Cards like Cultivate
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
82% of decks run one or more
vs. 56% of other Simic decks
67% of decks run two or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
2.1 per deck on average
vs. 1.2 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Cultivate 68%
- Rampant Growth 54%
- Kodama's Reach 45%
- Search for Tomorrow 11%
- Shared Roots 7%
- Viewpoint Synchronization 5%
- Explosive Vegetation 4%
- Verdant Mastery 4%
- Migration Path 3%
- Grow from the Ashes 2%
- Roamer's Routine 2%
Other options: Map the Frontier, Terramorph, Reach the Horizon, Far Wanderings, They Went This Way, Deep Reconnaissance, Path to the Festival, Primal Growth, Beneath the Sands, New Generation's Technique, Peregrination, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes
Cards like Mystic Confluence
13× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards like Elvish Mystic
1.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 34% of other Simic decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
0.99 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Elvish Mystic 43%
- Llanowar Elves 37%
- Fyndhorn Elves 11%
- Gyre Engineer 5%
- Boreal Druid 2%
Other options: Wirewood Elf, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Greenweaver Druid, Goobbue Gardener, Nantuko Elder, Fyndhorn Elder, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Arcane Signet
3.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 62% of other Simic decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 62%
- Commander's Sphere 18%
Cards like Urban Evolution
5.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Nyxbloom Ancient
8.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Nyxbloom Ancient 24%
- Mana Reflection 16%
Cards like Peregrine Drake
7.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Troyan, Gutsy Explorer
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea
12× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards like Craterhoof Behemoth
4.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Jubilation, Earthshaker Giant, Thundering Ceratok
Cards like Traverse the Outlands
6.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: New Frontiers, Slimefoot's Survey, Harvest Season, Turtle Tracks, Celebrate the Harvest
Cards like Thought Vessel
2.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Simic decks
Cards like Apex Devastator
3.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Mulldrifter
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Mulldrifter 50%
- Quantum Riddler 2%
Cards like Overwhelming Stampede
3.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards like Acidic Slime
1.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Acidic Slime 35%
- Reclamation Sage 10%
Other options: Foundation Breaker, Conclave Naturalists, Indrik Stomphowler, Viridian Shaman, Uktabi Orangutan, Myconid Spore Tender, Chomping Changeling
Cards like Gilded Lotus
6.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards like Zendikar Resurgent
8.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Thunderous Snapper
15× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Radagast, Wizard of Wilds relevance 0.70 · 42.6% (270 of 634 decks)
- Lantern of Insight relevance 0.79 · 27.8% (176 of 634 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.59 · 56.2% (356 of 634 decks)
- Wizened Snitches relevance 0.79 · 15.8% (100 of 634 decks)
- Thunderous Snapper relevance 0.65 · 33.6% (213 of 634 decks)
- Storm of Saruman relevance 0.69 · 23.5% (149 of 634 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.60 · 34.4% (218 of 634 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.58 · 33.8% (214 of 634 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.50 · 48.9% (310 of 634 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.50 · 48.4% (307 of 634 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.52 · 41.8% (265 of 634 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.47 · 49.8% (316 of 634 decks)
- Make Your Own Luck relevance 0.62 · 20.7% (131 of 634 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 0.48 · 45.3% (287 of 634 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.49 · 43.5% (276 of 634 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.63 · 18.8% (119 of 634 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.55 · 30.8% (195 of 634 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.59 · 18.8% (119 of 634 decks)
- Diluvian Primordial relevance 0.60 · 16.1% (102 of 634 decks)
- Evercoat Ursine relevance 0.69 · 8.8% (56 of 634 decks)
- Troyan, Gutsy Explorer relevance 0.41 · 51.6% (327 of 634 decks)
- Arcane Epiphany relevance 0.67 · 8.5% (54 of 634 decks)
- Colossal Whale relevance 0.56 · 15.6% (99 of 634 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.37 · 55.8% (354 of 634 decks)
