Gift of the Woods

Played in 362 decks

Gift of the Woods
$0.18 €0.11

Change per day

Commanders

27

Showing 1-10 of 27

Page size
All commanders (27)
  1. Michelangelo, Improviser relevance 2.37 · 4.5% (15 of 333 decks)
  2. Kaima, the Fractured Calm relevance 2.14 · 1.4% (13 of 897 decks)
  3. Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 1.83 · 2.6% (5 of 189 decks)
  4. Kaysa relevance 1.63 · 6.0% (5 of 84 decks)
  5. Titanbones, Towering Heart relevance 1.60 · 2.8% (7 of 248 decks)
  6. Lord Dregg, Insect Invader relevance 1.25 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
  7. Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 1.14 · 11.8% (2 of 17 decks)
  8. Isao, Enlightened Bushi relevance 1.05 · 2.7% (3 of 111 decks)
  9. Arcades Sabboth relevance 1.02 · 1.6% (2 of 124 decks)
  10. Tigra, Feline Fury relevance 0.89 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
  11. Tana, the Bloodsower // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.84 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
  12. Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 0.77 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
  13. Lord Magnus relevance 0.76 · 9.1% (1 of 11 decks)
  14. Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Falthis, Shadowcat Familiar relevance 0.73 · 5.9% (1 of 17 decks)
  15. Flatman relevance 0.64 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
  16. Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.63 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
  17. The Lady of the Mountain relevance 0.62 · 2.2% (1 of 45 decks)
  18. Lila, Hospitality Hostess relevance 0.61 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
  19. Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Ravos, Soultender relevance 0.61 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
  20. Reptil, Dinomorpher relevance 0.61 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
  21. Ragnar relevance 0.60 · 1.1% (1 of 87 decks)
  22. Lady Zhurong, Warrior Queen relevance 0.56 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
  23. Autumn Willow relevance 0.52 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
  24. Jaheira, Friend of the Forest relevance 0.51 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
  25. Kodama of the East Tree // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.51 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
  26. Silvos, Rogue Elemental relevance 0.48 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
  27. Fblthp, Knows the Way relevance 0.46 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)

Parallel Cards

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
All parallel cards (6)
  1. Favor of the Woods
  2. Ferocity
  3. Noble Stand
  4. Retaliation
  5. Beastmaster's Magemark
  6. Luminous Wake

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Ferocity
    0.87 9.4%
    $0.20 €0.11
  • Forced Adaptation
    0.70 10.5%
    $0.21 €0.14
  • Carapace
    0.68 8.0%
    $0.16 €0.16
  • Gift of Paradise
    0.62 9.9%
    $0.27 €0.12
  • Regeneration
    0.61 7.7%
    $0.29 €0.25
  • King Cheetah
    0.61 5.5%
    $0.14 €0.13
  • Overgrown Battlement
    0.61 11.6%
    $0.34 €0.46
  • Quiet Disrepair
    0.60 6.6%
    $0.13 €0.09
  • Primal Frenzy
    0.58 6.4%
    $0.15 €0.13
  • Rancor
    0.57 13.3%
    $1.80 €1.14
All most relevant (30)
  1. Ferocity relevance 0.87 · 9.4% (34 of 362 decks)
  2. Forced Adaptation relevance 0.70 · 10.5% (38 of 362 decks)
  3. Carapace relevance 0.68 · 8.0% (29 of 362 decks)
  4. Gift of Paradise relevance 0.62 · 9.9% (36 of 362 decks)
  5. Regeneration relevance 0.61 · 7.7% (28 of 362 decks)
  6. King Cheetah relevance 0.61 · 5.5% (20 of 362 decks)
  7. Overgrown Battlement relevance 0.61 · 11.6% (42 of 362 decks)
  8. Quiet Disrepair relevance 0.60 · 6.6% (24 of 362 decks)
  9. Primal Frenzy relevance 0.58 · 6.4% (23 of 362 decks)
  10. Rancor relevance 0.57 · 13.3% (48 of 362 decks)
  11. Spider Umbra relevance 0.56 · 9.1% (33 of 362 decks)
  12. Predatory Hunger relevance 0.56 · 8.0% (29 of 362 decks)
  13. Bequeathal relevance 0.56 · 7.5% (27 of 362 decks)
  14. Wild Growth relevance 0.56 · 17.4% (63 of 362 decks)
  15. Shape the Sands relevance 0.54 · 6.1% (22 of 362 decks)
  16. Bestial Bloodline relevance 0.54 · 6.1% (22 of 362 decks)
  17. Llanowar Elves relevance 0.54 · 23.2% (84 of 362 decks)
  18. Spider Climb relevance 0.53 · 5.2% (19 of 362 decks)
  19. Enthralling Victor relevance 0.53 · 5.8% (21 of 362 decks)
  20. Frog Tongue relevance 0.53 · 6.9% (25 of 362 decks)
  21. Track Down relevance 0.52 · 6.6% (24 of 362 decks)
  22. Fruit of the First Tree relevance 0.51 · 6.9% (25 of 362 decks)
  23. Dryad's Favor relevance 0.51 · 6.1% (22 of 362 decks)
  24. Jaddi Offshoot relevance 0.51 · 8.6% (31 of 362 decks)
  25. Ancestral Mask relevance 0.50 · 9.7% (35 of 362 decks)
  26. Skyshroud Elite relevance 0.50 · 5.0% (18 of 362 decks)
  27. Great Forest Druid relevance 0.49 · 9.4% (34 of 362 decks)
  28. Abundant Growth relevance 0.48 · 9.7% (35 of 362 decks)
  29. Giant Growth relevance 0.48 · 8.8% (32 of 362 decks)
  30. Crash of Rhinos relevance 0.47 · 4.7% (17 of 362 decks)

