Cards like Welcoming Vampire
7.5× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Selesnya decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Soul of the Harvest
Cards like Avacyn's Pilgrim
1.5× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 48% of other Selesnya decks
46% of decks run two or more
vs. 31% of other Selesnya decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 1.1 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Avacyn's Pilgrim 56%
- Llanowar Elves 46%
- Elvish Mystic 35%
- Fyndhorn Elves 16%
- Boreal Druid 1%
- Steward of Valeron 1%
Other options: Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Doorkeeper Thrull
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Thalia, Guardian of Thraben
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Deafening Silence
9.6× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Grand Abolisher
5.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Selesnya decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Grand Abolisher 35%
- Voice of Victory 23%
Cards like Metallic Mimic
17× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Mother of Runes
5.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Eladamri's Call
2.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Selesnya decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Soulless Jailer
19× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Anthem of Champions
3.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Selesnya decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Enduring Innocence
3.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Selesnya decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Basking Broodscale
5.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Beast Within
1.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 39% of other Selesnya decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 18% of other Selesnya decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.58 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Beast Within 43%
- Generous Gift 29%
Cards like Chord of Calling
2.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Selesnya decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Scute Swarm
4.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Selesnya decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Thalia, Heretic Cathar
18× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Collector Ouphe
13× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Collector Ouphe 35%
- Cursed Totem 2%
Cards like Sol Ring
2.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 73% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.74 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Heroic Intervention
1.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other Selesnya decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.47 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 37% of other Selesnya decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Selesnya decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.56 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 24%
- Three Visits 20%
- Skyshroud Claim 10%
Other options: Ranger's Path, Field Trip, Nissa's Pilgrimage, Hunting Wilds, Glimpse the Core
Cards like Swords to Plowshares
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 62% of other Selesnya decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.62 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Gaddock Teeg
14× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Gaddock Teeg 32%
- Sanctum Prelate 2%
All top picks (50)
- Ayula, Queen Among Bears relevance 0.30 · 89.0% (73 of 82 decks)
- Reverence relevance 0.35 · 52.4% (43 of 82 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.36 · 31.7% (26 of 82 decks)
- King Darien XLVIII relevance 0.35 · 35.4% (29 of 82 decks)
- Basking Broodscale relevance 0.34 · 31.7% (26 of 82 decks)
- Flowering of the White Tree relevance 0.30 · 45.1% (37 of 82 decks)
- Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.37 · 23.2% (19 of 82 decks)
- Aura Mutation relevance 0.36 · 23.2% (19 of 82 decks)
- Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 0.35 · 25.6% (21 of 82 decks)
- Anthem of Champions relevance 0.33 · 29.3% (24 of 82 decks)
- Beorn the Fierce relevance 0.37 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.31 · 35.4% (29 of 82 decks)
- Metallic Mimic relevance 0.36 · 20.7% (17 of 82 decks)
- Banner of Kinship relevance 0.36 · 20.7% (17 of 82 decks)
- Requisition Raid relevance 0.32 · 31.7% (26 of 82 decks)
- Rally the Ranks relevance 0.37 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Jacked Rabbit relevance 0.36 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Werebear relevance 0.36 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.35 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.34 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Studious First-Year // Rampant Growth relevance 0.34 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.31 · 26.8% (22 of 82 decks)
- Scurry Oak relevance 0.34 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Adaptive Automaton relevance 0.36 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.29 · 29.3% (24 of 82 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.21 · 61.0% (50 of 82 decks)
- Good-Fortune Unicorn relevance 0.34 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.33 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.30 · 25.6% (21 of 82 decks)
- Welcoming Vampire relevance 0.26 · 37.8% (31 of 82 decks)
- Faithful Watchdog relevance 0.35 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.21 · 56.1% (46 of 82 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.32 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Rampaging Yao Guai relevance 0.34 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.30 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.32 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Mentor of the Meek relevance 0.26 · 31.7% (26 of 82 decks)
- Owlbear Cub relevance 0.34 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- March of the Multitudes relevance 0.34 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.31 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Spear of Heliod relevance 0.33 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.34 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
- Enduring Innocence relevance 0.26 · 30.5% (25 of 82 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.32 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.30 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.27 · 24.4% (20 of 82 decks)
- Trostani Discordant relevance 0.32 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Alpha Status relevance 0.34 · 8.5% (7 of 82 decks)
- Champions from Beyond relevance 0.34 · 8.5% (7 of 82 decks)
- Tendershoot Dryad relevance 0.33 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Ayula, Queen Among Bears relevance 0.30 · 89.0% (73 of 82 decks)
- King Darien XLVIII relevance 0.35 · 35.4% (29 of 82 decks)
- Basking Broodscale relevance 0.34 · 31.7% (26 of 82 decks)
- Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.37 · 23.2% (19 of 82 decks)
- Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 0.35 · 25.6% (21 of 82 decks)
- Beorn the Fierce relevance 0.37 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Metallic Mimic relevance 0.36 · 20.7% (17 of 82 decks)
