Cards like Gyre Sage
11× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
76% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
55% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Gyre Sage 58%
- Kami of Whispered Hopes 55%
- Incubation Druid 49%
Cards like Llanowar Elves
2.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Simic decks
52% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 59%
- Elvish Mystic 53%
- Fyndhorn Elves 32%
- Boreal Druid 3%
- Gyre Engineer 2%
- Orochi Merge-Keeper 1%
Other options: Druid of the Cowl, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Fyndhorn Elder, Goobbue Gardener, Wirewood Elf, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Orochi Sustainer, Rootrider Faun, Nantuko Elder, Skyshroud Troopers
Cards like Hardened Scales
2.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Simic decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.34 in other Simic decks
Cards like Cultivator of Blades
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Gruul Beastmaster, Iron-Craw Crusher
Cards like Forgotten Ancient
8.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Simic decks
Cards like Invisible Stalker
6.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Invisible Stalker 32%
- Slither Blade 7%
- Triton Shorestalker 5%
- Mist-Cloaked Herald 4%
- Gudul Lurker 3%
- Jhessian Infiltrator 1%
Other options: Phantom Warrior, Phantom Ninja, Metathran Soldier, Hazy Homunculus, Mystic of the Hidden Way, Talas Warrior, Latch Seeker, Tidal Kraken, Plasma Elemental, Covert Operative
Cards like Cold-Eyed Selkie
11× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Illvoi Infiltrator, Lu Xun, Scholar General, Neurok Commando, Thieving Magpie, Scroll Thief, Sea-Dasher Octopus, Thieving Otter, Stealer of Secrets, Vedalken Heretic, Soulknife Spy, Nimble Brigand, Marchesa's Infiltrator, Gateway Sneak, Saltwater Stalwart, Nine-Tail White Fox, Jhessian Thief
Cards like Birds of Paradise
4.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Birds of Paradise 40%
- Maraleaf Pixie 20%
Cards like Rapid Hybridization
1.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 37% of other Simic decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.49 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Rapid Hybridization 38%
- Pongify 27%
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other Simic decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.39 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 37%
- Lightning Greaves 26%
Cards like Ouroboroid
6.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Glen Elendra Archmage
17× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards like Duskshell Crawler
7.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Duskshell Crawler 26%
- Tuskguard Captain 5%
- Gnarlid Colony 4%
- Zegana, Utopian Speaker 4%
- Pridemalkin 3%
- Drix Fatemaker 1%
Other options: Crowned Ceratok, Trollbred Guardian, Baloth Pup
Cards like Fathom Mage
4.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Reclamation Sage
3.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Uktabi Orangutan, Indrik Stomphowler, Conclave Naturalists, Myconid Spore Tender
Cards like Counterspell
1.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 50% of other Simic decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
0.76 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Counterspell 48%
- Negate 25%
- Essence Scatter 1%
Other options: Wash Away, Wild Unraveling, Remove Soul, Envelop, Nullify, Disruption Protocol, Intervene, Stern Scolding, Minor Misstep, Spell Snare, False Summoning, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Outwit, Preemptive Strike, Extinguish, Mystic Denial
Cards like Evolution Witness
9.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like The Earth Crystal
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Thrummingbird
8.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards like Heroic Intervention
1.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other Simic decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Blighted Agent relevance 0.84 · 39.7% (1,386 of 3,495 decks)
- Cultivator of Blades relevance 0.93 · 27.4% (959 of 3,495 decks)
- Wild Beastmaster relevance 0.95 · 24.0% (840 of 3,495 decks)
- Sage of Hours relevance 0.81 · 39.9% (1,396 of 3,495 decks)
- Iridescent Hornbeetle relevance 0.84 · 34.8% (1,216 of 3,495 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.64 · 60.3% (2,106 of 3,495 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.65 · 54.8% (1,914 of 3,495 decks)
- Invisible Stalker relevance 0.81 · 32.3% (1,130 of 3,495 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.57 · 66.9% (2,337 of 3,495 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.56 · 58.2% (2,035 of 3,495 decks)
- Simic Manipulator relevance 0.81 · 20.5% (716 of 3,495 decks)
- Mycoloth relevance 0.81 · 15.5% (543 of 3,495 decks)
