Cephalid Vandal
Played in 162 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (8)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 4.87 · 42.5% (68 of 160 decks)
- Fblthp, Impossibly Lost relevance 1.43 · 1.9% (11 of 575 decks)
- Bilbo, Thief in the Night relevance 1.23 · 1.0% (13 of 1,240 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 1.04 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Ormos, Archive Keeper relevance 0.94 · 2.1% (4 of 195 decks)
- Zellix, Sanity Flayer // Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.56 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Doc Ock, Sinister Scientist relevance 0.45 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 0.40 · 2.0% (1 of 51 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 3.44 · 55.6% (90 of 162 decks)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 3.14 · 50.0% (81 of 162 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 2.79 · 42.0% (68 of 162 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 2.75 · 47.5% (77 of 162 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 2.22 · 45.1% (73 of 162 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 2.21 · 40.1% (65 of 162 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 2.13 · 37.7% (61 of 162 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 2.12 · 40.1% (65 of 162 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 1.88 · 38.3% (62 of 162 decks)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 1.81 · 30.9% (50 of 162 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 1.62 · 29.0% (47 of 162 decks)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 1.53 · 25.3% (41 of 162 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 1.45 · 34.0% (55 of 162 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 1.25 · 22.2% (36 of 162 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.25 · 25.9% (42 of 162 decks)
- Wonder relevance 1.10 · 35.2% (57 of 162 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.09 · 21.0% (34 of 162 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.08 · 21.0% (34 of 162 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 1.08 · 31.5% (51 of 162 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 1.04 · 20.4% (33 of 162 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 1.03 · 21.6% (35 of 162 decks)
- Mental Note relevance 1.02 · 21.6% (35 of 162 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 1.02 · 32.1% (52 of 162 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.96 · 27.2% (44 of 162 decks)
- Deranged Assistant relevance 0.92 · 20.4% (33 of 162 decks)
- Millikin relevance 0.88 · 21.0% (34 of 162 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 0.88 · 16.0% (26 of 162 decks)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 0.86 · 15.4% (25 of 162 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.85 · 22.8% (37 of 162 decks)
- Hedron Crab relevance 0.84 · 27.8% (45 of 162 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 3.44 · 55.6% (90 of 162 decks)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 3.14 · 50.0% (81 of 162 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 2.79 · 42.0% (68 of 162 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 2.75 · 47.5% (77 of 162 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 2.22 · 45.1% (73 of 162 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 2.21 · 40.1% (65 of 162 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 2.13 · 37.7% (61 of 162 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 2.12 · 40.1% (65 of 162 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 1.88 · 38.3% (62 of 162 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 1.62 · 29.0% (47 of 162 decks)
- Wonder relevance 1.10 · 35.2% (57 of 162 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.09 · 21.0% (34 of 162 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.08 · 21.0% (34 of 162 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 1.08 · 31.5% (51 of 162 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 1.03 · 21.6% (35 of 162 decks)
- Deranged Assistant relevance 0.92 · 20.4% (33 of 162 decks)
- Millikin relevance 0.88 · 21.0% (34 of 162 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 0.88 · 16.0% (26 of 162 decks)
- Hedron Crab relevance 0.84 · 27.8% (45 of 162 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 0.81 · 16.0% (26 of 162 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 0.80 · 14.2% (23 of 162 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 0.80 · 14.2% (23 of 162 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.75 · 22.8% (37 of 162 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 0.72 · 11.7% (19 of 162 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 0.71 · 11.1% (18 of 162 decks)
- Ambassador Laquatus relevance 0.69 · 11.7% (19 of 162 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 0.67 · 16.7% (27 of 162 decks)
- Mothdust Changeling relevance 0.64 · 12.3% (20 of 162 decks)
- Bubble Smuggler relevance 0.63 · 9.9% (16 of 162 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 0.86 · 15.4% (25 of 162 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.66 · 21.6% (35 of 162 decks)
All enchantments (7)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 1.53 · 25.3% (41 of 162 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 1.45 · 34.0% (55 of 162 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 1.25 · 22.2% (36 of 162 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 1.04 · 20.4% (33 of 162 decks)
- Levitation relevance 0.83 · 16.0% (26 of 162 decks)
- Chronic Flooding relevance 0.62 · 10.5% (17 of 162 decks)
- Drowned Secrets relevance 0.62 · 16.7% (27 of 162 decks)
All instants (4)
- Mental Note relevance 1.02 · 21.6% (35 of 162 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.85 · 22.8% (37 of 162 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.81 · 27.8% (45 of 162 decks)
- Plagiarize relevance 0.70 · 11.1% (18 of 162 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 1.81 · 30.9% (50 of 162 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.25 · 25.9% (42 of 162 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 1.02 · 32.1% (52 of 162 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.96 · 27.2% (44 of 162 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.66 · 16.7% (27 of 162 decks)
- Increasing Confusion relevance 0.62 · 13.6% (22 of 162 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.73 · 16.7% (27 of 162 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.98 · 40.7% (66 of 162 decks)
EDH data for Cephalid Vandal: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 162 real decks.