Change per day
Archetypes
53% of decks lean toward it
45% of decks lean toward it
27% of decks lean toward it
Top Picks
With signature card Forgotten Ancient
53% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Slither Blade
45% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Scute Swarm
27% of decks lean toward it
Measured on 93 of these decks. A deck leans toward an archetype when at least a twentieth of its makeup follows that plan, so one deck can lean toward several.
Cards like Slither Blade
16× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Slither Blade 27%
- Triton Shorestalker 21%
- Invisible Stalker 19%
- Gudul Lurker 13%
- Mist-Cloaked Herald 11%
- Jhessian Infiltrator 4%
- Phantom Warrior 2%
- Mystic of the Hidden Way 1%
- Metathran Soldier 1%
- Covert Operative 1%
- Phantom Ninja 1%
Other options: Tidal Kraken, Talas Warrior, Plasma Elemental, Latch Seeker
Cards like Elvish Refueler
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Birds of Paradise
7.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other Simic decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Birds of Paradise 28%
- Maraleaf Pixie 25%
Cards like Zimone, Paradox Sculptor
8.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Bident of Thassa
11× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Simic decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 32%
- Elvish Mystic 25%
- Fyndhorn Elves 18%
- Boreal Druid 2%
- Apprentice Wizard 2%
- Nantuko Elder 1%
- Fyndhorn Elder 1%
- Druid of the Cowl 1%
- Goobbue Gardener 1%
- Llanowar Tribe 1%
Other options: Greenweaver Druid, Golden Hind, Wirewood Elf, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Rootrider Faun, Skyshroud Troopers, Orochi Sustainer, Sea Scryer
Cards like Forgotten Ancient
4.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Simic decks
Cards like Counterspell
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 50% of other Simic decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.66 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Counterspell 34%
- Negate 29%
- Essence Scatter 3%
- Remove Soul 1%
Other options: Intervene, Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Outwit
Cards like Cold-Eyed Selkie
7.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Cold-Eyed Selkie 29%
- Edric, Spymaster of Trest 7%
- Ultimecia, Temporal Threat 2%
- Sea-Dasher Octopus 1%
- Thieving Magpie 1%
Other options: Illvoi Infiltrator, Nimble Brigand, Broodbirth Viper, Vedalken Heretic, Saltwater Stalwart, Neurok Commando, Nine-Tail White Fox, Thieving Otter, Scroll Thief, Gateway Sneak, Soulknife Spy, Stealer of Secrets, Marchesa's Infiltrator, Jhessian Thief, Spider-Man 2099, Miguel O'Hara, Sure-Footed Infiltrator
Cards like Hardened Scales
1.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other Simic decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other Simic decks
Cards like Silent Hallcreeper
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Ozolith, the Shattered Spire
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 19%
- Lightning Greaves 17%
Cards like Aetherize
2.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Aetherize 21%
- Perplexing Test 5%
- Evacuation 1%
Cards like Sakura-Tribe Elder
6.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.19 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Krosan Wayfarer, Oashra Cultivator, Embodiment of Spring
Cards like Gyre Sage
1.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Gyre Sage 18%
- Incubation Druid 7%
Cards like Cultivate
1.03× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 57% of other Simic decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. 39% of other Simic decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 1.3 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Cultivate 40%
- Rampant Growth 38%
- Kodama's Reach 29%
- Traverse the Outlands 7%
- Shared Roots 4%
- Search for Tomorrow 4%
- Explosive Vegetation 4%
- Harvest Season 3%
- Map the Frontier 2%
- Migration Path 2%
- Boundless Realms 2%
- Grow from the Ashes 2%
- Reshape the Earth 2%
- Map the Wastes 1%
Other options: Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, Nissa's Expedition, Roamer's Routine, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Spring // Mind, Slimefoot's Survey, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Celebrate the Harvest, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique
All top picks (50)
- Elvish Refueler relevance 0.85 · 41.1% (78 of 190 decks)
- Pit Automaton relevance 0.70 · 26.3% (50 of 190 decks)
- Rangers' Aetherhive relevance 0.67 · 12.6% (24 of 190 decks)
- Rangers' Refueler relevance 0.68 · 10.5% (20 of 190 decks)
- Slither Blade relevance 0.49 · 27.4% (52 of 190 decks)
- Afterburner Expert relevance 0.63 · 7.9% (15 of 190 decks)
- Skyserpent Seeker relevance 0.44 · 32.6% (62 of 190 decks)
- Silent Hallcreeper relevance 0.46 · 25.3% (48 of 190 decks)