- Katara, Waterbending Master relevance 0.93 · 9.5% (333 of 3,495 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.72 · 25.5% (890 of 3,495 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.70 · 26.9% (939 of 3,495 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.61 · 38.3% (1,340 of 3,495 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.58 · 43.0% (1,504 of 3,495 decks)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.79 · 13.4% (469 of 3,495 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.61 · 34.2% (1,196 of 3,495 decks)
- Cold-Eyed Selkie relevance 0.47 · 59.4% (2,077 of 3,495 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.65 · 26.9% (941 of 3,495 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.65 · 25.6% (894 of 3,495 decks)
- Giggling Skitterspike relevance 0.70 · 17.0% (593 of 3,495 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.51 · 48.8% (1,704 of 3,495 decks)
- Fungal Sprouting relevance 0.82 · 9.2% (322 of 3,495 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.57 · 36.3% (1,267 of 3,495 decks)
- Tainted Observer relevance 0.75 · 12.5% (436 of 3,495 decks)
- Glistener Elf relevance 0.83 · 8.3% (290 of 3,495 decks)
- Ezuri, Stalker of Spheres relevance 0.74 · 13.0% (455 of 3,495 decks)
- Trygon Predator relevance 0.57 · 34.6% (1,210 of 3,495 decks)
- Heronblade Elite relevance 0.85 · 6.3% (219 of 3,495 decks)
- Viral Drake relevance 0.81 · 8.3% (290 of 3,495 decks)
- Shroofus Sproutsire relevance 0.85 · 6.0% (211 of 3,495 decks)
- Viridian Corrupter relevance 0.84 · 6.6% (230 of 3,495 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.57 · 33.5% (1,172 of 3,495 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.51 · 43.7% (1,527 of 3,495 decks)
- Ouroboroid relevance 0.57 · 31.9% (1,116 of 3,495 decks)
- Animation Module relevance 0.81 · 7.4% (260 of 3,495 decks)
- Glen Elendra Archmage relevance 0.68 · 15.3% (536 of 3,495 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.71 · 13.0% (456 of 3,495 decks)
- Plaxmanta relevance 0.80 · 7.2% (251 of 3,495 decks)
- Tervigon relevance 0.73 · 10.9% (382 of 3,495 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.61 · 23.4% (818 of 3,495 decks)
- Plague Myr relevance 0.82 · 6.1% (214 of 3,495 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.60 · 24.0% (838 of 3,495 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.66 · 15.1% (527 of 3,495 decks)
- Glen Elendra Guardian relevance 0.76 · 8.7% (303 of 3,495 decks)
- Kodama of the West Tree relevance 0.59 · 23.5% (823 of 3,495 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.66 · 14.3% (499 of 3,495 decks)
- Blight Mamba relevance 0.80 · 5.7% (199 of 3,495 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Blighted Agent relevance 0.84 · 39.7% (1,386 of 3,495 decks)
- Cultivator of Blades relevance 0.93 · 27.4% (959 of 3,495 decks)
- Wild Beastmaster relevance 0.95 · 24.0% (840 of 3,495 decks)
- Sage of Hours relevance 0.81 · 39.9% (1,396 of 3,495 decks)
- Iridescent Hornbeetle relevance 0.84 · 34.8% (1,216 of 3,495 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.64 · 60.3% (2,106 of 3,495 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.65 · 54.8% (1,914 of 3,495 decks)
- Invisible Stalker relevance 0.81 · 32.3% (1,130 of 3,495 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.57 · 66.9% (2,337 of 3,495 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.56 · 58.2% (2,035 of 3,495 decks)
- Simic Manipulator relevance 0.81 · 20.5% (716 of 3,495 decks)
- Mycoloth relevance 0.81 · 15.5% (543 of 3,495 decks)
- Katara, Waterbending Master relevance 0.93 · 9.5% (333 of 3,495 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.70 · 26.9% (939 of 3,495 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.61 · 38.3% (1,340 of 3,495 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.58 · 43.0% (1,504 of 3,495 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.61 · 34.2% (1,196 of 3,495 decks)
- Cold-Eyed Selkie relevance 0.47 · 59.4% (2,077 of 3,495 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.65 · 26.9% (941 of 3,495 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.65 · 25.6% (894 of 3,495 decks)
- Giggling Skitterspike relevance 0.70 · 17.0% (593 of 3,495 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.51 · 48.8% (1,704 of 3,495 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.57 · 36.3% (1,267 of 3,495 decks)
- Tainted Observer relevance 0.75 · 12.5% (436 of 3,495 decks)
- Glistener Elf relevance 0.83 · 8.3% (290 of 3,495 decks)
- Ezuri, Stalker of Spheres relevance 0.74 · 13.0% (455 of 3,495 decks)
- Trygon Predator relevance 0.57 · 34.6% (1,210 of 3,495 decks)
- Heronblade Elite relevance 0.85 · 6.3% (219 of 3,495 decks)
- Viral Drake relevance 0.81 · 8.3% (290 of 3,495 decks)
- Shroofus Sproutsire relevance 0.85 · 6.0% (211 of 3,495 decks)
- Viridian Corrupter relevance 0.84 · 6.6% (230 of 3,495 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.51 · 43.7% (1,527 of 3,495 decks)
- Ouroboroid relevance 0.57 · 31.9% (1,116 of 3,495 decks)
- Glen Elendra Archmage relevance 0.68 · 15.3% (536 of 3,495 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.71 · 13.0% (456 of 3,495 decks)
