Wall of Reverence
Played in 1,340 Bant decks
Color Identity Spread
5.6% Bant
1030+39+2+4+1+4+
That's every commander.
All commanders (10)
- Arcades, the Strategist relevance 3.57 · 9.8% (1,079 of 11,021 decks)
- Shanna, Purifying Blade relevance 1.31 · 3.8% (41 of 1,081 decks)
- Rafiq of the Many relevance 0.65 · 1.2% (29 of 2,364 decks)
- Arcades Sabboth relevance 0.52 · 3.2% (4 of 126 decks)
- Jenara, Asura of War relevance 0.46 · 1.6% (7 of 448 decks)
- Susan Foreman // The Eleventh Doctor relevance 0.38 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa relevance 0.28 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Treva, the Renewer relevance 0.25 · 1.2% (3 of 260 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist relevance 0.14 · 1.4% (1 of 72 decks)
- Ragnar relevance 0.12 · 1.1% (1 of 94 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Wall of Denial relevance 2.19 · 74.9% (1,003 of 1,340 decks)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 2.16 · 73.6% (986 of 1,340 decks)
- Axebane Guardian relevance 2.00 · 67.3% (902 of 1,340 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 1.81 · 62.8% (842 of 1,340 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 1.80 · 63.2% (847 of 1,340 decks)
- Assault Formation relevance 1.79 · 56.0% (750 of 1,340 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 1.78 · 55.0% (737 of 1,340 decks)
- High Alert relevance 1.77 · 57.8% (774 of 1,340 decks)
- Crystal Barricade relevance 1.73 · 55.7% (747 of 1,340 decks)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 1.68 · 54.8% (734 of 1,340 decks)
- Tree of Redemption relevance 1.62 · 46.4% (622 of 1,340 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 1.62 · 54.0% (724 of 1,340 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 1.60 · 49.7% (666 of 1,340 decks)
- Tower Defense relevance 1.58 · 49.0% (657 of 1,340 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 1.58 · 52.6% (705 of 1,340 decks)
- Weathered Sentinels relevance 1.52 · 45.1% (605 of 1,340 decks)
- Stalwart Shield-Bearers relevance 1.52 · 48.4% (649 of 1,340 decks)
- Sunscape Familiar relevance 1.51 · 50.7% (679 of 1,340 decks)
- Hover Barrier relevance 1.50 · 45.1% (604 of 1,340 decks)
- Sylvan Caryatid relevance 1.48 · 48.4% (648 of 1,340 decks)
- Slaughter the Strong relevance 1.48 · 46.5% (623 of 1,340 decks)
- Fog Bank relevance 1.41 · 36.8% (493 of 1,340 decks)
- Perimeter Captain relevance 1.41 · 42.2% (566 of 1,340 decks)
- Shield-Wall Sentinel relevance 1.40 · 41.9% (562 of 1,340 decks)
- Wingmantle Chaplain relevance 1.36 · 36.7% (492 of 1,340 decks)
- Wall of Stolen Identity relevance 1.27 · 36.9% (494 of 1,340 decks)
- Wall of Junk relevance 1.26 · 36.6% (490 of 1,340 decks)
- Fell the Mighty relevance 1.24 · 36.6% (491 of 1,340 decks)
- Dusk // Dawn relevance 1.22 · 39.5% (529 of 1,340 decks)
- Vine Trellis relevance 1.22 · 35.7% (479 of 1,340 decks)
All creatures (39)
- Wall of Denial relevance 2.19 · 74.9% (1,003 of 1,340 decks)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 2.16 · 73.6% (986 of 1,340 decks)
- Axebane Guardian relevance 2.00 · 67.3% (902 of 1,340 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 1.81 · 62.8% (842 of 1,340 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 1.80 · 63.2% (847 of 1,340 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 1.78 · 55.0% (737 of 1,340 decks)
