Devouring Deep
Played in 43 Azorius decks
130+22+1+3+14+10+
Color Identity Spread
18.5% Azorius
Commanders
Most Relevant
Deep Freeze 76.7% of decks
Deep Freeze 76.7% of decks
Cryptoplasm 74.4% of decks
Cryptoplasm 74.4% of decks
Daring Sleuth // Bearer of Overwhelming Truths 72.1% of decks
Daring Sleuth // Bearer of Overwhelming Truths 72.1% of decks
Discontinuity 74.4% of decks
Discontinuity 74.4% of decks
Cloak of Feathers 69.8% of decks
Cloak of Feathers 69.8% of decks
Deem Inferior 69.8% of decks
Deem Inferior 69.8% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Gosta Dirk relevance 0.74 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Deep Freeze relevance 5.17 · 76.7% (33 of 43 decks)
- Cryptoplasm relevance 5.12 · 74.4% (32 of 43 decks)
- Daring Sleuth // Bearer of Overwhelming Truths relevance 4.91 · 72.1% (31 of 43 decks)
- Discontinuity relevance 4.83 · 74.4% (32 of 43 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 4.82 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Deem Inferior relevance 4.80 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Dispelling Exhale relevance 4.78 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Contradict relevance 4.78 · 72.1% (31 of 43 decks)
- Dragon's Eye Savants relevance 4.75 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Deepmuck Desperado relevance 4.75 · 74.4% (32 of 43 decks)
- Compelling Argument relevance 4.75 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Deny Existence relevance 4.75 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Counsel of the Soratami relevance 4.73 · 72.1% (31 of 43 decks)
- Cosmic Epiphany relevance 4.72 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Dance of Many relevance 4.71 · 74.4% (32 of 43 decks)
- Curfew relevance 4.71 · 72.1% (31 of 43 decks)
- Dire Downdraft relevance 4.69 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Curse of Echoes relevance 4.66 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Djinni Windseer relevance 4.65 · 67.4% (29 of 43 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 4.64 · 67.4% (29 of 43 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 4.64 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Departed Deckhand relevance 4.63 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Devious Cover-Up relevance 4.62 · 74.4% (32 of 43 decks)
- Cosi's Trickster relevance 4.60 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 4.59 · 67.4% (29 of 43 decks)
- Court Hussar relevance 4.59 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Conundrum Sphinx relevance 4.59 · 67.4% (29 of 43 decks)
- Disciple of the Ring relevance 4.59 · 72.1% (31 of 43 decks)
- Deceiver Exarch relevance 4.56 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Cultural Exchange relevance 4.56 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
All creatures (22)
- Cryptoplasm relevance 5.12 · 74.4% (32 of 43 decks)
- Daring Sleuth // Bearer of Overwhelming Truths relevance 4.91 · 72.1% (31 of 43 decks)
- Dragon's Eye Savants relevance 4.75 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Deepmuck Desperado relevance 4.75 · 74.4% (32 of 43 decks)
- Djinni Windseer relevance 4.65 · 67.4% (29 of 43 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 4.64 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Departed Deckhand relevance 4.63 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Cosi's Trickster relevance 4.60 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Court Hussar relevance 4.59 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Conundrum Sphinx relevance 4.59 · 67.4% (29 of 43 decks)
- Disciple of the Ring relevance 4.59 · 72.1% (31 of 43 decks)
- Deceiver Exarch relevance 4.56 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 4.55 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Conspiracy Unraveler relevance 4.54 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Disruptive Student relevance 4.51 · 67.4% (29 of 43 decks)
- Air Elemental relevance 4.50 · 65.1% (28 of 43 decks)
- Covert Technician relevance 4.48 · 67.4% (29 of 43 decks)
- Academy Researchers relevance 4.48 · 67.4% (29 of 43 decks)
- Constrictor Sage relevance 4.48 · 67.4% (29 of 43 decks)
- Deluge Virtuoso relevance 4.45 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Coveted Peacock relevance 4.45 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Disruptive Pitmage relevance 4.44 · 65.1% (28 of 43 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Collector's Case relevance 4.45 · 65.1% (28 of 43 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Deep Freeze relevance 5.17 · 76.7% (33 of 43 decks)
- Dance of Many relevance 4.71 · 74.4% (32 of 43 decks)
- Curse of Echoes relevance 4.66 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
All instants (14)
- Discontinuity relevance 4.83 · 74.4% (32 of 43 decks)
- Dispelling Exhale relevance 4.78 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Contradict relevance 4.78 · 72.1% (31 of 43 decks)
- Deny Existence relevance 4.75 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Curfew relevance 4.71 · 72.1% (31 of 43 decks)
- Dire Downdraft relevance 4.69 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 4.64 · 67.4% (29 of 43 decks)
- Devious Cover-Up relevance 4.62 · 74.4% (32 of 43 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 4.59 · 67.4% (29 of 43 decks)
- Catalog relevance 4.49 · 67.4% (29 of 43 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 4.47 · 74.4% (32 of 43 decks)
- Complicate relevance 4.42 · 67.4% (29 of 43 decks)
- Deny Entry relevance 4.42 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Commence the Endgame relevance 4.40 · 67.4% (29 of 43 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 4.82 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Deem Inferior relevance 4.80 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Compelling Argument relevance 4.75 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Counsel of the Soratami relevance 4.73 · 72.1% (31 of 43 decks)
- Cosmic Epiphany relevance 4.72 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Cultural Exchange relevance 4.56 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Concentrate relevance 4.55 · 76.7% (33 of 43 decks)
- Defy Death relevance 4.44 · 67.4% (29 of 43 decks)
- Distant Memories relevance 4.42 · 65.1% (28 of 43 decks)
- Drag Under relevance 4.40 · 65.1% (28 of 43 decks)
EDH data for Devouring Deep: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 43 real decks.













































