlegrace Angel relevance 0.92 · 53.1% (1,241 of 2,335 decks)
- Knight of Glory relevance 0.94 · 42.6% (994 of 2,335 decks)
- Ethercaste Knight relevance 0.94 · 41.5% (969 of 2,335 decks)
- Stoic Angel relevance 0.85 · 50.0% (1,168 of 2,335 decks)
- Akrasan Squire relevance 0.94 · 40.4% (943 of 2,335 decks)
- Aven Squire relevance 0.93 · 40.7% (950 of 2,335 decks)
- Angelic Benediction relevance 0.93 · 39.9% (931 of 2,335 decks)
- Sigiled Paladin relevance 0.94 · 38.8% (905 of 2,335 decks)
- Ardent Plea relevance 0.91 · 38.8% (906 of 2,335 decks)
- Sigil of Valor relevance 0.94 · 36.0% (841 of 2,335 decks)
- Steel of the Godhead relevance 0.72 · 59.8% (1,396 of 2,335 decks)
- Angelic Exaltation relevance 0.93 · 31.8% (743 of 2,335 decks)
- Frontline Sage relevance 0.95 · 28.7% (669 of 2,335 decks)
- Rashel, Fist of Torm relevance 0.92 · 30.8% (720 of 2,335 decks)
- Silent Arbiter relevance 0.84 · 39.0% (911 of 2,335 decks)
- Shield of the Oversoul relevance 0.73 · 52.8% (1,234 of 2,335 decks)
- Court Archers relevance 0.95 · 25.4% (592 of 2,335 decks)
- Guardians of Akrasa relevance 0.94 · 23.8% (555 of 2,335 decks)
- Sighted-Caste Sorcerer relevance 0.96 · 21.5% (503 of 2,335 decks)
- Idolized relevance 0.85 · 33.0% (770 of 2,335 decks)
- Rhox Charger relevance 0.95 · 19.7% (460 of 2,335 decks)
- Dueling Grounds relevance 0.86 · 27.7% (646 of 2,335 decks)
- Favor of the Overbeing relevance 0.87 · 25.4% (592 of 2,335 decks)
- Dawnray Archer relevance 0.95 · 16.1% (375 of 2,335 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.65 · 50.2% (1,172 of 2,335 decks)
- Galea, Kindler of Hope relevance 0.88 · 20.3% (474 of 2,335 decks)
- Spirit Mantle relevance 0.74 · 37.4% (873 of 2,335 decks)
- Armadillo Cloak relevance 0.77 · 33.9% (791 of 2,335 decks)
- Knotvine Paladin relevance 0.95 · 13.4% (312 of 2,335 decks)
- Danitha, New Benalia's Light relevance 0.74 · 35.6% (832 of 2,335 decks)
- Waveskimmer Aven relevance 0.94 · 13.9% (325 of 2,335 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.64 · 47.7% (1,113 of 2,335 decks)
- Open the Armory relevance 0.71 · 37.8% (882 of 2,335 decks)
- Staggering Insight relevance 0.77 · 28.9% (674 of 2,335 decks)
- Sram, Senior Edificer relevance 0.68 · 35.8% (837 of 2,335 decks)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.76 · 24.0% (561 of 2,335 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.73 · 24.5% (573 of 2,335 decks)
- Outrider of Jhess relevance 0.94 · 7.7% (179 of 2,335 decks)
- Bastion Protector relevance 0.77 · 16.7% (391 of 2,335 decks)
- Sigarda's Aid relevance 0.71 · 24.5% (571 of 2,335 decks)
- Cold-Eyed Selkie relevance 0.67 · 29.4% (687 of 2,335 decks)
- Rhox Bodyguard relevance 0.92 · 7.8% (183 of 2,335 decks)
- Sword of Fire and Ice relevance 0.78 · 14.9% (347 of 2,335 decks)
- Behemoth Sledge relevance 0.72 · 21.4% (499 of 2,335 decks)
- Hindering Light relevance 0.73 · 19.5% (456 of 2,335 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Qasali Pridemage relevance 0.86 · 70.5% (1,646 of 2,335 decks)
- Sublime Archangel relevance 0.89 · 66.3% (1,549 of 2,335 decks)
- Sovereigns of Lost Alara relevance 0.85 · 65.0% (1,517 of 2,335 decks)
- Giltspire Avenger relevance 0.89 · 58.8% (1,372 of 2,335 decks)
- Battlegrace Angel relevance 0.92 · 53.1% (1,241 of 2,335 decks)
- Knight of Glory relevance 0.94 · 42.6% (994 of 2,335 decks)
- Ethercaste Knight relevance 0.94 · 41.5% (969 of 2,335 decks)
- Stoic Angel relevance 0.85 · 50.0% (1,168 of 2,335 decks)
- Akrasan Squire relevance 0.94 · 40.4% (943 of 2,335 decks)
- Aven Squire relevance 0.93 · 40.7% (950 of 2,335 decks)
- Sigiled Paladin relevance 0.94 · 38.8% (905 of 2,335 decks)
