Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (30)
- Maralen, Fae Ascendant relevance 2.79 · 60.9% (16,632 of 27,320 decks)
- Thranduil, the Elvenking relevance 2.70 · 66.0% (8,402 of 12,739 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 1.38 · 80.2% (65 of 81 decks)
- Kotis, the Fangkeeper relevance 1.28 · 23.9% (2,270 of 9,502 decks)
- Ukkima, Stalking Shadow // Cazur, Ruthless Stalker relevance 1.08 · 24.9% (559 of 2,249 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 1.07 · 29.1% (294 of 1,011 decks)
- Tasigur, the Golden Fang relevance 0.94 · 19.9% (612 of 3,074 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.92 · 62.2% (23 of 37 decks)
- Sidisi, Brood Tyrant relevance 0.79 · 15.6% (600 of 3,854 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel relevance 0.68 · 45.5% (15 of 33 decks)
- Damia, Sage of Stone relevance 0.62 · 14.0% (235 of 1,678 decks)
- Vorosh, the Hunter relevance 0.62 · 20.3% (63 of 310 decks)
- Zaxara, the Exemplary relevance 0.61 · 9.8% (1,147 of 11,681 decks)
- Glarb, Calamity's Augur relevance 0.51 · 8.0% (1,121 of 14,003 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.50 · 21.4% (24 of 112 decks)
- Uugguu, the Omniplasm relevance 0.49 · 9.0% (452 of 5,008 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 0.46 · 17.8% (28 of 157 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.45 · 36.8% (7 of 19 decks)
- Zimone and Dina relevance 0.45 · 8.8% (306 of 3,494 decks)
- Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 0.45 · 7.7% (563 of 7,277 decks)
- Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.45 · 13.9% (51 of 366 decks)
- Muldrotha, the Gravetide relevance 0.42 · 6.6% (877 of 13,376 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Armix, Filigree Thrasher relevance 0.38 · 25.8% (8 of 31 decks)
- Brokkos, Apex of Forever relevance 0.38 · 9.4% (98 of 1,041 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Tormod, the Desecrator relevance 0.38 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.33 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- The Mimeoplasm relevance 0.32 · 6.2% (233 of 3,730 decks)
- Indominus Rex, Alpha relevance 0.32 · 5.9% (301 of 5,089 decks)
- The Third Doctor // Vislor Turlough relevance 0.30 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator relevance 0.30 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.24 · 84.8% (32,883 of 38,756 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.09 · 46.1% (17,855 of 38,756 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.06 · 46.8% (18,152 of 38,756 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.01 · 44.3% (17,159 of 38,756 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 0.92 · 39.3% (15,244 of 38,756 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.90 · 36.9% (14,285 of 38,756 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.90 · 41.3% (16,024 of 38,756 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.83 · 35.7% (13,846 of 38,756 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.82 · 29.9% (11,579 of 38,756 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.79 · 44.6% (17,283 of 38,756 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.77 · 28.2% (10,922 of 38,756 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.76 · 33.0% (12,787 of 38,756 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.75 · 28.3% (10,984 of 38,756 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.73 · 31.6% (12,248 of 38,756 decks)
- High Perfect Morcant relevance 0.71 · 26.5% (10,278 of 38,756 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.69 · 31.2% (12,093 of 38,756 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.69 · 24.4% (9,445 of 38,756 decks)
- Bitterbloom Bearer relevance 0.68 · 25.7% (9,959 of 38,756 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.67 · 26.8% (10,399 of 38,756 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.66 · 24.0% (9,301 of 38,756 decks)
- Bitterblossom relevance 0.63 · 23.2% (8,998 of 38,756 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.63 · 20.3% (7,859 of 38,756 decks)
- Obyra, Dreaming Duelist relevance 0.62 · 22.2% (8,612 of 38,756 decks)
- Alela, Cunning Conqueror relevance 0.62 · 21.4% (8,312 of 38,756 decks)
- Spellstutter Sprite relevance 0.61 · 20.9% (8,083 of 38,756 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.61 · 21.9% (8,488 of 38,756 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.59 · 19.7% (7,649 of 38,756 decks)
