Cards like Snake Umbra
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
56% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Snake Umbra 61%
- Curiosity 60%
- Keen Sense 41%
- Ophidian Eye 2%
Cards like Stormchaser Drake
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
81% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
51% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Eel Umbra
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
38% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Eel Umbra 44%
- Lion Umbra 36%
- Spider Umbra 22%
- Boar Umbra 20%
Cards like Combat Research
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Combat Research 65%
- Sixth Sense 33%
- Curious Obsession 12%
Cards like Tyvar's Stand
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Tyvar's Stand 39%
- Snakeskin Veil 38%
- Overprotect 16%
- Blossoming Defense 11%
- Ranger's Guile 2%
Other options: Woodcutter's Grit
Cards like Setessan Champion
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Sea-Dasher Octopus
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.97 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Edric, Spymaster of Trest, Thieving Otter, Vedalken Heretic, Thieving Magpie, Nimble Brigand, Broodbirth Viper, Illvoi Infiltrator, Neurok Commando, Soulknife Spy, Lu Xun, Scholar General, Saltwater Stalwart, Nine-Tail White Fox, Scroll Thief, Gateway Sneak, Stealer of Secrets, Marchesa's Infiltrator, Jhessian Thief
Cards like Slip Through Space
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Touch of Invisibility
Cards like Tamiyo's Safekeeping
8.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Simic decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Quasiduplicate
8.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Quasiduplicate 21%
- Cackling Counterpart 15%
- Repudiate // Replicate 15%
- Fated Infatuation 5%
- Rally the Galadhrim 4%
- Echocasting Symposium 3%
- See Double 2%
- Spitting Image 1%
Other options: Self-Reflection
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Simic decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 47%
- Elvish Mystic 36%
- Fyndhorn Elves 20%
- Gyre Engineer 1%
Other options: Orochi Merge-Keeper, Boreal Druid, Druid of the Cowl, Rootrider Faun, Goobbue Gardener, Golden Hind, Fyndhorn Elder, Wirewood Elf, Leaf Gilder, Nantuko Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Woodland Mystic, Orochi Sustainer, Skyshroud Troopers
Cards like Rune of Might
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Irenicus's Vile Duplication
9.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards like Glowstone Recluse
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Rancor
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Cards like One with Nature
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards like Birds of Paradise
6.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Birds of Paradise 39%
- Maraleaf Pixie 27%
Cards like Alpha Authority
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Alpha Authority 32%
- Canopy Cover 14%
Cards like Counterspell
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 50% of other Simic decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Counterspell 46%
- Negate 27%
- Wash Away 2%
Other options: Essence Scatter, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, Minor Misstep, Intervene, Wild Unraveling, Envelop, Disruption Protocol, False Summoning, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Preemptive Strike, Nullify, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Outwit
Cards like Cartouche of Knowledge
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Future Flight, Astral Wingspan, Lofty Dreams, Stratus Walk
Cards like Wild Growth
3.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Wild Growth 20%
- Fertile Ground 6%
- Overgrowth 1%
Other options: Wolfwillow Haven, Shimmerwilds Growth, Glittering Frost, Dawn's Reflection, Verdant Haven, Market Festival, Blighted Burgeoning
Cards like Shore Up
5.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Shore Up 17%
- Magic Damper 4%
- Dive Down 2%
- Octopus Form 2%
- Mizzium Skin 1%
Other options: Glint, Chase Inspiration, You See a Guard Approach, Shell Shield
Cards like Hydra's Growth
14× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards like Invisible Stalker
2.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Gaea's Gift
12× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards like Cerulean Wisps
18× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards like Thought Vessel