- Sabotage Strategist relevance 0.59 · 7.9% (15 of 190 decks)
- Greenbelt Guardian relevance 0.55 · 8.9% (17 of 190 decks)
- Stampeding Scurryfoot relevance 0.55 · 7.4% (14 of 190 decks)
- Rover Blades relevance 0.55 · 7.4% (14 of 190 decks)
- Bounce Off relevance 0.49 · 11.1% (21 of 190 decks)
- Raised by Giants relevance 0.49 · 10.0% (19 of 190 decks)
- Skystreak Engineer relevance 0.55 · 5.3% (10 of 190 decks)
- Invisible Stalker relevance 0.42 · 18.9% (36 of 190 decks)
- Twitching Doll relevance 0.40 · 22.6% (43 of 190 decks)
- Triton Shorestalker relevance 0.40 · 21.1% (40 of 190 decks)
- Gudul Lurker relevance 0.44 · 13.2% (25 of 190 decks)
- Keen Buccaneer relevance 0.49 · 5.8% (11 of 190 decks)
- Flood the Engine relevance 0.48 · 6.8% (13 of 190 decks)
- Camera Launcher relevance 0.50 · 4.7% (9 of 190 decks)
- Nimble Thopterist relevance 0.50 · 4.7% (9 of 190 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.34 · 29.5% (56 of 190 decks)
- Flitterwing Nuisance relevance 0.44 · 9.5% (18 of 190 decks)
- Hulldrifter relevance 0.48 · 5.8% (11 of 190 decks)
- Ezuri, Claw of Progress relevance 0.38 · 16.3% (31 of 190 decks)
- Hazard of the Dunes relevance 0.48 · 5.3% (10 of 190 decks)
- Racers' Scoreboard relevance 0.48 · 4.7% (9 of 190 decks)
- Bestow Greatness relevance 0.47 · 5.8% (11 of 190 decks)
- Spectral Interference relevance 0.45 · 7.4% (14 of 190 decks)
- Point the Way relevance 0.47 · 5.3% (10 of 190 decks)
- Stall Out relevance 0.46 · 5.3% (10 of 190 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.33 · 25.3% (48 of 190 decks)
- Veloheart Bike relevance 0.45 · 5.3% (10 of 190 decks)
- Guidelight Optimizer relevance 0.44 · 5.3% (10 of 190 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.31 · 24.2% (46 of 190 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.38 · 10.0% (19 of 190 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.36 · 12.1% (23 of 190 decks)
- Ghostly Pilferer relevance 0.39 · 8.4% (16 of 190 decks)
- Sab-Sunen, Luxa Embodied relevance 0.35 · 12.6% (24 of 190 decks)
- March of the World Ooze relevance 0.38 · 8.9% (17 of 190 decks)
- Zimone, Paradox Sculptor relevance 0.29 · 26.8% (51 of 190 decks)
- Shoreline Looter relevance 0.38 · 7.4% (14 of 190 decks)
- Silken Strength relevance 0.43 · 4.2% (8 of 190 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.34 · 12.1% (23 of 190 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 0.39 · 6.3% (12 of 190 decks)
- Thunderous Velocipede relevance 0.37 · 8.4% (16 of 190 decks)
- Diversion Unit relevance 0.39 · 5.8% (11 of 190 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 0.28 · 27.4% (52 of 190 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Elvish Refueler relevance 0.85 · 41.1% (78 of 190 decks)
- Pit Automaton relevance 0.70 · 26.3% (50 of 190 decks)
- Slither Blade relevance 0.49 · 27.4% (52 of 190 decks)
- Afterburner Expert relevance 0.63 · 7.9% (15 of 190 decks)
- Skyserpent Seeker relevance 0.44 · 32.6% (62 of 190 decks)
- Silent Hallcreeper relevance 0.46 · 25.3% (48 of 190 decks)
- Sabotage Strategist relevance 0.59 · 7.9% (15 of 190 decks)
- Greenbelt Guardian relevance 0.55 · 8.9% (17 of 190 decks)
- Stampeding Scurryfoot relevance 0.55 · 7.4% (14 of 190 decks)
- Skystreak Engineer relevance 0.55 · 5.3% (10 of 190 decks)
- Invisible Stalker relevance 0.42 · 18.9% (36 of 190 decks)
- Twitching Doll relevance 0.40 · 22.6% (43 of 190 decks)
- Triton Shorestalker relevance 0.40 · 21.1% (40 of 190 decks)
- Gudul Lurker relevance 0.44 · 13.2% (25 of 190 decks)
- Keen Buccaneer relevance 0.49 · 5.8% (11 of 190 decks)
- Camera Launcher relevance 0.50 · 4.7% (9 of 190 decks)
- Nimble Thopterist relevance 0.50 · 4.7% (9 of 190 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.34 · 29.5% (56 of 190 decks)
- Flitterwing Nuisance relevance 0.44 · 9.5% (18 of 190 decks)
- Ezuri, Claw of Progress relevance 0.38 · 16.3% (31 of 190 decks)
- Hazard of the Dunes relevance 0.48 · 5.3% (10 of 190 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.33 · 25.3% (48 of 190 decks)
- Guidelight Optimizer relevance 0.44 · 5.3% (10 of 190 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.31 · 24.2% (46 of 190 decks)
- Ghostly Pilferer relevance 0.39 · 8.4% (16 of 190 decks)
- Sab-Sunen, Luxa Embodied relevance 0.35 · 12.6% (24 of 190 decks)
- Zimone, Paradox Sculptor relevance 0.29 · 26.8% (51 of 190 decks)
- Shoreline Looter relevance 0.38 · 7.4% (14 of 190 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.34 · 12.1% (23 of 190 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 0.39 · 6.3% (12 of 190 decks)
- Diversion Unit relevance 0.39 · 5.8% (11 of 190 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.30 · 17.9% (34 of 190 decks)
- Azure Beastbinder relevance 0.38 · 6.3% (12 of 190 decks)
- Elusive Otter // Grove's Bounty relevance 0.30 · 17.9% (34 of 190 decks)
- Blighted Agent relevance 0.34 · 9.5% (18 of 190 decks)
- Loxodon Surveyor relevance 0.47 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.23 · 38.4% (73 of 190 decks)
