Predatory Impetus
Played in 228 Green decks
1830+6+4+25+9+5+1+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
M'Baku, Jabari Chieftain 9.5% of decks
M'Baku, Jabari Chieftain 9.5% of decks
Saryth, the Viper's Fang 2.0% of decks
Saryth, the Viper's Fang 2.0% of decks
Lizard, Connors's Curse 3.0% of decks
Lizard, Connors's Curse 3.0% of decks
Skanos Dragonheart // Master Chef 33.3% of decks
Skanos Dragonheart // Master Chef 33.3% of decks
Thrun, the Last Troll 1.1% of decks
Thrun, the Last Troll 1.1% of decks
Silvos, Rogue Elemental 3.6% of decks
Silvos, Rogue Elemental 3.6% of decks
Most Relevant
Blanchwood Armor 31.6% of decks
Blanchwood Armor 31.6% of decks
Vow of Wildness 12.3% of decks
Vow of Wildness 12.3% of decks
Lure 14.9% of decks
Lure 14.9% of decks
New Horizons 12.3% of decks
New Horizons 12.3% of decks
Colossification 15.8% of decks
Colossification 15.8% of decks
Cartouche of Strength 11.4% of decks
Cartouche of Strength 11.4% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (18)
- M'Baku, Jabari Chieftain relevance 1.84 · 9.5% (8 of 84 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 1.08 · 2.0% (6 of 295 decks)
- Lizard, Connors's Curse relevance 1.00 · 3.0% (4 of 135 decks)
- Skanos Dragonheart // Master Chef relevance 0.74 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Thrun, the Last Troll relevance 0.72 · 1.1% (4 of 355 decks)
- Silvos, Rogue Elemental relevance 0.72 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.61 · 2.1% (2 of 96 decks)
- Isao, Enlightened Bushi relevance 0.58 · 1.7% (2 of 115 decks)
- Slurrk, All-Ingesting // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.47 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Slurrk, All-Ingesting // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.47 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.43 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- Quickbeam, Upstart Ent relevance 0.39 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Kodama of the South Tree relevance 0.37 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest // Master Chef relevance 0.35 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Greensleeves relevance 0.35 · 1.5% (1 of 66 decks)
- Masumaro, First to Live relevance 0.32 · 1.2% (1 of 81 decks)
- Bushmaster, Coiled Henchman relevance 0.32 · 1.2% (1 of 82 decks)
- Mirri, Cat Warrior relevance 0.32 · 1.2% (1 of 85 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.73 · 31.6% (72 of 228 decks)
- Vow of Wildness relevance 0.73 · 12.3% (28 of 228 decks)
- Lure relevance 0.63 · 14.9% (34 of 228 decks)
- New Horizons relevance 0.60 · 12.3% (28 of 228 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.59 · 15.8% (36 of 228 decks)
- Cartouche of Strength relevance 0.56 · 11.4% (26 of 228 decks)
- Enchantress's Presence relevance 0.52 · 11.8% (27 of 228 decks)
- Master Chef relevance 0.50 · 11.4% (26 of 228 decks)
- Noble Quarry relevance 0.50 · 7.5% (17 of 228 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.47 · 12.3% (28 of 228 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.47 · 15.4% (35 of 228 decks)
- Ordeal of Nylea relevance 0.46 · 11.8% (27 of 228 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.46 · 13.6% (31 of 228 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.46 · 15.4% (35 of 228 decks)
- Prodigious Growth relevance 0.46 · 8.8% (20 of 228 decks)
- Crystal Carapace relevance 0.46 · 7.9% (18 of 228 decks)
- Barroom Brawl relevance 0.45 · 7.9% (18 of 228 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.45 · 13.2% (30 of 228 decks)
- Seton's Desire relevance 0.45 · 6.6% (15 of 228 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.43 · 11.8% (27 of 228 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.43 · 27.6% (63 of 228 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmask relevance 0.43 · 7.9% (18 of 228 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.43 · 11.0% (25 of 228 decks)
- Assault Suit relevance 0.40 · 7.0% (16 of 228 decks)