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Simic decks
Cards like Ancestral Mask
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Aqueous Form
13× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Aqueous Form 54%
- Security Bypass 2%
Cards like Pongify
1.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.50 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Pongify 22%
- Rapid Hybridization 20%
All top picks (50)
- Stormchaser Drake relevance 0.91 · 76.8% (2,496 of 3,248 decks)
- Shielding Plax relevance 0.85 · 68.8% (2,234 of 3,248 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 0.90 · 62.9% (2,044 of 3,248 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.86 · 64.7% (2,103 of 3,248 decks)
- Spellwild Ouphe relevance 0.94 · 53.2% (1,728 of 3,248 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.86 · 61.1% (1,984 of 3,248 decks)
- Vesuvan Duplimancy relevance 0.85 · 61.8% (2,008 of 3,248 decks)
- Gemrazer relevance 0.87 · 58.4% (1,896 of 3,248 decks)
- Triton Fortune Hunter relevance 0.94 · 47.9% (1,557 of 3,248 decks)
- Migratory Greathorn relevance 0.87 · 55.3% (1,797 of 3,248 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.83 · 59.6% (1,937 of 3,248 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.72 · 69.7% (2,264 of 3,248 decks)
- Setessan Champion relevance 0.91 · 45.1% (1,466 of 3,248 decks)
- Pouncing Shoreshark relevance 0.91 · 45.8% (1,487 of 3,248 decks)
- Auramancer's Guise relevance 0.95 · 41.1% (1,335 of 3,248 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 0.81 · 55.6% (1,805 of 3,248 decks)
- One with Nature relevance 0.89 · 45.0% (1,460 of 3,248 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.82 · 53.5% (1,739 of 3,248 decks)
- Keen Sense relevance 0.92 · 41.3% (1,342 of 3,248 decks)
- Eel Umbra relevance 0.89 · 44.1% (1,432 of 3,248 decks)
- Sawtusk Demolisher relevance 0.90 · 42.2% (1,372 of 3,248 decks)
- Dreamtail Heron relevance 0.90 · 42.0% (1,364 of 3,248 decks)
- Glowstone Recluse relevance 0.93 · 36.1% (1,172 of 3,248 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.80 · 51.0% (1,656 of 3,248 decks)
- Parcelbeast relevance 0.87 · 43.0% (1,398 of 3,248 decks)
- Venerated Rotpriest relevance 0.86 · 43.5% (1,412 of 3,248 decks)
- Auspicious Starrix relevance 0.89 · 38.3% (1,245 of 3,248 decks)
- Timber Paladin relevance 0.97 · 28.5% (927 of 3,248 decks)
- Strong Back relevance 0.94 · 31.4% (1,021 of 3,248 decks)
- Rune of Might relevance 0.95 · 30.0% (976 of 3,248 decks)
- Tanglespan Lookout relevance 0.96 · 29.4% (954 of 3,248 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.92 · 33.6% (1,090 of 3,248 decks)
- Sixth Sense relevance 0.92 · 32.8% (1,064 of 3,248 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.89 · 36.5% (1,184 of 3,248 decks)
- Sanctum Weaver relevance 0.78 · 48.1% (1,563 of 3,248 decks)
- Eidolon of Blossoms relevance 0.89 · 33.9% (1,102 of 3,248 decks)
- Souvenir Snatcher relevance 0.92 · 31.2% (1,012 of 3,248 decks)
- Nerd Rage relevance 0.87 · 36.0% (1,168 of 3,248 decks)
- Trumpeting Gnarr relevance 0.91 · 31.0% (1,008 of 3,248 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.87 · 35.6% (1,156 of 3,248 decks)
- Octopus Umbra relevance 0.93 · 28.3% (919 of 3,248 decks)
- Artisan of Forms relevance 0.97 · 23.5% (764 of 3,248 decks)
- Alpha Authority relevance 0.89 · 31.8% (1,033 of 3,248 decks)
- Charge Through relevance 0.91 · 29.4% (956 of 3,248 decks)
- Slippery Bogle relevance 0.91 · 28.1% (913 of 3,248 decks)
- Gnarlback Rhino relevance 0.96 · 22.4% (728 of 3,248 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.68 · 54.3% (1,763 of 3,248 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.68 · 53.5% (1,739 of 3,248 decks)
- Archipelagore relevance 0.92 · 23.0% (748 of 3,248 decks)
- Boar Umbra relevance 0.94 · 19.8% (642 of 3,248 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Stormchaser Drake relevance 0.91 · 76.8% (2,496 of 3,248 decks)
- Spellwild Ouphe relevance 0.94 · 53.2% (1,728 of 3,248 decks)
- Gemrazer relevance 0.87 · 58.4% (1,896 of 3,248 decks)
- Triton Fortune Hunter relevance 0.94 · 47.9% (1,557 of 3,248 decks)
- Migratory Greathorn relevance 0.87 · 55.3% (1,797 of 3,248 decks)
- Setessan Champion relevance 0.91 · 45.1% (1,466 of 3,248 decks)
- Pouncing Shoreshark relevance 0.91 · 45.8% (1,487 of 3,248 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 0.81 · 55.6% (1,805 of 3,248 decks)
- Sawtusk Demolisher relevance 0.90 · 42.2% (1,372 of 3,248 decks)
- Dreamtail Heron relevance 0.90 · 42.0% (1,364 of 3,248 decks)
