Undergrowth Leopard
Played in 295 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (4)
- Volo, Guide to Monsters relevance 1.67 · 1.1% (57 of 5,414 decks)
- Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Master Chef relevance 1.11 · 1.6% (9 of 563 decks)
- Sita Varma, Masked Racer relevance 0.46 · 1.1% (2 of 187 decks)
- Zegana, Utopian Speaker relevance 0.31 · 1.3% (1 of 79 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Voracious Varmint relevance 0.82 · 13.2% (39 of 295 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.68 · 16.3% (48 of 295 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.67 · 24.4% (72 of 295 decks)
- Insidious Fungus relevance 0.63 · 15.6% (46 of 295 decks)
- Poison Dart Frog relevance 0.59 · 19.7% (58 of 295 decks)
- Dragon Sniper relevance 0.57 · 10.2% (30 of 295 decks)
- Sagu Wildling // Roost Seek relevance 0.53 · 9.8% (29 of 295 decks)
- Cankerbloom relevance 0.50 · 12.9% (38 of 295 decks)
- Caustic Caterpillar relevance 0.49 · 8.5% (25 of 295 decks)
- Noxious Newt relevance 0.48 · 11.2% (33 of 295 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.46 · 14.2% (42 of 295 decks)
- Dirgur Island Dragon // Skimming Strike relevance 0.45 · 7.5% (22 of 295 decks)
- Roamer's Routine relevance 0.44 · 8.5% (25 of 295 decks)
- Nightshade Dryad relevance 0.43 · 9.5% (28 of 295 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.42 · 12.5% (37 of 295 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.42 · 26.4% (78 of 295 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.41 · 32.2% (95 of 295 decks)
- Sazh's Chocobo relevance 0.40 · 8.8% (26 of 295 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.39 · 20.3% (60 of 295 decks)
- Spore Frog relevance 0.39 · 12.2% (36 of 295 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.39 · 9.5% (28 of 295 decks)
- Auroral Procession relevance 0.39 · 11.5% (34 of 295 decks)
- Tender Wildguide relevance 0.38 · 8.1% (24 of 295 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.38 · 7.8% (23 of 295 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.37 · 9.5% (28 of 295 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.37 · 10.8% (32 of 295 decks)
- Mirkwood Spider relevance 0.37 · 5.4% (16 of 295 decks)
- Aegis Turtle relevance 0.37 · 7.1% (21 of 295 decks)
- Keeper of Fables relevance 0.36 · 6.4% (19 of 295 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.36 · 7.1% (21 of 295 decks)
All creatures (31)
- Voracious Varmint relevance 0.82 · 13.2% (39 of 295 decks)
- Insidious Fungus relevance 0.63 · 15.6% (46 of 295 decks)
- Poison Dart Frog relevance 0.59 · 19.7% (58 of 295 decks)
- Dragon Sniper relevance 0.57 · 10.2% (30 of 295 decks)
- Sagu Wildling // Roost Seek relevance 0.53 · 9.8% (29 of 295 decks)
- Cankerbloom relevance 0.50 · 12.9% (38 of 295 decks)
- Caustic Caterpillar relevance 0.49 · 8.5% (25 of 295 decks)
- Noxious Newt relevance 0.48 · 11.2% (33 of 295 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.46 · 14.2% (42 of 295 decks)
- Dirgur Island Dragon // Skimming Strike relevance 0.45 · 7.5% (22 of 295 decks)
- Nightshade Dryad relevance 0.43 · 9.5% (28 of 295 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.42 · 12.5% (37 of 295 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.41 · 32.2% (95 of 295 decks)
- Sazh's Chocobo relevance 0.40 · 8.8% (26 of 295 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.39 · 20.3% (60 of 295 decks)
- Spore Frog relevance 0.39 · 12.2% (36 of 295 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.39 · 9.5% (28 of 295 decks)
- Tender Wildguide relevance 0.38 · 8.1% (24 of 295 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.37 · 10.8% (32 of 295 decks)
- Mirkwood Spider relevance 0.37 · 5.4% (16 of 295 decks)
- Aegis Turtle relevance 0.37 · 7.1% (21 of 295 decks)
- Keeper of Fables relevance 0.36 · 6.4% (19 of 295 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.36 · 7.1% (21 of 295 decks)
- Burnished Hart relevance 0.36 · 7.8% (23 of 295 decks)
- Prosperous Innkeeper relevance 0.36 · 8.8% (26 of 295 decks)
- Three Tree Rootweaver relevance 0.35 · 6.4% (19 of 295 decks)
- Skyserpent Seeker relevance 0.35 · 8.5% (25 of 295 decks)
- Man-o'-War relevance 0.35 · 8.1% (24 of 295 decks)
- Junk Winder relevance 0.34 · 11.2% (33 of 295 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.34 · 9.2% (27 of 295 decks)
- District Mascot relevance 0.33 · 5.8% (17 of 295 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.35 · 12.2% (36 of 295 decks)
All instants (8)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.68 · 16.3% (48 of 295 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.67 · 24.4% (72 of 295 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.42 · 26.4% (78 of 295 decks)
- Auroral Procession relevance 0.39 · 11.5% (34 of 295 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.37 · 9.5% (28 of 295 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.36 · 7.5% (22 of 295 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.35 · 7.1% (21 of 295 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.34 · 6.8% (20 of 295 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Roamer's Routine relevance 0.44 · 8.5% (25 of 295 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.38 · 7.8% (23 of 295 decks)
All lands (8)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.78 · 39.0% (115 of 295 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.51 · 31.5% (93 of 295 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.41 · 10.5% (31 of 295 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.41 · 24.4% (72 of 295 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.39 · 14.9% (44 of 295 decks)
- Guadosalam, Farplane Gateway relevance 0.35 · 8.5% (25 of 295 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.35 · 9.2% (27 of 295 decks)
- Lakeside Shack relevance 0.33 · 7.5% (22 of 295 decks)
EDH data for Undergrowth Leopard: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 295 real decks.