Cards like Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
80% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
52% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
5.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. 27% of other green decks
62% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
1.9 per deck on average
vs. 0.44 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Icetill Explorer
4.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
0.91 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Exploration
11× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Harrow
2.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
0.94 per deck on average
vs. 0.56 in other green decks
Cards
- Harrow 28%
- Entish Restoration 23%
- Scapeshift 22%
- Roiling Regrowth 11%
- Cycle of Renewal 6%
- Planar Engineering 5%
Cards like Sakura-Tribe Scout
14× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Explore
7.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other green decks
Cards
- Explore 34%
- Summer Bloom 14%
- Journey of Discovery 6%
- Enter the Unknown 5%
Cards like Ghalta the Unstoppable
18× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other green decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Scute Swarm
3.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other green decks
Cards
- Scute Swarm 48%
- Springheart Nantuko 14%
Cards like Crucible of Worlds
3.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Bristly Bill, Spine Sower
1.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other green decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.38 in other green decks
Cards
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower 23%
- Mossborn Hydra 20%
- Oran-Rief Hydra 8%
- Territorial Scythecat 8%
- Scythecat Cub 6%
- Vinelasher Kudzu 3%
- Seedship Agrarian 2%
- Undergrowth Champion 2%
Other options: Foe-liage, Floral Evoker, Murasa Ranger, Sazh's Chocobo
Cards like Nylea's Presence
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other green decks
Cards like Cultivator Colossus
3.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
1.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 61% of other green decks
48% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Cultivate 51%
- Kodama's Reach 38%
- Rampant Growth 28%
- Shared Roots 8%
- Search for Tomorrow 3%
- Explosive Vegetation 3%
- Migration Path 3%
- Map the Frontier 2%
- Reach the Horizon 2%
- Terramorph 2%
- Viewpoint Synchronization 2%
- They Went This Way 2%
- Grow from the Ashes 2%
- New Generation's Technique 2%
Other options: Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Roamer's Routine, Path to the Festival
Cards like Lumra, Bellow of the Woods
10× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Titania, Gaea Incarnate
Cards like Three Visits
1.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other green decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
0.91 per deck on average
vs. 0.90 in other green decks
Cards
- Three Visits 35%
- Nature's Lore 34%
- Skyshroud Claim 12%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 8%
- Field Trip 2%
Other options: Ranger's Path, Hunting Wilds, Glimpse the Core
Cards like Fog
1.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
15% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other green decks
Cards like Dancing from Dark to Dawn
5.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Worldly Tutor
1.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
- Worldly Tutor 28%
- Sylvan Tutor 5%
All top picks (50)
- Prismatic Omen relevance 0.56 · 55.4% (36 of 65 decks)
- Rootpath Purifier relevance 0.42 · 61.5% (40 of 65 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.31 · 76.9% (50 of 65 decks)
- Nylea's Presence relevance 0.51 · 23.1% (15 of 65 decks)
- Hexhaven Invigorator relevance 0.34 · 32.3% (21 of 65 decks)
- Pia, Aether Ascetic relevance 0.37 · 21.5% (14 of 65 decks)
- Overlord of the Hauntwoods relevance 0.32 · 32.3% (21 of 65 decks)
- Ghalta the Unstoppable relevance 0.34 · 27.7% (18 of 65 decks)
- Navigator's Compass relevance 0.44 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Jodah's Codex relevance 0.43 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 0.32 · 27.7% (18 of 65 decks)
- Energybending relevance 0.39 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Tromp the Domains relevance 0.40 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Through the Forest Gate relevance 0.29 · 27.7% (18 of 65 decks)
- Hiveheart Shaman relevance 0.39 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.22 · 53.8% (35 of 65 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.23 · 44.6% (29 of 65 decks)
- Scion of Draco relevance 0.35 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.25 · 35.4% (23 of 65 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.26 · 30.8% (20 of 65 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.24 · 36.9% (24 of 65 decks)
- Draco relevance 0.35 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.26 · 27.7% (18 of 65 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.19 · 58.5% (38 of 65 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 0.29 · 13.8% (9 of 65 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Scout relevance 0.27 · 20.0% (13 of 65 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.25 · 26.2% (17 of 65 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.22 · 36.9% (24 of 65 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.26 · 20.0% (13 of 65 decks)
- Carnivorous Cultivator // Enroot relevance 0.31 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Monument to Endurance relevance 0.32 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Prismatic Geoscope relevance 0.34 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Loamcrafter Faun relevance 0.30 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.18 · 53.8% (35 of 65 decks)
- Dancing from Dark to Dawn relevance 0.23 · 29.2% (19 of 65 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.25 · 20.0% (13 of 65 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.20 · 41.5% (27 of 65 decks)
- Lush Growth relevance 0.31 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.22 · 29.2% (19 of 65 decks)
- Emrakul, the Exigent Doom relevance 0.29 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.18 · 47.7% (31 of 65 decks)
- Together as One relevance 0.31 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- All-Fates Scroll relevance 0.30 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Might of Alara relevance 0.31 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.23 · 23.1% (15 of 65 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.18 · 49.2% (32 of 65 decks)
- Gaea's Might relevance 0.30 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.22 · 26.2% (17 of 65 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 0.25 · 13.8% (9 of 65 decks)
- Nantuko Cultivator relevance 0.28 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Rootpath Purifier relevance 0.42 · 61.5% (40 of 65 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.31 · 76.9% (50 of 65 decks)
- Hexhaven Invigorator relevance 0.34 · 32.3% (21 of 65 decks)
- Pia, Aether Ascetic relevance 0.37 · 21.5% (14 of 65 decks)
- Overlord of the Hauntwoods relevance 0.32 · 32.3% (21 of 65 decks)
- Ghalta the Unstoppable relevance 0.34 · 27.7% (18 of 65 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 0.32 · 27.7% (18 of 65 decks)
- Hiveheart Shaman relevance 0.39 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.22 · 53.8% (35 of 65 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.23 · 44.6% (29 of 65 decks)
