Back to Nature
Played in 340 Sultai decks
230+10+1+18+8+1+12+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
Nature's Claim 13.2% of decks
Nature's Claim 13.2% of decks
Culling Ritual 19.1% of decks
Culling Ritual 19.1% of decks
Glissa Sunslayer 14.4% of decks
Glissa Sunslayer 14.4% of decks
Toxic Deluge 21.5% of decks
Toxic Deluge 21.5% of decks
Dark Ritual 19.7% of decks
Dark Ritual 19.7% of decks
Baleful Strix 17.1% of decks
Baleful Strix 17.1% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Vorosh, the Hunter relevance 0.69 · 1.3% (4 of 307 decks)
- Nashi, Illusion Gadgeteer relevance 0.47 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.44 · 13.2% (45 of 340 decks)
- Culling Ritual relevance 0.41 · 19.1% (65 of 340 decks)
- Glissa Sunslayer relevance 0.40 · 14.4% (49 of 340 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.39 · 21.5% (73 of 340 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.39 · 19.7% (67 of 340 decks)
- Baleful Strix relevance 0.38 · 17.1% (58 of 340 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.38 · 21.2% (72 of 340 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.38 · 12.9% (44 of 340 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.37 · 25.6% (87 of 340 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.37 · 20.3% (69 of 340 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.36 · 18.5% (63 of 340 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.35 · 19.1% (65 of 340 decks)
- Death Begets Life relevance 0.34 · 10.0% (34 of 340 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.33 · 14.1% (48 of 340 decks)
- Cavern Harpy relevance 0.33 · 5.0% (17 of 340 decks)
- Fade from History relevance 0.33 · 5.0% (17 of 340 decks)
- Damnation relevance 0.32 · 11.2% (38 of 340 decks)
- Culling the Weak relevance 0.32 · 8.5% (29 of 340 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.32 · 14.7% (50 of 340 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.31 · 17.6% (60 of 340 decks)
- Acererak the Archlich relevance 0.31 · 4.7% (16 of 340 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.30 · 9.4% (32 of 340 decks)
- Tear Asunder relevance 0.30 · 14.1% (48 of 340 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.30 · 13.5% (46 of 340 decks)
- Kefnet the Mindful relevance 0.29 · 6.8% (23 of 340 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.29 · 8.2% (28 of 340 decks)
- Aluren relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (17 of 340 decks)
- Infernal Grasp relevance 0.29 · 7.9% (27 of 340 decks)
- Malevolent Hermit // Benevolent Geist relevance 0.28 · 5.9% (20 of 340 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.28 · 14.1% (48 of 340 decks)
All creatures (10)
- Glissa Sunslayer relevance 0.40 · 14.4% (49 of 340 decks)
- Baleful Strix relevance 0.38 · 17.1% (58 of 340 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.38 · 21.2% (72 of 340 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.37 · 25.6% (87 of 340 decks)
- Cavern Harpy relevance 0.33 · 5.0% (17 of 340 decks)
- Acererak the Archlich relevance 0.31 · 4.7% (16 of 340 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.30 · 9.4% (32 of 340 decks)
- Kefnet the Mindful relevance 0.29 · 6.8% (23 of 340 decks)
- Malevolent Hermit // Benevolent Geist relevance 0.28 · 5.9% (20 of 340 decks)
- Scavenged Brawler relevance 0.27 · 6.8% (23 of 340 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Aluren relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (17 of 340 decks)
All instants (18)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.44 · 13.2% (45 of 340 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.39 · 19.7% (67 of 340 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.36 · 18.5% (63 of 340 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.35 · 19.1% (65 of 340 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.33 · 14.1% (48 of 340 decks)
- Culling the Weak relevance 0.32 · 8.5% (29 of 340 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.32 · 14.7% (50 of 340 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.31 · 17.6% (60 of 340 decks)
- Tear Asunder relevance 0.30 · 14.1% (48 of 340 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.30 · 13.5% (46 of 340 decks)
- Infernal Grasp relevance 0.29 · 7.9% (27 of 340 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.28 · 14.1% (48 of 340 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.28 · 7.1% (24 of 340 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.28 · 7.6% (26 of 340 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.27 · 6.8% (23 of 340 decks)
- Turn the Earth relevance 0.27 · 4.4% (15 of 340 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.27 · 5.9% (20 of 340 decks)
- Lim-Dûl's Vault relevance 0.27 · 6.5% (22 of 340 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Culling Ritual relevance 0.41 · 19.1% (65 of 340 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.39 · 21.5% (73 of 340 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.38 · 12.9% (44 of 340 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.37 · 20.3% (69 of 340 decks)
- Death Begets Life relevance 0.34 · 10.0% (34 of 340 decks)
- Fade from History relevance 0.33 · 5.0% (17 of 340 decks)
- Damnation relevance 0.32 · 11.2% (38 of 340 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.29 · 8.2% (28 of 340 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.32 · 15.9% (54 of 340 decks)
All lands (12)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.40 · 28.2% (96 of 340 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.36 · 14.4% (49 of 340 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.34 · 12.1% (41 of 340 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.34 · 11.8% (40 of 340 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.33 · 13.2% (45 of 340 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.32 · 10.6% (36 of 340 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.31 · 12.9% (44 of 340 decks)
- Bayou relevance 0.30 · 14.4% (49 of 340 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.30 · 14.4% (49 of 340 decks)
- Twilight Mire relevance 0.29 · 12.6% (43 of 340 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.28 · 13.5% (46 of 340 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.28 · 12.6% (43 of 340 decks)
EDH data for Back to Nature: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 340 real decks.
















