- Crystal Barricade relevance 1.73 · 55.7% (747 of 1,340 decks)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 1.68 · 54.8% (734 of 1,340 decks)
- Tree of Redemption relevance 1.62 · 46.4% (622 of 1,340 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 1.62 · 54.0% (724 of 1,340 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 1.60 · 49.7% (666 of 1,340 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 1.58 · 52.6% (705 of 1,340 decks)
- Weathered Sentinels relevance 1.52 · 45.1% (605 of 1,340 decks)
- Stalwart Shield-Bearers relevance 1.52 · 48.4% (649 of 1,340 decks)
- Sunscape Familiar relevance 1.51 · 50.7% (679 of 1,340 decks)
- Hover Barrier relevance 1.50 · 45.1% (604 of 1,340 decks)
- Sylvan Caryatid relevance 1.48 · 48.4% (648 of 1,340 decks)
- Fog Bank relevance 1.41 · 36.8% (493 of 1,340 decks)
- Perimeter Captain relevance 1.41 · 42.2% (566 of 1,340 decks)
- Shield-Wall Sentinel relevance 1.40 · 41.9% (562 of 1,340 decks)
- Wingmantle Chaplain relevance 1.36 · 36.7% (492 of 1,340 decks)
- Wall of Stolen Identity relevance 1.27 · 36.9% (494 of 1,340 decks)
- Wall of Junk relevance 1.26 · 36.6% (490 of 1,340 decks)
- Vine Trellis relevance 1.22 · 35.7% (479 of 1,340 decks)
- Wall of Tanglecord relevance 1.21 · 34.3% (460 of 1,340 decks)
- Angelic Wall relevance 1.16 · 30.7% (411 of 1,340 decks)
- Carven Caryatid relevance 1.11 · 29.6% (396 of 1,340 decks)
- Towering Titan relevance 1.10 · 28.1% (376 of 1,340 decks)
- Walking Bulwark relevance 1.09 · 30.1% (404 of 1,340 decks)
- Wall of Roots relevance 1.08 · 30.4% (408 of 1,340 decks)
- Jeskai Barricade relevance 1.07 · 31.3% (420 of 1,340 decks)
- Mnemonic Wall relevance 1.06 · 26.0% (349 of 1,340 decks)
- Rampart Architect relevance 1.03 · 23.9% (320 of 1,340 decks)
- Wall of Essence relevance 0.99 · 21.0% (281 of 1,340 decks)
- Drift of Phantasms relevance 0.98 · 26.9% (360 of 1,340 decks)
- Wall of Runes relevance 0.97 · 26.6% (356 of 1,340 decks)
- Glacial Wall relevance 0.96 · 21.6% (289 of 1,340 decks)
- Suspicious Bookcase relevance 0.93 · 21.7% (291 of 1,340 decks)
- Fortified Rampart relevance 0.91 · 22.5% (301 of 1,340 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Rammas Echor, Ancient Shield relevance 1.03 · 29.1% (390 of 1,340 decks)
- Meekstone relevance 0.93 · 26.3% (352 of 1,340 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Assault Formation relevance 1.79 · 56.0% (750 of 1,340 decks)
- High Alert relevance 1.77 · 57.8% (774 of 1,340 decks)
- Brave the Sands relevance 1.21 · 35.7% (479 of 1,340 decks)
- Stoneskin relevance 0.95 · 25.2% (338 of 1,340 decks)
All instants (1)
- Tower Defense relevance 1.58 · 49.0% (657 of 1,340 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Slaughter the Strong relevance 1.48 · 46.5% (623 of 1,340 decks)
- Fell the Mighty relevance 1.24 · 36.6% (491 of 1,340 decks)
- Dusk // Dawn relevance 1.22 · 39.5% (529 of 1,340 decks)
- Expel the Interlopers relevance 0.93 · 23.9% (320 of 1,340 decks)
EDH data for Wall of Reverence: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,340 real decks.












