- Glitch Ghost Surveyor relevance 0.46 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Mist-Cloaked Herald relevance 0.31 · 11.1% (21 of 190 decks)
- Mercurial Spelldancer relevance 0.36 · 5.8% (11 of 190 decks)
- Cold-Eyed Selkie relevance 0.25 · 29.5% (56 of 190 decks)
- Enduring Curiosity relevance 0.31 · 11.6% (22 of 190 decks)
- Agonasaur Rex relevance 0.36 · 4.7% (9 of 190 decks)
- Ouroboroid relevance 0.28 · 15.3% (29 of 190 decks)
- Mu Yanling, Wind Rider relevance 0.40 · 3.7% (7 of 190 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.26 · 18.4% (35 of 190 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.29 · 11.1% (21 of 190 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.28 · 13.2% (25 of 190 decks)
- Threefold Thunderhulk relevance 0.33 · 5.8% (11 of 190 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.23 · 31.6% (60 of 190 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Rangers' Aetherhive relevance 0.67 · 12.6% (24 of 190 decks)
- Rangers' Refueler relevance 0.68 · 10.5% (20 of 190 decks)
- Rover Blades relevance 0.55 · 7.4% (14 of 190 decks)
- Hulldrifter relevance 0.48 · 5.8% (11 of 190 decks)
- Racers' Scoreboard relevance 0.48 · 4.7% (9 of 190 decks)
- Veloheart Bike relevance 0.45 · 5.3% (10 of 190 decks)
- Thunderous Velocipede relevance 0.37 · 8.4% (16 of 190 decks)
- Thopter Fabricator relevance 0.38 · 5.8% (11 of 190 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.28 · 19.5% (37 of 190 decks)
- Guidelight Matrix relevance 0.44 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.32 · 7.9% (15 of 190 decks)
- Midnight Mangler relevance 0.42 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.29 · 9.5% (18 of 190 decks)
- The Indomitable relevance 0.31 · 4.7% (9 of 190 decks)
- Lifecraft Engine relevance 0.38 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.24 · 14.2% (27 of 190 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.28 · 5.8% (11 of 190 decks)
- Power Fist relevance 0.30 · 4.2% (8 of 190 decks)
- Riverchurn Monument relevance 0.31 · 3.7% (7 of 190 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.26 · 5.3% (10 of 190 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.19 · 16.8% (32 of 190 decks)
- Possession Engine relevance 0.34 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Aether Syphon relevance 0.33 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Colossus Hammer relevance 0.33 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Radiant Lotus relevance 0.32 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Starting Column relevance 0.34 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.20 · 9.5% (18 of 190 decks)
- Deluxe Dragster relevance 0.31 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.20 · 6.8% (13 of 190 decks)
- Earthrumbler relevance 0.31 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Winged Boots relevance 0.25 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.16 · 17.4% (33 of 190 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.15 · 18.9% (36 of 190 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.15 · 19.5% (37 of 190 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.24 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.18 · 7.9% (15 of 190 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmask relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Combine Chrysalis relevance 0.19 · 4.2% (8 of 190 decks)
- Retrofitter Foundry relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Dragon Throne of Tarkir relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (7 of 190 decks)
- The Enigma Jewel // Locus of Enlightenment relevance 0.24 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.13 · 15.8% (30 of 190 decks)
- Aetheric Amplifier relevance 0.22 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- The Key to the Vault relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Lavaspur Boots relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- The Water Crystal relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.15 · 5.3% (10 of 190 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Raised by Giants relevance 0.49 · 10.0% (19 of 190 decks)
- Flood the Engine relevance 0.48 · 6.8% (13 of 190 decks)
- Point the Way relevance 0.47 · 5.3% (10 of 190 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.36 · 12.1% (23 of 190 decks)
- March of the World Ooze relevance 0.38 · 8.9% (17 of 190 decks)