- Frontline Sage relevance 0.95 · 28.7% (669 of 2,335 decks)
- Rashel, Fist of Torm relevance 0.92 · 30.8% (720 of 2,335 decks)
- Silent Arbiter relevance 0.84 · 39.0% (911 of 2,335 decks)
- Court Archers relevance 0.95 · 25.4% (592 of 2,335 decks)
- Guardians of Akrasa relevance 0.94 · 23.8% (555 of 2,335 decks)
- Sighted-Caste Sorcerer relevance 0.96 · 21.5% (503 of 2,335 decks)
- Rhox Charger relevance 0.95 · 19.7% (460 of 2,335 decks)
- Dawnray Archer relevance 0.95 · 16.1% (375 of 2,335 decks)
- Galea, Kindler of Hope relevance 0.88 · 20.3% (474 of 2,335 decks)
- Knotvine Paladin relevance 0.95 · 13.4% (312 of 2,335 decks)
- Danitha, New Benalia's Light relevance 0.74 · 35.6% (832 of 2,335 decks)
- Waveskimmer Aven relevance 0.94 · 13.9% (325 of 2,335 decks)
- Sram, Senior Edificer relevance 0.68 · 35.8% (837 of 2,335 decks)
- Outrider of Jhess relevance 0.94 · 7.7% (179 of 2,335 decks)
- Bastion Protector relevance 0.77 · 16.7% (391 of 2,335 decks)
- Cold-Eyed Selkie relevance 0.67 · 29.4% (687 of 2,335 decks)
- Rhox Bodyguard relevance 0.92 · 7.8% (183 of 2,335 decks)
- Grunn, the Lonely King relevance 0.91 · 7.1% (165 of 2,335 decks)
- Sigiled Behemoth relevance 0.93 · 6.3% (147 of 2,335 decks)
- Stoneforge Mystic relevance 0.74 · 16.7% (391 of 2,335 decks)
- Pippin, Guard of the Citadel relevance 0.70 · 18.4% (429 of 2,335 decks)
- Danitha Capashen, Paragon relevance 0.69 · 19.4% (452 of 2,335 decks)
- Mother of Runes relevance 0.63 · 26.9% (629 of 2,335 decks)
- Puresteel Paladin relevance 0.67 · 17.3% (405 of 2,335 decks)
- Dauntless Escort relevance 0.75 · 9.7% (227 of 2,335 decks)
- Peggy Carter, Secret Agent relevance 0.89 · 4.5% (105 of 2,335 decks)
- Steward of Valeron relevance 0.85 · 4.8% (111 of 2,335 decks)
- Blighted Agent relevance 0.68 · 12.2% (285 of 2,335 decks)
- Jhessian Infiltrator relevance 0.85 · 4.5% (104 of 2,335 decks)
- Bant Battlemage relevance 0.82 · 4.7% (109 of 2,335 decks)
- Medomai the Ageless relevance 0.74 · 6.3% (147 of 2,335 decks)
- Invisible Stalker relevance 0.70 · 8.0% (186 of 2,335 decks)
- Sigarda, Host of Herons relevance 0.67 · 9.3% (218 of 2,335 decks)
- Giver of Runes relevance 0.66 · 9.6% (225 of 2,335 decks)
- Knight of New Alara relevance 0.86 · 4.0% (94 of 2,335 decks)
- Bruna, Light of Alabaster relevance 0.67 · 8.7% (203 of 2,335 decks)
- Pearl-Ear, Imperial Advisor relevance 0.64 · 8.8% (206 of 2,335 decks)
- Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist relevance 0.66 · 7.1% (166 of 2,335 decks)
- Kor Spiritdancer relevance 0.64 · 8.2% (191 of 2,335 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Sigil of Valor relevance 0.94 · 36.0% (841 of 2,335 decks)
- Sword of Fire and Ice relevance 0.78 · 14.9% (347 of 2,335 decks)
- Behemoth Sledge relevance 0.72 · 21.4% (499 of 2,335 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.71 · 19.4% (452 of 2,335 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.79 · 12.2% (284 of 2,335 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.67 · 20.7% (483 of 2,335 decks)
- Hammer of Nazahn relevance 0.72 · 12.5% (293 of 2,335 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.66 · 15.7% (367 of 2,335 decks)
- Inquisitor's Flail relevance 0.86 · 4.8% (112 of 2,335 decks)
- Sword of Light and Shadow relevance 0.77 · 7.8% (181 of 2,335 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.64 · 16.0% (374 of 2,335 decks)
- Conqueror's Flail relevance 0.73 · 8.9% (207 of 2,335 decks)
- Umezawa's Jitte relevance 0.77 · 6.5% (152 of 2,335 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.68 · 11.2% (261 of 2,335 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.76 · 5.1% (120 of 2,335 decks)
- Obelisk of Bant relevance 0.72 · 7.1% (165 of 2,335 decks)
