Devouring Deep
Played in 92 Blue decks
430+37+3+3+2+4+1+
Color Identity Spread
39.7% Blue
Commanders
Tui and La, Moon and Ocean 3.3% of decks
Tui and La, Moon and Ocean 3.3% of decks
Ray Fillet, Man Ray 12.5% of decks
Ray Fillet, Man Ray 12.5% of decks
K-9, Mark I 5.0% of decks
K-9, Mark I 5.0% of decks
James, Wandering Dad // Follow Him 1.2% of decks
James, Wandering Dad // Follow Him 1.2% of decks
Most Relevant
Manta Ray 50.0% of decks
Manta Ray 50.0% of decks
Dandân 47.8% of decks
Dandân 47.8% of decks
Flying Dolphin-Fish 43.5% of decks
Flying Dolphin-Fish 43.5% of decks
Kapsho Kitefins 41.3% of decks
Kapsho Kitefins 41.3% of decks
Fishliver Oil 51.1% of decks
Fishliver Oil 51.1% of decks
Bubble Smuggler 40.2% of decks
Bubble Smuggler 40.2% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (4)
- Tui and La, Moon and Ocean relevance 2.26 · 3.3% (17 of 515 decks)
- Ray Fillet, Man Ray relevance 0.71 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- K-9, Mark I relevance 0.60 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- James, Wandering Dad // Follow Him relevance 0.42 · 1.2% (1 of 82 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Manta Ray relevance 3.45 · 50.0% (46 of 92 decks)
- Dandân relevance 2.93 · 47.8% (44 of 92 decks)
- Flying Dolphin-Fish relevance 2.83 · 43.5% (40 of 92 decks)
- Kapsho Kitefins relevance 2.77 · 41.3% (38 of 92 decks)
- Fishliver Oil relevance 2.67 · 51.1% (47 of 92 decks)
- Bubble Smuggler relevance 2.55 · 40.2% (37 of 92 decks)
- Moat Piranhas relevance 2.47 · 35.9% (33 of 92 decks)
- Breaching Hippocamp relevance 2.47 · 41.3% (38 of 92 decks)
- Giant Koi relevance 2.42 · 44.6% (41 of 92 decks)
- Mystic Skyfish relevance 2.34 · 34.8% (32 of 92 decks)
- Benthic Behemoth relevance 2.25 · 34.8% (32 of 92 decks)
- Harbor Serpent relevance 2.24 · 35.9% (33 of 92 decks)
- Stinging Lionfish relevance 2.24 · 44.6% (41 of 92 decks)
- Colossal Whale relevance 2.07 · 43.5% (40 of 92 decks)
- Windrider Eel relevance 2.07 · 32.6% (30 of 92 decks)
- Skitter Eel relevance 2.01 · 33.7% (31 of 92 decks)
- Aboleth Spawn relevance 1.99 · 46.7% (43 of 92 decks)
- Tidal Barracuda relevance 1.96 · 44.6% (41 of 92 decks)
- Jace's Mindseeker relevance 1.96 · 41.3% (38 of 92 decks)
- Surge Mare relevance 1.96 · 32.6% (30 of 92 decks)
- Skyswimmer Koi relevance 1.90 · 31.5% (29 of 92 decks)
- Sleep with the Fishes relevance 1.87 · 29.3% (27 of 92 decks)
- Ichthyomorphosis relevance 1.87 · 34.8% (32 of 92 decks)
- Coral Barrier relevance 1.80 · 27.2% (25 of 92 decks)
- Fishing Pole relevance 1.76 · 29.3% (27 of 92 decks)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 1.67 · 41.3% (38 of 92 decks)
- Fleet Swallower relevance 1.59 · 45.7% (42 of 92 decks)
- Inkfathom Divers relevance 1.57 · 22.8% (21 of 92 decks)
- Enclave Elite relevance 1.55 · 22.8% (21 of 92 decks)
- Inkwell Leviathan relevance 1.48 · 38.0% (35 of 92 decks)
All creatures (37)
- Manta Ray relevance 3.45 · 50.0% (46 of 92 decks)
- Dandân relevance 2.93 · 47.8% (44 of 92 decks)
- Flying Dolphin-Fish relevance 2.83 · 43.5% (40 of 92 decks)
