Oakhame Adversary
Played in 5,666 Green decks
3030+37+3+1+1+6+2+
Color Identity Spread
45.6% Green
Commanders
Fynn, the Fangbearer 49.9% of decks
Fynn, the Fangbearer 49.9% of decks
Saryth, the Viper's Fang 17.3% of decks
Saryth, the Viper's Fang 17.3% of decks
Jolrael, Mwonvuli Recluse 16.3% of decks
Jolrael, Mwonvuli Recluse 16.3% of decks
Questing Beast 11.4% of decks
Questing Beast 11.4% of decks
Marwyn, the Nurturer 5.0% of decks
Marwyn, the Nurturer 5.0% of decks
Toski, Bearer of Secrets 6.4% of decks
Toski, Bearer of Secrets 6.4% of decks
Most Relevant
Wasteland Viper 60.6% of decks
Wasteland Viper 60.6% of decks
Gnarlwood Dryad 58.2% of decks
Gnarlwood Dryad 58.2% of decks
Narnam Renegade 53.0% of decks
Narnam Renegade 53.0% of decks
Ambush Viper 61.9% of decks
Ambush Viper 61.9% of decks
Moss Viper 57.2% of decks
Moss Viper 57.2% of decks
Infectious Bite 61.3% of decks
Infectious Bite 61.3% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Fynn, the Fangbearer relevance 4.63 · 49.9% (4,365 of 8,745 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 1.46 · 17.3% (51 of 295 decks)
- Jolrael, Mwonvuli Recluse relevance 1.37 · 16.3% (43 of 263 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 1.22 · 11.4% (54 of 473 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.03 · 5.0% (213 of 4,274 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.96 · 6.4% (71 of 1,101 decks)
- Legolas, Master Archer relevance 0.91 · 5.5% (88 of 1,605 decks)
- Sosuke, Son of Seshiro relevance 0.84 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.80 · 4.9% (67 of 1,379 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.75 · 8.6% (16 of 187 decks)
- Gorm the Great relevance 0.66 · 66.7% (2 of 3 decks)
- Syr Faren, the Hengehammer relevance 0.58 · 10.9% (6 of 55 decks)
- Eladamri, Lord of Leaves relevance 0.47 · 3.9% (17 of 440 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.44 · 2.8% (28 of 1,008 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.41 · 2.4% (34 of 1,423 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.38 · 9.1% (3 of 33 decks)
- Imaryll, Elfhame Elite relevance 0.36 · 4.0% (8 of 201 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.35 · 5.2% (5 of 96 decks)
- Braulios of Pheres Band relevance 0.32 · 3.9% (6 of 153 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.28 · 1.7% (22 of 1,291 decks)
- Six relevance 0.27 · 1.5% (28 of 1,909 decks)
- Glissa Sunseeker relevance 0.25 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.24 · 1.2% (37 of 3,120 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.24 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Doorman relevance 0.21 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Cazur, Ruthless Stalker relevance 0.21 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Varis, Silverymoon Ranger relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (6 of 303 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Thrun, Breaker of Silence relevance 0.19 · 1.2% (15 of 1,251 decks)
- Old One Eye relevance 0.18 · 2.4% (4 of 169 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Wasteland Viper relevance 2.11 · 60.6% (3,432 of 5,666 decks)
- Gnarlwood Dryad relevance 2.09 · 58.2% (3,297 of 5,666 decks)
- Narnam Renegade relevance 1.98 · 53.0% (3,001 of 5,666 decks)
- Ambush Viper relevance 1.98 · 61.9% (3,505 of 5,666 decks)
- Moss Viper relevance 1.96 · 57.2% (3,239 of 5,666 decks)
- Infectious Bite relevance 1.95 · 61.3% (3,476 of 5,666 decks)
- Tajuru Blightblade relevance 1.92 · 55.5% (3,143 of 5,666 decks)
- Fang of Shigeki relevance 1.91 · 56.6% (3,209 of 5,666 decks)
- Sedge Scorpion relevance 1.91 · 54.3% (3,075 of 5,666 decks)
- Ichorspit Basilisk relevance 1.88 · 52.9% (2,995 of 5,666 decks)
- Deadly Recluse relevance 1.86 · 54.9% (3,111 of 5,666 decks)
- Bloated Contaminator relevance 1.83 · 54.1% (3,066 of 5,666 decks)
- Nightshade Dryad relevance 1.83 · 57.9% (3,282 of 5,666 decks)
- Thornweald Archer relevance 1.78 · 53.2% (3,014 of 5,666 decks)
- Hornet Queen relevance 1.77 · 60.3% (3,415 of 5,666 decks)
- Dragon Sniper relevance 1.76 · 56.3% (3,192 of 5,666 decks)
- Venerated Rotpriest relevance 1.76 · 52.4% (2,968 of 5,666 decks)
- Smell Fear relevance 1.73 · 52.6% (2,981 of 5,666 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 1.70 · 54.1% (3,064 of 5,666 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 1.66 · 51.0% (2,890 of 5,666 decks)