- Grafted Exoskeleton relevance 0.76 · 4.8% (113 of 2,335 decks)
- Sword of Vengeance relevance 0.71 · 6.2% (145 of 2,335 decks)
- Rammas Echor, Ancient Shield relevance 0.56 · 18.3% (427 of 2,335 decks)
- Colossus Hammer relevance 0.64 · 10.4% (243 of 2,335 decks)
- Mask of Memory relevance 0.72 · 5.1% (120 of 2,335 decks)
- Buster Sword relevance 0.67 · 7.6% (178 of 2,335 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.59 · 12.7% (297 of 2,335 decks)
- Sword of War and Peace relevance 0.71 · 4.9% (115 of 2,335 decks)
- Sword of Sinew and Steel relevance 0.73 · 4.7% (109 of 2,335 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.58 · 12.2% (284 of 2,335 decks)
- Thran Power Suit relevance 0.66 · 5.9% (138 of 2,335 decks)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.65 · 6.2% (145 of 2,335 decks)
- Dragonfire Blade relevance 0.66 · 5.3% (124 of 2,335 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.61 · 7.1% (165 of 2,335 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.59 · 8.4% (197 of 2,335 decks)
- Power Fist relevance 0.60 · 5.1% (119 of 2,335 decks)
- Sword of Hearth and Home relevance 0.60 · 5.2% (121 of 2,335 decks)
- Robe of Stars relevance 0.58 · 6.7% (157 of 2,335 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.63 · 4.5% (105 of 2,335 decks)
- Winged Boots relevance 0.56 · 6.9% (160 of 2,335 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.46 · 14.2% (331 of 2,335 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.69 · 3.8% (89 of 2,335 decks)
- Excalibur, Sword of Eden relevance 0.64 · 4.2% (97 of 2,335 decks)
- Sword of Body and Mind relevance 0.74 · 3.3% (77 of 2,335 decks)
- Azorius Signet relevance 0.42 · 16.1% (377 of 2,335 decks)
- Prowler's Helm relevance 0.74 · 3.0% (69 of 2,335 decks)
- Bilbo's Ring relevance 0.76 · 2.8% (65 of 2,335 decks)
- Belt of Giant Strength relevance 0.58 · 4.3% (101 of 2,335 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.41 · 14.0% (328 of 2,335 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.26 · 55.5% (1,297 of 2,335 decks)
- Celestial Armor relevance 0.64 · 2.9% (67 of 2,335 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.31 · 28.8% (672 of 2,335 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.43 · 7.1% (166 of 2,335 decks)
- Sword of Forge and Frontier relevance 0.59 · 3.2% (75 of 2,335 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Finest Hour relevance 0.70 · 84.9% (1,983 of 2,335 decks)
- Angelic Benediction relevance 0.93 · 39.9% (931 of 2,335 decks)
- Ardent Plea relevance 0.91 · 38.8% (906 of 2,335 decks)
- Steel of the Godhead relevance 0.72 · 59.8% (1,396 of 2,335 decks)
- Angelic Exaltation relevance 0.93 · 31.8% (743 of 2,335 decks)
- Shield of the Oversoul relevance 0.73 · 52.8% (1,234 of 2,335 decks)
- Idolized relevance 0.85 · 33.0% (770 of 2,335 decks)
- Dueling Grounds relevance 0.86 · 27.7% (646 of 2,335 decks)
- Favor of the Overbeing relevance 0.87 · 25.4% (592 of 2,335 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.65 · 50.2% (1,172 of 2,335 decks)
- Spirit Mantle relevance 0.74 · 37.4% (873 of 2,335 decks)
- Armadillo Cloak relevance 0.77 · 33.9% (791 of 2,335 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.64 · 47.7% (1,113 of 2,335 decks)
- Staggering Insight relevance 0.77 · 28.9% (674 of 2,335 decks)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.76 · 24.0% (561 of 2,335 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.73 · 24.5% (573 of 2,335 decks)
- Sigarda's Aid relevance 0.71 · 24.5% (571 of 2,335 decks)
- Security Bypass relevance 0.82 · 11.2% (262 of 2,335 decks)
- Unflinching Courage relevance 0.71 · 19.2% (449 of 2,335 decks)