- Glowstone Recluse relevance 0.93 · 36.1% (1,172 of 3,248 decks)
- Parcelbeast relevance 0.87 · 43.0% (1,398 of 3,248 decks)
- Venerated Rotpriest relevance 0.86 · 43.5% (1,412 of 3,248 decks)
- Auspicious Starrix relevance 0.89 · 38.3% (1,245 of 3,248 decks)
- Timber Paladin relevance 0.97 · 28.5% (927 of 3,248 decks)
- Tanglespan Lookout relevance 0.96 · 29.4% (954 of 3,248 decks)
- Sanctum Weaver relevance 0.78 · 48.1% (1,563 of 3,248 decks)
- Eidolon of Blossoms relevance 0.89 · 33.9% (1,102 of 3,248 decks)
- Souvenir Snatcher relevance 0.92 · 31.2% (1,012 of 3,248 decks)
- Trumpeting Gnarr relevance 0.91 · 31.0% (1,008 of 3,248 decks)
- Artisan of Forms relevance 0.97 · 23.5% (764 of 3,248 decks)
- Slippery Bogle relevance 0.91 · 28.1% (913 of 3,248 decks)
- Gnarlback Rhino relevance 0.96 · 22.4% (728 of 3,248 decks)
- Archipelagore relevance 0.92 · 23.0% (748 of 3,248 decks)
- Entity Tracker relevance 0.92 · 19.2% (624 of 3,248 decks)
- Errant, Street Artist relevance 0.86 · 25.3% (823 of 3,248 decks)
- Herald of the Pantheon relevance 0.92 · 13.1% (427 of 3,248 decks)
- Pollywog Symbiote relevance 0.92 · 13.3% (431 of 3,248 decks)
- Essence Symbiote relevance 0.95 · 11.5% (372 of 3,248 decks)
- Gladecover Scout relevance 0.95 · 10.7% (346 of 3,248 decks)
- Destiny Spinner relevance 0.80 · 21.5% (697 of 3,248 decks)
- Legolas, Master Archer relevance 0.86 · 14.1% (459 of 3,248 decks)
- Orvar, the All-Form relevance 0.82 · 16.9% (550 of 3,248 decks)
- Venomthrope relevance 0.89 · 10.8% (350 of 3,248 decks)
- Eutropia the Twice-Favored relevance 0.92 · 8.7% (283 of 3,248 decks)
- Meletis Astronomer relevance 0.97 · 6.3% (206 of 3,248 decks)
- Invisible Stalker relevance 0.74 · 19.3% (627 of 3,248 decks)
- Aura Gnarlid relevance 0.95 · 6.6% (215 of 3,248 decks)
- Mysterious Egg relevance 0.95 · 5.9% (191 of 3,248 decks)
- Giggling Skitterspike relevance 0.72 · 20.6% (669 of 3,248 decks)
- Verduran Enchantress relevance 0.87 · 7.3% (236 of 3,248 decks)
- Composer of Spring relevance 0.91 · 5.6% (182 of 3,248 decks)
- Protean Thaumaturge relevance 0.89 · 5.4% (177 of 3,248 decks)
- Silhana Ledgewalker relevance 0.85 · 6.8% (221 of 3,248 decks)
- Ms. Marvel, Kamala Khan relevance 0.82 · 6.7% (218 of 3,248 decks)
- Triton Wavebreaker relevance 0.86 · 5.0% (162 of 3,248 decks)
- Triton Cavalry relevance 0.93 · 4.4% (144 of 3,248 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.57 · 27.2% (885 of 3,248 decks)
- Cold-Eyed Selkie relevance 0.44 · 39.5% (1,284 of 3,248 decks)
- Sage of Hours relevance 0.63 · 8.5% (277 of 3,248 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All artifacts (13)
- Twinning Staff relevance 0.71 · 44.2% (1,435 of 3,248 decks)
- Helm of the Gods relevance 0.93 · 5.6% (182 of 3,248 decks)
- Mirror Box relevance 0.58 · 10.1% (328 of 3,248 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.47 · 7.5% (243 of 3,248 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.48 · 5.6% (182 of 3,248 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.30 · 17.7% (574 of 3,248 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.26 · 17.5% (568 of 3,248 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.26 · 14.9% (485 of 3,248 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.24 · 19.8% (643 of 3,248 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.34 · 3.4% (111 of 3,248 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.30 · 3.8% (124 of 3,248 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.10 · 51.8% (1,684 of 3,248 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 63.4% (2,060 of 3,248 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Shielding Plax relevance 0.85 · 68.8% (2,234 of 3,248 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 0.90 · 62.9% (2,044 of 3,248 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.86 · 64.7% (2,103 of 3,248 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.86 · 61.1% (1,984 of 3,248 decks)
- Vesuvan Duplimancy relevance 0.85 · 61.8% (2,008 of 3,248 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.83 · 59.6% (1,937 of 3,248 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.72 · 69.7% (2,264 of 3,248 decks)
- Auramancer's Guise relevance 0.95 · 41.1% (1,335 of 3,248 decks)
- One with Nature relevance 0.89 · 45.0% (1,460 of 3,248 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.82 · 53.5% (1,739 of 3,248 decks)
- Keen Sense relevance 0.92 · 41.3% (1,342 of 3,248 decks)
- Eel Umbra relevance 0.89 · 44.1% (1,432 of 3,248 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.80 · 51.0% (1,656 of 3,248 decks)