- Ankle Biter relevance 1.64 · 48.1% (2,723 of 5,666 decks)
- Mirkwood Spider relevance 1.64 · 45.2% (2,563 of 5,666 decks)
- Contagion Clasp relevance 1.50 · 38.7% (2,190 of 5,666 decks)
- Hornet Nest relevance 1.43 · 40.6% (2,303 of 5,666 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 1.40 · 49.2% (2,786 of 5,666 decks)
- Cankerbloom relevance 1.40 · 49.9% (2,830 of 5,666 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 1.37 · 62.4% (3,538 of 5,666 decks)
- Contaminant Grafter relevance 1.35 · 34.5% (1,954 of 5,666 decks)
- Carnivorous Canopy relevance 1.27 · 33.4% (1,890 of 5,666 decks)
- Planewide Celebration relevance 1.27 · 31.0% (1,756 of 5,666 decks)
All creatures (37)
- Wasteland Viper relevance 2.11 · 60.6% (3,432 of 5,666 decks)
- Gnarlwood Dryad relevance 2.09 · 58.2% (3,297 of 5,666 decks)
- Narnam Renegade relevance 1.98 · 53.0% (3,001 of 5,666 decks)
- Ambush Viper relevance 1.98 · 61.9% (3,505 of 5,666 decks)
- Moss Viper relevance 1.96 · 57.2% (3,239 of 5,666 decks)
- Tajuru Blightblade relevance 1.92 · 55.5% (3,143 of 5,666 decks)
- Fang of Shigeki relevance 1.91 · 56.6% (3,209 of 5,666 decks)
- Sedge Scorpion relevance 1.91 · 54.3% (3,075 of 5,666 decks)
- Ichorspit Basilisk relevance 1.88 · 52.9% (2,995 of 5,666 decks)
- Deadly Recluse relevance 1.86 · 54.9% (3,111 of 5,666 decks)
- Bloated Contaminator relevance 1.83 · 54.1% (3,066 of 5,666 decks)
- Nightshade Dryad relevance 1.83 · 57.9% (3,282 of 5,666 decks)
- Thornweald Archer relevance 1.78 · 53.2% (3,014 of 5,666 decks)
- Hornet Queen relevance 1.77 · 60.3% (3,415 of 5,666 decks)
- Dragon Sniper relevance 1.76 · 56.3% (3,192 of 5,666 decks)
- Venerated Rotpriest relevance 1.76 · 52.4% (2,968 of 5,666 decks)
- Ankle Biter relevance 1.64 · 48.1% (2,723 of 5,666 decks)
- Mirkwood Spider relevance 1.64 · 45.2% (2,563 of 5,666 decks)
- Hornet Nest relevance 1.43 · 40.6% (2,303 of 5,666 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 1.40 · 49.2% (2,786 of 5,666 decks)
- Cankerbloom relevance 1.40 · 49.9% (2,830 of 5,666 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 1.37 · 62.4% (3,538 of 5,666 decks)
- Contaminant Grafter relevance 1.35 · 34.5% (1,954 of 5,666 decks)
- Kappa Tech-Wrecker relevance 1.26 · 29.9% (1,692 of 5,666 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 1.24 · 37.2% (2,105 of 5,666 decks)
- Deathbloom Gardener relevance 1.22 · 30.8% (1,744 of 5,666 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 1.16 · 40.8% (2,309 of 5,666 decks)
- Pollenbright Druid relevance 1.14 · 30.6% (1,735 of 5,666 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 1.13 · 45.1% (2,555 of 5,666 decks)
- Skullwinder relevance 1.08 · 28.4% (1,611 of 5,666 decks)
- Toxic Scorpion relevance 1.05 · 24.3% (1,376 of 5,666 decks)
- Flesh Burrower relevance 1.00 · 24.4% (1,384 of 5,666 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.99 · 54.3% (3,078 of 5,666 decks)
- Poison Dart Frog relevance 0.96 · 27.1% (1,538 of 5,666 decks)
- Phyrexian Swarmlord relevance 0.92 · 21.2% (1,204 of 5,666 decks)
- Axebane Ferox relevance 0.90 · 20.9% (1,183 of 5,666 decks)
- Gran Pulse Ochu relevance 0.88 · 21.4% (1,212 of 5,666 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Contagion Clasp relevance 1.50 · 38.7% (2,190 of 5,666 decks)
- Viridian Longbow relevance 1.16 · 27.5% (1,556 of 5,666 decks)
- Glistening Sphere relevance 0.88 · 19.5% (1,104 of 5,666 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Rancor relevance 0.85 · 33.4% (1,891 of 5,666 decks)
All instants (1)
- Infectious Bite relevance 1.95 · 61.3% (3,476 of 5,666 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Smell Fear relevance 1.73 · 52.6% (2,981 of 5,666 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 1.70 · 54.1% (3,064 of 5,666 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 1.66 · 51.0% (2,890 of 5,666 decks)
- Carnivorous Canopy relevance 1.27 · 33.4% (1,890 of 5,666 decks)
- Planewide Celebration relevance 1.27 · 31.0% (1,756 of 5,666 decks)
- Noxious Assault relevance 1.20 · 29.2% (1,653 of 5,666 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Access Tunnel relevance 1.64 · 47.4% (2,688 of 5,666 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 1.35 · 51.6% (2,922 of 5,666 decks)
EDH data for Oakhame Adversary: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 5,666 real decks.




















