- Mantle of the Ancients relevance 0.66 · 22.5% (526 of 2,335 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.70 · 16.8% (392 of 2,335 decks)
- All That Glitters relevance 0.59 · 32.7% (763 of 2,335 decks)
- Sigil of the Nayan Gods relevance 0.86 · 6.3% (148 of 2,335 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.59 · 31.6% (737 of 2,335 decks)
- Strong Back relevance 0.73 · 11.9% (278 of 2,335 decks)
- Angelic Destiny relevance 0.74 · 10.2% (239 of 2,335 decks)
- Daybreak Coronet relevance 0.74 · 8.8% (205 of 2,335 decks)
- Super State relevance 0.71 · 10.1% (237 of 2,335 decks)
- Audacity relevance 0.77 · 6.0% (140 of 2,335 decks)
- Ethereal Armor relevance 0.59 · 20.6% (482 of 2,335 decks)
- Team Avatar relevance 0.68 · 11.3% (265 of 2,335 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.69 · 10.1% (235 of 2,335 decks)
- Alpha Authority relevance 0.70 · 9.1% (213 of 2,335 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 0.59 · 15.0% (350 of 2,335 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.70 · 6.9% (160 of 2,335 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.69 · 7.0% (164 of 2,335 decks)
- Unquestioned Authority relevance 0.65 · 9.4% (219 of 2,335 decks)
- Canopy Cover relevance 0.70 · 5.0% (116 of 2,335 decks)
- Aether Tunnel relevance 0.71 · 4.8% (113 of 2,335 decks)
- Gift of Immortality relevance 0.67 · 6.3% (146 of 2,335 decks)
- Keen Sense relevance 0.74 · 4.4% (103 of 2,335 decks)
- Forge Anew relevance 0.67 · 5.5% (129 of 2,335 decks)
- Sheltered by Ghosts relevance 0.60 · 10.1% (236 of 2,335 decks)
- Hyena Umbra relevance 0.66 · 5.8% (136 of 2,335 decks)
- Timely Ward relevance 0.64 · 5.1% (118 of 2,335 decks)
- Almost Perfect relevance 0.68 · 3.6% (83 of 2,335 decks)
- Sterling Grove relevance 0.47 · 10.7% (251 of 2,335 decks)
- Enchantress's Presence relevance 0.48 · 9.0% (209 of 2,335 decks)
- Shielded by Faith relevance 0.63 · 3.9% (91 of 2,335 decks)
- Sage's Reverie relevance 0.57 · 4.4% (103 of 2,335 decks)
All instants (49)
- Hindering Light relevance 0.73 · 19.5% (456 of 2,335 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.76 · 9.6% (225 of 2,335 decks)
- Bant Charm relevance 0.56 · 29.6% (690 of 2,335 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.70 · 9.4% (220 of 2,335 decks)
- Selesnya Charm relevance 0.73 · 4.9% (115 of 2,335 decks)
- Brokers Charm relevance 0.58 · 11.1% (259 of 2,335 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.63 · 7.3% (170 of 2,335 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.53 · 8.0% (186 of 2,335 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.52 · 7.2% (167 of 2,335 decks)
- Vines of Vastwood relevance 0.74 · 3.0% (69 of 2,335 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.50 · 4.6% (108 of 2,335 decks)
- Berserk relevance 0.65 · 2.9% (68 of 2,335 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.34 · 20.3% (474 of 2,335 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.34 · 19.9% (465 of 2,335 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.37 · 12.5% (293 of 2,335 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.33 · 17.1% (400 of 2,335 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.50 · 4.0% (94 of 2,335 decks)
- Dovin's Veto relevance 0.30 · 24.6% (574 of 2,335 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.43 · 4.5% (105 of 2,335 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.36 · 9.6% (225 of 2,335 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.38 · 7.4% (172 of 2,335 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.33 · 12.5% (291 of 2,335 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.30 · 18.9% (441 of 2,335 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.39 · 5.2% (121 of 2,335 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.35 · 9.3% (218 of 2,335 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.31 · 13.4% (312 of 2,335 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.26 · 26.1% (610 of 2,335 decks)