- Strong Back relevance 0.94 · 31.4% (1,021 of 3,248 decks)
- Rune of Might relevance 0.95 · 30.0% (976 of 3,248 decks)
- Sixth Sense relevance 0.92 · 32.8% (1,064 of 3,248 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.89 · 36.5% (1,184 of 3,248 decks)
- Nerd Rage relevance 0.87 · 36.0% (1,168 of 3,248 decks)
- Octopus Umbra relevance 0.93 · 28.3% (919 of 3,248 decks)
- Alpha Authority relevance 0.89 · 31.8% (1,033 of 3,248 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.68 · 54.3% (1,763 of 3,248 decks)
- Boar Umbra relevance 0.94 · 19.8% (642 of 3,248 decks)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.87 · 27.0% (878 of 3,248 decks)
- Corrupted Conscience relevance 0.89 · 23.8% (774 of 3,248 decks)
- Spider Umbra relevance 0.91 · 22.0% (713 of 3,248 decks)
- Setessan Training relevance 0.93 · 17.0% (552 of 3,248 decks)
- Cartouche of Knowledge relevance 0.92 · 17.8% (579 of 3,248 decks)
- Mark of Sakiko relevance 0.95 · 13.7% (444 of 3,248 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.86 · 20.2% (657 of 3,248 decks)
- Audacity relevance 0.92 · 13.3% (433 of 3,248 decks)
- Enchantress's Presence relevance 0.89 · 14.3% (465 of 3,248 decks)
- Canopy Cover relevance 0.87 · 14.0% (454 of 3,248 decks)
- Sigil of Sleep relevance 0.93 · 10.3% (335 of 3,248 decks)
- Curious Obsession relevance 0.90 · 11.9% (386 of 3,248 decks)
- Vow of Wildness relevance 0.93 · 9.0% (292 of 3,248 decks)
- Traveler's Cloak relevance 0.91 · 9.7% (315 of 3,248 decks)
- Well Rested relevance 0.86 · 12.1% (394 of 3,248 decks)
- Karametra's Favor relevance 0.92 · 9.0% (293 of 3,248 decks)
- Giant Inheritance relevance 0.92 · 7.7% (251 of 3,248 decks)
- Animal Friend relevance 0.92 · 6.5% (210 of 3,248 decks)
- Favor of the Overbeing relevance 0.82 · 10.7% (348 of 3,248 decks)
- Indomitable Might relevance 0.89 · 6.1% (198 of 3,248 decks)
- Verdant Embrace relevance 0.89 · 6.2% (200 of 3,248 decks)
- Frog Tongue relevance 0.85 · 7.6% (247 of 3,248 decks)
- Meltstrider's Resolve relevance 0.87 · 6.6% (213 of 3,248 decks)
- Hydra's Growth relevance 0.68 · 15.5% (502 of 3,248 decks)
- Cartouche of Strength relevance 0.85 · 5.0% (163 of 3,248 decks)
- Curator's Ward relevance 0.81 · 6.6% (215 of 3,248 decks)
- Ordeal of Nylea relevance 0.75 · 9.5% (308 of 3,248 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.75 · 7.5% (245 of 3,248 decks)
All instants (50)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.92 · 33.6% (1,090 of 3,248 decks)
- Charge Through relevance 0.91 · 29.4% (956 of 3,248 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.68 · 53.5% (1,739 of 3,248 decks)
- Viridescent Wisps relevance 0.97 · 11.8% (382 of 3,248 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.76 · 30.5% (990 of 3,248 decks)
- Leap relevance 0.93 · 12.7% (412 of 3,248 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.85 · 17.2% (559 of 3,248 decks)
- Royal Treatment relevance 0.75 · 24.9% (809 of 3,248 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.58 · 47.0% (1,525 of 3,248 decks)
- Verdant Rebirth relevance 0.92 · 6.7% (217 of 3,248 decks)
- Twisted Image relevance 0.87 · 7.2% (235 of 3,248 decks)
- Trash the Town relevance 0.83 · 8.1% (263 of 3,248 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.67 · 15.6% (507 of 3,248 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.66 · 17.1% (556 of 3,248 decks)
- Blossoming Defense relevance 0.74 · 11.1% (362 of 3,248 decks)
- Poison the Blade relevance 0.89 · 4.7% (153 of 3,248 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.68 · 14.0% (454 of 3,248 decks)
- Repudiate // Replicate relevance 0.67 · 15.0% (486 of 3,248 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.51 · 37.6% (1,221 of 3,248 decks)
- Vines of Vastwood relevance 0.76 · 7.4% (239 of 3,248 decks)
- Double Major relevance 0.51 · 35.7% (1,159 of 3,248 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.70 · 9.1% (296 of 3,248 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.47 · 38.6% (1,254 of 3,248 decks)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.59 · 15.1% (490 of 3,248 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.69 · 7.3% (236 of 3,248 decks)
- Fated Infatuation relevance 0.71 · 5.0% (163 of 3,248 decks)
- Fleeting Distraction relevance 0.79 · 3.9% (127 of 3,248 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.59 · 7.9% (256 of 3,248 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.61 · 4.9% (158 of 3,248 decks)
