Cephalid Pathmage
Played in 219 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
36.2% Blue
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (10)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 5.42 · 62.0% (101 of 163 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 1.94 · 7.6% (11 of 144 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 1.20 · 1.0% (17 of 1,687 decks)
- Slinn Voda, the Rising Deep relevance 0.80 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Doc Ock, Sinister Scientist relevance 0.80 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Kiora, the Rising Tide relevance 0.65 · 1.4% (3 of 214 decks)
- Ertai, Wizard Adept relevance 0.63 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist relevance 0.53 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Ultimecia, Temporal Threat relevance 0.53 · 1.5% (2 of 135 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.29 · 1.0% (1 of 97 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 3.41 · 54.3% (119 of 219 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 3.15 · 54.3% (119 of 219 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 2.97 · 60.3% (132 of 219 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 2.64 · 47.9% (105 of 219 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 2.51 · 47.5% (104 of 219 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 2.46 · 39.7% (87 of 219 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 2.41 · 42.5% (93 of 219 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 2.31 · 47.0% (103 of 219 decks)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 2.03 · 34.7% (76 of 219 decks)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 1.88 · 31.1% (68 of 219 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 1.72 · 30.6% (67 of 219 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 1.58 · 37.0% (81 of 219 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.43 · 29.7% (65 of 219 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 1.28 · 26.9% (59 of 219 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.26 · 24.2% (53 of 219 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.25 · 24.2% (53 of 219 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 1.24 · 21.9% (48 of 219 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 1.20 · 35.2% (77 of 219 decks)
- Wonder relevance 1.20 · 38.4% (84 of 219 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 1.16 · 22.8% (50 of 219 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 1.13 · 20.5% (45 of 219 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.07 · 30.1% (66 of 219 decks)
- Levitation relevance 1.06 · 20.5% (45 of 219 decks)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 1.06 · 19.2% (42 of 219 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 1.05 · 32.0% (70 of 219 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 1.01 · 17.8% (39 of 219 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 0.99 · 19.6% (43 of 219 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 0.99 · 17.4% (38 of 219 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 0.96 · 15.1% (33 of 219 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 0.90 · 14.6% (32 of 219 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 3.41 · 54.3% (119 of 219 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 3.15 · 54.3% (119 of 219 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 2.97 · 60.3% (132 of 219 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 2.64 · 47.9% (105 of 219 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 2.51 · 47.5% (104 of 219 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 2.46 · 39.7% (87 of 219 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 2.41 · 42.5% (93 of 219 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 2.31 · 47.0% (103 of 219 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 1.72 · 30.6% (67 of 219 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 1.28 · 26.9% (59 of 219 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.26 · 24.2% (53 of 219 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.25 · 24.2% (53 of 219 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 1.20 · 35.2% (77 of 219 decks)
- Wonder relevance 1.20 · 38.4% (84 of 219 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 1.13 · 20.5% (45 of 219 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 1.05 · 32.0% (70 of 219 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 1.01 · 17.8% (39 of 219 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 0.99 · 19.6% (43 of 219 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 0.99 · 17.4% (38 of 219 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 0.96 · 15.1% (33 of 219 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 0.90 · 14.6% (32 of 219 decks)
- Escape Artist relevance 0.82 · 11.9% (26 of 219 decks)
- Mothdust Changeling relevance 0.68 · 13.2% (29 of 219 decks)
- Amoeboid Changeling relevance 0.65 · 12.3% (27 of 219 decks)
- Bubble Smuggler relevance 0.61 · 9.6% (21 of 219 decks)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 0.58 · 8.7% (19 of 219 decks)
- Shapesharer relevance 0.55 · 10.0% (22 of 219 decks)
- Universal Automaton relevance 0.53 · 10.5% (23 of 219 decks)
- Aether Figment relevance 0.50 · 7.8% (17 of 219 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 1.06 · 19.2% (42 of 219 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.80 · 26.0% (57 of 219 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.57 · 33.3% (73 of 219 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.50 · 11.4% (25 of 219 decks)
All enchantments (8)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 1.88 · 31.1% (68 of 219 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 1.58 · 37.0% (81 of 219 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 1.24 · 21.9% (48 of 219 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 1.16 · 22.8% (50 of 219 decks)
- Levitation relevance 1.06 · 20.5% (45 of 219 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.63 · 16.9% (37 of 219 decks)
- Cowardice relevance 0.62 · 10.5% (23 of 219 decks)
- Opposition relevance 0.50 · 11.4% (25 of 219 decks)
All instants (2)
- Deluge relevance 0.61 · 11.4% (25 of 219 decks)
- Plagiarize relevance 0.49 · 7.8% (17 of 219 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 2.03 · 34.7% (76 of 219 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.43 · 29.7% (65 of 219 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.07 · 30.1% (66 of 219 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.74 · 23.3% (51 of 219 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.55 · 17.4% (38 of 219 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.64 · 14.6% (32 of 219 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.77 · 32.0% (70 of 219 decks)
EDH data for Cephalid Pathmage: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 219 real decks.