- Render Silent relevance 0.52 · 2.7% (64 of 2,335 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.51 · 2.8% (65 of 2,335 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.37 · 4.7% (110 of 2,335 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.31 · 10.7% (250 of 2,335 decks)
- Dawn's Truce relevance 0.32 · 7.1% (166 of 2,335 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.32 · 8.0% (187 of 2,335 decks)
- Return to Dust relevance 0.50 · 2.5% (59 of 2,335 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.22 · 34.0% (795 of 2,335 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.46 · 2.8% (66 of 2,335 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.25 · 17.9% (418 of 2,335 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.44 · 3.1% (73 of 2,335 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.27 · 11.4% (267 of 2,335 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.26 · 13.0% (303 of 2,335 decks)
- Silence relevance 0.34 · 4.4% (103 of 2,335 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.18 · 39.9% (932 of 2,335 decks)
- Flare of Fortitude relevance 0.43 · 2.7% (63 of 2,335 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.35 · 3.9% (90 of 2,335 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.33 · 3.6% (85 of 2,335 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.34 · 3.1% (72 of 2,335 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.14 · 50.9% (1,188 of 2,335 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.18 · 17.0% (398 of 2,335 decks)
- Swords to Plowshares relevance 0.10 · 59.3% (1,384 of 2,335 decks)
All sorceries (31)
- Open the Armory relevance 0.71 · 37.8% (882 of 2,335 decks)
- Steelshaper's Gift relevance 0.74 · 15.2% (354 of 2,335 decks)
- Single Combat relevance 0.73 · 11.1% (260 of 2,335 decks)
- Divine Reckoning relevance 0.73 · 6.2% (145 of 2,335 decks)
- Winds of Rath relevance 0.59 · 16.7% (389 of 2,335 decks)
- Slash the Ranks relevance 0.75 · 4.9% (114 of 2,335 decks)
- Distortion Strike relevance 0.78 · 3.3% (76 of 2,335 decks)
- Supreme Verdict relevance 0.42 · 16.5% (386 of 2,335 decks)
- Retether relevance 0.66 · 3.5% (82 of 2,335 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.47 · 9.1% (213 of 2,335 decks)
- Wargate relevance 0.45 · 10.0% (233 of 2,335 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.53 · 4.7% (110 of 2,335 decks)
- Idyllic Tutor relevance 0.44 · 9.0% (211 of 2,335 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.49 · 4.9% (114 of 2,335 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.69 · 2.5% (59 of 2,335 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.32 · 21.0% (490 of 2,335 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.27 · 30.2% (705 of 2,335 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.44 · 4.4% (103 of 2,335 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.35 · 6.5% (151 of 2,335 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.24 · 29.4% (686 of 2,335 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.47 · 2.8% (65 of 2,335 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.20 · 36.2% (845 of 2,335 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.41 · 3.0% (70 of 2,335 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.21 · 19.8% (463 of 2,335 decks)