- Silken Strength relevance 0.43 · 4.2% (8 of 190 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.34 · 8.4% (16 of 190 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.28 · 13.7% (26 of 190 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.29 · 11.1% (21 of 190 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.29 · 8.9% (17 of 190 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.32 · 5.3% (10 of 190 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.26 · 13.2% (25 of 190 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.23 · 16.8% (32 of 190 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.28 · 6.8% (13 of 190 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.29 · 6.3% (12 of 190 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.25 · 11.1% (21 of 190 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.24 · 11.6% (22 of 190 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.31 · 3.7% (7 of 190 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.26 · 6.8% (13 of 190 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.24 · 9.5% (18 of 190 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.20 · 21.6% (41 of 190 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (12 of 190 decks)
- Primal Empathy relevance 0.25 · 4.7% (9 of 190 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.18 · 22.6% (43 of 190 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.22 · 9.5% (18 of 190 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.16 · 28.9% (55 of 190 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.19 · 16.8% (32 of 190 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.22 · 5.3% (10 of 190 decks)
- Super State relevance 0.30 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Bioengineered Future relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.20 · 7.4% (14 of 190 decks)
- Awakening Zone relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (7 of 190 decks)
- Traveler's Cloak relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Abundant Growth relevance 0.26 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.20 · 5.3% (10 of 190 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.18 · 7.9% (15 of 190 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.22 · 3.7% (7 of 190 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.17 · 9.5% (18 of 190 decks)
- New Horizons relevance 0.26 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Thickest in the Thicket relevance 0.24 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Master Chef relevance 0.24 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (7 of 190 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.17 · 4.2% (8 of 190 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.19 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.17 · 3.7% (7 of 190 decks)
- Druids' Repository relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.13 · 9.5% (18 of 190 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.18 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
All instants (50)
- Bounce Off relevance 0.49 · 11.1% (21 of 190 decks)
- Bestow Greatness relevance 0.47 · 5.8% (11 of 190 decks)
- Spectral Interference relevance 0.45 · 7.4% (14 of 190 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.38 · 10.0% (19 of 190 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 0.28 · 27.4% (52 of 190 decks)
- Trip Up relevance 0.45 · 3.7% (7 of 190 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.33 · 6.8% (13 of 190 decks)
- Teferi's Time Twist relevance 0.31 · 7.4% (14 of 190 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.30 · 7.9% (15 of 190 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.24 · 13.7% (26 of 190 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.21 · 21.1% (40 of 190 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.20 · 22.6% (43 of 190 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.24 · 8.4% (16 of 190 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (12 of 190 decks)
- Biomass Mutation relevance 0.22 · 10.0% (19 of 190 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.17 · 29.5% (56 of 190 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (9 of 190 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.23 · 6.8% (13 of 190 decks)
- Run Over relevance 0.35 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.23 · 5.8% (11 of 190 decks)
- Refute relevance 0.24 · 4.2% (8 of 190 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.23 · 5.3% (10 of 190 decks)
- Bioshift relevance 0.24 · 4.2% (8 of 190 decks)
- Quandrix Charm relevance 0.21 · 8.9% (17 of 190 decks)
- Access Denied relevance 0.28 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.19 · 11.1% (21 of 190 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.20 · 7.4% (14 of 190 decks)
- Decisive Denial relevance 0.19 · 9.5% (18 of 190 decks)
- Plasm Capture relevance 0.22 · 4.2% (8 of 190 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (7 of 190 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.15 · 23.7% (45 of 190 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.15 · 17.9% (34 of 190 decks)
- Double Major relevance 0.19 · 6.8% (13 of 190 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.23 · 3.7% (7 of 190 decks)
- Invigorating Surge relevance 0.24 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Mutational Advantage relevance 0.19 · 5.3% (10 of 190 decks)
