Nessian Courser
Played in 264 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
41.7% Green
- Green 264 · 41.7%
- Selesnya 222 · 35.1%
- Ink-Treader 57 · 9.0%
- Golgari 24 · 3.8%
- Gruul 20 · 3.2%
- Other (8) 46 · 7.3%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (7)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 4.79 · 14.5% (222 of 1,535 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 2.10 · 10.2% (12 of 118 decks)
- Braulios of Pheres Band relevance 0.92 · 2.6% (4 of 153 decks)
- Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.57 · 1.9% (2 of 103 decks)
- Sosuke, Son of Seshiro relevance 0.38 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen of Efrava relevance 0.33 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Bounteous Kirin relevance 0.32 · 1.4% (1 of 71 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 4.07 · 81.8% (216 of 264 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 3.95 · 83.7% (221 of 264 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 3.85 · 72.7% (192 of 264 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 3.59 · 59.8% (158 of 264 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 3.56 · 64.4% (170 of 264 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 3.43 · 66.7% (176 of 264 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 3.38 · 62.9% (166 of 264 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 3.38 · 67.0% (177 of 264 decks)
- Murasa Brute relevance 3.35 · 54.2% (143 of 264 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 3.28 · 61.7% (163 of 264 decks)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 3.08 · 70.1% (185 of 264 decks)
- Harrier Naga relevance 3.07 · 45.8% (121 of 264 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 3.03 · 57.6% (152 of 264 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 2.94 · 52.7% (139 of 264 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 2.93 · 57.6% (152 of 264 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 2.88 · 57.6% (152 of 264 decks)
- Gnarled Mass relevance 2.88 · 43.2% (114 of 264 decks)
- Ferocious Zheng relevance 2.84 · 45.5% (120 of 264 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 2.80 · 47.3% (125 of 264 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 2.68 · 71.2% (188 of 264 decks)
- Hollowhenge Beast relevance 2.66 · 41.3% (109 of 264 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 2.62 · 72.0% (190 of 264 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 2.58 · 48.5% (128 of 264 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 2.50 · 39.4% (104 of 264 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.40 · 84.1% (222 of 264 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 2.27 · 62.1% (164 of 264 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 2.24 · 39.4% (104 of 264 decks)
- Runeclaw Bear relevance 2.12 · 60.6% (160 of 264 decks)
- Norwood Ranger relevance 2.11 · 33.0% (87 of 264 decks)
- Woodland Druid relevance 2.09 · 32.6% (86 of 264 decks)
All creatures (39)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 4.07 · 81.8% (216 of 264 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 3.95 · 83.7% (221 of 264 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 3.85 · 72.7% (192 of 264 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 3.59 · 59.8% (158 of 264 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 3.56 · 64.4% (170 of 264 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 3.43 · 66.7% (176 of 264 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 3.38 · 62.9% (166 of 264 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 3.38 · 67.0% (177 of 264 decks)
- Murasa Brute relevance 3.35 · 54.2% (143 of 264 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 3.28 · 61.7% (163 of 264 decks)
- Harrier Naga relevance 3.07 · 45.8% (121 of 264 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 3.03 · 57.6% (152 of 264 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 2.94 · 52.7% (139 of 264 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 2.93 · 57.6% (152 of 264 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 2.88 · 57.6% (152 of 264 decks)
- Gnarled Mass relevance 2.88 · 43.2% (114 of 264 decks)
- Ferocious Zheng relevance 2.84 · 45.5% (120 of 264 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 2.80 · 47.3% (125 of 264 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 2.68 · 71.2% (188 of 264 decks)
- Hollowhenge Beast relevance 2.66 · 41.3% (109 of 264 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 2.62 · 72.0% (190 of 264 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 2.58 · 48.5% (128 of 264 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 2.50 · 39.4% (104 of 264 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.40 · 84.1% (222 of 264 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 2.27 · 62.1% (164 of 264 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 2.24 · 39.4% (104 of 264 decks)
- Runeclaw Bear relevance 2.12 · 60.6% (160 of 264 decks)
- Norwood Ranger relevance 2.11 · 33.0% (87 of 264 decks)
- Woodland Druid relevance 2.09 · 32.6% (86 of 264 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 2.08 · 61.7% (163 of 264 decks)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 2.02 · 32.2% (85 of 264 decks)
- Cowl Prowler relevance 2.00 · 32.2% (85 of 264 decks)
- Elvish Ranger relevance 1.81 · 27.7% (73 of 264 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 1.67 · 25.4% (67 of 264 decks)
- Balduvian Bears relevance 1.56 · 42.4% (112 of 264 decks)
- Bear Cub relevance 1.46 · 41.7% (110 of 264 decks)
- Fang-Druid Summoner relevance 1.30 · 21.2% (56 of 264 decks)
- Spined Wurm relevance 1.09 · 16.3% (43 of 264 decks)
- Keeper of Fables relevance 0.84 · 22.7% (60 of 264 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Hall of Triumph relevance 1.09 · 20.8% (55 of 264 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 0.89 · 25.4% (67 of 264 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 3.08 · 70.1% (185 of 264 decks)
- Gaea's Anthem relevance 1.72 · 38.3% (101 of 264 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 1.28 · 52.7% (139 of 264 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 1.08 · 34.8% (92 of 264 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.85 · 37.1% (98 of 264 decks)
All instants (1)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.83 · 37.1% (98 of 264 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 1.19 · 26.1% (69 of 264 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.93 · 40.5% (107 of 264 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.86 · 33.7% (89 of 264 decks)
EDH data for Nessian Courser: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 264 real decks.