Sylvok Explorer
Played in 75 Green decks
930+45+3+2+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Kogla, the Titan Ape 1.9% of decks
Kogla, the Titan Ape 1.9% of decks
Kamahl, Fist of Krosa 1.3% of decks
Kamahl, Fist of Krosa 1.3% of decks
Halana, Kessig Ranger 5.9% of decks
Halana, Kessig Ranger 5.9% of decks
Kodama of the South Tree 1.8% of decks
Kodama of the South Tree 1.8% of decks
Glissa Sunseeker 1.5% of decks
Glissa Sunseeker 1.5% of decks
Captain Kathryn Janeway 1.4% of decks
Captain Kathryn Janeway 1.4% of decks
Most Relevant
Wose Pathfinder 29.3% of decks
Wose Pathfinder 29.3% of decks
Scorned Villager // Moonscarred Werewolf 24.0% of decks
Scorned Villager // Moonscarred Werewolf 24.0% of decks
Quirion Explorer 24.0% of decks
Quirion Explorer 24.0% of decks
Reclusive Taxidermist 20.0% of decks
Reclusive Taxidermist 20.0% of decks
Naga Vitalist 20.0% of decks
Naga Vitalist 20.0% of decks
Humble Naturalist 16.0% of decks
Humble Naturalist 16.0% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (9)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 1.44 · 1.9% (6 of 317 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 1.08 · 1.3% (4 of 312 decks)
- Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.66 · 5.9% (1 of 17 decks)
- Kodama of the South Tree relevance 0.51 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Glissa Sunseeker relevance 0.48 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Captain Kathryn Janeway relevance 0.48 · 1.4% (1 of 69 decks)
- Fblthp, Knows the Way relevance 0.46 · 1.3% (1 of 78 decks)
- Kaysa relevance 0.46 · 1.2% (1 of 83 decks)
- Iwamori of the Open Fist relevance 0.45 · 1.1% (1 of 88 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Wose Pathfinder relevance 1.55 · 29.3% (22 of 75 decks)
- Scorned Villager // Moonscarred Werewolf relevance 1.42 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
- Quirion Explorer relevance 1.30 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
- Reclusive Taxidermist relevance 1.28 · 20.0% (15 of 75 decks)
- Naga Vitalist relevance 1.21 · 20.0% (15 of 75 decks)
- Humble Naturalist relevance 1.03 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Whisperer of the Wilds relevance 1.00 · 30.7% (23 of 75 decks)
- Werebear relevance 1.00 · 33.3% (25 of 75 decks)
- Intrepid Paleontologist relevance 0.98 · 17.3% (13 of 75 decks)
- Golden Hind relevance 0.95 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Orochi Sustainer relevance 0.94 · 17.3% (13 of 75 decks)
- Quirion Elves relevance 0.89 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Elfhame Druid relevance 0.89 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Ulvenwald Captive // Ulvenwald Abomination relevance 0.87 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Vine Trellis relevance 0.86 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Raucous Audience relevance 0.86 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
- Magus of the Library relevance 0.84 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 0.78 · 20.0% (15 of 75 decks)
- Wirewood Elf relevance 0.78 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Three Tree Rootweaver relevance 0.78 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Leafkin Druid relevance 0.76 · 17.3% (13 of 75 decks)
- Heart Warden relevance 0.71 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Karametra's Acolyte relevance 0.67 · 29.3% (22 of 75 decks)
- Greenweaver Druid relevance 0.66 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 0.64 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Leaf Gilder relevance 0.64 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Goobbue Gardener relevance 0.64 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Somberwald Sage relevance 0.61 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Reap and Sow relevance 0.61 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Drumhunter relevance 0.61 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
All creatures (45)
- Wose Pathfinder relevance 1.55 · 29.3% (22 of 75 decks)
- Scorned Villager // Moonscarred Werewolf relevance 1.42 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
- Quirion Explorer relevance 1.30 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
- Reclusive Taxidermist relevance 1.28 · 20.0% (15 of 75 decks)
- Naga Vitalist relevance 1.21 · 20.0% (15 of 75 decks)
- Humble Naturalist relevance 1.03 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Whisperer of the Wilds relevance 1.00 · 30.7% (23 of 75 decks)
- Werebear relevance 1.00 · 33.3% (25 of 75 decks)
- Intrepid Paleontologist relevance 0.98 · 17.3% (13 of 75 decks)
- Golden Hind relevance 0.95 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Orochi Sustainer relevance 0.94 · 17.3% (13 of 75 decks)
- Quirion Elves relevance 0.89 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Elfhame Druid relevance 0.89 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Ulvenwald Captive // Ulvenwald Abomination relevance 0.87 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Vine Trellis relevance 0.86 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Raucous Audience relevance 0.86 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
- Magus of the Library relevance 0.84 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 0.78 · 20.0% (15 of 75 decks)
- Wirewood Elf relevance 0.78 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Three Tree Rootweaver relevance 0.78 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Leafkin Druid relevance 0.76 · 17.3% (13 of 75 decks)
- Heart Warden relevance 0.71 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Karametra's Acolyte relevance 0.67 · 29.3% (22 of 75 decks)
- Greenweaver Druid relevance 0.66 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 0.64 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Leaf Gilder relevance 0.64 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Goobbue Gardener relevance 0.64 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Somberwald Sage relevance 0.61 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Drumhunter relevance 0.61 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Nightshade Dryad relevance 0.59 · 18.7% (14 of 75 decks)
- Drover of the Mighty relevance 0.58 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Voyaging Satyr relevance 0.58 · 12.0% (9 of 75 decks)
- Hardbristle Bandit relevance 0.58 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elder relevance 0.58 · 12.0% (9 of 75 decks)
- Tender Wildguide relevance 0.57 · 12.0% (9 of 75 decks)
- Poison Dart Frog relevance 0.57 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Viridian Joiner relevance 0.54 · 12.0% (9 of 75 decks)
- Bugenhagen, Wise Elder relevance 0.50 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Copper Myr relevance 0.49 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Shaman of Forgotten Ways relevance 0.47 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 0.46 · 12.0% (9 of 75 decks)
- Llanowar Loamspeaker relevance 0.45 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.45 · 18.7% (14 of 75 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.43 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Dragon Sniper relevance 0.42 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
All instants (3)
- Blitzball Shot relevance 0.52 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.47 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.40 · 22.7% (17 of 75 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Reap and Sow relevance 0.61 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 0.51 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
EDH data for Sylvok Explorer: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 75 real decks.