- Progenitor Mimic relevance 0.47 · 32.6% (207 of 634 decks)
- Overlord of the Floodpits relevance 0.61 · 11.5% (73 of 634 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.55 · 17.0% (108 of 634 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.46 · 34.9% (221 of 634 decks)
- Hornet Queen relevance 0.46 · 34.9% (221 of 634 decks)
- Twinning Staff relevance 0.50 · 25.7% (163 of 634 decks)
- Kozilek's Unsealing relevance 0.50 · 23.2% (147 of 634 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.48 · 27.6% (175 of 634 decks)
- Travel Through Caradhras relevance 0.54 · 16.9% (107 of 634 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.52 · 19.7% (125 of 634 decks)
- Field of Dreams relevance 0.69 · 5.0% (32 of 634 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.42 · 38.5% (244 of 634 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.48 · 23.3% (148 of 634 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.47 · 24.6% (156 of 634 decks)
- Seeds of Renewal relevance 0.55 · 12.3% (78 of 634 decks)
- Wizard's Staff relevance 0.55 · 11.5% (73 of 634 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.49 · 18.6% (118 of 634 decks)
- Overlord of the Hauntwoods relevance 0.48 · 19.7% (125 of 634 decks)
- Silverback Elder relevance 0.49 · 17.0% (108 of 634 decks)
- Song of Eärendil relevance 0.50 · 15.6% (99 of 634 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.46 · 23.0% (146 of 634 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.47 · 19.7% (125 of 634 decks)
- Submerge relevance 0.56 · 8.8% (56 of 634 decks)
- Keruga, the Macrosage relevance 0.51 · 12.8% (81 of 634 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.38 · 39.4% (250 of 634 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.43 · 24.6% (156 of 634 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Radagast, Wizard of Wilds relevance 0.70 · 42.6% (270 of 634 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.59 · 56.2% (356 of 634 decks)
- Wizened Snitches relevance 0.79 · 15.8% (100 of 634 decks)
- Thunderous Snapper relevance 0.65 · 33.6% (213 of 634 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.47 · 49.8% (316 of 634 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 0.48 · 45.3% (287 of 634 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.49 · 43.5% (276 of 634 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.63 · 18.8% (119 of 634 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.55 · 30.8% (195 of 634 decks)
- Diluvian Primordial relevance 0.60 · 16.1% (102 of 634 decks)
- Evercoat Ursine relevance 0.69 · 8.8% (56 of 634 decks)
- Troyan, Gutsy Explorer relevance 0.41 · 51.6% (327 of 634 decks)
- Colossal Whale relevance 0.56 · 15.6% (99 of 634 decks)
- Progenitor Mimic relevance 0.47 · 32.6% (207 of 634 decks)
- Overlord of the Floodpits relevance 0.61 · 11.5% (73 of 634 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.55 · 17.0% (108 of 634 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.46 · 34.9% (221 of 634 decks)
- Hornet Queen relevance 0.46 · 34.9% (221 of 634 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.42 · 38.5% (244 of 634 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.47 · 24.6% (156 of 634 decks)
- Overlord of the Hauntwoods relevance 0.48 · 19.7% (125 of 634 decks)
- Silverback Elder relevance 0.49 · 17.0% (108 of 634 decks)
- Keruga, the Macrosage relevance 0.51 · 12.8% (81 of 634 decks)
- Octomancer relevance 0.43 · 22.6% (143 of 634 decks)
- Círdan the Shipwright relevance 0.50 · 12.1% (77 of 634 decks)
- Astral Dragon relevance 0.51 · 11.5% (73 of 634 decks)
- Volo, Guide to Monsters relevance 0.56 · 7.3% (46 of 634 decks)
- Realm Seekers relevance 0.51 · 11.4% (72 of 634 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.43 · 19.7% (125 of 634 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.40 · 26.8% (170 of 634 decks)
- Wandering Archaic // Explore the Vastlands relevance 0.42 · 19.7% (125 of 634 decks)
- Wistfulness relevance 0.48 · 11.2% (71 of 634 decks)
- Stormkeld Vanguard // Bear Down relevance 0.51 · 7.6% (48 of 634 decks)
- Rashmi, Eternities Crafter relevance 0.42 · 16.9% (107 of 634 decks)
- Elrond of the White Council relevance 0.45 · 12.3% (78 of 634 decks)
- Palinchron relevance 0.52 · 6.2% (39 of 634 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.41 · 16.7% (106 of 634 decks)
- Radagast of Rhosgobel relevance 0.48 · 8.7% (55 of 634 decks)
- Wose Pathfinder relevance 0.49 · 7.7% (49 of 634 decks)
- Omni-Changeling relevance 0.46 · 9.8% (62 of 634 decks)
- Generous Ent relevance 0.51 · 5.4% (34 of 634 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.40 · 15.6% (99 of 634 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.37 · 24.1% (153 of 634 decks)
- Regal Behemoth relevance 0.49 · 5.4% (34 of 634 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 0.46 · 8.2% (52 of 634 decks)
