Quirion Druid
Played in 63 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
23.5% Green
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (7)
- Seton, Krosan Protector relevance 1.41 · 1.1% (7 of 622 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 1.33 · 1.6% (5 of 315 decks)
- Autumn Willow, Harmony relevance 0.97 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Bumi, Eclectic Earthbender relevance 0.95 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.62 · 3.7% (1 of 27 decks)
- Greensleeves relevance 0.51 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Marwyn, the Preserver relevance 0.50 · 1.4% (1 of 73 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 1.85 · 42.9% (27 of 63 decks)
- Nature's Revolt relevance 1.83 · 33.3% (21 of 63 decks)
- Living Lands relevance 1.60 · 30.2% (19 of 63 decks)
- Waker of the Wilds relevance 1.45 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Natural Affinity relevance 1.43 · 27.0% (17 of 63 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 1.40 · 31.7% (20 of 63 decks)
- Awakening of Vitu-Ghazi relevance 1.40 · 25.4% (16 of 63 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 1.23 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Llanowar Loamspeaker relevance 1.20 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Emergent Sequence relevance 1.16 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
- Ambush Commander relevance 1.13 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 1.12 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 1.10 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 1.09 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 1.08 · 52.4% (33 of 63 decks)
- Life and Limb relevance 1.07 · 25.4% (16 of 63 decks)
- Llanowar Druid relevance 1.04 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Embodiment of Insight relevance 1.02 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
- Liege of the Tangle relevance 1.00 · 19.0% (12 of 63 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 1.00 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.96 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
- Jolrael, Empress of Beasts relevance 0.85 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
- Earthbending Student relevance 0.84 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.84 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Rampaging Growth relevance 0.83 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
- Druid Lyrist relevance 0.83 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Wakeroot Elemental relevance 0.82 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.81 · 25.4% (16 of 63 decks)
- Ainok Survivalist relevance 0.80 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Elvish Branchbender relevance 0.80 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
All creatures (26)
- Waker of the Wilds relevance 1.45 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 1.23 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Llanowar Loamspeaker relevance 1.20 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Ambush Commander relevance 1.13 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 1.10 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Llanowar Druid relevance 1.04 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Embodiment of Insight relevance 1.02 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
- Liege of the Tangle relevance 1.00 · 19.0% (12 of 63 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.96 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
- Jolrael, Empress of Beasts relevance 0.85 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
- Earthbending Student relevance 0.84 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
- Druid Lyrist relevance 0.83 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Wakeroot Elemental relevance 0.82 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Ainok Survivalist relevance 0.80 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Elvish Branchbender relevance 0.80 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
- Den Protector relevance 0.80 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Toph, Earthbending Master relevance 0.80 · 19.0% (12 of 63 decks)
- Nantuko Vigilante relevance 0.76 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- The Legend of Kyoshi // Avatar Kyoshi relevance 0.72 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Hauntwoods Shrieker relevance 0.68 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
- Toph, the Blind Bandit relevance 0.66 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Avatar Kyoshi, Earthbender relevance 0.66 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf Archdruid relevance 0.64 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.64 · 25.4% (16 of 63 decks)
- Bumi, Eclectic Earthbender relevance 0.64 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Badgermole relevance 0.63 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
All enchantments (7)
- Nature's Revolt relevance 1.83 · 33.3% (21 of 63 decks)
- Living Lands relevance 1.60 · 30.2% (19 of 63 decks)
- Life and Limb relevance 1.07 · 25.4% (16 of 63 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.81 · 25.4% (16 of 63 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.79 · 25.4% (16 of 63 decks)
- Solid Ground relevance 0.70 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Evolutionary Leap relevance 0.70 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
All instants (4)
- Natural Affinity relevance 1.43 · 27.0% (17 of 63 decks)
- Awakening of Vitu-Ghazi relevance 1.40 · 25.4% (16 of 63 decks)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 1.09 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
- Rampaging Growth relevance 0.83 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 1.40 · 31.7% (20 of 63 decks)
- Emergent Sequence relevance 1.16 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 1.00 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.84 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Rockalanche relevance 0.70 · 19.0% (12 of 63 decks)
All planeswalkers (3)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 1.85 · 42.9% (27 of 63 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 1.12 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 1.08 · 52.4% (33 of 63 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Treetop Village relevance 0.98 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Soulstone Sanctuary relevance 0.69 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.67 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.67 · 25.4% (16 of 63 decks)
- Blinkmoth Nexus relevance 0.64 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
EDH data for Quirion Druid: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 63 real decks.