- Jacked Rabbit relevance 0.36 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Werebear relevance 0.36 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.35 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Studious First-Year // Rampant Growth relevance 0.34 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.34 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Scurry Oak relevance 0.34 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Adaptive Automaton relevance 0.36 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.21 · 61.0% (50 of 82 decks)
- Good-Fortune Unicorn relevance 0.34 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Welcoming Vampire relevance 0.26 · 37.8% (31 of 82 decks)
- Faithful Watchdog relevance 0.35 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.21 · 56.1% (46 of 82 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.32 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Rampaging Yao Guai relevance 0.34 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.32 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Mentor of the Meek relevance 0.26 · 31.7% (26 of 82 decks)
- Owlbear Cub relevance 0.34 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.31 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.34 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
- Enduring Innocence relevance 0.26 · 30.5% (25 of 82 decks)
- Trostani Discordant relevance 0.32 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Tendershoot Dryad relevance 0.33 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
- Rosie Cotton of South Lane relevance 0.31 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Torens, Fist of the Angels relevance 0.29 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Mikaeus, the Lunarch relevance 0.30 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.30 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Serra Redeemer relevance 0.33 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.33 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Roaming Throne relevance 0.31 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
- Ouroboroid relevance 0.30 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Charismatic Conqueror relevance 0.27 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Spider-Ham, Peter Porker relevance 0.32 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.24 · 24.4% (20 of 82 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.19 · 48.8% (40 of 82 decks)
- Ainok Strike Leader relevance 0.31 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Mother Bear relevance 0.31 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
- Vastlands Scavenger // Bind to Life relevance 0.31 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
- Runeclaw Bear relevance 0.31 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
- Loyal Guardian relevance 0.30 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.30 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.28 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.30 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
- Brigid, Hero of Kinsbaile relevance 0.29 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.36 · 31.7% (26 of 82 decks)
- Banner of Kinship relevance 0.36 · 20.7% (17 of 82 decks)
- Spear of Heliod relevance 0.33 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.22 · 41.5% (34 of 82 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.28 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.27 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Obelisk of Urd relevance 0.33 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.30 · 8.5% (7 of 82 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.31 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.30 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.29 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Thorn of Amethyst relevance 0.26 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.28 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Chronicle of Victory relevance 0.29 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
- Door of Destinies relevance 0.29 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.27 · 8.5% (7 of 82 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.26 · 8.5% (7 of 82 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.26 · 8.5% (7 of 82 decks)
- Coat of Arms relevance 0.28 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Orcrist, Goblin-cleaver relevance 0.27 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- The Immortal Sun relevance 0.27 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Oketra's Monument relevance 0.25 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.27 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.27 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Pearl Medallion relevance 0.24 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Winter Moon relevance 0.23 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Slate of Ancestry relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Halo Fountain relevance 0.23 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.19 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.09 · 67.1% (55 of 82 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.19 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.18 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Grafdigger's Cage relevance 0.17 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Lumen-Class Frigate relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Symmetry Matrix relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- White Lotus Tile relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Aether Vial relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Staff of the Storyteller relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Icon of Ancestry relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Ensnaring Bridge relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.17 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Weathered Runestone relevance 0.16 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.16 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Reverence relevance 0.35 · 52.4% (43 of 82 decks)
- Flowering of the White Tree relevance 0.30 · 45.1% (37 of 82 decks)
- Anthem of Champions relevance 0.33 · 29.3% (24 of 82 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.31 · 35.4% (29 of 82 decks)
- Rally the Ranks relevance 0.37 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.31 · 26.8% (22 of 82 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.29 · 29.3% (24 of 82 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.33 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.30 · 25.6% (21 of 82 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.32 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.30 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Champions from Beyond relevance 0.34 · 8.5% (7 of 82 decks)
- Alpha Status relevance 0.34 · 8.5% (7 of 82 decks)
- Dancing from Dark to Dawn relevance 0.33 · 8.5% (7 of 82 decks)
- Porphyry Nodes relevance 0.33 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Nature's Revolt relevance 0.31 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.30 · 8.5% (7 of 82 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.30 · 8.5% (7 of 82 decks)
- Always Watching relevance 0.31 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
- Tocasia's Welcome relevance 0.27 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.24 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Glorious Anthem relevance 0.30 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