- Anticausal Vestige relevance 0.47 · 6.6% (42 of 634 decks)
- Hammerhead Tyrant relevance 0.48 · 5.2% (33 of 634 decks)
- Summon: Valefor relevance 0.53 · 4.3% (27 of 634 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.46 · 6.6% (42 of 634 decks)
- Runadi, Behemoth Caller relevance 0.48 · 4.9% (31 of 634 decks)
All artifacts (45)
- Lantern of Insight relevance 0.79 · 27.8% (176 of 634 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.60 · 34.4% (218 of 634 decks)
- Twinning Staff relevance 0.50 · 25.7% (163 of 634 decks)
- Wizard's Staff relevance 0.55 · 11.5% (73 of 634 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.54 · 7.3% (46 of 634 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.42 · 11.4% (72 of 634 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.36 · 18.5% (117 of 634 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.42 · 9.5% (60 of 634 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.39 · 10.4% (66 of 634 decks)
- Seal of the Guildpact relevance 0.54 · 3.2% (20 of 634 decks)
- Lothlórien Blade relevance 0.41 · 5.0% (32 of 634 decks)
- Dreamstone Hedron relevance 0.48 · 3.8% (24 of 634 decks)
- Mirror of Galadriel relevance 0.38 · 5.0% (32 of 634 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.35 · 7.9% (50 of 634 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.29 · 15.1% (96 of 634 decks)
- Model of Unity relevance 0.38 · 4.7% (30 of 634 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.41 · 4.1% (26 of 634 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.34 · 6.0% (38 of 634 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.24 · 25.7% (163 of 634 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.23 · 28.2% (179 of 634 decks)
- Wondrous Crucible relevance 0.45 · 2.8% (18 of 634 decks)
- Glamdring, Foe-hammer // Gleam of Death relevance 0.44 · 2.8% (18 of 634 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.31 · 5.5% (35 of 634 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.30 · 4.7% (30 of 634 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.26 · 10.4% (66 of 634 decks)
- Voltaic Key relevance 0.43 · 2.5% (16 of 634 decks)
- Mirror Box relevance 0.33 · 4.1% (26 of 634 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.41 · 2.7% (17 of 634 decks)
- Strionic Resonator relevance 0.34 · 3.5% (22 of 634 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.20 · 19.7% (125 of 634 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.33 · 3.0% (19 of 634 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.24 · 5.0% (32 of 634 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.18 · 19.9% (126 of 634 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.28 · 3.8% (24 of 634 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.24 · 4.4% (28 of 634 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.18 · 13.2% (84 of 634 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.26 · 3.8% (24 of 634 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.24 · 4.1% (26 of 634 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (24 of 634 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (26 of 634 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (24 of 634 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.24 · 3.3% (21 of 634 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.23 · 3.5% (22 of 634 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.08 · 62.5% (396 of 634 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 76.0% (482 of 634 decks)
All enchantments (36)
- Storm of Saruman relevance 0.69 · 23.5% (149 of 634 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.50 · 48.9% (310 of 634 decks)
- Kozilek's Unsealing relevance 0.50 · 23.2% (147 of 634 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.52 · 19.7% (125 of 634 decks)
- Field of Dreams relevance 0.69 · 5.0% (32 of 634 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.49 · 18.6% (118 of 634 decks)
- Song of Eärendil relevance 0.50 · 15.6% (99 of 634 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.46 · 23.0% (146 of 634 decks)
- Cosmic Crucible relevance 0.57 · 5.8% (37 of 634 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.54 · 7.9% (50 of 634 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.43 · 16.4% (104 of 634 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.39 · 15.8% (100 of 634 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.44 · 9.0% (57 of 634 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.42 · 10.3% (65 of 634 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.44 · 8.5% (54 of 634 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.40 · 7.4% (47 of 634 decks)