- Time Wipe relevance 0.40 · 2.6% (60 of 2,335 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.35 · 3.3% (77 of 2,335 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 0.37 · 2.7% (63 of 2,335 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.15 · 41.6% (972 of 2,335 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.34 · 3.1% (72 of 2,335 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.23 · 4.2% (97 of 2,335 decks)
- Promise of Loyalty relevance 0.24 · 2.9% (67 of 2,335 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Elspeth, Knight-Errant relevance 0.77 · 8.0% (186 of 2,335 decks)
- Tamiyo, Field Researcher relevance 0.29 · 5.3% (124 of 2,335 decks)
All utility lands (40)
- Cathedral of War relevance 0.89 · 65.5% (1,529 of 2,335 decks)
- Strength of the Harvest // Haven of the Harvest relevance 0.57 · 20.2% (471 of 2,335 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.40 · 54.2% (1,265 of 2,335 decks)
- Hall of Heliod's Generosity relevance 0.51 · 19.7% (461 of 2,335 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.57 · 7.5% (175 of 2,335 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.54 · 7.1% (166 of 2,335 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.48 · 6.3% (147 of 2,335 decks)
- Inkmoth Nexus relevance 0.60 · 3.3% (77 of 2,335 decks)
- Tranquil Landscape relevance 0.35 · 17.7% (414 of 2,335 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.42 · 5.7% (132 of 2,335 decks)
- Stirring Wildwood relevance 0.59 · 2.8% (66 of 2,335 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.42 · 4.7% (109 of 2,335 decks)
- Celestial Colonnade relevance 0.52 · 3.2% (74 of 2,335 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.38 · 5.4% (126 of 2,335 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.39 · 4.8% (113 of 2,335 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.38 · 4.9% (114 of 2,335 decks)
- Meticulous Archive relevance 0.35 · 7.1% (166 of 2,335 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.34 · 8.3% (194 of 2,335 decks)
- Irrigated Farmland relevance 0.38 · 4.8% (113 of 2,335 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.38 · 4.7% (109 of 2,335 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.39 · 4.6% (108 of 2,335 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.48 · 3.1% (73 of 2,335 decks)
- Access Tunnel relevance 0.44 · 3.7% (86 of 2,335 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.40 · 4.1% (96 of 2,335 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.44 · 3.5% (81 of 2,335 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.30 · 10.7% (250 of 2,335 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.27 · 14.3% (334 of 2,335 decks)
- Sejiri Shelter // Sejiri Glacier relevance 0.45 · 3.1% (72 of 2,335 decks)
- Spara's Headquarters relevance 0.20 · 40.0% (935 of 2,335 decks)
- Temple of Enlightenment relevance 0.25 · 15.3% (358 of 2,335 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.31 · 5.4% (126 of 2,335 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.25 · 14.7% (344 of 2,335 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.28 · 9.1% (213 of 2,335 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.24 · 15.2% (355 of 2,335 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.34 · 3.3% (76 of 2,335 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.32 · 3.6% (84 of 2,335 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.20 · 14.4% (337 of 2,335 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.31 · 3.2% (75 of 2,335 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.16 · 20.3% (475 of 2,335 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.29 · 2.5% (58 of 2,335 decks)
All lands (50)