- Plaxmanta relevance 0.80 · 7.2% (251 of 3,495 decks)
- Tervigon relevance 0.73 · 10.9% (382 of 3,495 decks)
- Plague Myr relevance 0.82 · 6.1% (214 of 3,495 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.60 · 24.0% (838 of 3,495 decks)
- Glen Elendra Guardian relevance 0.76 · 8.7% (303 of 3,495 decks)
- Kodama of the West Tree relevance 0.59 · 23.5% (823 of 3,495 decks)
- Blight Mamba relevance 0.80 · 5.7% (199 of 3,495 decks)
- Skatewing Spy relevance 0.74 · 9.1% (319 of 3,495 decks)
- The Astonishing Ant-Man relevance 0.76 · 7.3% (256 of 3,495 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.66 · 13.3% (464 of 3,495 decks)
- Vorinclex, Monstrous Raider relevance 0.65 · 13.9% (487 of 3,495 decks)
- Mausoleum Wanderer relevance 0.76 · 6.7% (233 of 3,495 decks)
- Kaseto, Orochi Archmage relevance 0.77 · 6.0% (211 of 3,495 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.41 · 54.5% (1,906 of 3,495 decks)
- Tuskguard Captain relevance 0.76 · 5.1% (179 of 3,495 decks)
All artifacts (30)
- Animation Module relevance 0.81 · 7.4% (260 of 3,495 decks)
- Aetheric Amplifier relevance 0.68 · 7.2% (252 of 3,495 decks)
- Scepter of Celebration relevance 0.81 · 4.0% (139 of 3,495 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.47 · 27.7% (968 of 3,495 decks)
- Contagion Clasp relevance 0.68 · 4.7% (164 of 3,495 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.46 · 17.5% (611 of 3,495 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.51 · 9.7% (339 of 3,495 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.46 · 12.4% (434 of 3,495 decks)
- Simic Keyrune relevance 0.70 · 3.2% (112 of 3,495 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.40 · 14.7% (515 of 3,495 decks)
- Contagion Engine relevance 0.65 · 3.3% (116 of 3,495 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.49 · 5.2% (182 of 3,495 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.51 · 4.4% (155 of 3,495 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.29 · 37.1% (1,298 of 3,495 decks)
- Sword of Truth and Justice relevance 0.65 · 2.8% (97 of 3,495 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.35 · 15.9% (554 of 3,495 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.50 · 4.0% (140 of 3,495 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.30 · 26.0% (907 of 3,495 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.30 · 18.9% (659 of 3,495 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.39 · 5.0% (176 of 3,495 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.50 · 2.9% (100 of 3,495 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.25 · 24.1% (842 of 3,495 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.26 · 13.7% (480 of 3,495 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.46 · 2.5% (87 of 3,495 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.45 · 2.7% (94 of 3,495 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.42 · 3.0% (105 of 3,495 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.42 · 2.9% (101 of 3,495 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (98 of 3,495 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.10 · 51.3% (1,794 of 3,495 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 77.5% (2,709 of 3,495 decks)
All enchantments (33)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.57 · 33.5% (1,172 of 3,495 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.48 · 38.7% (1,353 of 3,495 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.59 · 19.1% (666 of 3,495 decks)
- Awakening Zone relevance 0.68 · 10.2% (356 of 3,495 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.39 · 46.9% (1,638 of 3,495 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.50 · 22.4% (783 of 3,495 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.51 · 16.4% (573 of 3,495 decks)
- Primal Empathy relevance 0.61 · 7.5% (262 of 3,495 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.48 · 16.5% (577 of 3,495 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.38 · 40.1% (1,400 of 3,495 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.56 · 9.1% (317 of 3,495 decks)
- Court of Garenbrig relevance 0.57 · 6.0% (211 of 3,495 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.52 · 7.3% (254 of 3,495 decks)
- Fable of Wolf and Owl relevance 0.69 · 3.2% (113 of 3,495 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.50 · 6.6% (229 of 3,495 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.30 · 43.7% (1,527 of 3,495 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.37 · 20.0% (700 of 3,495 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.47 · 4.7% (164 of 3,495 decks)
- Corrupted Conscience relevance 0.62 · 2.8% (98 of 3,495 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.43 · 5.1% (179 of 3,495 decks)
