Cephalid Pathmage
Played in 63 Simic decks
230+49+1+
Color Identity Spread
10.4% Simic
Commanders
Most Relevant
Cephalid Facetaker 28.6% of decks
Cephalid Facetaker 28.6% of decks
Cephalid Inkmage 20.6% of decks
Cephalid Inkmage 20.6% of decks
Kraken of the Straits 27.0% of decks
Kraken of the Straits 27.0% of decks
Deep-Sea Kraken 34.9% of decks
Deep-Sea Kraken 34.9% of decks
Caelorna, Coral Tyrant 25.4% of decks
Caelorna, Coral Tyrant 25.4% of decks
Slinn Voda, the Rising Deep 41.3% of decks
Slinn Voda, the Rising Deep 41.3% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Sita Varma, Masked Racer relevance 1.31 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Sword Coast Sailor // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.47 · 1.0% (1 of 99 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 1.66 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 1.42 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
- Kraken of the Straits relevance 1.40 · 27.0% (17 of 63 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 1.38 · 34.9% (22 of 63 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.31 · 25.4% (16 of 63 decks)
- Slinn Voda, the Rising Deep relevance 1.29 · 41.3% (26 of 63 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 1.25 · 31.7% (20 of 63 decks)
- Spawning Kraken relevance 1.24 · 42.9% (27 of 63 decks)
- Grappling Kraken relevance 1.22 · 34.9% (22 of 63 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.19 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Reservoir Kraken relevance 1.19 · 25.4% (16 of 63 decks)
- Sin, Unending Cataclysm relevance 1.18 · 33.3% (21 of 63 decks)
- Tolarian Kraken relevance 1.17 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 1.16 · 19.0% (12 of 63 decks)
- Monstrosity of the Lake relevance 1.15 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 1.13 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
- Nadir Kraken relevance 1.11 · 30.2% (19 of 63 decks)
- Tromokratis relevance 1.10 · 33.3% (21 of 63 decks)
- Inkwell Leviathan relevance 1.09 · 31.7% (20 of 63 decks)
- Serpent of Yawning Depths relevance 1.09 · 36.5% (23 of 63 decks)
- Stormsurge Kraken relevance 1.08 · 31.7% (20 of 63 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 1.08 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Nimbus Swimmer relevance 1.07 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Summon: Leviathan relevance 1.06 · 38.1% (24 of 63 decks)
- Starwinder relevance 1.04 · 34.9% (22 of 63 decks)
- Biblioplex Kraken relevance 1.03 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 1.03 · 27.0% (17 of 63 decks)
- Octoprophet relevance 1.01 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Wormhole Serpent relevance 0.99 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 0.99 · 34.9% (22 of 63 decks)
All creatures (49)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 1.66 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 1.42 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
- Kraken of the Straits relevance 1.40 · 27.0% (17 of 63 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 1.38 · 34.9% (22 of 63 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.31 · 25.4% (16 of 63 decks)
- Slinn Voda, the Rising Deep relevance 1.29 · 41.3% (26 of 63 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 1.25 · 31.7% (20 of 63 decks)
- Spawning Kraken relevance 1.24 · 42.9% (27 of 63 decks)
- Grappling Kraken relevance 1.22 · 34.9% (22 of 63 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.19 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Reservoir Kraken relevance 1.19 · 25.4% (16 of 63 decks)
- Sin, Unending Cataclysm relevance 1.18 · 33.3% (21 of 63 decks)
- Tolarian Kraken relevance 1.17 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 1.16 · 19.0% (12 of 63 decks)
- Monstrosity of the Lake relevance 1.15 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 1.13 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
- Nadir Kraken relevance 1.11 · 30.2% (19 of 63 decks)
- Tromokratis relevance 1.10 · 33.3% (21 of 63 decks)
- Inkwell Leviathan relevance 1.09 · 31.7% (20 of 63 decks)
- Serpent of Yawning Depths relevance 1.09 · 36.5% (23 of 63 decks)
- Stormsurge Kraken relevance 1.08 · 31.7% (20 of 63 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 1.08 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Nimbus Swimmer relevance 1.07 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Summon: Leviathan relevance 1.06 · 38.1% (24 of 63 decks)
- Starwinder relevance 1.04 · 34.9% (22 of 63 decks)
- Biblioplex Kraken relevance 1.03 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 1.03 · 27.0% (17 of 63 decks)
- Octoprophet relevance 1.01 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Wormhole Serpent relevance 0.99 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 0.99 · 34.9% (22 of 63 decks)
- Slither Blade relevance 0.97 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
- Stormtide Leviathan relevance 0.95 · 30.2% (19 of 63 decks)
- Breaching Leviathan relevance 0.93 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Triton Shorestalker relevance 0.92 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Glacier Godmaw relevance 0.92 · 27.0% (17 of 63 decks)
- Scrapdiver Serpent relevance 0.91 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Gudul Lurker relevance 0.91 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 0.89 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Tidal Kraken relevance 0.89 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Koma, World-Eater relevance 0.88 · 38.1% (24 of 63 decks)
- Bubble Smuggler relevance 0.87 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
- Simic Sky Swallower relevance 0.86 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 0.86 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
- Invisible Stalker relevance 0.85 · 19.0% (12 of 63 decks)
- The Watcher in the Water relevance 0.84 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 0.83 · 19.0% (12 of 63 decks)
- Kraken Hatchling relevance 0.80 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
- Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 0.79 · 34.9% (22 of 63 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 0.79 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.91 · 36.5% (23 of 63 decks)
EDH data for Cephalid Pathmage: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 63 real decks.




















