Sinister Concierge
Played in 250 Blue decks
1730+28+5+4+6+7+
Color Identity Spread
5.0% Blue
Commanders
Taigam, Master Opportunist 9.0% of decks
Taigam, Master Opportunist 9.0% of decks
Barrin, Master Wizard 16.3% of decks
Barrin, Master Wizard 16.3% of decks
Inga Rune-Eyes 13.2% of decks
Inga Rune-Eyes 13.2% of decks
Chisei, Heart of Oceans 2.5% of decks
Chisei, Heart of Oceans 2.5% of decks
Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir 1.8% of decks
Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir 1.8% of decks
Imoen, Mystic Trickster // Feywild Visitor 33.3% of decks
Imoen, Mystic Trickster // Feywild Visitor 33.3% of decks
Most Relevant
Jhoira's Timebug 28.4% of decks
Jhoira's Timebug 28.4% of decks
Time Beetle 26.4% of decks
Time Beetle 26.4% of decks
Wibbly-wobbly, Timey-wimey 25.2% of decks
Wibbly-wobbly, Timey-wimey 25.2% of decks
Suspend 34.8% of decks
Suspend 34.8% of decks
All of History, All at Once 21.6% of decks
All of History, All at Once 21.6% of decks
Inspiring Refrain 21.6% of decks
Inspiring Refrain 21.6% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (17)
- Taigam, Master Opportunist relevance 3.40 · 9.0% (74 of 825 decks)
- Barrin, Master Wizard relevance 2.73 · 16.3% (20 of 123 decks)
- Inga Rune-Eyes relevance 1.79 · 13.2% (7 of 53 decks)
- Chisei, Heart of Oceans relevance 0.99 · 2.5% (5 of 199 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.89 · 1.8% (5 of 276 decks)
- Imoen, Mystic Trickster // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.72 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Oglor, Devoted Assistant relevance 0.68 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Danny Pink relevance 0.65 · 1.6% (3 of 191 decks)
- Zellix, Sanity Flayer relevance 0.64 · 2.9% (2 of 69 decks)
- Jason Bright, Glowing Prophet relevance 0.63 · 2.9% (2 of 70 decks)
- Taniwha relevance 0.62 · 1.4% (3 of 217 decks)
- Osgood, Operation Double relevance 0.61 · 2.6% (2 of 78 decks)
- Lieutenant Commander Data relevance 0.53 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Echo, Perceptive Prodigy relevance 0.48 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.40 · 2.8% (1 of 36 decks)
- Meneldor, Swift Savior relevance 0.36 · 2.1% (1 of 47 decks)
- Alirios, Enraptured relevance 0.28 · 1.1% (1 of 95 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Jhoira's Timebug relevance 1.64 · 28.4% (71 of 250 decks)
- Time Beetle relevance 1.53 · 26.4% (66 of 250 decks)
- Wibbly-wobbly, Timey-wimey relevance 1.45 · 25.2% (63 of 250 decks)
- Suspend relevance 1.42 · 34.8% (87 of 250 decks)
- All of History, All at Once relevance 1.30 · 21.6% (54 of 250 decks)
- Inspiring Refrain relevance 1.22 · 21.6% (54 of 250 decks)
- Reality Strobe relevance 1.21 · 17.6% (44 of 250 decks)
- Rotating Fireplace relevance 1.19 · 20.4% (51 of 250 decks)
- Clockspinning relevance 1.07 · 29.6% (74 of 250 decks)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 1.01 · 21.2% (53 of 250 decks)
- Ancestral Vision relevance 1.00 · 21.6% (54 of 250 decks)
- Star Whale relevance 0.96 · 18.0% (45 of 250 decks)
- Errant, Street Artist relevance 0.95 · 17.6% (44 of 250 decks)
- Timebender relevance 0.92 · 13.6% (34 of 250 decks)
- Aeon Chronicler relevance 0.87 · 15.6% (39 of 250 decks)
- Paradox Haze relevance 0.86 · 20.4% (51 of 250 decks)
- Twinning Staff relevance 0.76 · 16.4% (41 of 250 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 0.75 · 15.6% (39 of 250 decks)
- Sol Talisman relevance 0.75 · 16.8% (42 of 250 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.73 · 20.4% (51 of 250 decks)
- Uthros Psionicist relevance 0.71 · 15.2% (38 of 250 decks)
- Highspire Bell-Ringer relevance 0.68 · 12.8% (32 of 250 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.64 · 23.6% (59 of 250 decks)
- Mox Tantalite relevance 0.62 · 12.4% (31 of 250 decks)