Creatures

19

Showing 1-10 of 19

Page size
  • King Cheetah
    0.61 5.5%
    $0.14 €0.13
  • Overgrown Battlement
    0.61 11.6%
    $0.34 €0.46
  • Llanowar Elves
    0.54 23.2%
    $0.33 €0.21
  • Enthralling Victor
    0.53 5.8%
    $0.15 €0.12
  • Jaddi Offshoot
    0.51 8.6%
    $0.29 €0.23
  • Skyshroud Elite
    0.50 5.0%
    $0.38 €0.78
  • Great Forest Druid
    0.49 9.4%
    $0.26 €0.13
  • Crash of Rhinos
    0.47 4.7%
    $0.19 €0.13
  • Femeref Archers
    0.47 5.2%
    $0.14 €0.13
  • Sylvan Brushstrider
    0.46 4.4%
    $0.13 €0.06
All creatures (19)
  1. King Cheetah relevance 0.61 · 5.5% (20 of 362 decks)
  2. Overgrown Battlement relevance 0.61 · 11.6% (42 of 362 decks)
  3. Llanowar Elves relevance 0.54 · 23.2% (84 of 362 decks)
  4. Enthralling Victor relevance 0.53 · 5.8% (21 of 362 decks)
  5. Jaddi Offshoot relevance 0.51 · 8.6% (31 of 362 decks)
  6. Skyshroud Elite relevance 0.50 · 5.0% (18 of 362 decks)
  7. Great Forest Druid relevance 0.49 · 9.4% (34 of 362 decks)
  8. Crash of Rhinos relevance 0.47 · 4.7% (17 of 362 decks)
  9. Femeref Archers relevance 0.47 · 5.2% (19 of 362 decks)
  10. Sylvan Brushstrider relevance 0.46 · 4.4% (16 of 362 decks)
  11. Pharika's Disciple relevance 0.45 · 4.7% (17 of 362 decks)
  12. Rampaging Rendhorn relevance 0.45 · 4.4% (16 of 362 decks)
  13. Siege Wurm relevance 0.45 · 5.2% (19 of 362 decks)
  14. Boneyard Wurm relevance 0.44 · 5.8% (21 of 362 decks)
  15. Greater Basilisk relevance 0.44 · 4.7% (17 of 362 decks)
  16. Broodhunter Wurm relevance 0.44 · 4.7% (17 of 362 decks)
  17. Tapestry Warden relevance 0.43 · 5.8% (21 of 362 decks)
  18. Almighty Brushwagg relevance 0.43 · 5.0% (18 of 362 decks)
  19. Lurking Roper relevance 0.42 · 4.4% (16 of 362 decks)