- Collective Blessing relevance 0.30 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.28 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Wedding Announcement // Wedding Festivity relevance 0.29 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Radiant Destiny relevance 0.29 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Steely Resolve relevance 0.29 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Bearscape relevance 0.29 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.20 · 30.5% (25 of 82 decks)
- Master Chef relevance 0.28 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
- Virtue of Loyalty // Ardenvale Fealty relevance 0.28 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
- Paladin Class relevance 0.25 · 8.5% (7 of 82 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.26 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.21 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.25 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.21 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Authority of the Consuls relevance 0.20 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.24 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.23 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Glorious Sunrise relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Intangible Virtue relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Endless Foot Assault relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Gaea's Anthem relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Tale of Katara and Toph relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Ayula's Influence relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Trouble in Pairs relevance 0.21 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.22 · 8.5% (7 of 82 decks)
- Seal of Primordium relevance 0.24 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.22 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
All instants (50)
- Aura Mutation relevance 0.36 · 23.2% (19 of 82 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.30 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- March of the Multitudes relevance 0.34 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Secure the Wastes relevance 0.33 · 8.5% (7 of 82 decks)
- Unbreakable Formation relevance 0.29 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.21 · 42.7% (35 of 82 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.25 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.22 · 29.3% (24 of 82 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.28 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
- Sundering Growth relevance 0.30 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.25 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.28 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Will of the Mardu relevance 0.28 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
- Duty Beyond Death relevance 0.28 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
- Grand Crescendo relevance 0.28 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.26 · 8.5% (7 of 82 decks)
- Lull relevance 0.28 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.21 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.16 · 40.2% (33 of 82 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.19 · 22.0% (18 of 82 decks)
- Earthshape relevance 0.27 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Rebuff the Wicked relevance 0.25 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.25 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Reprieve relevance 0.20 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Flare of Fortitude relevance 0.19 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Call the Coppercoats relevance 0.23 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.20 · 8.5% (7 of 82 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.19 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.16 · 20.7% (17 of 82 decks)
- Surge of Salvation relevance 0.20 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Rootborn Defenses relevance 0.21 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Clever Concealment relevance 0.19 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Silence relevance 0.17 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.18 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.11 · 48.8% (40 of 82 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.12 · 36.6% (30 of 82 decks)
- Orim's Chant relevance 0.18 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Moogles' Valor relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Hail Storm relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Awaken the Bear relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.13 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Swords to Plowshares relevance 0.08 · 68.3% (56 of 82 decks)
- Dawn's Truce relevance 0.16 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Enter the Avatar State relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Requisition Raid relevance 0.32 · 31.7% (26 of 82 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.27 · 24.4% (20 of 82 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.28 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.26 · 25.6% (21 of 82 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.31 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.33 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.31 · 8.5% (7 of 82 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.31 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.24 · 24.4% (20 of 82 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.30 · 8.5% (7 of 82 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.25 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.26 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.24 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.28 · 8.5% (7 of 82 decks)
- Fade from History relevance 0.29 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Grizzly Fate relevance 0.29 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.28 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
- Increasing Devotion relevance 0.28 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.26 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- United Front relevance 0.27 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Martial Coup relevance 0.27 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Wear Down relevance 0.27 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Season of the Burrow relevance 0.27 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.27 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Hop to It relevance 0.27 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Solar Tide relevance 0.27 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.23 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Tragic Arrogance relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Preposterous Proportions relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 0.22 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.23 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.23 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.17 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.22 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Traverse the Ulvenwald relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Super Combo relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.15 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.16 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