- Storm of Saruman relevance 0.62 · 13.6% (34 of 250 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.62 · 17.2% (43 of 250 decks)
- Shadow of the Second Sun relevance 0.61 · 16.4% (41 of 250 decks)
- Watcher of Hours relevance 0.56 · 9.2% (23 of 250 decks)
- Sphinx of the Second Sun relevance 0.56 · 16.8% (42 of 250 decks)
- Watcher for Tomorrow relevance 0.53 · 11.2% (28 of 250 decks)
All creatures (28)
- Jhoira's Timebug relevance 1.64 · 28.4% (71 of 250 decks)
- Time Beetle relevance 1.53 · 26.4% (66 of 250 decks)
- Star Whale relevance 0.96 · 18.0% (45 of 250 decks)
- Errant, Street Artist relevance 0.95 · 17.6% (44 of 250 decks)
- Timebender relevance 0.92 · 13.6% (34 of 250 decks)
- Aeon Chronicler relevance 0.87 · 15.6% (39 of 250 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 0.75 · 15.6% (39 of 250 decks)
- Uthros Psionicist relevance 0.71 · 15.2% (38 of 250 decks)
- Highspire Bell-Ringer relevance 0.68 · 12.8% (32 of 250 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.64 · 23.6% (59 of 250 decks)
- Watcher of Hours relevance 0.56 · 9.2% (23 of 250 decks)
- Sphinx of the Second Sun relevance 0.56 · 16.8% (42 of 250 decks)
- Watcher for Tomorrow relevance 0.53 · 11.2% (28 of 250 decks)
- Tomb of Horrors Adventurer relevance 0.53 · 9.2% (23 of 250 decks)
- Ojer Pakpatiq, Deepest Epoch // Temple of Cyclical Time relevance 0.49 · 14.0% (35 of 250 decks)
- Reef Worm relevance 0.49 · 10.4% (26 of 250 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.48 · 17.2% (43 of 250 decks)
- Sower of Temptation relevance 0.48 · 12.4% (31 of 250 decks)
- Overlord of the Floodpits relevance 0.47 · 11.2% (28 of 250 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.47 · 26.0% (65 of 250 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.46 · 10.0% (25 of 250 decks)
- Patron Wizard relevance 0.46 · 11.2% (28 of 250 decks)
- Alphinaud Leveilleur relevance 0.45 · 7.6% (19 of 250 decks)
- Wingblade Disciple relevance 0.45 · 8.4% (21 of 250 decks)
- Chronozoa relevance 0.45 · 8.0% (20 of 250 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.45 · 14.8% (37 of 250 decks)
- Tishana's Tidebinder relevance 0.45 · 14.0% (35 of 250 decks)
- Faerie Artisans relevance 0.44 · 10.0% (25 of 250 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Rotating Fireplace relevance 1.19 · 20.4% (51 of 250 decks)
- Twinning Staff relevance 0.76 · 16.4% (41 of 250 decks)
- Sol Talisman relevance 0.75 · 16.8% (42 of 250 decks)
- Mox Tantalite relevance 0.62 · 12.4% (31 of 250 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.46 · 24.8% (62 of 250 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Paradox Haze relevance 0.86 · 20.4% (51 of 250 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.73 · 20.4% (51 of 250 decks)
- Storm of Saruman relevance 0.62 · 13.6% (34 of 250 decks)
- Shadow of the Second Sun relevance 0.61 · 16.4% (41 of 250 decks)
All instants (6)
- Suspend relevance 1.42 · 34.8% (87 of 250 decks)
- Clockspinning relevance 1.07 · 29.6% (74 of 250 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.62 · 17.2% (43 of 250 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.50 · 30.4% (76 of 250 decks)
- Press the Enemy relevance 0.45 · 9.6% (24 of 250 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.44 · 22.8% (57 of 250 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Wibbly-wobbly, Timey-wimey relevance 1.45 · 25.2% (63 of 250 decks)
- All of History, All at Once relevance 1.30 · 21.6% (54 of 250 decks)
- Inspiring Refrain relevance 1.22 · 21.6% (54 of 250 decks)
- Reality Strobe relevance 1.21 · 17.6% (44 of 250 decks)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 1.01 · 21.2% (53 of 250 decks)
- Ancestral Vision relevance 1.00 · 21.6% (54 of 250 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.44 · 28.8% (72 of 250 decks)
EDH data for Sinister Concierge: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 250 real decks.
















