- Hydra's Growth relevance 0.53 · 3.5% (122 of 3,495 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.50 · 3.2% (112 of 3,495 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.35 · 6.6% (230 of 3,495 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.28 · 15.8% (552 of 3,495 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.40 · 4.2% (148 of 3,495 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.34 · 4.8% (169 of 3,495 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.29 · 7.9% (275 of 3,495 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.36 · 3.8% (134 of 3,495 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.41 · 2.6% (91 of 3,495 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.40 · 2.7% (95 of 3,495 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.38 · 2.6% (91 of 3,495 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.34 · 2.9% (100 of 3,495 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.24 · 4.3% (152 of 3,495 decks)
All instants (50)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.72 · 25.5% (890 of 3,495 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.66 · 14.3% (499 of 3,495 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.64 · 14.1% (493 of 3,495 decks)
- Serum Snare relevance 0.68 · 7.7% (269 of 3,495 decks)
- Steady Progress relevance 0.71 · 6.0% (211 of 3,495 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.39 · 52.4% (1,832 of 3,495 decks)
- Bioshift relevance 0.63 · 8.8% (308 of 3,495 decks)
- Mutational Advantage relevance 0.51 · 18.1% (632 of 3,495 decks)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 0.64 · 5.1% (179 of 3,495 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.50 · 14.4% (504 of 3,495 decks)
- Snakeform relevance 0.74 · 3.6% (125 of 3,495 decks)
- Mirror Match relevance 0.82 · 2.9% (101 of 3,495 decks)
- Reject Imperfection relevance 0.65 · 4.3% (151 of 3,495 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.54 · 6.3% (221 of 3,495 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.51 · 7.9% (276 of 3,495 decks)
- Fuel for the Cause relevance 0.67 · 3.7% (128 of 3,495 decks)
- Infectious Bite relevance 0.65 · 3.7% (129 of 3,495 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 0.43 · 13.5% (473 of 3,495 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.38 · 21.4% (748 of 3,495 decks)
- Cobra Trap relevance 0.78 · 2.5% (87 of 3,495 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.48 · 7.8% (271 of 3,495 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.40 · 14.1% (492 of 3,495 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.43 · 10.8% (379 of 3,495 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.45 · 8.3% (290 of 3,495 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.47 · 6.6% (232 of 3,495 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.42 · 7.6% (266 of 3,495 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.43 · 6.2% (218 of 3,495 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.35 · 14.0% (490 of 3,495 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.38 · 9.1% (317 of 3,495 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.38 · 7.4% (259 of 3,495 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.28 · 24.7% (864 of 3,495 decks)
- Radstorm relevance 0.57 · 2.7% (93 of 3,495 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.28 · 24.7% (864 of 3,495 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.32 · 13.0% (453 of 3,495 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.27 · 26.8% (937 of 3,495 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.24 · 37.9% (1,325 of 3,495 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.23 · 39.1% (1,367 of 3,495 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.45 · 3.6% (127 of 3,495 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.30 · 12.9% (452 of 3,495 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.44 · 3.7% (130 of 3,495 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.28 · 18.3% (639 of 3,495 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.26 · 22.5% (788 of 3,495 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.31 · 10.1% (353 of 3,495 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.43 · 3.7% (129 of 3,495 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.27 · 14.6% (512 of 3,495 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.47 · 2.6% (92 of 3,495 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.42 · 3.3% (115 of 3,495 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.30 · 6.2% (216 of 3,495 decks)
- Plasm Capture relevance 0.45 · 2.6% (90 of 3,495 decks)
- Silkguard relevance 0.34 · 4.1% (145 of 3,495 decks)
All sorceries (41)
- Fungal Sprouting relevance 0.82 · 9.2% (322 of 3,495 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.61 · 23.4% (818 of 3,495 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.66 · 15.1% (527 of 3,495 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.64 · 12.3% (430 of 3,495 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 0.66 · 9.8% (342 of 3,495 decks)
- Smell Fear relevance 0.69 · 6.3% (219 of 3,495 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.56 · 12.4% (434 of 3,495 decks)
- Carnivorous Canopy relevance 0.69 · 4.2% (146 of 3,495 decks)