- Kapsho Kitefins relevance 2.77 · 41.3% (38 of 92 decks)
- Bubble Smuggler relevance 2.55 · 40.2% (37 of 92 decks)
- Moat Piranhas relevance 2.47 · 35.9% (33 of 92 decks)
- Breaching Hippocamp relevance 2.47 · 41.3% (38 of 92 decks)
- Giant Koi relevance 2.42 · 44.6% (41 of 92 decks)
- Mystic Skyfish relevance 2.34 · 34.8% (32 of 92 decks)
- Benthic Behemoth relevance 2.25 · 34.8% (32 of 92 decks)
- Harbor Serpent relevance 2.24 · 35.9% (33 of 92 decks)
- Stinging Lionfish relevance 2.24 · 44.6% (41 of 92 decks)
- Colossal Whale relevance 2.07 · 43.5% (40 of 92 decks)
- Windrider Eel relevance 2.07 · 32.6% (30 of 92 decks)
- Skitter Eel relevance 2.01 · 33.7% (31 of 92 decks)
- Aboleth Spawn relevance 1.99 · 46.7% (43 of 92 decks)
- Tidal Barracuda relevance 1.96 · 44.6% (41 of 92 decks)
- Jace's Mindseeker relevance 1.96 · 41.3% (38 of 92 decks)
- Surge Mare relevance 1.96 · 32.6% (30 of 92 decks)
- Skyswimmer Koi relevance 1.90 · 31.5% (29 of 92 decks)
- Coral Barrier relevance 1.80 · 27.2% (25 of 92 decks)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 1.67 · 41.3% (38 of 92 decks)
- Fleet Swallower relevance 1.59 · 45.7% (42 of 92 decks)
- Inkfathom Divers relevance 1.57 · 22.8% (21 of 92 decks)
- Enclave Elite relevance 1.55 · 22.8% (21 of 92 decks)
- Inkwell Leviathan relevance 1.48 · 38.0% (35 of 92 decks)
- Scrounging Skyray relevance 1.38 · 23.9% (22 of 92 decks)
- Rishadan Dockhand relevance 1.36 · 23.9% (22 of 92 decks)
- Stormtide Leviathan relevance 1.34 · 45.7% (42 of 92 decks)
- Merfolk Spy relevance 1.34 · 22.8% (21 of 92 decks)
- Reef Worm relevance 1.27 · 27.2% (25 of 92 decks)
- The Flood of Mars relevance 1.14 · 29.3% (27 of 92 decks)
- Tui and La, Moon and Ocean relevance 1.14 · 26.1% (24 of 92 decks)
- Wavebreak Hippocamp relevance 1.14 · 46.7% (43 of 92 decks)
- Ray Fillet, Man Ray relevance 0.98 · 16.3% (15 of 92 decks)
- Reservoir Kraken relevance 0.97 · 18.5% (17 of 92 decks)
- Ray Fillet, Wave Warrior relevance 0.92 · 17.4% (16 of 92 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Fishing Pole relevance 1.76 · 29.3% (27 of 92 decks)
- Fishing Gear relevance 0.99 · 16.3% (15 of 92 decks)
- Quicksilver Fountain relevance 0.93 · 20.7% (19 of 92 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Fishliver Oil relevance 2.67 · 51.1% (47 of 92 decks)
- Sleep with the Fishes relevance 1.87 · 29.3% (27 of 92 decks)
- Ichthyomorphosis relevance 1.87 · 34.8% (32 of 92 decks)
All instants (2)
- Piracy Charm relevance 1.05 · 17.4% (16 of 92 decks)
- Unagi's Spray relevance 0.96 · 15.2% (14 of 92 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Mind Spiral relevance 0.98 · 16.3% (15 of 92 decks)
- Drawn from Dreams relevance 0.93 · 18.5% (17 of 92 decks)
- Flow of Ideas relevance 0.85 · 23.9% (22 of 92 decks)
- Part Water relevance 0.82 · 12.0% (11 of 92 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Fountainport relevance 0.98 · 25.0% (23 of 92 decks)
EDH data for Devouring Deep: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 92 real decks.



