- Dancing from Dark to Dawn relevance 0.44 · 4.4% (28 of 634 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.25 · 33.8% (214 of 634 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.36 · 7.4% (47 of 634 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.34 · 9.6% (61 of 634 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.31 · 9.9% (63 of 634 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.28 · 11.4% (72 of 634 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.31 · 5.0% (32 of 634 decks)
- Glorious Sunrise relevance 0.41 · 2.8% (18 of 634 decks)
- Dictate of Karametra relevance 0.44 · 2.4% (15 of 634 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (38 of 634 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.31 · 3.0% (19 of 634 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.30 · 2.7% (17 of 634 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.25 · 3.6% (23 of 634 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (17 of 634 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (24 of 634 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.18 · 8.4% (53 of 634 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.18 · 5.4% (34 of 634 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (17 of 634 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.20 · 4.3% (27 of 634 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.18 · 3.5% (22 of 634 decks)
All instants (50)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.50 · 48.4% (307 of 634 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.59 · 18.8% (119 of 634 decks)
- Arcane Epiphany relevance 0.67 · 8.5% (54 of 634 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.48 · 23.3% (148 of 634 decks)
- Submerge relevance 0.56 · 8.8% (56 of 634 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.43 · 24.6% (156 of 634 decks)
- Elminster's Simulacrum relevance 0.56 · 8.0% (51 of 634 decks)
- This Town Ain't Big Enough relevance 0.56 · 6.3% (40 of 634 decks)
- Spell Swindle relevance 0.52 · 8.2% (52 of 634 decks)
- Natural Reclamation relevance 0.49 · 10.9% (69 of 634 decks)
- Embrace the Paradox relevance 0.40 · 15.6% (99 of 634 decks)
- Forceful Denial relevance 0.50 · 5.4% (34 of 634 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.34 · 30.1% (191 of 634 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.35 · 25.7% (163 of 634 decks)
- Learn from the Past relevance 0.47 · 5.8% (37 of 634 decks)
- Whiplash Trap relevance 0.57 · 3.6% (23 of 634 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.42 · 8.2% (52 of 634 decks)
- Mana Sculpt relevance 0.42 · 7.3% (46 of 634 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.42 · 5.7% (36 of 634 decks)
- Sail into the West relevance 0.40 · 6.3% (40 of 634 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.40 · 6.9% (44 of 634 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.39 · 7.7% (49 of 634 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.42 · 4.6% (29 of 634 decks)
- Expel from Orazca relevance 0.51 · 3.2% (20 of 634 decks)
- Trap the Trespassers relevance 0.39 · 4.9% (31 of 634 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.39 · 4.7% (30 of 634 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.37 · 4.9% (31 of 634 decks)
- Desertion relevance 0.47 · 2.8% (18 of 634 decks)
- Hurl into History relevance 0.48 · 2.5% (16 of 634 decks)
- Wizard's Retort relevance 0.45 · 2.8% (18 of 634 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.22 · 28.5% (181 of 634 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.30 · 6.9% (44 of 634 decks)
- Autumn's Veil relevance 0.40 · 3.5% (22 of 634 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.28 · 8.2% (52 of 634 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.37 · 3.5% (22 of 634 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.26 · 9.9% (63 of 634 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.18 · 37.5% (238 of 634 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.25 · 9.5% (60 of 634 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.21 · 18.8% (119 of 634 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.34 · 3.5% (22 of 634 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.25 · 9.0% (57 of 634 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.23 · 11.5% (73 of 634 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (38 of 634 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.18 · 18.5% (117 of 634 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.19 · 15.6% (99 of 634 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.23 · 5.4% (34 of 634 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.14 · 43.7% (277 of 634 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.22 · 7.3% (46 of 634 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.22 · 6.9% (44 of 634 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.12 · 47.3% (300 of 634 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.58 · 33.8% (214 of 634 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.52 · 41.8% (265 of 634 decks)
