Phosphorescent Feast
Played in 48 Green decks
730+22+1+5+5+6+1+2+
Color Identity Spread
43.2% Green
Commanders
Renata, Called to the Hunt 1.4% of decks
Renata, Called to the Hunt 1.4% of decks
Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer 1.9% of decks
Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer 1.9% of decks
Slurrk, All-Ingesting // Anara, Wolvid Familiar 16.7% of decks
Slurrk, All-Ingesting // Anara, Wolvid Familiar 16.7% of decks
Galion, Elvenking's Butler 7.1% of decks
Galion, Elvenking's Butler 7.1% of decks
Sosuke, Son of Seshiro 2.3% of decks
Sosuke, Son of Seshiro 2.3% of decks
Syr Faren, the Hengehammer 1.7% of decks
Syr Faren, the Hengehammer 1.7% of decks
Most Relevant
Setessan Petitioner 25.0% of decks
Setessan Petitioner 25.0% of decks
Nylea's Disciple 22.9% of decks
Nylea's Disciple 22.9% of decks
Primalcrux 25.0% of decks
Primalcrux 25.0% of decks
Khalni Hydra 27.1% of decks
Khalni Hydra 27.1% of decks
Klothys's Design 22.9% of decks
Klothys's Design 22.9% of decks
Aspect of Hydra 22.9% of decks
Aspect of Hydra 22.9% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (7)
- Renata, Called to the Hunt relevance 1.38 · 1.4% (5 of 355 decks)
- Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.91 · 1.9% (2 of 103 decks)
- Slurrk, All-Ingesting // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.85 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Galion, Elvenking's Butler relevance 0.74 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Sosuke, Son of Seshiro relevance 0.60 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Syr Faren, the Hengehammer relevance 0.56 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Masumaro, First to Live relevance 0.52 · 1.2% (1 of 81 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Setessan Petitioner relevance 1.52 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Nylea's Disciple relevance 1.43 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- Primalcrux relevance 1.33 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Khalni Hydra relevance 1.24 · 27.1% (13 of 48 decks)
- Klothys's Design relevance 1.22 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- Aspect of Hydra relevance 0.93 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- Karametra's Acolyte relevance 0.90 · 39.6% (19 of 48 decks)
- Predator Ooze relevance 0.85 · 20.8% (10 of 48 decks)
- Nyx Lotus relevance 0.85 · 20.8% (10 of 48 decks)
- Elderscale Wurm relevance 0.82 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Old-Growth Troll relevance 0.80 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 0.77 · 27.1% (13 of 48 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.67 · 20.8% (10 of 48 decks)
- Yorvo, Lord of Garenbrig relevance 0.65 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Praetor's Counsel relevance 0.64 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.61 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 0.60 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.52 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.52 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Silverback Elder relevance 0.52 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 0.51 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.51 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.49 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.48 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.46 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.46 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.44 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Regal Force relevance 0.43 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.42 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.41 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
All creatures (22)
- Setessan Petitioner relevance 1.52 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Nylea's Disciple relevance 1.43 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- Primalcrux relevance 1.33 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Khalni Hydra relevance 1.24 · 27.1% (13 of 48 decks)
- Karametra's Acolyte relevance 0.90 · 39.6% (19 of 48 decks)
- Predator Ooze relevance 0.85 · 20.8% (10 of 48 decks)
- Elderscale Wurm relevance 0.82 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Old-Growth Troll relevance 0.80 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 0.77 · 27.1% (13 of 48 decks)
- Yorvo, Lord of Garenbrig relevance 0.65 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 0.60 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.52 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Silverback Elder relevance 0.52 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 0.51 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.46 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- Regal Force relevance 0.43 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Vigor relevance 0.37 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 0.36 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.35 · 20.8% (10 of 48 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.35 · 20.8% (10 of 48 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.34 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.31 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Nyx Lotus relevance 0.85 · 20.8% (10 of 48 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.61 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.46 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.44 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.36 · 20.8% (10 of 48 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.35 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
All instants (5)
- Aspect of Hydra relevance 0.93 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.67 · 20.8% (10 of 48 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.51 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.49 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.33 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Klothys's Design relevance 1.22 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- Praetor's Counsel relevance 0.64 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.52 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.42 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.41 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.39 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.48 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.41 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.39 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
EDH data for Phosphorescent Feast: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 48 real decks.




