- Day of Judgment relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Helping Hand relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Biorhythm relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Split Up relevance 0.17 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.16 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Camaraderie relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (6)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.32 · 8.5% (7 of 82 decks)
- Elspeth, Storm Slayer relevance 0.30 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
- Elspeth, Sun's Champion relevance 0.32 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Ajani, the Greathearted relevance 0.27 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Ajani, Outland Chaperone relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
All battles (2)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.16 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Invasion of Gobakhan // Lightshield Array relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.30 · 24.4% (20 of 82 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.31 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.26 · 26.8% (22 of 82 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.28 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.22 · 37.8% (31 of 82 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.30 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Castle Ardenvale relevance 0.27 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Minas Tirith relevance 0.26 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.23 · 26.8% (22 of 82 decks)
- Restless Prairie relevance 0.27 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
- Botanical Plaza relevance 0.28 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.23 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.23 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.27 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.26 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
- Windbrisk Heights relevance 0.25 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Strength of the Harvest // Haven of the Harvest relevance 0.20 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.22 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.23 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.27 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.27 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Monumental Henge relevance 0.24 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.23 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.19 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.23 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- The Shire relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Shelters All relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Mirrex relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.16 · 25.6% (21 of 82 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.18 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.20 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.21 · 8.5% (7 of 82 decks)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.23 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.20 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Eiganjo Castle relevance 0.20 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Sejiri Shelter // Sejiri Glacier relevance 0.20 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.14 · 30.5% (25 of 82 decks)
- Okina, Temple to the Grandfathers relevance 0.21 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.19 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Adagia, Windswept Bastion relevance 0.20 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Ondu Inversion // Ondu Skyruins relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Kabira Takedown // Kabira Plateau relevance 0.18 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- The Hunter Maze relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Cryptic Caves relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Razorgrass Ambush // Razorgrass Field relevance 0.16 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.18 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.17 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.18 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
All lands (50)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.33 · 31.7% (26 of 82 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 0.32 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.30 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.28 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.29 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.21 · 25.6% (21 of 82 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.24 · 8.5% (7 of 82 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.15 · 37.8% (31 of 82 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.17 · 24.4% (20 of 82 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.20 · 8.5% (7 of 82 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.18 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.16 · 20.7% (17 of 82 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.13 · 45.1% (37 of 82 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.19 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.18 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.15 · 29.3% (24 of 82 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.18 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- Radiant Grove relevance 0.20 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.15 · 23.2% (19 of 82 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.18 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.19 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.19 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.14 · 24.4% (20 of 82 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.12 · 35.4% (29 of 82 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.14 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.16 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.16 · 8.5% (7 of 82 decks)
- Canopy Vista relevance 0.08 · 63.4% (52 of 82 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.17 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Citadel Gate relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.08 · 63.4% (52 of 82 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.15 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Tranquil Expanse relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.15 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.09 · 46.3% (38 of 82 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.14 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.13 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.08 · 45.1% (37 of 82 decks)
- Grasslands relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.14 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.13 · 4.9% (4 of 82 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.16 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.07 · 52.4% (43 of 82 decks)
- Arctic Treeline relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Gathering Place relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.05 · 62.2% (51 of 82 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Kudo, King Among Bears, from 82 real Commander decks.