Battle Mammoth
Played in 1,818 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
23.6% Green
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (30)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 3.10 · 13.1% (394 of 2,997 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 2.74 · 22.6% (85 of 376 decks)
- Surrak, Elusive Hunter relevance 1.81 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Jolrael, Mwonvuli Recluse relevance 1.77 · 12.2% (32 of 263 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 1.27 · 7.0% (21 of 299 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 1.17 · 2.6% (92 of 3,523 decks)
- Radagast the Brown relevance 1.16 · 4.3% (32 of 738 decks)
- Radagast of Rhosgobel relevance 1.13 · 2.2% (121 of 5,420 decks)
- Susan Foreman relevance 1.13 · 36.4% (4 of 11 decks)
- Ojer Kaslem, Deepest Growth // Temple of Cultivation relevance 1.09 · 3.7% (33 of 882 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 1.00 · 1.7% (137 of 7,843 decks)
- The Earth King relevance 0.99 · 2.7% (43 of 1,599 decks)
- Rhonas the Indomitable relevance 0.98 · 4.5% (17 of 379 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 0.85 · 1.6% (87 of 5,612 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.81 · 3.5% (14 of 401 decks)
- Nylea, Keen-Eyed relevance 0.81 · 4.1% (11 of 266 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.79 · 3.2% (15 of 475 decks)
- Bugenhagen, Wise Elder relevance 0.73 · 2.8% (15 of 544 decks)
- Sutina, Speaker of the Tajuru relevance 0.69 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
- Old Gnawbone relevance 0.68 · 3.4% (9 of 262 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.68 · 1.8% (24 of 1,298 decks)
- Oviya, Automech Artisan relevance 0.67 · 1.5% (34 of 2,224 decks)
- Surrak, the Hunt Caller relevance 0.66 · 6.9% (4 of 58 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.65 · 2.4% (13 of 535 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.64 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.64 · 1.4% (35 of 2,490 decks)
- Tyvar, the Pummeler relevance 0.63 · 2.8% (10 of 363 decks)
- Arasta of the Endless Web relevance 0.62 · 3.4% (7 of 204 decks)
- Pia, Aether Ascetic relevance 0.62 · 1.9% (16 of 824 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.55 · 1.9% (12 of 640 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.98 · 36.9% (671 of 1,818 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.90 · 33.8% (615 of 1,818 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.89 · 47.4% (861 of 1,818 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.87 · 35.9% (652 of 1,818 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.84 · 28.8% (524 of 1,818 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.84 · 34.6% (629 of 1,818 decks)
- Outcaster Trailblazer relevance 0.81 · 26.5% (482 of 1,818 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.81 · 26.8% (488 of 1,818 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.75 · 34.0% (618 of 1,818 decks)
- Silverback Elder relevance 0.75 · 27.2% (495 of 1,818 decks)
- Surrak, Elusive Hunter relevance 0.73 · 19.1% (347 of 1,818 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.73 · 20.6% (375 of 1,818 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.73 · 24.7% (449 of 1,818 decks)
- Surrak, the Hunt Caller relevance 0.72 · 23.2% (421 of 1,818 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 0.70 · 32.9% (598 of 1,818 decks)
- Hulking Raptor relevance 0.68 · 23.7% (430 of 1,818 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 0.65 · 18.8% (341 of 1,818 decks)
- Thorn Mammoth relevance 0.63 · 17.2% (312 of 1,818 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.63 · 17.9% (326 of 1,818 decks)
- Keeper of Fables relevance 0.63 · 16.9% (308 of 1,818 decks)
- Challenger Troll relevance 0.61 · 15.7% (286 of 1,818 decks)
- Whisperer of the Wilds relevance 0.59 · 18.0% (327 of 1,818 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.59 · 34.3% (624 of 1,818 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.59 · 18.2% (331 of 1,818 decks)
- Nylea, Keen-Eyed relevance 0.58 · 17.3% (314 of 1,818 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 0.58 · 15.4% (280 of 1,818 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.54 · 26.8% (488 of 1,818 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.53 · 14.0% (255 of 1,818 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.53 · 22.0% (400 of 1,818 decks)
- Topiary Stomper relevance 0.52 · 17.2% (313 of 1,818 decks)
All creatures (42)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.98 · 36.9% (671 of 1,818 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.90 · 33.8% (615 of 1,818 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.89 · 47.4% (861 of 1,818 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.87 · 35.9% (652 of 1,818 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.84 · 28.8% (524 of 1,818 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.84 · 34.6% (629 of 1,818 decks)
- Outcaster Trailblazer relevance 0.81 · 26.5% (482 of 1,818 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.81 · 26.8% (488 of 1,818 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.75 · 34.0% (618 of 1,818 decks)
- Silverback Elder relevance 0.75 · 27.2% (495 of 1,818 decks)
- Surrak, Elusive Hunter relevance 0.73 · 19.1% (347 of 1,818 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.73 · 20.6% (375 of 1,818 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.73 · 24.7% (449 of 1,818 decks)
- Surrak, the Hunt Caller relevance 0.72 · 23.2% (421 of 1,818 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 0.70 · 32.9% (598 of 1,818 decks)
- Hulking Raptor relevance 0.68 · 23.7% (430 of 1,818 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 0.65 · 18.8% (341 of 1,818 decks)
- Thorn Mammoth relevance 0.63 · 17.2% (312 of 1,818 decks)
- Keeper of Fables relevance 0.63 · 16.9% (308 of 1,818 decks)
- Challenger Troll relevance 0.61 · 15.7% (286 of 1,818 decks)
- Whisperer of the Wilds relevance 0.59 · 18.0% (327 of 1,818 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.59 · 34.3% (624 of 1,818 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.59 · 18.2% (331 of 1,818 decks)
- Nylea, Keen-Eyed relevance 0.58 · 17.3% (314 of 1,818 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 0.58 · 15.4% (280 of 1,818 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.53 · 14.0% (255 of 1,818 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.53 · 22.0% (400 of 1,818 decks)
- Topiary Stomper relevance 0.52 · 17.2% (313 of 1,818 decks)
- Spinner of Souls relevance 0.52 · 13.0% (237 of 1,818 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.50 · 13.4% (243 of 1,818 decks)
- Ojer Kaslem, Deepest Growth // Temple of Cultivation relevance 0.49 · 16.6% (301 of 1,818 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.47 · 37.4% (680 of 1,818 decks)
- Agonasaur Rex relevance 0.47 · 12.2% (221 of 1,818 decks)
- Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 0.47 · 16.1% (293 of 1,818 decks)
- God-Eternal Rhonas relevance 0.47 · 13.0% (236 of 1,818 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.46 · 24.3% (442 of 1,818 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.46 · 12.8% (232 of 1,818 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.46 · 15.2% (277 of 1,818 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.45 · 17.1% (310 of 1,818 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.45 · 27.3% (497 of 1,818 decks)
- Froghemoth relevance 0.45 · 8.7% (159 of 1,818 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.45 · 19.5% (354 of 1,818 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.45 · 17.6% (320 of 1,818 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.63 · 17.9% (326 of 1,818 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.54 · 26.8% (488 of 1,818 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.50 · 22.3% (405 of 1,818 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.48 · 32.5% (590 of 1,818 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.47 · 17.2% (313 of 1,818 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.57 · 44.2% (804 of 1,818 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.51 · 22.1% (401 of 1,818 decks)
EDH data for Battle Mammoth: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,818 real decks.