- March of Swirling Mist relevance 0.49 · 12.4% (403 of 3,248 decks)
- Invigorate relevance 0.77 · 3.2% (105 of 3,248 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.53 · 8.3% (269 of 3,248 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.51 · 9.8% (318 of 3,248 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.56 · 5.4% (174 of 3,248 decks)
- Swell of Growth relevance 0.78 · 2.9% (94 of 3,248 decks)
- Aggressive Urge relevance 0.79 · 2.7% (87 of 3,248 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.45 · 11.8% (384 of 3,248 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.59 · 4.2% (135 of 3,248 decks)
- Prishe's Wanderings relevance 0.64 · 3.7% (121 of 3,248 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.62 · 3.8% (124 of 3,248 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 0.41 · 11.6% (378 of 3,248 decks)
- Refocus relevance 0.67 · 2.5% (82 of 3,248 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.44 · 5.2% (168 of 3,248 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.57 · 2.9% (95 of 3,248 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.28 · 27.3% (887 of 3,248 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.37 · 6.6% (215 of 3,248 decks)
- Decisive Denial relevance 0.35 · 6.7% (218 of 3,248 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.26 · 24.9% (810 of 3,248 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.26 · 21.6% (702 of 3,248 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.32 · 8.8% (286 of 3,248 decks)
All sorceries (35)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.87 · 35.6% (1,156 of 3,248 decks)
- Scale the Heights relevance 0.83 · 28.5% (927 of 3,248 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.76 · 22.4% (726 of 3,248 decks)
- Enter the Unknown relevance 0.78 · 17.4% (566 of 3,248 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.57 · 38.1% (1,237 of 3,248 decks)
- Quasiduplicate relevance 0.68 · 20.8% (675 of 3,248 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.61 · 17.9% (580 of 3,248 decks)
- Irresistible Prey relevance 0.89 · 4.2% (138 of 3,248 decks)
- Oracle's Restoration relevance 0.76 · 5.8% (190 of 3,248 decks)
- Ember Island Production relevance 0.69 · 7.7% (251 of 3,248 decks)
- Stolen Identity relevance 0.71 · 5.1% (166 of 3,248 decks)
- Croaking Counterpart relevance 0.55 · 15.2% (494 of 3,248 decks)
- Pym Particles relevance 0.67 · 6.7% (219 of 3,248 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.48 · 22.0% (716 of 3,248 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 0.87 · 3.1% (100 of 3,248 decks)
- Over the Edge relevance 0.61 · 4.9% (158 of 3,248 decks)
- Creeping Renaissance relevance 0.70 · 3.0% (97 of 3,248 decks)
- Rally the Galadhrim relevance 0.59 · 3.9% (127 of 3,248 decks)
- Multiversal Recruitment relevance 0.67 · 3.1% (101 of 3,248 decks)
- Rootcast Apprenticeship relevance 0.64 · 3.3% (107 of 3,248 decks)
- Mirage Mockery relevance 0.69 · 2.6% (86 of 3,248 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.57 · 2.6% (86 of 3,248 decks)
- Aggressive Biomancy relevance 0.42 · 4.1% (134 of 3,248 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.48 · 3.2% (104 of 3,248 decks)
- Replication Technique relevance 0.43 · 2.8% (91 of 3,248 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.20 · 27.2% (883 of 3,248 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.21 · 15.9% (515 of 3,248 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.22 · 13.5% (439 of 3,248 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.19 · 23.6% (767 of 3,248 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.17 · 31.3% (1,017 of 3,248 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.20 · 14.0% (455 of 3,248 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.26 · 4.5% (147 of 3,248 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (99 of 3,248 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.31 · 2.6% (85 of 3,248 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (85 of 3,248 decks)
