Sinister Concierge
Played in 194 Dimir decks
1030+9+1+24+7+2+7+
Color Identity Spread
3.9% Dimir
Commanders
Ertai Resurrected 9.6% of decks
Ertai Resurrected 9.6% of decks
Kang Prime 5.8% of decks
Kang Prime 5.8% of decks
Hidetsugu and Kairi 1.4% of decks
Hidetsugu and Kairi 1.4% of decks
Kels, Fight Fixer 3.0% of decks
Kels, Fight Fixer 3.0% of decks
Cyclonus, the Saboteur // Cyclonus, Cybertronian Fighter 3.5% of decks
Cyclonus, the Saboteur // Cyclonus, Cybertronian Fighter 3.5% of decks
Rassilon, the War President 2.2% of decks
Rassilon, the War President 2.2% of decks
Most Relevant
Lose Focus 37.1% of decks
Lose Focus 37.1% of decks
Stern Scolding 37.1% of decks
Stern Scolding 37.1% of decks
Long Goodbye 35.1% of decks
Long Goodbye 35.1% of decks
Remand 38.1% of decks
Remand 38.1% of decks
Fire Nation Occupation 33.0% of decks
Fire Nation Occupation 33.0% of decks
Cling to Dust 37.6% of decks
Cling to Dust 37.6% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (10)
- Ertai Resurrected relevance 3.43 · 9.6% (46 of 480 decks)
- Kang Prime relevance 2.46 · 5.8% (21 of 364 decks)
- Hidetsugu and Kairi relevance 1.81 · 1.4% (28 of 2,018 decks)
- Kels, Fight Fixer relevance 1.78 · 3.0% (13 of 437 decks)
- Cyclonus, the Saboteur // Cyclonus, Cybertronian Fighter relevance 1.37 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Rassilon, the War President relevance 1.29 · 2.2% (7 of 313 decks)
- Truss, Chief Engineer relevance 0.74 · 2.9% (2 of 68 decks)
- Sword Coast Sailor // Burakos, Party Leader relevance 0.70 · 1.1% (3 of 262 decks)
- Feywild Visitor // Sivriss, Nightmare Speaker relevance 0.42 · 2.1% (1 of 47 decks)
- Shadowheart, Dark Justiciar // Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.41 · 2.0% (1 of 51 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Lose Focus relevance 2.15 · 37.1% (72 of 194 decks)
- Stern Scolding relevance 2.07 · 37.1% (72 of 194 decks)
- Long Goodbye relevance 2.03 · 35.1% (68 of 194 decks)
- Remand relevance 1.90 · 38.1% (74 of 194 decks)
- Fire Nation Occupation relevance 1.90 · 33.0% (64 of 194 decks)
- Cling to Dust relevance 1.88 · 37.6% (73 of 194 decks)
- Spell Snare relevance 1.80 · 37.1% (72 of 194 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 1.69 · 27.8% (54 of 194 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 1.63 · 35.1% (68 of 194 decks)
- Bloodchief's Thirst relevance 1.56 · 25.8% (50 of 194 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 1.55 · 38.7% (75 of 194 decks)
- Fatal Push relevance 1.47 · 37.6% (73 of 194 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 1.46 · 34.0% (66 of 194 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 1.44 · 36.6% (71 of 194 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 1.43 · 34.5% (67 of 194 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 1.42 · 36.1% (70 of 194 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 1.39 · 33.5% (65 of 194 decks)
- Requiting Hex relevance 1.38 · 21.1% (41 of 194 decks)
- Cut Down relevance 1.37 · 28.9% (56 of 194 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 1.36 · 36.6% (71 of 194 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 1.29 · 35.1% (68 of 194 decks)
- Daze relevance 1.29 · 29.9% (58 of 194 decks)
- Barrowgoyf relevance 1.29 · 24.2% (47 of 194 decks)
- Profane Tutor relevance 1.27 · 31.4% (61 of 194 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 1.26 · 37.6% (73 of 194 decks)
- Abhorrent Oculus relevance 1.24 · 25.8% (50 of 194 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 1.19 · 35.1% (68 of 194 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 1.18 · 27.8% (54 of 194 decks)
- Change the Equation relevance 1.16 · 17.5% (34 of 194 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 1.13 · 35.6% (69 of 194 decks)
All creatures (9)
- Subtlety relevance 1.43 · 34.5% (67 of 194 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 1.36 · 36.6% (71 of 194 decks)
- Barrowgoyf relevance 1.29 · 24.2% (47 of 194 decks)
- Abhorrent Oculus relevance 1.24 · 25.8% (50 of 194 decks)
- Psychic Frog relevance 1.12 · 31.4% (61 of 194 decks)
- Orcish Bowmasters relevance 1.01 · 35.1% (68 of 194 decks)
- Jhoira's Timebug relevance 0.98 · 14.4% (28 of 194 decks)
- Harbinger of the Seas relevance 0.92 · 15.5% (30 of 194 decks)
- Time Beetle relevance 0.90 · 13.9% (27 of 194 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Fire Nation Occupation relevance 1.90 · 33.0% (64 of 194 decks)
All instants (24)
- Lose Focus relevance 2.15 · 37.1% (72 of 194 decks)
- Stern Scolding relevance 2.07 · 37.1% (72 of 194 decks)
- Long Goodbye relevance 2.03 · 35.1% (68 of 194 decks)
- Remand relevance 1.90 · 38.1% (74 of 194 decks)
- Cling to Dust relevance 1.88 · 37.6% (73 of 194 decks)
- Spell Snare relevance 1.80 · 37.1% (72 of 194 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 1.69 · 27.8% (54 of 194 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 1.63 · 35.1% (68 of 194 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 1.55 · 38.7% (75 of 194 decks)
- Fatal Push relevance 1.47 · 37.6% (73 of 194 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 1.46 · 34.0% (66 of 194 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 1.44 · 36.6% (71 of 194 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 1.42 · 36.1% (70 of 194 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 1.39 · 33.5% (65 of 194 decks)
- Requiting Hex relevance 1.38 · 21.1% (41 of 194 decks)
- Cut Down relevance 1.37 · 28.9% (56 of 194 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 1.29 · 35.1% (68 of 194 decks)
- Daze relevance 1.29 · 29.9% (58 of 194 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 1.26 · 37.6% (73 of 194 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 1.18 · 27.8% (54 of 194 decks)
- Change the Equation relevance 1.16 · 17.5% (34 of 194 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 1.13 · 35.6% (69 of 194 decks)
- Sauron's Ransom relevance 1.09 · 26.8% (52 of 194 decks)
- Dismember relevance 1.03 · 34.5% (67 of 194 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Bloodchief's Thirst relevance 1.56 · 25.8% (50 of 194 decks)
- Profane Tutor relevance 1.27 · 31.4% (61 of 194 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 1.19 · 35.1% (68 of 194 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 1.05 · 28.9% (56 of 194 decks)
- Inquisition of Kozilek relevance 1.03 · 18.0% (35 of 194 decks)
- Thoughtseize relevance 1.01 · 21.6% (42 of 194 decks)
- Inspiring Refrain relevance 0.96 · 14.9% (29 of 194 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 1.13 · 25.3% (49 of 194 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 1.11 · 20.6% (40 of 194 decks)
All lands (7)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.99 · 36.1% (70 of 194 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.98 · 37.6% (73 of 194 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.98 · 34.5% (67 of 194 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.97 · 36.6% (71 of 194 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.96 · 36.1% (70 of 194 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.94 · 36.1% (70 of 194 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.93 · 37.1% (72 of 194 decks)
EDH data for Sinister Concierge: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 194 real decks.
















































