Elvish Branchbender
Played in 60 Simic decks
130+40+3+1+2+3+1+
Color Identity Spread
6.3% Simic
Commanders
Most Relevant
Timberwatch Elf 38.3% of decks
Timberwatch Elf 38.3% of decks
Lys Alana Huntmaster 46.7% of decks
Lys Alana Huntmaster 46.7% of decks
Wellwisher 36.7% of decks
Wellwisher 36.7% of decks
Elvish Guidance 30.0% of decks
Elvish Guidance 30.0% of decks
Priest of Titania 60.0% of decks
Priest of Titania 60.0% of decks
Elvish Pioneer 30.0% of decks
Elvish Pioneer 30.0% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Thranduil, Sindarin Liege // Silvan Rally relevance 2.37 · 1.4% (23 of 1,684 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 2.45 · 38.3% (23 of 60 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 2.45 · 46.7% (28 of 60 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 2.27 · 36.7% (22 of 60 decks)
- Elvish Guidance relevance 1.85 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.83 · 60.0% (36 of 60 decks)
- Elvish Pioneer relevance 1.66 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 1.61 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 1.56 · 55.0% (33 of 60 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.55 · 41.7% (25 of 60 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 1.50 · 45.0% (27 of 60 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 1.46 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Presence of Gond relevance 1.33 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Mirkwood Nurturer relevance 1.29 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 1.27 · 36.7% (22 of 60 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 1.26 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Boughside Wanderers relevance 1.23 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 1.20 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Ivy Lane Denizen relevance 1.16 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.14 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Birchlore Rangers relevance 1.11 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Skyshroud Ranger relevance 1.10 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 1.07 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.07 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Elvish Rejuvenator relevance 1.05 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 1.02 · 43.3% (26 of 60 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 1.00 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.00 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Cloakwood Swarmkeeper relevance 0.98 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.97 · 33.3% (20 of 60 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.95 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
All creatures (40)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 2.45 · 38.3% (23 of 60 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 2.45 · 46.7% (28 of 60 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 2.27 · 36.7% (22 of 60 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.83 · 60.0% (36 of 60 decks)
- Elvish Pioneer relevance 1.66 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 1.61 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 1.56 · 55.0% (33 of 60 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.55 · 41.7% (25 of 60 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 1.50 · 45.0% (27 of 60 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 1.46 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Mirkwood Nurturer relevance 1.29 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 1.27 · 36.7% (22 of 60 decks)
- Boughside Wanderers relevance 1.23 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 1.20 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Ivy Lane Denizen relevance 1.16 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.14 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Birchlore Rangers relevance 1.11 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Skyshroud Ranger relevance 1.10 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 1.07 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.07 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Elvish Rejuvenator relevance 1.05 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 1.02 · 43.3% (26 of 60 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 1.00 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.00 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Cloakwood Swarmkeeper relevance 0.98 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.97 · 33.3% (20 of 60 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.95 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Essence Warden relevance 0.91 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Guardian of the Halls relevance 0.89 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.87 · 58.3% (35 of 60 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.87 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.86 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.85 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Sylvan Ranger relevance 0.82 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.80 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.76 · 60.0% (36 of 60 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.74 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 0.74 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.73 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.71 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Elvish Guidance relevance 1.85 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
- Presence of Gond relevance 1.33 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.74 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
All instants (1)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.70 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Distant Melody relevance 1.26 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.74 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Hobbit Hole relevance 1.02 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Elvenking's Halls relevance 0.99 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.86 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
All lands (1)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.73 · 45.0% (27 of 60 decks)
EDH data for Elvish Branchbender: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 60 real decks.


