- Verdant Confluence relevance 0.72 · 3.8% (134 of 3,495 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.57 · 6.4% (223 of 3,495 decks)
- Fangs of Kalonia relevance 0.56 · 5.7% (199 of 3,495 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.39 · 26.7% (932 of 3,495 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.52 · 7.4% (259 of 3,495 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.51 · 7.2% (252 of 3,495 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.38 · 21.3% (743 of 3,495 decks)
- Biomantic Mastery relevance 0.70 · 2.9% (101 of 3,495 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.49 · 4.9% (170 of 3,495 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.42 · 8.9% (310 of 3,495 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.44 · 6.2% (217 of 3,495 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.38 · 11.7% (410 of 3,495 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.47 · 4.6% (162 of 3,495 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.44 · 5.0% (174 of 3,495 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.38 · 10.2% (355 of 3,495 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.32 · 10.7% (374 of 3,495 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.51 · 2.9% (100 of 3,495 decks)
- Sylvan Offering relevance 0.53 · 2.6% (90 of 3,495 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.21 · 38.6% (1,349 of 3,495 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.40 · 3.8% (132 of 3,495 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.30 · 9.2% (322 of 3,495 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.24 · 20.7% (722 of 3,495 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.22 · 24.9% (870 of 3,495 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.35 · 4.1% (143 of 3,495 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.23 · 21.1% (736 of 3,495 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.35 · 4.1% (142 of 3,495 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.20 · 27.7% (969 of 3,495 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.18 · 34.0% (1,190 of 3,495 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.38 · 2.8% (99 of 3,495 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.34 · 3.1% (108 of 3,495 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.32 · 3.1% (110 of 3,495 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.30 · 2.9% (102 of 3,495 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.23 · 4.2% (146 of 3,495 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (4)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.79 · 13.4% (469 of 3,495 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.66 · 4.1% (143 of 3,495 decks)
- Jiang Yanggu, Wildcrafter relevance 0.61 · 3.6% (127 of 3,495 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.41 · 5.2% (181 of 3,495 decks)
All utility lands (41)
- Inkmoth Nexus relevance 0.72 · 12.8% (448 of 3,495 decks)
- Novijen, Heart of Progress relevance 0.60 · 17.8% (622 of 3,495 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.69 · 7.8% (273 of 3,495 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.55 · 13.0% (456 of 3,495 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.42 · 33.8% (1,181 of 3,495 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.44 · 26.1% (913 of 3,495 decks)
- Zoetic Cavern relevance 0.75 · 3.7% (131 of 3,495 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.49 · 12.6% (440 of 3,495 decks)
- High Market relevance 0.71 · 3.1% (108 of 3,495 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.46 · 9.1% (317 of 3,495 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.53 · 4.5% (156 of 3,495 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.45 · 7.5% (261 of 3,495 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.33 · 21.5% (752 of 3,495 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.27 · 35.1% (1,226 of 3,495 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.38 · 5.8% (203 of 3,495 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.29 · 20.1% (704 of 3,495 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.53 · 3.0% (104 of 3,495 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.39 · 4.7% (166 of 3,495 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.28 · 15.5% (540 of 3,495 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.34 · 7.7% (268 of 3,495 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.34 · 6.6% (229 of 3,495 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.29 · 13.9% (485 of 3,495 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.26 · 17.2% (602 of 3,495 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.27 · 13.1% (458 of 3,495 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.21 · 32.2% (1,127 of 3,495 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.26 · 12.1% (422 of 3,495 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.30 · 6.6% (230 of 3,495 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.41 · 