- Bant Panorama relevance 0.52 · 11.8% (276 of 2,335 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.46 · 6.6% (155 of 2,335 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.40 · 10.2% (239 of 2,335 decks)
- Mystic Gate relevance 0.42 · 7.5% (175 of 2,335 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.40 · 7.8% (181 of 2,335 decks)
- Treva's Ruins relevance 0.48 · 4.0% (94 of 2,335 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.34 · 12.0% (280 of 2,335 decks)
- Serra's Sanctum relevance 0.52 · 3.3% (77 of 2,335 decks)
- Tundra relevance 0.32 · 13.4% (312 of 2,335 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.32 · 13.7% (319 of 2,335 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.35 · 9.0% (211 of 2,335 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.39 · 4.8% (113 of 2,335 decks)
- Deserted Beach relevance 0.28 · 21.1% (492 of 2,335 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.38 · 5.5% (129 of 2,335 decks)
- Azorius Chancery relevance 0.33 · 10.9% (255 of 2,335 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.34 · 9.8% (229 of 2,335 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.37 · 5.2% (121 of 2,335 decks)
- Floodfarm Verge relevance 0.35 · 8.1% (190 of 2,335 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.31 · 12.1% (282 of 2,335 decks)
- Hengegate Pathway // Mistgate Pathway relevance 0.39 · 4.6% (108 of 2,335 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.27 · 23.6% (551 of 2,335 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.33 · 9.2% (215 of 2,335 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.36 · 5.3% (124 of 2,335 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.38 · 4.7% (109 of 2,335 decks)
- Tranquil Cove relevance 0.39 · 4.5% (105 of 2,335 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.36 · 4.8% (113 of 2,335 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.32 · 10.1% (236 of 2,335 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.29 · 13.5% (316 of 2,335 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.37 · 4.5% (106 of 2,335 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.37 · 4.6% (107 of 2,335 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.39 · 4.2% (99 of 2,335 decks)
- Urban Retreat relevance 0.34 · 5.9% (138 of 2,335 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.45 · 3.3% (77 of 2,335 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.23 · 30.7% (716 of 2,335 decks)
- Sea of Clouds relevance 0.23 · 26.8% (625 of 2,335 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.34 · 4.9% (114 of 2,335 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.32 · 5.1% (120 of 2,335 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.32 · 5.0% (116 of 2,335 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.29 · 8.4% (197 of 2,335 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.30 · 7.1% (166 of 2,335 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.22 · 28.5% (665 of 2,335 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.34 · 4.5% (105 of 2,335 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.31 · 5.0% (117 of 2,335 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.21 · 31.8% (743 of 2,335 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.35 · 4.3% (100 of 2,335 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.20 · 33.0% (771 of 2,335 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.22 · 24.7% (576 of 2,335 decks)
- Seachrome Coast relevance 0.30 · 6.3% (147 of 2,335 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.23 · 20.7% (483 of 2,335 decks)
- Adarkar Wastes relevance 0.22 · 24.4% (570 of 2,335 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Rafiq of the Many, from 2,335 real Commander decks.