- Make Your Own Luck relevance 0.62 · 20.7% (131 of 634 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.37 · 55.8% (354 of 634 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.48 · 27.6% (175 of 634 decks)
- Travel Through Caradhras relevance 0.54 · 16.9% (107 of 634 decks)
- Seeds of Renewal relevance 0.55 · 12.3% (78 of 634 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.47 · 19.7% (125 of 634 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.38 · 39.4% (250 of 634 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.44 · 15.0% (95 of 634 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.41 · 19.7% (125 of 634 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.32 · 42.7% (271 of 634 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.39 · 18.8% (119 of 634 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.51 · 5.7% (36 of 634 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.44 · 10.4% (66 of 634 decks)
- Viewpoint Synchronization relevance 0.51 · 4.6% (29 of 634 decks)
- Aether Gale relevance 0.43 · 9.0% (57 of 634 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 0.46 · 5.0% (32 of 634 decks)
- Sylvan Offering relevance 0.44 · 6.3% (40 of 634 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.39 · 10.9% (69 of 634 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.34 · 17.7% (112 of 634 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.39 · 9.5% (60 of 634 decks)
- Nissa's Expedition relevance 0.48 · 4.3% (27 of 634 decks)
- Will of the Temur relevance 0.43 · 4.9% (31 of 634 decks)
- Portent of Calamity relevance 0.48 · 4.3% (27 of 634 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.39 · 8.7% (55 of 634 decks)
- Through the Forest Gate relevance 0.41 · 5.7% (36 of 634 decks)
- Plea for Power relevance 0.40 · 6.8% (43 of 634 decks)
- Spelltwine relevance 0.52 · 3.5% (22 of 634 decks)
- Verdant Mastery relevance 0.46 · 4.1% (26 of 634 decks)
- Spitting Image relevance 0.40 · 5.2% (33 of 634 decks)
- Ember Island Production relevance 0.42 · 4.4% (28 of 634 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.35 · 7.4% (47 of 634 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.37 · 4.9% (31 of 634 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.42 · 3.9% (25 of 634 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.34 · 6.6% (42 of 634 decks)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 0.49 · 2.8% (18 of 634 decks)
- Selvala's Stampede relevance 0.39 · 4.3% (27 of 634 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.38 · 4.4% (28 of 634 decks)
- Abstract Performance relevance 0.49 · 2.7% (17 of 634 decks)
- Sorcerous Squall relevance 0.47 · 3.0% (19 of 634 decks)
- Mnemonic Deluge relevance 0.39 · 3.9% (25 of 634 decks)
- Nissa's Renewal relevance 0.44 · 3.3% (21 of 634 decks)
- Verdant Confluence relevance 0.45 · 3.2% (20 of 634 decks)
- Replication Technique relevance 0.34 · 5.2% (33 of 634 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.28 · 12.5% (79 of 634 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.30 · 9.5% (60 of 634 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.34 · 4.7% (30 of 634 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.15 · 68.5% (434 of 634 decks)
- Hunted by The Family relevance 0.49 · 2.4% (15 of 634 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (1)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.29 · 6.0% (38 of 634 decks)
All utility lands (37)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.45 · 13.4% (85 of 634 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.40 · 14.0% (89 of 634 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.39 · 13.6% (86 of 634 decks)
- Moonring Island relevance 0.55 · 3.9% (25 of 634 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.36 · 16.9% (107 of 634 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.42 · 8.0% (51 of 634 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.34 · 10.7% (68 of 634 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.35 · 7.4% (47 of 634 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.33 · 8.7% (55 of 634 decks)
- Drowner of Truth // Drowned Jungle relevance 0.38 · 4.6% (29 of 634 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.25 · 23.5% (149 of 634 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.33 · 6.2% (39 of 634 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.23 · 18.0% (114 of 634 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.22 · 18.5% (117 of 634 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.22 · 17.0% (108 of 634 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.21 · 17.8% (113 of 634 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.25 · 8.2% (52 of 634 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.28 · 4.4% (28 of 634 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.24 · 7.9% (50 of 634 