Oakhame Adversary
Played in 590 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
4.7% Sultai
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (5)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 2.65 · 40.5% (15 of 37 decks)
- Felix Five-Boots relevance 2.15 · 3.0% (85 of 2,789 decks)
- Tasigur, the Golden Fang relevance 1.21 · 1.2% (38 of 3,101 decks)
- Brokkos, Apex of Forever relevance 0.82 · 1.1% (12 of 1,058 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.49 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Glissa Sunslayer relevance 0.84 · 30.0% (177 of 590 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.75 · 51.7% (305 of 590 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.69 · 39.2% (231 of 590 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.63 · 28.6% (169 of 590 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.61 · 26.8% (158 of 590 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.60 · 26.6% (157 of 590 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.59 · 24.7% (146 of 590 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.58 · 26.8% (158 of 590 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.58 · 29.8% (176 of 590 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.57 · 23.1% (136 of 590 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.54 · 15.4% (91 of 590 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 0.53 · 22.9% (135 of 590 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.53 · 18.8% (111 of 590 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.52 · 13.1% (77 of 590 decks)
- Edric, Spymaster of Trest relevance 0.51 · 15.4% (91 of 590 decks)
- Morcant's Loyalist relevance 0.51 · 16.6% (98 of 590 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.50 · 15.4% (91 of 590 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.49 · 12.4% (73 of 590 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.49 · 12.7% (75 of 590 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 0.49 · 15.3% (90 of 590 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.49 · 11.7% (69 of 590 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.49 · 22.5% (133 of 590 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.48 · 10.3% (61 of 590 decks)
- Trygon Predator relevance 0.48 · 14.1% (83 of 590 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.48 · 16.8% (99 of 590 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.48 · 12.2% (72 of 590 decks)
- Archpriest of Shadows relevance 0.46 · 9.8% (58 of 590 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.46 · 14.6% (86 of 590 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.45 · 12.0% (71 of 590 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.45 · 19.0% (112 of 590 decks)
All creatures (31)
- Glissa Sunslayer relevance 0.84 · 30.0% (177 of 590 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.75 · 51.7% (305 of 590 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.69 · 39.2% (231 of 590 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.63 · 28.6% (169 of 590 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.61 · 26.8% (158 of 590 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.60 · 26.6% (157 of 590 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.59 · 24.7% (146 of 590 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.58 · 26.8% (158 of 590 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.57 · 23.1% (136 of 590 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 0.53 · 22.9% (135 of 590 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.53 · 18.8% (111 of 590 decks)
- Edric, Spymaster of Trest relevance 0.51 · 15.4% (91 of 590 decks)
- Morcant's Loyalist relevance 0.51 · 16.6% (98 of 590 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.50 · 15.4% (91 of 590 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.49 · 12.4% (73 of 590 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.49 · 12.7% (75 of 590 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 0.49 · 15.3% (90 of 590 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.48 · 10.3% (61 of 590 decks)
- Trygon Predator relevance 0.48 · 14.1% (83 of 590 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.48 · 12.2% (72 of 590 decks)
- Archpriest of Shadows relevance 0.46 · 9.8% (58 of 590 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.46 · 14.6% (86 of 590 decks)
- High Perfect Morcant relevance 0.44 · 16.6% (98 of 590 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.44 · 18.8% (111 of 590 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.44 · 16.4% (97 of 590 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.43 · 12.2% (72 of 590 decks)
- Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel relevance 0.41 · 9.2% (54 of 590 decks)
- Shadowmage Infiltrator relevance 0.41 · 10.3% (61 of 590 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.40 · 12.4% (73 of 590 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.40 · 13.4% (79 of 590 decks)
- Eclipsed Elf relevance 0.39 · 11.2% (66 of 590 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.54 · 15.4% (91 of 590 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.49 · 22.5% (133 of 590 decks)
- Dimir Signet relevance 0.41 · 14.1% (83 of 590 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.52 · 13.1% (77 of 590 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.43 · 9.7% (57 of 590 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.39 · 13.2% (78 of 590 decks)
All instants (8)
- Negate relevance 0.58 · 29.8% (176 of 590 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.49 · 11.7% (69 of 590 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.48 · 16.8% (99 of 590 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.45 · 12.0% (71 of 590 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.45 · 19.0% (112 of 590 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.44 · 10.3% (61 of 590 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.44 · 11.5% (68 of 590 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.44 · 13.2% (78 of 590 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.39 · 26.9% (159 of 590 decks)
All lands (4)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.50 · 37.5% (221 of 590 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.40 · 19.7% (116 of 590 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.39 · 13.7% (81 of 590 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.39 · 27.5% (162 of 590 decks)
EDH data for Oakhame Adversary: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 590 real decks.