Sinister Concierge
Played in 298 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
5.9% Simic
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (4)
- Alaundo the Seer relevance 5.07 · 16.7% (251 of 1,500 decks)
- The Thirteenth Doctor // Ace, Fearless Rebel relevance 0.87 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- The Thirteenth Doctor // Clara Oswald relevance 0.61 · 2.3% (2 of 87 decks)
- The Thirteenth Doctor // Nardole, Resourceful Cyborg relevance 0.44 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Inspiring Refrain relevance 4.03 · 75.2% (224 of 298 decks)
- Aeon Chronicler relevance 3.67 · 66.4% (198 of 298 decks)
- Venture Forth relevance 3.54 · 64.4% (192 of 298 decks)
- Reality Strobe relevance 3.46 · 57.7% (172 of 298 decks)
- Taigam, Master Opportunist relevance 3.28 · 58.7% (175 of 298 decks)
- Star Whale relevance 3.22 · 58.7% (175 of 298 decks)
- Jhoira's Timebug relevance 3.20 · 51.7% (154 of 298 decks)
- Time Beetle relevance 3.13 · 50.3% (150 of 298 decks)
- Watcher of Hours relevance 2.86 · 44.6% (133 of 298 decks)
- Epochrasite relevance 2.65 · 38.9% (116 of 298 decks)
- Chakram Retriever relevance 2.63 · 50.0% (149 of 298 decks)
- All of History, All at Once relevance 2.59 · 40.6% (121 of 298 decks)
- Wibbly-wobbly, Timey-wimey relevance 2.56 · 39.6% (118 of 298 decks)
- The Thirteenth Doctor relevance 2.51 · 53.0% (158 of 298 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 2.48 · 58.1% (173 of 298 decks)
- Ancestral Vision relevance 2.46 · 60.7% (181 of 298 decks)
- Sol Talisman relevance 2.37 · 50.3% (150 of 298 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 2.29 · 50.3% (150 of 298 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 2.29 · 47.3% (141 of 298 decks)
- Rotating Fireplace relevance 2.22 · 33.2% (99 of 298 decks)
- Tolarian Kraken relevance 2.21 · 45.0% (134 of 298 decks)
- Sphinx of the Second Sun relevance 2.16 · 46.0% (137 of 298 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 2.11 · 43.0% (128 of 298 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 2.11 · 53.4% (159 of 298 decks)
- Suspend relevance 1.96 · 37.9% (113 of 298 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 1.83 · 51.7% (154 of 298 decks)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 1.81 · 43.3% (129 of 298 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 1.81 · 37.9% (113 of 298 decks)
- Mox Tantalite relevance 1.81 · 33.2% (99 of 298 decks)
- Marvin, Murderous Mimic relevance 1.70 · 40.6% (121 of 298 decks)
All creatures (24)
- Aeon Chronicler relevance 3.67 · 66.4% (198 of 298 decks)
- Taigam, Master Opportunist relevance 3.28 · 58.7% (175 of 298 decks)
- Star Whale relevance 3.22 · 58.7% (175 of 298 decks)
- Jhoira's Timebug relevance 3.20 · 51.7% (154 of 298 decks)
- Time Beetle relevance 3.13 · 50.3% (150 of 298 decks)
- Watcher of Hours relevance 2.86 · 44.6% (133 of 298 decks)
- Epochrasite relevance 2.65 · 38.9% (116 of 298 decks)
- Chakram Retriever relevance 2.63 · 50.0% (149 of 298 decks)
- The Thirteenth Doctor relevance 2.51 · 53.0% (158 of 298 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 2.48 · 58.1% (173 of 298 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 2.29 · 50.3% (150 of 298 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 2.29 · 47.3% (141 of 298 decks)
- Tolarian Kraken relevance 2.21 · 45.0% (134 of 298 decks)
- Sphinx of the Second Sun relevance 2.16 · 46.0% (137 of 298 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 2.11 · 43.0% (128 of 298 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 2.11 · 53.4% (159 of 298 decks)
- Marvin, Murderous Mimic relevance 1.70 · 40.6% (121 of 298 decks)
- Rift Sower relevance 1.57 · 27.2% (81 of 298 decks)
- Aphetto Alchemist relevance 1.48 · 29.2% (87 of 298 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 1.47 · 32.9% (98 of 298 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 1.40 · 66.1% (197 of 298 decks)
- Murkfiend Liege relevance 1.33 · 59.1% (176 of 298 decks)
- Clever Conjurer relevance 1.27 · 22.8% (68 of 298 decks)
- Arcanis the Omnipotent relevance 1.22 · 27.2% (81 of 298 decks)
All artifacts (8)
- Sol Talisman relevance 2.37 · 50.3% (150 of 298 decks)
- Rotating Fireplace relevance 2.22 · 33.2% (99 of 298 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 1.81 · 37.9% (113 of 298 decks)
- Mox Tantalite relevance 1.81 · 33.2% (99 of 298 decks)
- Sting, the Glinting Dagger relevance 1.59 · 27.5% (82 of 298 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 1.42 · 26.2% (78 of 298 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 1.34 · 32.6% (97 of 298 decks)
- Lotus Bloom relevance 1.16 · 22.1% (66 of 298 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 1.42 · 40.6% (121 of 298 decks)
- Quest for Renewal relevance 1.38 · 32.2% (96 of 298 decks)
- Instill Energy relevance 1.28 · 24.2% (72 of 298 decks)
All instants (6)
- Suspend relevance 1.96 · 37.9% (113 of 298 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 1.70 · 42.3% (126 of 298 decks)
- Clockspinning relevance 1.66 · 28.5% (85 of 298 decks)
- Refocus relevance 1.51 · 25.8% (77 of 298 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 1.30 · 27.2% (81 of 298 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 1.28 · 27.5% (82 of 298 decks)
All sorceries (9)
- Inspiring Refrain relevance 4.03 · 75.2% (224 of 298 decks)
- Venture Forth relevance 3.54 · 64.4% (192 of 298 decks)
- Reality Strobe relevance 3.46 · 57.7% (172 of 298 decks)
- All of History, All at Once relevance 2.59 · 40.6% (121 of 298 decks)
- Wibbly-wobbly, Timey-wimey relevance 2.56 · 39.6% (118 of 298 decks)
- Ancestral Vision relevance 2.46 · 60.7% (181 of 298 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 1.83 · 51.7% (154 of 298 decks)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 1.81 · 43.3% (129 of 298 decks)
- See the Truth relevance 1.21 · 20.8% (62 of 298 decks)
EDH data for Sinister Concierge: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 298 real decks.