- Might of the Masses relevance 0.28 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.13 · 28.9% (55 of 190 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (9 of 190 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.14 · 18.4% (35 of 190 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.19 · 4.2% (8 of 190 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.16 · 8.4% (16 of 190 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.16 · 8.9% (17 of 190 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.17 · 5.8% (11 of 190 decks)
- Sinister Sabotage relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Annul relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Louisoix's Sacrifice relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.21 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.21 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.21 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Stall Out relevance 0.46 · 5.3% (10 of 190 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.28 · 6.8% (13 of 190 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.27 · 8.4% (16 of 190 decks)
- Plow Through relevance 0.38 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.25 · 9.5% (18 of 190 decks)
- Scale Up relevance 0.31 · 3.7% (7 of 190 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.25 · 7.4% (14 of 190 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.25 · 7.4% (14 of 190 decks)
- Fangs of Kalonia relevance 0.25 · 5.3% (10 of 190 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.23 · 5.8% (11 of 190 decks)
- Mind into Matter relevance 0.21 · 7.9% (15 of 190 decks)
- Notorious Throng relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.20 · 7.9% (15 of 190 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (12 of 190 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.16 · 16.8% (32 of 190 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.13 · 38.4% (73 of 190 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.18 · 7.4% (14 of 190 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.13 · 28.9% (55 of 190 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.17 · 10.0% (19 of 190 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.14 · 23.7% (45 of 190 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (9 of 190 decks)
- Collective Unconscious relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Faerie Slumber Party relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (12 of 190 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.13 · 23.2% (44 of 190 decks)
- Ingenious Mastery relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.16 · 8.4% (16 of 190 decks)
- Knockout Maneuver relevance 0.24 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.11 · 40.0% (76 of 190 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.17 · 6.8% (13 of 190 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.15 · 10.0% (19 of 190 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (12 of 190 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.12 · 28.9% (55 of 190 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (7 of 190 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (7 of 190 decks)
- Mind Spring relevance 0.22 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (9 of 190 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.16 · 4.2% (8 of 190 decks)
- Wear Down relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.16 · 4.2% (8 of 190 decks)
- Applied Geometry relevance 0.19 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.17 · 3.7% (7 of 190 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Preposterous Proportions relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (5)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.35 · 5.3% (10 of 190 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.28 · 3.7% (7 of 190 decks)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.25 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Amonkhet Raceway relevance 0.41 · 5.8% (11 of 190 decks)
- Muraganda Raceway relevance 0.38 · 5.8% (11 of 190 decks)
- Avishkar Raceway relevance 0.40 · 3.7% (7 of 190 decks)
- Wild Roads relevance 0.40 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Reef Roads relevance 0.38 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (9 of 190 decks)