3.1% (110 of 3,495 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.28 · 8.6% (301 of 3,495 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.37 · 3.6% (127 of 3,495 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.42 · 2.7% (93 of 3,495 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.41 · 2.7% (95 of 3,495 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.24 · 11.4% (399 of 3,495 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.39 · 2.9% (102 of 3,495 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.38 · 2.9% (102 of 3,495 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.40 · 2.6% (91 of 3,495 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.37 · 3.0% (104 of 3,495 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.30 · 3.9% (138 of 3,495 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.34 · 3.1% (109 of 3,495 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.15 · 41.7% (1,459 of 3,495 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.29 · 2.5% (87 of 3,495 decks)
All lands (50)
- Hadana's Climb // Winged Temple of Orazca relevance 0.57 · 11.9% (416 of 3,495 decks)
- Vivid Grove relevance 0.61 · 4.3% (151 of 3,495 decks)
- Vivid Creek relevance 0.61 · 4.1% (142 of 3,495 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.36 · 20.8% (726 of 3,495 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.34 · 21.2% (742 of 3,495 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.40 · 10.6% (371 of 3,495 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.44 · 6.8% (238 of 3,495 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.45 · 5.3% (186 of 3,495 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.43 · 5.6% (196 of 3,495 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.42 · 6.2% (215 of 3,495 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.31 · 25.4% (889 of 3,495 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.40 · 6.8% (238 of 3,495 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.29 · 23.2% (810 of 3,495 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.28 · 22.3% (780 of 3,495 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.37 · 4.9% (173 of 3,495 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.28 · 16.9% (589 of 3,495 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.31 · 11.1% (388 of 3,495 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.31 · 11.0% (386 of 3,495 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.33 · 6.8% (236 of 3,495 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.26 · 16.5% (577 of 3,495 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.31 · 6.4% (222 of 3,495 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.46 · 2.9% (100 of 3,495 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.25 · 16.8% (587 of 3,495 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.22 · 27.1% (948 of 3,495 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.23 · 22.9% (799 of 3,495 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.32 · 5.3% (186 of 3,495 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.18 · 42.9% (1,501 of 3,495 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.33 · 4.5% (158 of 3,495 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.30 · 5.5% (192 of 3,495 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.25 · 12.0% (419 of 3,495 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.40 · 3.1% (109 of 3,495 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.32 · 4.4% (154 of 3,495 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.32 · 4.3% (151 of 3,495 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.18 · 36.8% (1,287 of 3,495 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.18 · 37.9% (1,325 of 3,495 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.16 · 48.5% (1,696 of 3,495 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.16 · 44.4% (1,553 of 3,495 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.41 · 2.5% (89 of 3,495 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.15 · 48.6% (1,697 of 3,495 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.26 · 5.2% (182 of 3,495 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.35 · 3.1% (109 of 3,495 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.37 · 2.8% (97 of 3,495 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.13 · 53.8% (1,882 of 3,495 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.31 · 3.7% (128 of 3,495 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.36 · 2.5% (87 of 3,495 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.10 · 67.1% (2,344 of 3,495 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.32 · 2.5% (87 of 3,495 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.05 · 82.1% (2,869 of 3,495 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 93.5% (3,267 of 3,495 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 93.3% (3,262 of 3,495 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Ezuri, Claw of Progress, from 3,495 real Commander decks.