Devouring Deep
Played in 38 Simic decks
230+32+1+6+2+4+1+4+
Color Identity Spread
16.4% Simic
Commanders
Most Relevant
River Boa 44.7% of decks
River Boa 44.7% of decks
Fishliver Oil 44.7% of decks
Fishliver Oil 44.7% of decks
Eluge, the Shoreless Sea 60.5% of decks
Eluge, the Shoreless Sea 60.5% of decks
Enclave Elite 39.5% of decks
Enclave Elite 39.5% of decks
Colossal Whale 55.3% of decks
Colossal Whale 55.3% of decks
Merfolk Spy 39.5% of decks
Merfolk Spy 39.5% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Xolatoyac, the Smiling Flood relevance 2.32 · 1.2% (17 of 1,412 decks)
- Nael, Avizoa Aeronaut relevance 0.60 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- River Boa relevance 3.03 · 44.7% (17 of 38 decks)
- Fishliver Oil relevance 2.86 · 44.7% (17 of 38 decks)
- Eluge, the Shoreless Sea relevance 2.74 · 60.5% (23 of 38 decks)
- Enclave Elite relevance 2.71 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
- Colossal Whale relevance 2.59 · 55.3% (21 of 38 decks)
- Merfolk Spy relevance 2.41 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
- Benthic Behemoth relevance 2.39 · 36.8% (14 of 38 decks)
- Stormtide Leviathan relevance 2.15 · 68.4% (26 of 38 decks)
- Meandering Towershell relevance 2.10 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Stinging Lionfish relevance 2.06 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Harbor Serpent relevance 2.02 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- The Flood of Mars relevance 1.90 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Rishadan Dockhand relevance 1.84 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Inkwell Leviathan relevance 1.81 · 52.6% (20 of 38 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 1.75 · 57.9% (22 of 38 decks)
- Tui and La, Moon and Ocean relevance 1.57 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Ichthyomorphosis relevance 1.47 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- The Sea Devils relevance 1.47 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Fishing Pole relevance 1.43 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Cold-Eyed Selkie relevance 1.30 · 55.3% (21 of 38 decks)
- Thada Adel, Acquisitor relevance 1.25 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Streambed Aquitects relevance 1.23 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Wavebreak Hippocamp relevance 1.21 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Elusive Krasis relevance 1.18 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- High Tide relevance 1.16 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Merrow Harbinger relevance 1.16 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Fisher's Talent relevance 1.11 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Tidal Barracuda relevance 1.02 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Bounty of the Luxa relevance 1.02 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Aquitect's Will relevance 0.95 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
All creatures (32)
- River Boa relevance 3.03 · 44.7% (17 of 38 decks)
- Eluge, the Shoreless Sea relevance 2.74 · 60.5% (23 of 38 decks)
- Enclave Elite relevance 2.71 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
- Colossal Whale relevance 2.59 · 55.3% (21 of 38 decks)
- Merfolk Spy relevance 2.41 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
- Benthic Behemoth relevance 2.39 · 36.8% (14 of 38 decks)
- Stormtide Leviathan relevance 2.15 · 68.4% (26 of 38 decks)
- Meandering Towershell relevance 2.10 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Stinging Lionfish relevance 2.06 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Harbor Serpent relevance 2.02 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- The Flood of Mars relevance 1.90 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Rishadan Dockhand relevance 1.84 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Inkwell Leviathan relevance 1.81 · 52.6% (20 of 38 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 1.75 · 57.9% (22 of 38 decks)
- Tui and La, Moon and Ocean relevance 1.57 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Cold-Eyed Selkie relevance 1.30 · 55.3% (21 of 38 decks)
- Thada Adel, Acquisitor relevance 1.25 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Streambed Aquitects relevance 1.23 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Wavebreak Hippocamp relevance 1.21 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Elusive Krasis relevance 1.18 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Merrow Harbinger relevance 1.16 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Tidal Barracuda relevance 1.02 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Stonybrook Banneret relevance 0.89 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Murkfiend Liege relevance 0.83 · 36.8% (14 of 38 decks)
- Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 0.78 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Master of the Pearl Trident relevance 0.77 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Sin, Unending Cataclysm relevance 0.75 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 0.74 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Lord of Atlantis relevance 0.62 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.50 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.45 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 0.45 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Fishing Pole relevance 1.43 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Fishliver Oil relevance 2.86 · 44.7% (17 of 38 decks)
- Ichthyomorphosis relevance 1.47 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- The Sea Devils relevance 1.47 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Fisher's Talent relevance 1.11 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Bounty of the Luxa relevance 1.02 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.43 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
All instants (2)
- High Tide relevance 1.16 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Engulf the Shore relevance 0.94 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Aquitect's Will relevance 0.95 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.64 · 36.8% (14 of 38 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.52 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.50 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.39 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
All lands (4)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.97 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.50 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.47 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.44 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
EDH data for Devouring Deep: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 38 real decks.




