- Urborg Elf relevance 0.59 · 19.3% (7,497 of 38,756 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.58 · 18.2% (7,054 of 38,756 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.57 · 17.5% (6,788 of 38,756 decks)
All creatures (39)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.24 · 84.8% (32,883 of 38,756 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.09 · 46.1% (17,855 of 38,756 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.06 · 46.8% (18,152 of 38,756 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.01 · 44.3% (17,159 of 38,756 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 0.92 · 39.3% (15,244 of 38,756 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.90 · 36.9% (14,285 of 38,756 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.90 · 41.3% (16,024 of 38,756 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.83 · 35.7% (13,846 of 38,756 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.82 · 29.9% (11,579 of 38,756 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.79 · 44.6% (17,283 of 38,756 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.77 · 28.2% (10,922 of 38,756 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.76 · 33.0% (12,787 of 38,756 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.75 · 28.3% (10,984 of 38,756 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.73 · 31.6% (12,248 of 38,756 decks)
- High Perfect Morcant relevance 0.71 · 26.5% (10,278 of 38,756 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.69 · 31.2% (12,093 of 38,756 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.69 · 24.4% (9,445 of 38,756 decks)
- Bitterbloom Bearer relevance 0.68 · 25.7% (9,959 of 38,756 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.67 · 26.8% (10,399 of 38,756 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.66 · 24.0% (9,301 of 38,756 decks)
- Obyra, Dreaming Duelist relevance 0.62 · 22.2% (8,612 of 38,756 decks)
- Alela, Cunning Conqueror relevance 0.62 · 21.4% (8,312 of 38,756 decks)
- Spellstutter Sprite relevance 0.61 · 20.9% (8,083 of 38,756 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.61 · 21.9% (8,488 of 38,756 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.59 · 19.7% (7,649 of 38,756 decks)
- Urborg Elf relevance 0.59 · 19.3% (7,497 of 38,756 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.58 · 18.2% (7,054 of 38,756 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.57 · 17.5% (6,788 of 38,756 decks)
- Scion of Oona relevance 0.56 · 18.5% (7,172 of 38,756 decks)
- Deathrite Shaman relevance 0.56 · 30.7% (11,881 of 38,756 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.56 · 17.1% (6,620 of 38,756 decks)
- Talion, the Kindly Lord relevance 0.54 · 18.6% (7,196 of 38,756 decks)
- Voracious Tome-Skimmer relevance 0.54 · 17.9% (6,921 of 38,756 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.54 · 16.5% (6,404 of 38,756 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.53 · 16.0% (6,216 of 38,756 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.53 · 16.1% (6,245 of 38,756 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 0.53 · 16.0% (6,204 of 38,756 decks)
- Tegwyll, Duke of Splendor relevance 0.52 · 16.6% (6,447 of 38,756 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.51 · 17.8% (6,908 of 38,756 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Bitterblossom relevance 0.63 · 23.2% (8,998 of 38,756 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.55 · 20.6% (7,980 of 38,756 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.51 · 18.5% (7,158 of 38,756 decks)
All instants (6)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.63 · 20.3% (7,859 of 38,756 decks)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 0.55 · 19.7% (7,636 of 38,756 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.55 · 31.3% (12,144 of 38,756 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.54 · 37.3% (14,439 of 38,756 decks)
- Spell Stutter relevance 0.50 · 15.6% (6,043 of 38,756 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.50 · 35.4% (13,703 of 38,756 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.53 · 37.1% (14,388 of 38,756 decks)
All lands (1)
- Eclipsed Realms relevance 0.50 · 16.4% (6,375 of 38,756 decks)
EDH data for Elvish Mystic: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 38,756 real decks.