- Scion of Draco relevance 0.35 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.25 · 35.4% (23 of 65 decks)
- Draco relevance 0.35 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.26 · 27.7% (18 of 65 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.19 · 58.5% (38 of 65 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 0.29 · 13.8% (9 of 65 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Scout relevance 0.27 · 20.0% (13 of 65 decks)
- Carnivorous Cultivator // Enroot relevance 0.31 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Loamcrafter Faun relevance 0.30 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.20 · 41.5% (27 of 65 decks)
- Emrakul, the Exigent Doom relevance 0.29 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.18 · 47.7% (31 of 65 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.18 · 49.2% (32 of 65 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.22 · 26.2% (17 of 65 decks)
- Nantuko Cultivator relevance 0.28 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.22 · 23.1% (15 of 65 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.18 · 43.1% (28 of 65 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.18 · 41.5% (27 of 65 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.19 · 33.8% (22 of 65 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.20 · 29.2% (19 of 65 decks)
- PuPu UFO relevance 0.25 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Marwyn, the Preserver relevance 0.27 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Budoka Gardener // Dokai, Weaver of Life relevance 0.26 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.17 · 43.1% (28 of 65 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.21 · 18.5% (12 of 65 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.17 · 36.9% (24 of 65 decks)
- Walking Atlas relevance 0.25 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Briar Hydra relevance 0.24 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Six relevance 0.19 · 20.0% (13 of 65 decks)
- Mistbreath Elder relevance 0.24 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Skyshroud Ranger relevance 0.22 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.16 · 35.4% (23 of 65 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.18 · 23.1% (15 of 65 decks)
- Endbringer relevance 0.24 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.17 · 24.6% (16 of 65 decks)
- Wildgrowth Archaic relevance 0.24 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Territorial Scythecat relevance 0.22 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Scaled Herbalist relevance 0.22 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Swampbenders relevance 0.23 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.18 · 15.4% (10 of 65 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Navigator's Compass relevance 0.44 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Jodah's Codex relevance 0.43 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Monument to Endurance relevance 0.32 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Prismatic Geoscope relevance 0.34 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- All-Fates Scroll relevance 0.30 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.23 · 23.1% (15 of 65 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.23 · 20.0% (13 of 65 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.21 · 21.5% (14 of 65 decks)
- Power Armor relevance 0.30 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- The Echoverse Fulcrum relevance 0.27 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Currency Converter relevance 0.27 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Umbilicus relevance 0.26 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Alchemist's Vial relevance 0.26 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Erratic Portal relevance 0.25 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.23 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.19 · 21.5% (14 of 65 decks)
- Sword of Forge and Frontier relevance 0.24 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.19 · 18.5% (12 of 65 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.20 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.17 · 16.9% (11 of 65 decks)
- Key to the City relevance 0.21 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Ghirapur Orrery relevance 0.20 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.16 · 12.3% (8 of 65 decks)
- Blood Clock relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- The Endstone relevance 0.18 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Bag of Holding relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Avarice Amulet relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Thrór's Map relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Power Fist relevance 0.16 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Sword of Body and Mind relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.15 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Necklace of Girion relevance 0.14 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.15 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Sword of Light and Shadow relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Armillary Sphere relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Tome of Legends relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Decoction Module relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Weather Maker relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.13 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.13 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Manaforce Mace relevance 0.19 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Sword of Hearth and Home relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Sword of Fire and Ice relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.10 · 21.5% (14 of 65 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.10 · 18.5% (12 of 65 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.11 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Throne of the God-Pharaoh relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Oblivion Stone relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Reito Lantern relevance 0.17 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.08 · 36.9% (24 of 65 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Prismatic Omen relevance 0.56 · 55.4% (36 of 65 decks)
- Nylea's Presence relevance 0.51 · 23.1% (15 of 65 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.26 · 30.8% (20 of 65 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.24 · 36.9% (24 of 65 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.25 · 26.2% (17 of 65 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.22 · 36.9% (24 of 65 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.26 · 20.0% (13 of 65 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.18 · 53.8% (35 of 65 decks)
- Dancing from Dark to Dawn relevance 0.23 · 29.2% (19 of 65 decks)
- Lush Growth relevance 0.31 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.22 · 29.2% (19 of 65 decks)
