Hungry Megasloth
Played in 125 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
43.9% Gruul
130+45+1+1+1+1+1+
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Slinza, the Spiked Stampede relevance 3.62 · 3.5% (113 of 3,194 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Advocate of the Beast relevance 3.40 · 53.6% (67 of 125 decks)
- Gnarlid Colony relevance 3.38 · 75.2% (94 of 125 decks)
- Woodland Liege relevance 3.28 · 73.6% (92 of 125 decks)
- Spined Tyrranax relevance 2.33 · 34.4% (43 of 125 decks)
- Baloth Gorger relevance 2.12 · 32.0% (40 of 125 decks)
- Krosan Warchief relevance 1.96 · 45.6% (57 of 125 decks)
- Garruk, Caller of Beasts relevance 1.76 · 32.0% (40 of 125 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 1.75 · 72.8% (91 of 125 decks)
- Affectionate Indrik relevance 1.59 · 24.0% (30 of 125 decks)
- Goobbue Gardener relevance 1.58 · 32.0% (40 of 125 decks)
- Giant Cindermaw relevance 1.44 · 30.4% (38 of 125 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.38 · 60.8% (76 of 125 decks)
- Canopy Baloth relevance 1.38 · 21.6% (27 of 125 decks)
- Axebane Ferox relevance 1.35 · 24.8% (31 of 125 decks)
- Lashwhip Predator relevance 1.34 · 21.6% (27 of 125 decks)
- Herd Baloth relevance 1.34 · 31.2% (39 of 125 decks)
- Bedhead Beastie relevance 1.34 · 20.8% (26 of 125 decks)
- Wirewood Savage relevance 1.26 · 28.0% (35 of 125 decks)
- Nylea's Forerunner relevance 1.25 · 27.2% (34 of 125 decks)
- Coliseum Behemoth relevance 1.25 · 24.8% (31 of 125 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 1.07 · 34.4% (43 of 125 decks)
- Herald of Ilharg relevance 1.07 · 25.6% (32 of 125 decks)
- Slumbering Trudge relevance 1.06 · 17.6% (22 of 125 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 1.05 · 34.4% (43 of 125 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 1.04 · 25.6% (32 of 125 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 1.03 · 18.4% (23 of 125 decks)
- Battlefront Krushok relevance 1.02 · 19.2% (24 of 125 decks)
- Cragplate Baloth relevance 1.02 · 17.6% (22 of 125 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 1.02 · 28.0% (35 of 125 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 1.02 · 27.2% (34 of 125 decks)
All creatures (45)
- Advocate of the Beast relevance 3.40 · 53.6% (67 of 125 decks)
- Gnarlid Colony relevance 3.38 · 75.2% (94 of 125 decks)
- Woodland Liege relevance 3.28 · 73.6% (92 of 125 decks)
- Spined Tyrranax relevance 2.33 · 34.4% (43 of 125 decks)
- Baloth Gorger relevance 2.12 · 32.0% (40 of 125 decks)
- Krosan Warchief relevance 1.96 · 45.6% (57 of 125 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 1.75 · 72.8% (91 of 125 decks)
- Affectionate Indrik relevance 1.59 · 24.0% (30 of 125 decks)
- Goobbue Gardener relevance 1.58 · 32.0% (40 of 125 decks)
- Giant Cindermaw relevance 1.44 · 30.4% (38 of 125 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.38 · 60.8% (76 of 125 decks)
- Canopy Baloth relevance 1.38 · 21.6% (27 of 125 decks)
- Axebane Ferox relevance 1.35 · 24.8% (31 of 125 decks)
- Lashwhip Predator relevance 1.34 · 21.6% (27 of 125 decks)
- Herd Baloth relevance 1.34 · 31.2% (39 of 125 decks)
- Bedhead Beastie relevance 1.34 · 20.8% (26 of 125 decks)
- Wirewood Savage relevance 1.26 · 28.0% (35 of 125 decks)
- Nylea's Forerunner relevance 1.25 · 27.2% (34 of 125 decks)
- Coliseum Behemoth relevance 1.25 · 24.8% (31 of 125 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 1.07 · 34.4% (43 of 125 decks)
- Herald of Ilharg relevance 1.07 · 25.6% (32 of 125 decks)
- Slumbering Trudge relevance 1.06 · 17.6% (22 of 125 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 1.05 · 34.4% (43 of 125 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 1.04 · 25.6% (32 of 125 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 1.03 · 18.4% (23 of 125 decks)
- Battlefront Krushok relevance 1.02 · 19.2% (24 of 125 decks)
- Cragplate Baloth relevance 1.02 · 17.6% (22 of 125 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 1.02 · 28.0% (35 of 125 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 1.02 · 27.2% (34 of 125 decks)
- Thragtusk relevance 0.93 · 17.6% (22 of 125 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 0.93 · 21.6% (27 of 125 decks)
- Frenzied Baloth relevance 0.93 · 32.8% (41 of 125 decks)
- Bloated Contaminator relevance 0.93 · 20.0% (25 of 125 decks)
- Renegade Krasis relevance 0.91 · 16.0% (20 of 125 decks)
- Skyscythe Engulfer relevance 0.91 · 13.6% (17 of 125 decks)
- Spellbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.90 · 22.4% (28 of 125 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 0.90 · 28.0% (35 of 125 decks)
- Ridgescale Tusker relevance 0.89 · 15.2% (19 of 125 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.87 · 24.8% (31 of 125 decks)
- Armored Scrapgorger relevance 0.86 · 20.8% (26 of 125 decks)
- Harmonious Grovestrider relevance 0.85 · 14.4% (18 of 125 decks)
- Gran Pulse Ochu relevance 0.85 · 12.8% (16 of 125 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.84 · 22.4% (28 of 125 decks)
- Quartzwood Crasher relevance 0.80 · 28.0% (35 of 125 decks)
- Frenzied Arynx relevance 0.79 · 12.0% (15 of 125 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.92 · 35.2% (44 of 125 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.95 · 31.2% (39 of 125 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Garruk, Caller of Beasts relevance 1.76 · 32.0% (40 of 125 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Contested Cliffs relevance 0.92 · 21.6% (27 of 125 decks)
All lands (1)
- Thriving Grove relevance 1.15 · 30.4% (38 of 125 decks)
EDH data for Hungry Megasloth: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 125 real decks.


























