Cloudstone Curio
Played in 2,109 Bant decks
Color Identity Spread
6.3% Bant
- Temur 4,963 · 14.7%
- Sultai 2,649 · 7.9%
- Green 2,321 · 6.9%
- Red 2,293 · 6.8%
- Gruul 2,132 · 6.3%
- Bant 2,109 · 6.3%
- Simic 1,909 · 5.7%
- Five-Color 1,790 · 5.3%
- Naya 1,474 · 4.4%
- Rakdos 1,233 · 3.7%
- Selesnya 1,190 · 3.5%
- Orzhov 1,063 · 3.2%
- Golgari 999 · 3.0%
- White 954 · 2.8%
- Jeskai 880 · 2.6%
- Mardu 822 · 2.4%
- Blue 751 · 2.2%
- Boros 742 · 2.2%
- Other (14) 3,402 · 10.1%
All commanders (15)
- Chulane, Teller of Tales relevance 4.10 · 23.1% (1,161 of 5,027 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.02 · 6.6% (15 of 226 decks)
- Galadriel, Light of Valinor relevance 0.95 · 1.8% (188 of 10,529 decks)
- Arcades, the Strategist relevance 0.87 · 1.6% (175 of 10,958 decks)
- Gorion, Wise Mentor relevance 0.86 · 3.0% (32 of 1,076 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen, Mercenary relevance 0.75 · 3.4% (16 of 466 decks)
- Helga, Skittish Seer relevance 0.67 · 1.1% (143 of 12,435 decks)
- Roon of the Hidden Realm relevance 0.54 · 1.5% (29 of 1,979 decks)
- Katilda and Lier relevance 0.48 · 1.7% (14 of 818 decks)
- Lagrella, the Magpie relevance 0.45 · 1.5% (16 of 1,084 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Rebbec, Architect of Ascension relevance 0.23 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Barbara Wright // The Fourth Doctor relevance 0.21 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Livio, Oathsworn Sentinel // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.20 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- The Second Doctor // Jamie McCrimmon relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (1 of 40 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.12 · 1.6% (1 of 62 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 1.73 · 52.6% (1,110 of 2,109 decks)
- Aluren relevance 1.60 · 34.7% (731 of 2,109 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.53 · 42.7% (901 of 2,109 decks)
- Whitemane Lion relevance 1.43 · 43.7% (922 of 2,109 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 1.28 · 43.4% (916 of 2,109 decks)
- Mana Breach relevance 1.15 · 22.3% (471 of 2,109 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 1.10 · 51.8% (1,092 of 2,109 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.08 · 38.4% (809 of 2,109 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.05 · 48.1% (1,015 of 2,109 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.01 · 33.0% (696 of 2,109 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.98 · 40.3% (850 of 2,109 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.96 · 37.6% (793 of 2,109 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.94 · 50.3% (1,060 of 2,109 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.92 · 41.3% (870 of 2,109 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.90 · 47.4% (1,000 of 2,109 decks)
- Avacyn's Pilgrim relevance 0.90 · 46.3% (976 of 2,109 decks)
- Grand Abolisher relevance 0.86 · 31.6% (666 of 2,109 decks)
- Recruiter of the Guard relevance 0.84 · 21.3% (449 of 2,109 decks)
- Noble Hierarch relevance 0.83 · 60.2% (1,269 of 2,109 decks)
- Dream Stalker relevance 0.82 · 15.3% (322 of 2,109 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.79 · 22.3% (470 of 2,109 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.79 · 22.6% (477 of 2,109 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.78 · 26.3% (554 of 2,109 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.75 · 32.7% (689 of 2,109 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.74 · 36.5% (770 of 2,109 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.71 · 33.9% (716 of 2,109 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.71 · 16.9% (356 of 2,109 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.70 · 24.8% (522 of 2,109 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.70 · 25.4% (536 of 2,109 decks)
- Ranger-Captain of Eos relevance 0.70 · 21.6% (456 of 2,109 decks)
All creatures (31)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 1.73 · 52.6% (1,110 of 2,109 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.53 · 42.7% (901 of 2,109 decks)
- Whitemane Lion relevance 1.43 · 43.7% (922 of 2,109 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 1.10 · 51.8% (1,092 of 2,109 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.08 · 38.4% (809 of 2,109 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.05 · 48.1% (1,015 of 2,109 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.01 · 33.0% (696 of 2,109 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.98 · 40.3% (850 of 2,109 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.94 · 50.3% (1,060 of 2,109 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.90 · 47.4% (1,000 of 2,109 decks)
- Avacyn's Pilgrim relevance 0.90 · 46.3% (976 of 2,109 decks)
- Grand Abolisher relevance 0.86 · 31.6% (666 of 2,109 decks)
- Recruiter of the Guard relevance 0.84 · 21.3% (449 of 2,109 decks)
- Noble Hierarch relevance 0.83 · 60.2% (1,269 of 2,109 decks)
- Dream Stalker relevance 0.82 · 15.3% (322 of 2,109 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.79 · 22.3% (470 of 2,109 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.79 · 22.6% (477 of 2,109 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.78 · 26.3% (554 of 2,109 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.74 · 36.5% (770 of 2,109 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.71 · 16.9% (356 of 2,109 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.70 · 25.4% (536 of 2,109 decks)
- Ranger-Captain of Eos relevance 0.70 · 21.6% (456 of 2,109 decks)
- Destiny Spinner relevance 0.69 · 19.4% (409 of 2,109 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.68 · 25.4% (536 of 2,109 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.67 · 12.9% (272 of 2,109 decks)
- Kor Skyfisher relevance 0.67 · 11.9% (251 of 2,109 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.67 · 19.2% (405 of 2,109 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.67 · 26.2% (552 of 2,109 decks)
- Esper Sentinel relevance 0.66 · 34.0% (717 of 2,109 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.66 · 21.3% (449 of 2,109 decks)
- Faeburrow Elder relevance 0.65 · 32.5% (686 of 2,109 decks)
All enchantments (8)
- Aluren relevance 1.60 · 34.7% (731 of 2,109 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 1.28 · 43.4% (916 of 2,109 decks)
- Mana Breach relevance 1.15 · 22.3% (471 of 2,109 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.70 · 25.3% (534 of 2,109 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.70 · 32.0% (674 of 2,109 decks)
- Overburden relevance 0.69 · 11.9% (250 of 2,109 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.65 · 16.7% (353 of 2,109 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.64 · 36.5% (770 of 2,109 decks)
All instants (6)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.92 · 41.3% (870 of 2,109 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.75 · 32.7% (689 of 2,109 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.71 · 33.9% (716 of 2,109 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.70 · 24.8% (522 of 2,109 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.67 · 32.6% (688 of 2,109 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.64 · 34.3% (723 of 2,109 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.96 · 37.6% (793 of 2,109 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Oboro, Palace in the Clouds relevance 0.71 · 13.4% (283 of 2,109 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.66 · 37.4% (788 of 2,109 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.64 · 31.1% (656 of 2,109 decks)
All lands (1)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.74 · 57.7% (1,217 of 2,109 decks)
EDH data for Cloudstone Curio: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 2,109 real decks.