- Way of the Paradox relevance 0.28 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.23 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Manabond relevance 0.25 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Ayula's Influence relevance 0.21 · 12.3% (8 of 65 decks)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.20 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Omnipresence relevance 0.21 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.18 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.18 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.17 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Abundant Growth relevance 0.19 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Claim the Kingdom relevance 0.19 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Prodigious Growth relevance 0.19 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Dense Foliage relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Crystalline Armor relevance 0.17 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Beorn's Hospitality relevance 0.16 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.16 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.16 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- The Huntsman's Redemption relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.14 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Gardenize relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Perilous Forays relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Assemble the Entmoot relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.13 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Thelon's Chant relevance 0.16 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.09 · 13.8% (9 of 65 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.10 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Raised by Giants relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Audacity relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.07 · 29.2% (19 of 65 decks)
- Super State relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.09 · 13.8% (9 of 65 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.10 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Solid Ground relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Way of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.15 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.10 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Sanctum of Fruitful Harvest relevance 0.15 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
All instants (50)
- Energybending relevance 0.39 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Might of Alara relevance 0.31 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Gaea's Might relevance 0.30 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Kozilek's Command relevance 0.23 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Awakening of Vitu-Ghazi relevance 0.23 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.14 · 32.3% (21 of 65 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.14 · 27.7% (18 of 65 decks)
- Chameleon Blur relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.17 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.13 · 27.7% (18 of 65 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.13 · 23.1% (15 of 65 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.14 · 12.3% (8 of 65 decks)
- You Look Upon the Tarrasque relevance 0.17 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Pair o' Dice Lost relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.16 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.15 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.11 · 29.2% (19 of 65 decks)
- Snag relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Groundswell relevance 0.16 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Primal Bellow relevance 0.14 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.11 · 15.4% (10 of 65 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.12 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.12 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.13 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.11 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Blinding Fog relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.12 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Autumn's Veil relevance 0.12 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Squall Line relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Elemental Teachings relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.10 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.11 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Avoid Fate relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Charge Through relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.09 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Sylvan Bounty relevance 0.14 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Animate Land relevance 0.14 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Flourishing Grapple relevance 0.14 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.06 · 33.8% (22 of 65 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.09 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Might of the Old Ways relevance 0.14 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Something Worth Saving relevance 0.13 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.06 · 44.6% (29 of 65 decks)
- Compel Brutality relevance 0.13 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Refresh relevance 0.13 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.08 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Skyshroud Blessing relevance 0.12 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Nourishing Shoal relevance 0.12 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Tromp the Domains relevance 0.40 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Through the Forest Gate relevance 0.29 · 27.7% (18 of 65 decks)
- Together as One relevance 0.31 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 0.25 · 13.8% (9 of 65 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.24 · 13.8% (9 of 65 decks)
- Uncle's Musings relevance 0.29 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.24 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.20 · 21.5% (14 of 65 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.21 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 0.20 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.14 · 33.8% (22 of 65 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.17 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Traverse the Ulvenwald relevance 0.19 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Enter the Unknown relevance 0.19 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.17 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.16 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.17 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Nostalgic Dreams relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Scouting Trek relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.11 · 35.4% (23 of 65 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.13 · 13.8% (9 of 65 decks)
- Plow Through relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.10 · 38.5% (25 of 65 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.15 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.13 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.12 · 16.9% (11 of 65 decks)
- Michelangelo's Technique relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Crack Open relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Hurricane relevance 0.15 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Formless Genesis relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.13 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Adventure Awaits relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.14 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Nature's Spiral relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.13 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.07 · 50.8% (33 of 65 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.11 · 13.8% (9 of 65 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.09 · 33.8% (22 of 65 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Savage Conception relevance 0.18 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.10 · 12.3% (8 of 65 decks)