- Night Market relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Balamb Garden, SeeD Academy // Balamb Garden, Airborne relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (7 of 190 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (12 of 190 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.16 · 14.2% (27 of 190 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.18 · 8.4% (16 of 190 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.14 · 22.6% (43 of 190 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.16 · 11.6% (22 of 190 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.23 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Novijen, Heart of Progress relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (7 of 190 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.16 · 6.8% (13 of 190 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.16 · 5.8% (11 of 190 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.14 · 11.6% (22 of 190 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.14 · 10.5% (20 of 190 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.15 · 5.8% (11 of 190 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.14 · 9.5% (18 of 190 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.14 · 6.8% (13 of 190 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.11 · 19.5% (37 of 190 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (9 of 190 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.17 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.17 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.18 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.12 · 8.9% (17 of 190 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.17 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.12 · 6.8% (13 of 190 decks)
- Paradox Gardens relevance 0.15 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.11 · 6.3% (12 of 190 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.14 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.11 · 6.8% (13 of 190 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.14 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.14 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.14 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.07 · 20.0% (38 of 190 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.11 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
All lands (50)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.18 · 31.1% (59 of 190 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.23 · 8.4% (16 of 190 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.19 · 18.9% (36 of 190 decks)
- Hadana's Climb // Winged Temple of Orazca relevance 0.23 · 5.3% (10 of 190 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (12 of 190 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.14 · 28.4% (54 of 190 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.14 · 20.5% (39 of 190 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.15 · 17.4% (33 of 190 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.17 · 10.0% (19 of 190 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.14 · 17.9% (34 of 190 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.15 · 13.7% (26 of 190 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.16 · 9.5% (18 of 190 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.14 · 13.7% (26 of 190 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.15 · 9.5% (18 of 190 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.21 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.10 · 32.1% (61 of 190 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.14 · 8.4% (16 of 190 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.12 · 18.4% (35 of 190 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.10 · 30.5% (58 of 190 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.09 · 39.5% (75 of 190 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (9 of 190 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.10 · 27.4% (52 of 190 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (9 of 190 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.09 · 34.2% (65 of 190 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (8 of 190 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (9 of 190 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.12 · 9.5% (18 of 190 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.14 · 4.2% (8 of 190 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.13 · 5.8% (11 of 190 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.18 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Shire Terrace relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Lakeside Shack relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.08 · 33.2% (63 of 190 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.13 · 4.2% (8 of 190 decks)
- Mutant Town relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.13 · 4.2% (8 of 190 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.07 · 34.2% (65 of 190 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.14 · 3.2% (6 of 190 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.06 · 42.1% (80 of 190 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.11 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.03 · 64.7% (123 of 190 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 86.3% (164 of 190 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 86.3% (164 of 190 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Sita Varma, Masked Racer, from 190 real Commander decks.