- Raised by Giants relevance 0.39 · 9.2% (21 of 228 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.39 · 10.1% (23 of 228 decks)
- You Look Upon the Tarrasque relevance 0.38 · 8.3% (19 of 228 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.38 · 23.2% (53 of 228 decks)
- Once and Future relevance 0.38 · 7.0% (16 of 228 decks)
- Setessan Training relevance 0.38 · 7.5% (17 of 228 decks)
All creatures (6)
- Noble Quarry relevance 0.50 · 7.5% (17 of 228 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.46 · 13.6% (31 of 228 decks)
- Eidolon of Blossoms relevance 0.36 · 8.3% (19 of 228 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.36 · 7.5% (17 of 228 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.36 · 12.7% (29 of 228 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.35 · 9.6% (22 of 228 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.43 · 11.8% (27 of 228 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmask relevance 0.43 · 7.9% (18 of 228 decks)
- Assault Suit relevance 0.40 · 7.0% (16 of 228 decks)
- Nemesis Mask relevance 0.36 · 6.1% (14 of 228 decks)
All enchantments (25)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.73 · 31.6% (72 of 228 decks)
- Vow of Wildness relevance 0.73 · 12.3% (28 of 228 decks)
- Lure relevance 0.63 · 14.9% (34 of 228 decks)
- New Horizons relevance 0.60 · 12.3% (28 of 228 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.59 · 15.8% (36 of 228 decks)
- Cartouche of Strength relevance 0.56 · 11.4% (26 of 228 decks)
- Enchantress's Presence relevance 0.52 · 11.8% (27 of 228 decks)
- Master Chef relevance 0.50 · 11.4% (26 of 228 decks)
- Ordeal of Nylea relevance 0.46 · 11.8% (27 of 228 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.46 · 15.4% (35 of 228 decks)
- Prodigious Growth relevance 0.46 · 8.8% (20 of 228 decks)
- Crystal Carapace relevance 0.46 · 7.9% (18 of 228 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.45 · 13.2% (30 of 228 decks)
- Seton's Desire relevance 0.45 · 6.6% (15 of 228 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.43 · 11.0% (25 of 228 decks)
- Raised by Giants relevance 0.39 · 9.2% (21 of 228 decks)
- Setessan Training relevance 0.38 · 7.5% (17 of 228 decks)
- Nature's Embrace relevance 0.37 · 6.1% (14 of 228 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.37 · 11.4% (26 of 228 decks)
- Warbriar Blessing relevance 0.37 · 6.1% (14 of 228 decks)
- Curse of Predation relevance 0.36 · 5.7% (13 of 228 decks)
- Feral Invocation relevance 0.36 · 5.3% (12 of 228 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.35 · 9.2% (21 of 228 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.35 · 13.6% (31 of 228 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 0.34 · 8.3% (19 of 228 decks)
All instants (9)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.47 · 12.3% (28 of 228 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.47 · 15.4% (35 of 228 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.43 · 27.6% (63 of 228 decks)
- You Look Upon the Tarrasque relevance 0.38 · 8.3% (19 of 228 decks)
- Once and Future relevance 0.38 · 7.0% (16 of 228 decks)
- Prizefight relevance 0.36 · 9.2% (21 of 228 decks)
- Band Together relevance 0.36 · 7.0% (16 of 228 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.35 · 15.8% (36 of 228 decks)
- Evolution Charm relevance 0.35 · 8.3% (19 of 228 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Barroom Brawl relevance 0.45 · 7.9% (18 of 228 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.39 · 10.1% (23 of 228 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.38 · 23.2% (53 of 228 decks)
- Knockout Maneuver relevance 0.37 · 7.9% (18 of 228 decks)
- Soul's Might relevance 0.36 · 6.6% (15 of 228 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.45 · 11.4% (26 of 228 decks)
EDH data for Predatory Impetus: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 228 real decks.




















