- Pull Through the Weft relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Wandering Stream relevance 0.17 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Spinning Wheel Kick relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Snarl Song relevance 0.16 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.11 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Earthbending Lesson relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (11)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.25 · 20.0% (13 of 65 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.16 · 29.2% (19 of 65 decks)
- Garruk, Curse Breaker relevance 0.19 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.14 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.08 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.08 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.08 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.07 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.07 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.06 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.05 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.08 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.42 · 26.2% (17 of 65 decks)
- Roiling Canopy relevance 0.33 · 32.3% (21 of 65 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.25 · 23.1% (15 of 65 decks)
- Unstable Frontier relevance 0.34 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.23 · 21.5% (14 of 65 decks)
- Heap Gate relevance 0.30 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.27 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Maze's End relevance 0.26 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.20 · 21.5% (14 of 65 decks)
- Sanctum of Eternity relevance 0.22 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.23 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 0.25 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.18 · 13.8% (9 of 65 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.19 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.14 · 32.3% (21 of 65 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.13 · 40.0% (26 of 65 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.17 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.18 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Ghost Town relevance 0.19 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Blinkmoth Nexus relevance 0.19 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.14 · 20.0% (13 of 65 decks)
- Arch of Orazca relevance 0.18 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.16 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.16 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 0.17 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.16 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Mirrorpool relevance 0.15 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.13 · 15.4% (10 of 65 decks)
- Kishla Village relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.14 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.11 · 27.7% (18 of 65 decks)
- Endless Sands relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Inkmoth Nexus relevance 0.15 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.14 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Crawling Barrens relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.10 · 24.6% (16 of 65 decks)
- Haunted Fengraf relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.13 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.14 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Drownyard Temple relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.12 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.13 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Adventurer's Inn relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Cryptic Caves relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.08 · 26.2% (17 of 65 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.11 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.10 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.11 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.09 · 16.9% (11 of 65 decks)
All lands (50)
- Snow-Covered Wastes relevance 0.60 · 60.0% (39 of 65 decks)
- Wastes relevance 0.49 · 63.1% (41 of 65 decks)
- Thran Portal relevance 0.58 · 30.8% (20 of 65 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.27 · 72.3% (47 of 65 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 0.34 · 13.8% (9 of 65 decks)
- Baldur's Gate relevance 0.34 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.25 · 26.2% (17 of 65 decks)
- Gond Gate relevance 0.30 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Multiversal Passage relevance 0.29 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.25 · 15.4% (10 of 65 decks)
- Gateway Plaza relevance 0.30 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 0.29 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.24 · 12.3% (8 of 65 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.24 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.24 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.23 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.16 · 30.8% (20 of 65 decks)
- Cloudpost relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Glimmerpost relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.17 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.13 · 20.0% (13 of 65 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.13 · 16.9% (11 of 65 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.14 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.16 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.15 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Elven Passage relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.10 · 20.0% (13 of 65 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.13 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.12 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.10 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Room of Refuge relevance 0.16 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Promising Vein relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Shimmering Grotto relevance 0.15 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.10 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Rupture Spire relevance 0.15 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.14 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.14 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Snow-Covered Mountain relevance 0.14 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.14 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.10 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Unknown Shores relevance 0.14 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.09 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Undiscovered Paradise relevance 0.13 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.09 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.09 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Matzalantli, the Great Door // The Core relevance 0.12 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Mage-Ring Network relevance 0.11 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Fblthp, Knows the Way, from 65 real Commander decks.