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.27 · 4.4% (28 of 634 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.31 · 3.6% (23 of 634 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.23 · 7.4% (47 of 634 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.19 · 17.2% (109 of 634 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.23 · 8.0% (51 of 634 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.19 · 16.6% (105 of 634 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.27 · 4.3% (27 of 634 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.22 · 8.8% (56 of 634 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.20 · 12.8% (81 of 634 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.15 · 27.4% (174 of 634 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.31 · 2.4% (15 of 634 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.11 · 47.3% (300 of 634 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (24 of 634 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.17 · 8.2% (52 of 634 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.26 · 2.5% (16 of 634 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.16 · 10.7% (68 of 634 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (16 of 634 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (16 of 634 decks)
All lands (46)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.38 · 13.2% (84 of 634 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.37 · 11.2% (71 of 634 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.26 · 27.1% (172 of 634 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.26 · 22.6% (143 of 634 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.20 · 46.4% (294 of 634 decks)
- Forbidden Orchard relevance 0.39 · 3.5% (22 of 634 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.23 · 14.0% (89 of 634 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.26 · 8.5% (54 of 634 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.28 · 5.2% (33 of 634 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.14 · 54.9% (348 of 634 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.23 · 12.9% (82 of 634 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.20 · 21.8% (138 of 634 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.21 · 16.6% (105 of 634 decks)
- Tarnished Citadel relevance 0.35 · 3.3% (21 of 634 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.14 · 49.5% (314 of 634 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.20 · 15.3% (97 of 634 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.25 · 5.2% (33 of 634 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.27 · 4.4% (28 of 634 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.25 · 4.7% (30 of 634 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.31 · 3.5% (22 of 634 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.13 · 54.3% (344 of 634 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.25 · 4.6% (29 of 634 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.23 · 5.8% (37 of 634 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.22 · 8.5% (54 of 634 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.18 · 16.4% (104 of 634 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.25 · 4.6% (29 of 634 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.19 · 13.7% (87 of 634 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.22 · 5.2% (33 of 634 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.16 · 20.7% (131 of 634 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.21 · 6.0% (38 of 634 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.18 · 10.9% (69 of 634 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.21 · 5.5% (35 of 634 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.14 · 33.8% (214 of 634 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.12 · 44.3% (281 of 634 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (30 of 634 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.18 · 10.4% (66 of 634 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.21 · 4.6% (29 of 634 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.21 · 4.3% (27 of 634 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.11 · 39.9% (253 of 634 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.10 · 47.3% (300 of 634 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.08 · 67.8% (430 of 634 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.21 · 3.5% (22 of 634 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (15 of 634 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.04 · 83.3% (528 of 634 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 89.1% (565 of 634 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 89.9% (570 of 634 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Gandalf, Westward Voyager, from 634 real Commander decks.