Artifacts

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Rosethorn Halberd
    0.46 5.0%
    $0.08 €0.05
All artifacts (1)
  1. Rosethorn Halberd relevance 0.46 · 5.0% (18 of 362 decks)

Enchantments

23

Showing 1-10 of 23

Page size
  • Ferocity
    0.87 9.4%
    $0.20 €0.11
  • Forced Adaptation
    0.70 10.5%
    $0.21 €0.14
  • Carapace
    0.68 8.0%
    $0.16 €0.16
  • Gift of Paradise
    0.62 9.9%
    $0.27 €0.12
  • Regeneration
    0.61 7.7%
    $0.29 €0.25
  • Quiet Disrepair
    0.60 6.6%
    $0.13 €0.09
  • Primal Frenzy
    0.58 6.4%
    $0.15 €0.13
  • Rancor
    0.57 13.3%
    $1.80 €1.14
  • Spider Umbra
    0.56 9.1%
    $0.33 €0.36
  • Predatory Hunger
    0.56 8.0%
    $0.65 €0.51
All enchantments (23)
  1. Ferocity relevance 0.87 · 9.4% (34 of 362 decks)
  2. Forced Adaptation relevance 0.70 · 10.5% (38 of 362 decks)
  3. Carapace relevance 0.68 · 8.0% (29 of 362 decks)
  4. Gift of Paradise relevance 0.62 · 9.9% (36 of 362 decks)
  5. Regeneration relevance 0.61 · 7.7% (28 of 362 decks)
  6. Quiet Disrepair relevance 0.60 · 6.6% (24 of 362 decks)
  7. Primal Frenzy relevance 0.58 · 6.4% (23 of 362 decks)
  8. Rancor relevance 0.57 · 13.3% (48 of 362 decks)
  9. Spider Umbra relevance 0.56 · 9.1% (33 of 362 decks)
  10. Predatory Hunger relevance 0.56 · 8.0% (29 of 362 decks)
  11. Bequeathal relevance 0.56 · 7.5% (27 of 362 decks)
  12. Wild Growth relevance 0.56 · 17.4% (63 of 362 decks)
  13. Bestial Bloodline relevance 0.54 · 6.1% (22 of 362 decks)
  14. Spider Climb relevance 0.53 · 5.2% (19 of 362 decks)
  15. Frog Tongue relevance 0.53 · 6.9% (25 of 362 decks)
  16. Fruit of the First Tree relevance 0.51 · 6.9% (25 of 362 decks)
  17. Dryad's Favor relevance 0.51 · 6.1% (22 of 362 decks)
  18. Ancestral Mask relevance 0.50 · 9.7% (35 of 362 decks)
  19. Abundant Growth relevance 0.48 · 9.7% (35 of 362 decks)
  20. Silken Strength relevance 0.47 · 5.8% (21 of 362 decks)
  21. Keen Sense relevance 0.44 · 8.3% (30 of 362 decks)
  22. War Dance relevance 0.43 · 4.1% (15 of 362 decks)
  23. The Brute relevance 0.43 · 4.7% (17 of 362 decks)

Instants

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Shape the Sands
    0.54 6.1%
    $0.06 €0.09
  • Giant Growth
    0.48 8.8%
    $0.20 €0.06
  • Biosynthic Burst
    0.47 8.6%
    $0.30 €0.09
  • Fog
    0.45 11.3%
    $1.04 €0.25
  • Return to Nature
    0.45 10.5%
    $0.32 €0.21
All instants (5)
  1. Shape the Sands relevance 0.54 · 6.1% (22 of 362 decks)
  2. Giant Growth relevance 0.48 · 8.8% (32 of 362 decks)
  3. Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.47 · 8.6% (31 of 362 decks)
  4. Fog relevance 0.45 · 11.3% (41 of 362 decks)
  5. Return to Nature relevance 0.45 · 10.5% (38 of 362 decks)

Sorceries

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Track Down
    0.52 6.6%
    $0.21 €0.07
  • Cultivate
    0.46 26.2%
    $0.45 €0.48
All sorceries (2)
  1. Track Down relevance 0.52 · 6.6% (24 of 362 decks)
  2. Cultivate relevance 0.46 · 26.2% (95 of 362 decks)

EDH data for Gift of the Woods: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 362 real decks.