Nessian Courser
Played in 222 Selesnya decks
Color Identity Spread
34.8% Selesnya
- Green 266 · 41.7%
- Selesnya 222 · 34.8%
- Ink-Treader 58 · 9.1%
- Golgari 25 · 3.9%
- Gruul 20 · 3.1%
- Other (9) 47 · 7.4%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (3)
- Jasmine Boreal of the Seven relevance 3.64 · 4.7% (199 of 4,199 decks)
- Butterbur, Bree Innkeeper relevance 0.42 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Jasmine Boreal relevance 0.41 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Centaur Courser relevance 2.89 · 48.2% (107 of 222 decks)
- Watchwolf relevance 2.50 · 64.9% (144 of 222 decks)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 2.43 · 62.2% (138 of 222 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 2.31 · 57.2% (127 of 222 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 2.28 · 55.4% (123 of 222 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.22 · 57.7% (128 of 222 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 2.21 · 54.1% (120 of 222 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 2.17 · 46.8% (104 of 222 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 2.17 · 39.6% (88 of 222 decks)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 2.14 · 55.4% (123 of 222 decks)
- Savannah Lions relevance 2.14 · 54.1% (120 of 222 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 1.94 · 46.4% (103 of 222 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 1.93 · 45.0% (100 of 222 decks)
- Blade of the Sixth Pride relevance 1.87 · 39.6% (88 of 222 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 1.86 · 41.9% (93 of 222 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 1.84 · 47.7% (106 of 222 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 1.83 · 37.4% (83 of 222 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 1.79 · 45.5% (101 of 222 decks)
- Isamaru, Hound of Konda relevance 1.76 · 44.1% (98 of 222 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 1.75 · 43.2% (96 of 222 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 1.71 · 39.2% (87 of 222 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 1.71 · 28.8% (64 of 222 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 1.67 · 38.7% (86 of 222 decks)
- Raptor Companion relevance 1.66 · 36.5% (81 of 222 decks)
- Oreskos Swiftclaw relevance 1.54 · 31.5% (70 of 222 decks)
- Runeclaw Bear relevance 1.53 · 28.4% (63 of 222 decks)
- Sundial, Dawn Tyrant relevance 1.46 · 34.7% (77 of 222 decks)
- Devilthorn Fox relevance 1.44 · 32.0% (71 of 222 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 1.42 · 23.0% (51 of 222 decks)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 1.42 · 27.0% (60 of 222 decks)
All creatures (46)
- Centaur Courser relevance 2.89 · 48.2% (107 of 222 decks)
- Watchwolf relevance 2.50 · 64.9% (144 of 222 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 2.31 · 57.2% (127 of 222 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 2.28 · 55.4% (123 of 222 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.22 · 57.7% (128 of 222 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 2.21 · 54.1% (120 of 222 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 2.17 · 46.8% (104 of 222 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 2.17 · 39.6% (88 of 222 decks)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 2.14 · 55.4% (123 of 222 decks)
- Savannah Lions relevance 2.14 · 54.1% (120 of 222 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 1.94 · 46.4% (103 of 222 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 1.93 · 45.0% (100 of 222 decks)
- Blade of the Sixth Pride relevance 1.87 · 39.6% (88 of 222 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 1.86 · 41.9% (93 of 222 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 1.84 · 47.7% (106 of 222 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 1.83 · 37.4% (83 of 222 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 1.79 · 45.5% (101 of 222 decks)
- Isamaru, Hound of Konda relevance 1.76 · 44.1% (98 of 222 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 1.75 · 43.2% (96 of 222 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 1.71 · 39.2% (87 of 222 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 1.71 · 28.8% (64 of 222 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 1.67 · 38.7% (86 of 222 decks)
- Raptor Companion relevance 1.66 · 36.5% (81 of 222 decks)
- Oreskos Swiftclaw relevance 1.54 · 31.5% (70 of 222 decks)
- Runeclaw Bear relevance 1.53 · 28.4% (63 of 222 decks)
- Sundial, Dawn Tyrant relevance 1.46 · 34.7% (77 of 222 decks)
- Devilthorn Fox relevance 1.44 · 32.0% (71 of 222 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 1.42 · 23.0% (51 of 222 decks)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 1.42 · 27.0% (60 of 222 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 1.41 · 26.1% (58 of 222 decks)
- Elite Vanguard relevance 1.40 · 28.8% (64 of 222 decks)
- Prowling Caracal relevance 1.39 · 26.6% (59 of 222 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 1.37 · 30.2% (67 of 222 decks)
- Craw Wurm relevance 1.17 · 17.6% (39 of 222 decks)
- Savai Sabertooth relevance 1.14 · 23.9% (53 of 222 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 1.13 · 21.6% (48 of 222 decks)
- Shepherd of the Flock // Usher to Safety relevance 1.11 · 24.3% (54 of 222 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 1.10 · 23.9% (53 of 222 decks)
- Fang-Druid Summoner relevance 1.10 · 23.9% (53 of 222 decks)
- Cowl Prowler relevance 1.07 · 17.1% (38 of 222 decks)
- Elvish Ranger relevance 1.06 · 18.0% (40 of 222 decks)
- Cheeky House-Mouse // Squeak By relevance 1.05 · 23.0% (51 of 222 decks)
- Armored Wolf-Rider relevance 1.02 · 18.5% (41 of 222 decks)
- Silvercoat Lion relevance 1.02 · 15.3% (34 of 222 decks)
- Ferocious Zheng relevance 1.01 · 15.3% (34 of 222 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 1.00 · 18.0% (40 of 222 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 2.43 · 62.2% (138 of 222 decks)
- Gaea's Anthem relevance 1.18 · 27.5% (61 of 222 decks)
- Glorious Anthem relevance 1.11 · 26.1% (58 of 222 decks)
- Anthem of Champions relevance 1.08 · 36.0% (80 of 222 decks)
EDH data for Nessian Courser: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 222 real decks.