All utility lands (25)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.49 · 10.7% (348 of 3,248 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.48 · 11.5% (373 of 3,248 decks)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.52 · 7.4% (239 of 3,248 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.43 · 11.5% (373 of 3,248 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.45 · 5.2% (170 of 3,248 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.57 · 3.6% (116 of 3,248 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.37 · 11.4% (371 of 3,248 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.34 · 11.5% (374 of 3,248 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.29 · 20.7% (671 of 3,248 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.26 · 31.1% (1,011 of 3,248 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.45 · 3.9% (126 of 3,248 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.32 · 11.2% (365 of 3,248 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.28 · 16.0% (520 of 3,248 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.33 · 7.8% (252 of 3,248 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.28 · 15.6% (508 of 3,248 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.26 · 19.4% (631 of 3,248 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.40 · 4.1% (133 of 3,248 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.26 · 19.3% (627 of 3,248 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.28 · 12.8% (415 of 3,248 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.27 · 8.4% (272 of 3,248 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.20 · 28.9% (940 of 3,248 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.30 · 4.6% (148 of 3,248 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.26 · 6.2% (202 of 3,248 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.15 · 45.7% (1,483 of 3,248 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.22 · 5.0% (162 of 3,248 decks)
All lands (38)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.34 · 16.1% (524 of 3,248 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.30 · 25.7% (834 of 3,248 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.29 · 22.1% (719 of 3,248 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.32 · 14.3% (463 of 3,248 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.37 · 5.1% (165 of 3,248 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.24 · 30.8% (1,002 of 3,248 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.41 · 3.9% (127 of 3,248 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.39 · 4.3% (140 of 3,248 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.30 · 10.7% (347 of 3,248 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.25 · 20.0% (649 of 3,248 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.26 · 17.7% (576 of 3,248 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.29 · 9.7% (316 of 3,248 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.26 · 14.6% (474 of 3,248 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.32 · 5.0% (162 of 3,248 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.31 · 5.9% (191 of 3,248 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.32 · 5.0% (163 of 3,248 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.31 · 5.5% (180 of 3,248 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.30 · 5.7% (186 of 3,248 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.22 · 24.9% (808 of 3,248 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.18 · 43.2% (1,404 of 3,248 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.18 · 43.7% (1,420 of 3,248 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.16 · 55.4% (1,799 of 3,248 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.32 · 4.6% (150 of 3,248 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.34 · 4.2% (135 of 3,248 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.25 · 10.5% (340 of 3,248 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.16 · 47.1% (1,530 of 3,248 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.41 · 2.7% (88 of 3,248 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.24 · 10.7% (347 of 3,248 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.18 · 34.1% (1,108 of 3,248 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.13 · 55.8% (1,812 of 3,248 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.28 · 4.4% (142 of 3,248 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.14 · 43.9% (1,425 of 3,248 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.32 · 2.7% (87 of 3,248 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.33 · 2.6% (83 of 3,248 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.10 · 66.5% (2,160 of 3,248 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.04 · 80.0% (2,599 of 3,248 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 91.2% (2,961 of 3,248 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 90.9% (2,954 of 3,248 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Ivy, Gleeful Spellthief, from 3,248 real Commander decks.