Cultivator of Blades
Played in 1,264 Simic decks
1230+42+3+3+1+1+
Color Identity Spread
20.0% Simic
Commanders
Ezuri, Claw of Progress 27.6% of decks
Ezuri, Claw of Progress 27.6% of decks
Galadriel, Elven-Queen 2.4% of decks
Galadriel, Elven-Queen 2.4% of decks
Tanazir Quandrix 3.2% of decks
Tanazir Quandrix 3.2% of decks
Thranduil, Sindarin Liege // Silvan Rally 1.3% of decks
Thranduil, Sindarin Liege // Silvan Rally 1.3% of decks
Esix, Fractal Bloom 1.1% of decks
Esix, Fractal Bloom 1.1% of decks
Shameless Charlatan // Wilson, Refined Grizzly 4.3% of decks
Shameless Charlatan // Wilson, Refined Grizzly 4.3% of decks
Most Relevant
Wild Beastmaster 42.7% of decks
Wild Beastmaster 42.7% of decks
Champion of Lambholt 65.1% of decks
Champion of Lambholt 65.1% of decks
Fathom Mage 72.0% of decks
Fathom Mage 72.0% of decks
Iridescent Hornbeetle 44.1% of decks
Iridescent Hornbeetle 44.1% of decks
Blighted Agent 42.2% of decks
Blighted Agent 42.2% of decks
Invisible Stalker 42.0% of decks
Invisible Stalker 42.0% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (12)
- Ezuri, Claw of Progress relevance 5.10 · 27.6% (981 of 3,559 decks)
- Galadriel, Elven-Queen relevance 1.22 · 2.4% (48 of 2,028 decks)
- Tanazir Quandrix relevance 1.00 · 3.2% (15 of 468 decks)
- Thranduil, Sindarin Liege // Silvan Rally relevance 0.69 · 1.3% (21 of 1,678 decks)
- Esix, Fractal Bloom relevance 0.60 · 1.1% (19 of 1,782 decks)
- Shameless Charlatan // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.57 · 4.3% (3 of 70 decks)
- Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher // Hardy Outlander relevance 0.54 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Glacian, Powerstone Engineer // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.36 · 8.3% (1 of 12 decks)
- Sita Varma, Masked Racer relevance 0.35 · 1.6% (3 of 190 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.18 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Keruga, the Macrosage relevance 0.14 · 1.1% (1 of 94 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Wild Beastmaster relevance 2.32 · 42.7% (540 of 1,264 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 2.10 · 65.1% (823 of 1,264 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 2.03 · 72.0% (910 of 1,264 decks)
- Iridescent Hornbeetle relevance 1.99 · 44.1% (558 of 1,264 decks)
- Blighted Agent relevance 1.89 · 42.2% (533 of 1,264 decks)
- Invisible Stalker relevance 1.86 · 42.0% (531 of 1,264 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 1.85 · 56.3% (711 of 1,264 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 1.81 · 63.9% (808 of 1,264 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 1.63 · 49.8% (629 of 1,264 decks)
- Sage of Hours relevance 1.62 · 37.8% (478 of 1,264 decks)
- Cold-Eyed Selkie relevance 1.54 · 65.2% (824 of 1,264 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.51 · 38.4% (485 of 1,264 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 1.48 · 48.0% (607 of 1,264 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 1.42 · 46.8% (591 of 1,264 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 1.41 · 53.9% (681 of 1,264 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.35 · 50.9% (643 of 1,264 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 1.34 · 43.1% (545 of 1,264 decks)
- Simic Manipulator relevance 1.30 · 27.5% (347 of 1,264 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 1.24 · 37.3% (472 of 1,264 decks)
- Trygon Predator relevance 1.21 · 39.0% (493 of 1,264 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 1.17 · 55.7% (704 of 1,264 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 1.17 · 59.2% (748 of 1,264 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.14 · 48.8% (617 of 1,264 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 1.12 · 56.7% (717 of 1,264 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 1.10 · 30.1% (380 of 1,264 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 1.10 · 29.9% (378 of 1,264 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 1.05 · 50.9% (644 of 1,264 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.97 · 23.7% (299 of 1,264 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.96 · 64.2% (812 of 1,264 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.93 · 39.3% (497 of 1,264 decks)
All creatures (42)
- Wild Beastmaster relevance 2.32 · 42.7% (540 of 1,264 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 2.10 · 65.1% (823 of 1,264 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 2.03 · 72.0% (910 of 1,264 decks)
- Iridescent Hornbeetle relevance 1.99 · 44.1% (558 of 1,264 decks)
- Blighted Agent relevance 1.89 · 42.2% (533 of 1,264 decks)
- Invisible Stalker relevance 1.86 · 42.0% (531 of 1,264 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 1.85 · 56.3% (711 of 1,264 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 1.81 · 63.9% (808 of 1,264 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 1.63 · 49.8% (629 of 1,264 decks)
- Sage of Hours relevance 1.62 · 37.8% (478 of 1,264 decks)
- Cold-Eyed Selkie relevance 1.54 · 65.2% (824 of 1,264 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.51 · 38.4% (485 of 1,264 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 1.48 · 48.0% (607 of 1,264 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 1.42 · 46.8% (591 of 1,264 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 1.41 · 53.9% (681 of 1,264 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.35 · 50.9% (643 of 1,264 decks)
- Simic Manipulator relevance 1.30 · 27.5% (347 of 1,264 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 1.24 · 37.3% (472 of 1,264 decks)
- Trygon Predator relevance 1.21 · 39.0% (493 of 1,264 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 1.17 · 55.7% (704 of 1,264 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.14 · 48.8% (617 of 1,264 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 1.12 · 56.7% (717 of 1,264 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 1.10 · 30.1% (380 of 1,264 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 1.10 · 29.9% (378 of 1,264 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 1.05 · 50.9% (644 of 1,264 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.96 · 64.2% (812 of 1,264 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.93 · 39.3% (497 of 1,264 decks)
- Ouroboroid relevance 0.92 · 29.4% (372 of 1,264 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.90 · 28.1% (355 of 1,264 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.90 · 26.4% (334 of 1,264 decks)
- Mycoloth relevance 0.88 · 17.7% (224 of 1,264 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.87 · 45.0% (569 of 1,264 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.86 · 67.8% (857 of 1,264 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.84 · 41.7% (527 of 1,264 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.82 · 31.6% (399 of 1,264 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.82 · 34.5% (436 of 1,264 decks)
- Giggling Skitterspike relevance 0.82 · 19.3% (244 of 1,264 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.81 · 24.6% (311 of 1,264 decks)
- Kodama of the West Tree relevance 0.79 · 23.3% (295 of 1,264 decks)
- Elusive Otter // Grove's Bounty relevance 0.77 · 24.1% (304 of 1,264 decks)
- Glen Elendra Archmage relevance 0.77 · 18.6% (235 of 1,264 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.73 · 16.4% (207 of 1,264 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 1.34 · 43.1% (545 of 1,264 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.91 · 35.8% (452 of 1,264 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.89 · 43.9% (555 of 1,264 decks)
All instants (3)
- Inspiring Call relevance 1.17 · 59.2% (748 of 1,264 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.97 · 23.7% (299 of 1,264 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.84 · 20.6% (261 of 1,264 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.89 · 25.4% (321 of 1,264 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.79 · 15.9% (201 of 1,264 decks)
EDH data for Cultivator of Blades: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,264 real decks.

































